| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1668
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:31:00 -
[31] - Quote
how about making racial R32s be used in the production of intermediate racial t2 components
holy hell i solved the whole problem, give me a cushy job, CCP |

Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
163
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:32:00 -
[32] - Quote
It's "nerf," not "nurf."
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |

March rabbit
Ganse Shadow of xXDEATHXx
118
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:44:00 -
[33] - Quote
saltrock0000 wrote:Just because moons wouldnt be desirable - other than building caps, owning SOV and desirable systems to plex/rat/mine in would still be, therefore still offering incentive for the average blob PvPer to participate in battles, if not more! Isn't someone more likely to fleet up if they are defending thier own personal income, and not that of some alliance leader scooping billions in moon goo? how would you get info fleet to defend your own personal income if nearest enemy is 50 jumps away? And those enemy are lazy and selfish carebears like you?
have you ever heard about Droneland? About its main problem which caused last war? |

Hemmo Paskiainen
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
285
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:45:00 -
[34] - Quote
lilol' me wrote:alliances should be made to work for it! Simple as. The issue is that moons have stayed in the same place, so all the nullsec alliances no the location of pretty much every moon in eve, null, empire and low sec, and they have taken THEM ALL!!! its a fecking joke! and you know what there is nothing you can do about it. When you have 1000 supers or sub caps willing to defend the pos at all costs.
Moons should be randomised every 3 months. So that you have to actually go and work for them, spend time building and moving poses, going to actually find them! and also give the little guy a chance to hit the jackpot now and again. Even just for a few months! its totally totally wrong how unbalanced and unfair moongold works at the moment..
and if i get a comment, that you expect ppl to up poses and move them, damn right i do! you think making billions a month for doing sweet FA is right? work for your damn money...There will be less throw away ships and battles also. Perhaps alliances will think tactically instead of blobby and know that hey dont worry we lose 10 supers we have 100 in the hanger to insta replace.
Consequences! Risk vs Reward aint that what eves about? doesnt seem the case for the large nullsec alliances now does it!
You do have to work for it, sov grinding is really boring. Sov bills to keep you members happy with ratting space are also expencise. Reimbursments are expencise. Defending your space is als needed. There is much more. To much to type. There is effort the issue is effort vs reward thingy. 8B for a tech moon is a bit el mucho vs the effort
CCP FIX BLACK OPS FFS |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
138
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:50:00 -
[35] - Quote
Allow 100 titans to link up to form a super doomsday that can crack a moon = best fix  |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1671
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:55:00 -
[36] - Quote
lilol' me wrote:alliances should be made to work for it! Simple as. The issue is that moons have stayed in the same place, so all the nullsec alliances no the location of pretty much every moon in eve, null, empire and low sec, and they have taken THEM ALL!!! its a fecking joke! and you know what there is nothing you can do about it. When you have 1000 supers or sub caps willing to defend the pos at all costs.
alliances don't tend to nationalize lower-end moons, you can easily find untowered lower-end moons and extract them at a profit
if you're asking why you can't get a personal tech moon, you're a hypocrite
lilol' me wrote:Moons should be randomised every 3 months. So that you have to actually go and work for them, spend time building and moving poses, going to actually find them! and also give the little guy a chance to hit the jackpot now and again. Even just for a few months! its totally totally wrong how unbalanced and unfair moongold works at the moment..
and every 3 months the T2 market would screw up as every goddamn region has to be scanned again, and who do you think has the advantage when coordinating large-scale, region-wide moon scanning? heh
lilol' me wrote:and if i get a comment, that you expect ppl to up poses and move them, damn right i do! you think making billions a month for doing sweet FA is right? work for your damn money...There will be less throw away ships and battles also. Perhaps alliances will think tactically instead of blobby and know that hey dont worry we lose 10 supers we have 100 in the hanger to insta replace.
I don't consider the hours spent fueling towers, emptying silos and shipping to market as "sweet **** all," do you?
lilol' me wrote:Consequences! Risk vs Reward aint that what eves about? doesnt seem the case for the large nullsec alliances now does it!
because moon mining is totally risk free and effortless |

