| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

saltrock0000
Obsessive Compulsive Disasters
27
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 09:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
A Simple quote from another thread which i think deserves a thread of its own:
Moon mining has horribly unbalanced nullsec pvp. Remove moon mining and make people play eve to earn isk again so that the blobbers have to run around in pve ships and get shot at too.
Now this to me sounds like a eureka moment! |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1226
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 09:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
This has never been discussed before and certainly warrants yet another thread with no new insights posted in the wrong forum section. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

baltec1
476
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 09:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
Come and take it off us. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
174
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:01:00 -
[4] - Quote
saltrock0000 wrote:A Simple quote from another thread which i think deserves a thread of its own:
Moon mining has horribly unbalanced nullsec pvp. Remove moon mining and make people play eve to earn isk again so that the blobbers have to run around in pve ships and get shot at too.
Now this to me sounds like a eureka moment!
Moons are what in other games are called "battle objectives".
So, go and battle and take them, that's what they sit there for. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1657
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
it shouldn't be removed but the T2 market shouldn't entirely rely on technetium, heh |

saltrock0000
Obsessive Compulsive Disasters
27
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:07:00 -
[6] - Quote
Dispite people obviously wanting to defend thier incomes by trololing, this should really be thought about.
it would certainly be a kick up the ass for RMT's
Just because moons wouldnt be desirable - other than building caps, owning SOV and desirable systems to plex/rat/mine in would still be, therefore still offering incentive for the average blob PvPer to participate in battles, if not more! Isn't someone more likely to fleet up if they are defending thier own personal income, and not that of some alliance leader scooping billions in moon goo? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1658
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:07:00 -
[7] - Quote
it's obvious that you don't know anything about the t2 market though lmao |

Ned Black
Driders
6
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:07:00 -
[8] - Quote
The major problem with moon mining is that it is completely static. If you have a tech moon then you have free isk in abundance.
All they would have to do is to make them switch moon goo around a bit now and then. That super duper tech moon suddenly runs dry and starts spouting the least valuable moon goo of all and just as suddenly that little miniature alliance in the back end of nowhere suddenly has a moon that is pure gold... and then after exploiting that moon for a while it runs out as well... that really is all the "nerf" you need.
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1658
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:08:00 -
[9] - Quote
saltrock0000 wrote:not that of some alliance leader scooping billions in moon goo?
kleptocratic alliances like that tend to fail under the pressure of an invasion
see white noise |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1658
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:09:00 -
[10] - Quote
Ned Black wrote:The major problem with moon mining is that it is completely static. If you have a tech moon then you have free isk in abundance.
All they would have to do is to make them switch moon goo around a bit now and then. That super duper tech moon suddenly runs dry and starts spouting the least valuable moon goo of all and just as suddenly that little miniature alliance in the back end of nowhere suddenly has a moon that is pure gold... and then after exploiting that moon for a while it runs out as well... that really is all the "nerf" you need.
this would only screw up the T2 market even further when there's a choke on supply after the periodic "moon rotation" or whatever where everyone and their mother is out scanning moons for the next month
moon rotation would be a terrible mechanic |

saltrock0000
Obsessive Compulsive Disasters
27
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:10:00 -
[11] - Quote
Ned Black wrote:The major problem with moon mining is that it is completely static. If you have a tech moon then you have free isk in abundance.
All they would have to do is to make them switch moon goo around a bit now and then. That super duper tech moon suddenly runs dry and starts spouting the least valuable moon goo of all and just as suddenly that little miniature alliance in the back end of nowhere suddenly has a moon that is pure gold... and then after exploiting that moon for a while it runs out as well... that really is all the "nerf" you need.
Also a good idea. would certainly cause massive conflicts and battles, which hey isnt that what 0.0 peoplez want? <--- yes with a z KOZZZZZ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1658
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:11:00 -
[12] - Quote
saltrock0000 wrote:Ned Black wrote:The major problem with moon mining is that it is completely static. If you have a tech moon then you have free isk in abundance.
All they would have to do is to make them switch moon goo around a bit now and then. That super duper tech moon suddenly runs dry and starts spouting the least valuable moon goo of all and just as suddenly that little miniature alliance in the back end of nowhere suddenly has a moon that is pure gold... and then after exploiting that moon for a while it runs out as well... that really is all the "nerf" you need.
Also a good idea. would certainly cause massive conflicts and battles, which hey isnt that what 0.0 peoplez want? <--- yes with a z KOZZZZZ
have you ever left highsec |