lilol' me
Comply Or Die Shit.Happens
6
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 14:19:00 -
[37] - Quote
Andski wrote:lilol' me wrote:alliances should be made to work for it! Simple as. The issue is that moons have stayed in the same place, so all the nullsec alliances no the location of pretty much every moon in eve, null, empire and low sec, and they have taken THEM ALL!!! its a fecking joke! and you know what there is nothing you can do about it. When you have 1000 supers or sub caps willing to defend the pos at all costs. alliances don't tend to nationalize lower-end moons, you can easily find untowered lower-end moons and extract them at a profit if you're asking why you can't get a personal tech moon, you're a hypocrite This is not exactly true now is it, yes there maybe the 'odd' moon out of thousands, but people like PL and many other large alliances have pretty much swallowed up the moons in low sec. You know this be true...lilol' me wrote:Moons should be randomised every 3 months. So that you have to actually go and work for them, spend time building and moving poses, going to actually find them! and also give the little guy a chance to hit the jackpot now and again. Even just for a few months! its totally totally wrong how unbalanced and unfair moongold works at the moment.. and every 3 months the T2 market would screw up as every goddamn region has to be scanned again, and who do you think has the advantage when coordinating large-scale, region-wide moon scanning? heh Look it wouldnt screw it up at all, you cant tell me all the plentiful trillions of stock would just crash. Thats nonsense. I might actually be a good thing and stop the constant building of supers etc. Yes large alliances will have the advantage of course, but at least you are working for it, and doing something, rather than just maintaining a tower.lilol' me wrote:and if i get a comment, that you expect ppl to up poses and move them, damn right i do! you think making billions a month for doing sweet FA is right? work for your damn money...There will be less throw away ships and battles also. Perhaps alliances will think tactically instead of blobby and know that hey dont worry we lose 10 supers we have 100 in the hanger to insta replace. I don't consider the hours spent fueling towers, emptying silos and shipping to market as "sweet **** all," do you? OK look this is a specific person(s) role, who do this day in day out, where they make a good living out of it! You make trillions in ISK what do you think you should do just sit there and do nothing for it? Alliances like yourselves have the manpower the logistics setup everything to make this pretty much a breeze to resupply poses and maintain them. I mean jesus christ its just made even easier with the new fuel blocks for god sake. How many hours will that cut off!. Its got easier and easier to maintain poses now. You dont need a billion poses in one system to keep sov anymore, you only have tactical poses and moon ones now, so again a MASSIVE reduction, yet more tech moons came available. So a massive increase in profits and massive decrease in how to get it.lilol' me wrote:Consequences! Risk vs Reward aint that what eves about? doesnt seem the case for the large nullsec alliances now does it! because moon mining is totally risk free and effortless For the large alliances, all in all yes... You all blue balled, and who is going to try get them off you? So yes its risk free. |

Niko Takahashi
United Starbase Systems
27
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 14:28:00 -
[38] - Quote
Andski wrote:Ned Black wrote:The major problem with moon mining is that it is completely static. If you have a tech moon then you have free isk in abundance.
All they would have to do is to make them switch moon goo around a bit now and then. That super duper tech moon suddenly runs dry and starts spouting the least valuable moon goo of all and just as suddenly that little miniature alliance in the back end of nowhere suddenly has a moon that is pure gold... and then after exploiting that moon for a while it runs out as well... that really is all the "nerf" you need.
this would only screw up the T2 market even further when there's a choke on supply after the periodic "moon rotation" or whatever where everyone and their mother is out scanning moons for the next month moon rotation would be a terrible mechanic
I agree no rotation
Use same patterns as ore belts basics in High bit better in low best in null but you can get the stuff almost everywhere.
OR
Use PI type or types of moons with the Null being best richest and the high lowest poorest. With lets say 64 moons having deposits of all 64s 32 all of and so on and on. Only setup of the Harvester will determine which one you extract and it will be on ever lower units per day until you allow to replenish and switch different material.
Both alternatives make the better moons more valuable then the crappy ones but would make cartels almost impossible since people would just switch extractors to meet market demand.
So you would still ahve the motivation to tke the better moons of other people but it would be more market driven pricing and not cartels. |

Orion GUardian
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 14:31:00 -
[39] - Quote
I wonder: Why do people think moonmining would give the normal nullsec player ANYTHING?
Unless you are an Alliance CEO that skims of his fellow mates (and steals from the alliance at that) you have no gain whatsoever from Moons. Most Alliances I know put their moonincome into "Ship replacement Programs"to defend into subsiding Capital ships to defend, paying for sov to hold an defend some more.
I would doubt that from 10*7B/month Moons a rich alliance may own only 1% is going into someones pockets to get rich. Unless ofc your alliance CEO is an ass which may as well be the case for alot of allies I don't see the audits ;) But the normal Nullsec player will enver see a single ISK of that unless he gets a ship replaced he LOST during defense |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1671
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 14:35:00 -
[40] - Quote
I'm not going to bother to quote when you don't bother to split quotes, ugh:
CCP has not added tech moons to the game since they added the Black Rise region in the Empyrean Age, FYI, and that was several expansion cycles before Technetium became the primary bottleneck.
Large alliances don't gobble up every moon that coughs up the slightest margin. Lower-end moons are mined by smaller alliances or even individual corporations, for reaction chains.
If the market is dependent on a few depleting stockpiles over a significant period of time (two weeks to a month) the prices will skyrocket. Also, supercapitals are T1 hulls, the intermediate capital components do not require T2 components to build.
Correct, alliances have logistics teams. Isn't it hard to believe that an organized logistics team with delegated responsibilities can be efficient? Wow.
The large alliances like Morsus Mihi and RAZOR which held massive numbers of tech moons across the north? Gee, I wonder what ever happened to them. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1671
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 14:51:00 -
[41] - Quote
Orion GUardian wrote:I wonder: Why do people think moonmining would give the normal nullsec player ANYTHING?
Unless you are an Alliance CEO that skims of his fellow mates (and steals from the alliance at that) you have no gain whatsoever from Moons. Most Alliances I know put their moonincome into "Ship replacement Programs"to defend into subsiding Capital ships to defend, paying for sov to hold an defend some more.
I would doubt that from 10*7B/month Moons a rich alliance may own only 1% is going into someones pockets to get rich. Unless ofc your alliance CEO is an ass which may as well be the case for alot of allies I don't see the audits ;) But the normal Nullsec player will enver see a single ISK of that unless he gets a ship replaced he LOST during defense
"We'll reimburse any ship loss you take while PvPing."
"Here's your monthly stipend from our tech income."
Which of those two would you say promotes more activity? |

Ocih
Space Mermaids
65
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 14:55:00 -
[42] - Quote
Andski wrote:Orion GUardian wrote:I wonder: Why do people think moonmining would give the normal nullsec player ANYTHING?
Unless you are an Alliance CEO that skims of his fellow mates (and steals from the alliance at that) you have no gain whatsoever from Moons. Most Alliances I know put their moonincome into "Ship replacement Programs"to defend into subsiding Capital ships to defend, paying for sov to hold an defend some more.
I would doubt that from 10*7B/month Moons a rich alliance may own only 1% is going into someones pockets to get rich. Unless ofc your alliance CEO is an ass which may as well be the case for alot of allies I don't see the audits ;) But the normal Nullsec player will enver see a single ISK of that unless he gets a ship replaced he LOST during defense "We'll reimburse any ship loss you take while PvPing." "Here's your monthly stipend from our tech income." Which of those two would you say promotes more activity?
If I pay you.
|

Jafit McJafitson
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
189
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 15:10:00 -
[43] - Quote
Lets make all of Eve highsec. |