saltrock0000
Obsessive Compulsive Disasters
27
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:13:00 -
[13] - Quote
Andski wrote:saltrock0000 wrote:Ned Black wrote:The major problem with moon mining is that it is completely static. If you have a tech moon then you have free isk in abundance.
All they would have to do is to make them switch moon goo around a bit now and then. That super duper tech moon suddenly runs dry and starts spouting the least valuable moon goo of all and just as suddenly that little miniature alliance in the back end of nowhere suddenly has a moon that is pure gold... and then after exploiting that moon for a while it runs out as well... that really is all the "nerf" you need.
Also a good idea. would certainly cause massive conflicts and battles, which hey isnt that what 0.0 peoplez want? <--- yes with a z KOZZZZZ have you ever left highsec
Only someone who has lived in 0.0 for many years would hate it so much |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1228
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:14:00 -
[14] - Quote
Obviously not. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1658
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:15:00 -
[15] - Quote
clearly there are no massive conflicts and battles taking place over moons, nope not at all
the drf took over the north for gudfitez |

baltec1
476
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:17:00 -
[16] - Quote
saltrock0000 wrote:
Only someone who has lived in 0.0 for many years would hate it so much
The sky high T2 prices that would cause would mean everyone would hate it.
0.0 is currently burning hotter than all of 2011 combined and by the looks of things tech will be getting a long overdue nerf this year. |

Jarnis McPieksu
Aliastra Gallente Federation
282
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:19:00 -
[17] - Quote
0.0 is burning mostly because with TiDi you can now have 1000+ player fleet fights without the server melting and hamsters dying by the dozen. Naturally the goals tend to be aligned with "what can get us alliance level ISKies?" which today equals "Technetium moons" but if there were any changes, it would just cause the huge fleets to adjust their targets. They'll always find something to shoot at.
I wouldn't mind a 0.0 moon goo rebalance which would make R64s and R32s valuable yet not stupid-100kISK-per-unit valuable. That would spread the fighting around the whole map. |

Tiberius Sunstealer
Phantom Soulreavers
75
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 10:20:00 -
[18] - Quote
Andski wrote:clearly there are no massive conflicts and battles taking place over moons, nope not at all
the DRF and ncdot/raiden/PL took over the north for gudfitez You didn't know? Don't you feel like an idiot. |

Aineko Macx
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
122
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 12:44:00 -
[19] - Quote
Introduce Tech alchemy and be done with it. |

RaTTuS
BIG Gentlemen's Agreement
170
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 12:50:00 -
[20] - Quote
moon mining should be like PI mining ..... http://eveboard.com/ub/419190933-134.png
|

Rixiu
North Star Networks The Kadeshi
87
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 12:54:00 -
[21] - Quote
Remove the moon-goo pos module and use titans for moon-mining. Fix 0,0. |

Tore Vest
156
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 12:55:00 -
[22] - Quote
Remove moon goo... And leave technetium to hauler spawns  Highsec carebear... and proud of it |

Defecanda
Shogun's Samurai F0RCEFUL ENTRY
41
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 12:59:00 -
[23] - Quote
Option #1: Sovereignty upgrades make all systems self-sustaining. (i.e. integrate moon harvesting into sovereignty) Problem: No conflict, no objectives, hyper-inflation, PLEX buildup
Option #2: Diminishing moon materials (i.e. Overall quantity in sandbox static, but single moon resources deplete) Problem: The market would be a $h|t-fest of fluctuation and no one would want to spend time in a game re-scouting new resources. -1 to fun factor
Option #3: Re-write T2 manufacturing in a way that balances moon materials (i.e. Technetium not used across the board. However, inter-regional dependence still necessary for full production to encourage trade and minor conflict for the greedy.) Problem: I would like feedback. Cannot think of any "You FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL to jump because you are cloaked . . . ." |

My Postman
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
21
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:07:00 -
[24] - Quote
And remove T2 BPO - you forgot.
(I hope Akita does-¦nt read that but i will get my flameproof suit, just in case) |

Iniquita
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
28
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:13:00 -
[25] - Quote
You could just increase the volume of goo producted on high end moons. The increased supply should drive down prices. For example if tech produced 200 units/hr instead of 100. |

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
525
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:13:00 -
[26] - Quote
saltrock0000 wrote:A Simple quote from another thread which i think deserves a thread of its own:
Moon mining has horribly unbalanced nullsec pvp. Remove moon mining and make people play eve to earn isk again so that the blobbers have to run around in pve ships and get shot at too.
Now this to me sounds like a eureka moment!
Balance moon poo |

Hemmo Paskiainen
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
285
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:19:00 -
[27] - Quote
Solution:
Make every r64 moon worth 2b. Make evry R32 worth 1b a month. 10b is magnet, 500m is meh not worth the effort. 2-1b is perfect for big and small alliances to fight over. 70 r64 = still 140b.
with all moons worth something, there will be much more pew pew and internal battle and ripoffs, agrues fights about moons. in other words, 0.0 would become more dynamic. CCP FIX BLACK OPS FFS |

Levija Saplina
Supremacy Inc. Not Found.
61
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:20:00 -
[28] - Quote
Translation from the OP : "I does not have mai technetium moon and I are very jealous, please mother CCP tell on them and do something, please please please I are useless". |

lilol' me
Comply Or Die Shit.Happens
6
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:23:00 -
[29] - Quote
alliances should be made to work for it! Simple as. The issue is that moons have stayed in the same place, so all the nullsec alliances no the location of pretty much every moon in eve, null, empire and low sec, and they have taken THEM ALL!!! its a fecking joke! and you know what there is nothing you can do about it. When you have 1000 supers or sub caps willing to defend the pos at all costs.
Moons should be randomised every 3 months. So that you have to actually go and work for them, spend time building and moving poses, going to actually find them! and also give the little guy a chance to hit the jackpot now and again. Even just for a few months! its totally totally wrong how unbalanced and unfair moongold works at the moment..
and if i get a comment, that you expect ppl to up poses and move them, damn right i do! you think making billions a month for doing sweet FA is right? work for your damn money...There will be less throw away ships and battles also. Perhaps alliances will think tactically instead of blobby and know that hey dont worry we lose 10 supers we have 100 in the hanger to insta replace.
Consequences! Risk vs Reward aint that what eves about? doesnt seem the case for the large nullsec alliances now does it! |

Holy One
SniggWaffe EVE Corporation 123566322353
160
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:26:00 -
[30] - Quote
Tech moon ~ 8bn pcm. Incursion runner ~8bn pcm.
Don't see the problem. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1668
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:31:00 -
[31] - Quote
how about making racial R32s be used in the production of intermediate racial t2 components
holy hell i solved the whole problem, give me a cushy job, CCP |

Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
163
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:32:00 -
[32] - Quote
It's "nerf," not "nurf."
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |

March rabbit
Ganse Shadow of xXDEATHXx
118
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:44:00 -
[33] - Quote
saltrock0000 wrote:Just because moons wouldnt be desirable - other than building caps, owning SOV and desirable systems to plex/rat/mine in would still be, therefore still offering incentive for the average blob PvPer to participate in battles, if not more! Isn't someone more likely to fleet up if they are defending thier own personal income, and not that of some alliance leader scooping billions in moon goo? how would you get info fleet to defend your own personal income if nearest enemy is 50 jumps away? And those enemy are lazy and selfish carebears like you?
have you ever heard about Droneland? About its main problem which caused last war? |