Ocih
Space Mermaids
65
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 15:22:00 -
[44] - Quote
Jafit McJafitson wrote:Lets make all of Eve highsec.
I've always supported making it all null sec. I think we can agree that wouldn't work out so well for CCP though.
OP: We all agree, Moon Goo is a serious imbalance to null population. The solution isn't as easy to diagnose. See Jita Technecium for what it is. Extra. The 100K price is relative. It was 60K when PI was all seeds and its all relative to cost of mining it.
Super Caps aren't and never were designed to hold Sov, they are designed to take it. PvP recruitments are designed to fight wars, not keep the peace. No alliance pads the wallets of thier members with moon goo. Its a maintenance income. It goes deeper than just Moon Goo. When we had intended Dominion Sov indices, people were in null in droves. They nerfed that and people left. There is nothing to do in Null expect PvP and even that gets old if you burn out on it. |

Orion GUardian
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 15:23:00 -
[45] - Quote
Andski wrote:Orion GUardian wrote:I wonder: Why do people think moonmining would give the normal nullsec player ANYTHING?
Unless you are an Alliance CEO that skims of his fellow mates (and steals from the alliance at that) you have no gain whatsoever from Moons. Most Alliances I know put their moonincome into "Ship replacement Programs"to defend into subsiding Capital ships to defend, paying for sov to hold an defend some more.
I would doubt that from 10*7B/month Moons a rich alliance may own only 1% is going into someones pockets to get rich. Unless ofc your alliance CEO is an ass which may as well be the case for alot of allies I don't see the audits ;) But the normal Nullsec player will enver see a single ISK of that unless he gets a ship replaced he LOST during defense "We'll reimburse any ship loss you take while PvPing." "Here's your monthly stipend from our tech income." Which of those two would you say promotes more activity?
The first one ;)
I am not in Opposition to your point I am in fact trying to reinforce it. Because I just cannot understand how people can actually say: "Moon Goo makes all nullsecpeople RICH!!!!"
I mean that statement is wrong....the only people who would get rich would be people betraying their comrades. I didn't want to assume all alliance leaders do ;) So I apologize for not ebing clear on that:
I believe that most Alliance leaders do not **** their members, but I thinks its highly possible some do (especially my enemies :P) I am quite content with getting my ships replaced ;) Free Scimitars! |

Jafit McJafitson
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
190
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 16:19:00 -
[46] - Quote
Orion GUardian wrote:I believe that most Alliance leaders do not **** their members, but I thinks its highly possible some do (especially my enemies :P) I am quite content with getting my ships replaced ;) Free Scimitars!
Let me tell you about OWN alliance and how they were allowed to live in Deklein with Tech moons, they only partially reimbursed their pilots for some fleet ships, and how TEST sent a UN aid convoy of badgers to anchor cans full of water, grain and livestock outside their station to help their impoverished peoples.
They eventually got kicked out and paid White Noise something like 40bn a month to rent a constellation in Vale with no access to tech, which they could afford due to hoarding their moon income and exploiting their members.
I'd like to think that cases like OWN are rare. |

Orion GUardian
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 16:25:00 -
[47] - Quote
Jafit: I remember OWN and the stuff that happened in Deklein and I myself like to think that there are very few alliance leaderships doing such stuff.
I myself get reimbursed 100% for every ship I lose so I cannot complain, but I lose this ships for the alliance anyway, so it only seems natural to be reimbursed ;) |

Rel'k Bloodlor
Mecha Enterprises Fleet
94
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 16:27:00 -
[48] - Quote
I think the making moon mining deplete and spawn at diffident moons in a constellation every couple of months give or take the intensity of how their mined could shake things up. But all n' all my understanding of moon goo is rather limited to blowing up POS parts and taking the goo.
I am in Factional Warfare. Have been from day one.-á-áI will never work for a mega corp in null-sec. Do not make FW like null-sec.-áMake FW worth our time. Reword us for what we already do.Give us some more activities to do. |