Hemmo Paskiainen
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
285
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:45:00 -
[34] - Quote
lilol' me wrote:alliances should be made to work for it! Simple as. The issue is that moons have stayed in the same place, so all the nullsec alliances no the location of pretty much every moon in eve, null, empire and low sec, and they have taken THEM ALL!!! its a fecking joke! and you know what there is nothing you can do about it. When you have 1000 supers or sub caps willing to defend the pos at all costs.
Moons should be randomised every 3 months. So that you have to actually go and work for them, spend time building and moving poses, going to actually find them! and also give the little guy a chance to hit the jackpot now and again. Even just for a few months! its totally totally wrong how unbalanced and unfair moongold works at the moment..
and if i get a comment, that you expect ppl to up poses and move them, damn right i do! you think making billions a month for doing sweet FA is right? work for your damn money...There will be less throw away ships and battles also. Perhaps alliances will think tactically instead of blobby and know that hey dont worry we lose 10 supers we have 100 in the hanger to insta replace.
Consequences! Risk vs Reward aint that what eves about? doesnt seem the case for the large nullsec alliances now does it!
You do have to work for it, sov grinding is really boring. Sov bills to keep you members happy with ratting space are also expencise. Reimbursments are expencise. Defending your space is als needed. There is much more. To much to type. There is effort the issue is effort vs reward thingy. 8B for a tech moon is a bit el mucho vs the effort
CCP FIX BLACK OPS FFS |

Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
138
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:50:00 -
[35] - Quote
Allow 100 titans to link up to form a super doomsday that can crack a moon = best fix  |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1671
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:55:00 -
[36] - Quote
lilol' me wrote:alliances should be made to work for it! Simple as. The issue is that moons have stayed in the same place, so all the nullsec alliances no the location of pretty much every moon in eve, null, empire and low sec, and they have taken THEM ALL!!! its a fecking joke! and you know what there is nothing you can do about it. When you have 1000 supers or sub caps willing to defend the pos at all costs.
alliances don't tend to nationalize lower-end moons, you can easily find untowered lower-end moons and extract them at a profit
if you're asking why you can't get a personal tech moon, you're a hypocrite
lilol' me wrote:Moons should be randomised every 3 months. So that you have to actually go and work for them, spend time building and moving poses, going to actually find them! and also give the little guy a chance to hit the jackpot now and again. Even just for a few months! its totally totally wrong how unbalanced and unfair moongold works at the moment..
and every 3 months the T2 market would screw up as every goddamn region has to be scanned again, and who do you think has the advantage when coordinating large-scale, region-wide moon scanning? heh
lilol' me wrote:and if i get a comment, that you expect ppl to up poses and move them, damn right i do! you think making billions a month for doing sweet FA is right? work for your damn money...There will be less throw away ships and battles also. Perhaps alliances will think tactically instead of blobby and know that hey dont worry we lose 10 supers we have 100 in the hanger to insta replace.
I don't consider the hours spent fueling towers, emptying silos and shipping to market as "sweet **** all," do you?
lilol' me wrote:Consequences! Risk vs Reward aint that what eves about? doesnt seem the case for the large nullsec alliances now does it!
because moon mining is totally risk free and effortless |

lilol' me
Comply Or Die Shit.Happens
6
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 14:19:00 -
[37] - Quote
Andski wrote:lilol' me wrote:alliances should be made to work for it! Simple as. The issue is that moons have stayed in the same place, so all the nullsec alliances no the location of pretty much every moon in eve, null, empire and low sec, and they have taken THEM ALL!!! its a fecking joke! and you know what there is nothing you can do about it. When you have 1000 supers or sub caps willing to defend the pos at all costs. alliances don't tend to nationalize lower-end moons, you can easily find untowered lower-end moons and extract them at a profit if you're asking why you can't get a personal tech moon, you're a hypocrite This is not exactly true now is it, yes there maybe the 'odd' moon out of thousands, but people like PL and many other large alliances have pretty much swallowed up the moons in low sec. You know this be true...lilol' me wrote:Moons should be randomised every 3 months. So that you have to actually go and work for them, spend time building and moving poses, going to actually find them! and also give the little guy a chance to hit the jackpot now and again. Even just for a few months! its totally totally wrong how unbalanced and unfair moongold works at the moment.. and every 3 months the T2 market would screw up as every goddamn region has to be scanned again, and who do you think has the advantage when coordinating large-scale, region-wide moon scanning? heh Look it wouldnt screw it up at all, you cant tell me all the plentiful trillions of stock would just crash. Thats nonsense. I might actually be a good thing and stop the constant building of supers etc. Yes large alliances will have the advantage of course, but at least you are working for it, and doing something, rather than just maintaining a tower.lilol' me wrote:and if i get a comment, that you expect ppl to up poses and move them, damn right i do! you think making billions a month for doing sweet FA is right? work for your damn money...There will be less throw away ships and battles also. Perhaps alliances will think tactically instead of blobby and know that hey dont worry we lose 10 supers we have 100 in the hanger to insta replace. I don't consider the hours spent fueling towers, emptying silos and shipping to market as "sweet **** all," do you? OK look this is a specific person(s) role, who do this day in day out, where they make a good living out of it! You make trillions in ISK what do you think you should do just sit there and do nothing for it? Alliances like yourselves have the manpower the logistics setup everything to make this pretty much a breeze to resupply poses and maintain them. I mean jesus christ its just made even easier with the new fuel blocks for god sake. How many hours will that cut off!. Its got easier and easier to maintain poses now. You dont need a billion poses in one system to keep sov anymore, you only have tactical poses and moon ones now, so again a MASSIVE reduction, yet more tech moons came available. So a massive increase in profits and massive decrease in how to get it.lilol' me wrote:Consequences! Risk vs Reward aint that what eves about? doesnt seem the case for the large nullsec alliances now does it! because moon mining is totally risk free and effortless For the large alliances, all in all yes... You all blue balled, and who is going to try get them off you? So yes its risk free. |