Captain Carius
Deathshead Inc.
7
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 16:47:00 -
[49] - Quote
What an innocent bunch you people are.
You know, if I was an investor that was really focussed on making money out of a game like EVE, I wouldn't change the moons because it is one of the primary mechanisms designed into the game that funnels isk into the Zero RMT Corps that supply RMT websites. Furthermore, I would own and operate those RMT Corps and websites through third party ownership and farm the crap out of it. Then I would charge players in the game monthly isk "rentals" to participate as a defender of the isk printing Zero RMT operations. So those players not only pay a monthly subscription fee for Eve, but they are also being farmed for additional isk.
Now that would truly be the greatest scam of New Eden's history.
But , of course, this could never happen, could it?
|

Mr R4nd0m
Retribution. Shit.Happens
50
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 16:52:00 -
[50] - Quote
Jafit McJafitson wrote:Orion GUardian wrote:I believe that most Alliance leaders do not **** their members, but I thinks its highly possible some do (especially my enemies :P) I am quite content with getting my ships replaced ;) Free Scimitars! Let me tell you about OWN alliance and how they were allowed to live in Deklein with Tech moons, they only partially reimbursed their pilots for some fleet ships, and how TEST sent a UN aid convoy of badgers to anchor cans full of water, grain and livestock outside their station to help their impoverished peoples. They eventually got kicked out and paid White Noise something like 40bn a month to rent a constellation in Vale with no access to tech, which they could afford due to hoarding their moon income and exploiting their members. I'd like to think that cases like OWN are rare.
would you like to post your accounts please? I mean dont you and goons feck over their own new members by scamming them?
Jeezzz
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1672
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:17:00 -
[51] - Quote
Captain Carius wrote:What an innocent bunch you people are.
You know, if I was an investor that was really focussed on making money out of a game like EVE, I wouldn't change the moons because it is one of the primary mechanisms designed into the game that funnels isk into the Zero RMT Corps that supply RMT websites. Furthermore, I would own and operate those RMT Corps and websites through third party ownership and farm the crap out of it. Then I would charge players in the game monthly isk "rentals" to participate as a defender of the isk printing Zero RMT operations. So those players not only pay a monthly subscription fee for Eve, but they are also being farmed for additional isk.
Now that would truly be the greatest scam of New Eden's history.
But , of course, this could never happen, could it?
nope because they really wouldn't last long as a sov-holding entity |

Captain Carius
Deathshead Inc.
7
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:21:00 -
[52] - Quote
Andski wrote:Captain Carius wrote:What an innocent bunch you people are.
You know, if I was an investor that was really focussed on making money out of a game like EVE, I wouldn't change the moons because it is one of the primary mechanisms designed into the game that funnels isk into the Zero RMT Corps that supply RMT websites. Furthermore, I would own and operate those RMT Corps and websites through third party ownership and farm the crap out of it. Then I would charge players in the game monthly isk "rentals" to participate as a defender of the isk printing Zero RMT operations. So those players not only pay a monthly subscription fee for Eve, but they are also being farmed for additional isk.
Now that would truly be the greatest scam of New Eden's history.
But , of course, this could never happen, could it?
nope because they really wouldn't last long as a sov-holding entity
and that would be because???? |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
256
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:23:00 -
[53] - Quote
Remove everything from the game that dosen't directly benefit me personally. |