Niko Takahashi
United Starbase Systems
27
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 14:28:00 -
[38] - Quote
Andski wrote:Ned Black wrote:The major problem with moon mining is that it is completely static. If you have a tech moon then you have free isk in abundance.
All they would have to do is to make them switch moon goo around a bit now and then. That super duper tech moon suddenly runs dry and starts spouting the least valuable moon goo of all and just as suddenly that little miniature alliance in the back end of nowhere suddenly has a moon that is pure gold... and then after exploiting that moon for a while it runs out as well... that really is all the "nerf" you need.
this would only screw up the T2 market even further when there's a choke on supply after the periodic "moon rotation" or whatever where everyone and their mother is out scanning moons for the next month moon rotation would be a terrible mechanic
I agree no rotation
Use same patterns as ore belts basics in High bit better in low best in null but you can get the stuff almost everywhere.
OR
Use PI type or types of moons with the Null being best richest and the high lowest poorest. With lets say 64 moons having deposits of all 64s 32 all of and so on and on. Only setup of the Harvester will determine which one you extract and it will be on ever lower units per day until you allow to replenish and switch different material.
Both alternatives make the better moons more valuable then the crappy ones but would make cartels almost impossible since people would just switch extractors to meet market demand.
So you would still ahve the motivation to tke the better moons of other people but it would be more market driven pricing and not cartels. |

Orion GUardian
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 14:31:00 -
[39] - Quote
I wonder: Why do people think moonmining would give the normal nullsec player ANYTHING?
Unless you are an Alliance CEO that skims of his fellow mates (and steals from the alliance at that) you have no gain whatsoever from Moons. Most Alliances I know put their moonincome into "Ship replacement Programs"to defend into subsiding Capital ships to defend, paying for sov to hold an defend some more.
I would doubt that from 10*7B/month Moons a rich alliance may own only 1% is going into someones pockets to get rich. Unless ofc your alliance CEO is an ass which may as well be the case for alot of allies I don't see the audits ;) But the normal Nullsec player will enver see a single ISK of that unless he gets a ship replaced he LOST during defense |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1671
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 14:35:00 -
[40] - Quote
I'm not going to bother to quote when you don't bother to split quotes, ugh:
CCP has not added tech moons to the game since they added the Black Rise region in the Empyrean Age, FYI, and that was several expansion cycles before Technetium became the primary bottleneck.
Large alliances don't gobble up every moon that coughs up the slightest margin. Lower-end moons are mined by smaller alliances or even individual corporations, for reaction chains.
If the market is dependent on a few depleting stockpiles over a significant period of time (two weeks to a month) the prices will skyrocket. Also, supercapitals are T1 hulls, the intermediate capital components do not require T2 components to build.
Correct, alliances have logistics teams. Isn't it hard to believe that an organized logistics team with delegated responsibilities can be efficient? Wow.
The large alliances like Morsus Mihi and RAZOR which held massive numbers of tech moons across the north? Gee, I wonder what ever happened to them. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1671
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 14:51:00 -
[41] - Quote
Orion GUardian wrote:I wonder: Why do people think moonmining would give the normal nullsec player ANYTHING?
Unless you are an Alliance CEO that skims of his fellow mates (and steals from the alliance at that) you have no gain whatsoever from Moons. Most Alliances I know put their moonincome into "Ship replacement Programs"to defend into subsiding Capital ships to defend, paying for sov to hold an defend some more.
I would doubt that from 10*7B/month Moons a rich alliance may own only 1% is going into someones pockets to get rich. Unless ofc your alliance CEO is an ass which may as well be the case for alot of allies I don't see the audits ;) But the normal Nullsec player will enver see a single ISK of that unless he gets a ship replaced he LOST during defense
"We'll reimburse any ship loss you take while PvPing."
"Here's your monthly stipend from our tech income."
Which of those two would you say promotes more activity? |

Ocih
Space Mermaids
65
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 14:55:00 -
[42] - Quote
Andski wrote:Orion GUardian wrote:I wonder: Why do people think moonmining would give the normal nullsec player ANYTHING?
Unless you are an Alliance CEO that skims of his fellow mates (and steals from the alliance at that) you have no gain whatsoever from Moons. Most Alliances I know put their moonincome into "Ship replacement Programs"to defend into subsiding Capital ships to defend, paying for sov to hold an defend some more.
I would doubt that from 10*7B/month Moons a rich alliance may own only 1% is going into someones pockets to get rich. Unless ofc your alliance CEO is an ass which may as well be the case for alot of allies I don't see the audits ;) But the normal Nullsec player will enver see a single ISK of that unless he gets a ship replaced he LOST during defense "We'll reimburse any ship loss you take while PvPing." "Here's your monthly stipend from our tech income." Which of those two would you say promotes more activity?
If I pay you.
|

Jafit McJafitson
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
189
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 15:10:00 -
[43] - Quote
Lets make all of Eve highsec. |

Ocih
Space Mermaids
65
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 15:22:00 -
[44] - Quote
Jafit McJafitson wrote:Lets make all of Eve highsec.
I've always supported making it all null sec. I think we can agree that wouldn't work out so well for CCP though.
OP: We all agree, Moon Goo is a serious imbalance to null population. The solution isn't as easy to diagnose. See Jita Technecium for what it is. Extra. The 100K price is relative. It was 60K when PI was all seeds and its all relative to cost of mining it.
Super Caps aren't and never were designed to hold Sov, they are designed to take it. PvP recruitments are designed to fight wars, not keep the peace. No alliance pads the wallets of thier members with moon goo. Its a maintenance income. It goes deeper than just Moon Goo. When we had intended Dominion Sov indices, people were in null in droves. They nerfed that and people left. There is nothing to do in Null expect PvP and even that gets old if you burn out on it. |

Orion GUardian
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 15:23:00 -
[45] - Quote
Andski wrote:Orion GUardian wrote:I wonder: Why do people think moonmining would give the normal nullsec player ANYTHING?
Unless you are an Alliance CEO that skims of his fellow mates (and steals from the alliance at that) you have no gain whatsoever from Moons. Most Alliances I know put their moonincome into "Ship replacement Programs"to defend into subsiding Capital ships to defend, paying for sov to hold an defend some more.
I would doubt that from 10*7B/month Moons a rich alliance may own only 1% is going into someones pockets to get rich. Unless ofc your alliance CEO is an ass which may as well be the case for alot of allies I don't see the audits ;) But the normal Nullsec player will enver see a single ISK of that unless he gets a ship replaced he LOST during defense "We'll reimburse any ship loss you take while PvPing." "Here's your monthly stipend from our tech income." Which of those two would you say promotes more activity?
The first one ;)
I am not in Opposition to your point I am in fact trying to reinforce it. Because I just cannot understand how people can actually say: "Moon Goo makes all nullsecpeople RICH!!!!"
I mean that statement is wrong....the only people who would get rich would be people betraying their comrades. I didn't want to assume all alliance leaders do ;) So I apologize for not ebing clear on that:
I believe that most Alliance leaders do not **** their members, but I thinks its highly possible some do (especially my enemies :P) I am