sasuk
New Eden Construction Holdings
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:25:00 -
[54] - Quote
put moon goo in 0.5 and 0.6 systems that would sort out the issue lol |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1672
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:29:00 -
[55] - Quote
Captain Carius wrote:Andski wrote:Captain Carius wrote:What an innocent bunch you people are.
You know, if I was an investor that was really focussed on making money out of a game like EVE, I wouldn't change the moons because it is one of the primary mechanisms designed into the game that funnels isk into the Zero RMT Corps that supply RMT websites. Furthermore, I would own and operate those RMT Corps and websites through third party ownership and farm the crap out of it. Then I would charge players in the game monthly isk "rentals" to participate as a defender of the isk printing Zero RMT operations. So those players not only pay a monthly subscription fee for Eve, but they are also being farmed for additional isk.
Now that would truly be the greatest scam of New Eden's history.
But , of course, this could never happen, could it?
nope because they really wouldn't last long as a sov-holding entity and that would be because????
"Hey guys our sov is under attack, I expect you all to fight for it without reimbursements or any ship replacement whatsoever" |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1672
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:31:00 -
[56] - Quote
sasuk wrote:put moon goo in 0.5 and 0.6 systems that would sort out the issue lol
ahahahahah no |

Captain Carius
Deathshead Inc.
7
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:39:00 -
[57] - Quote
Andski wrote:Captain Carius wrote:Andski wrote:Captain Carius wrote:What an innocent bunch you people are.
You know, if I was an investor that was really focussed on making money out of a game like EVE, I wouldn't change the moons because it is one of the primary mechanisms designed into the game that funnels isk into the Zero RMT Corps that supply RMT websites. Furthermore, I would own and operate those RMT Corps and websites through third party ownership and farm the crap out of it. Then I would charge players in the game monthly isk "rentals" to participate as a defender of the isk printing Zero RMT operations. So those players not only pay a monthly subscription fee for Eve, but they are also being farmed for additional isk.
Now that would truly be the greatest scam of New Eden's history.
But , of course, this could never happen, could it?
nope because they really wouldn't last long as a sov-holding entity and that would be because???? "Hey guys our sov is under attack, I expect you all to fight for it without reimbursements or any ship replacement whatsoever"
Except that the RMT Corp is manned by chinese who work for fish tacos and bankrolled by the RMT websites for which this is a business and not your SOV chestbeating rights. Sorry, you lose. (If this isn't so Goon, then why haven't you wiped out the Russian element yet? Or is Novator and company too good for your Leet skills to deals with. Or maybe, just maybe, the Goons are in on it too? Nooo, couldn't be.) |

WhyTry1
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
56
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:57:00 -
[58] - Quote
Andski wrote:Captain Carius wrote:Andski wrote:Captain Carius wrote:What an innocent bunch you people are.
You know, if I was an investor that was really focussed on making money out of a game like EVE, I wouldn't change the moons because it is one of the primary mechanisms designed into the game that funnels isk into the Zero RMT Corps that supply RMT websites. Furthermore, I would own and operate those RMT Corps and websites through third party ownership and farm the crap out of it. Then I would charge players in the game monthly isk "rentals" to participate as a defender of the isk printing Zero RMT operations. So those players not only pay a monthly subscription fee for Eve, but they are also being farmed for additional isk.
Now that would truly be the greatest scam of New Eden's history.
But , of course, this could never happen, could it?
nope because they really wouldn't last long as a sov-holding entity and that would be because???? "Hey guys our sov is under attack, I expect you all to fight for it without reimbursements or any ship replacement whatsoever"
risk free pvp?? i know we shall just lose 200 ships, dont worry theres plenty more... gtfo... you basically saying shoot and lose as much as you want with no consequences? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1672
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 18:17:00 -
[59] - Quote
WhyTry1 wrote:risk free pvp?? i know we shall just lose 200 ships, dont worry theres plenty more... gtfo... you basically saying shoot and lose as much as you want with no consequences?
nobody asked for your worthless forum alt opinion |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1672
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 18:21:00 -
[60] - Quote
Captain Carius wrote:Except that the RMT Corp is manned by chinese who work for fish tacos and bankrolled by the RMT websites for which this is a business and not your SOV chestbeating rights. Sorry, you lose. (If this isn't so Goon, then why haven't you wiped out the Russian element yet? Or is Novator and company too good for your Leet skills to deals with. Or maybe, just maybe, the Goons are in on it too? Nooo, couldn't be.)
maybe you haven't noticed but we kinda kicked white noise out of branch
now who the **** is novator |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |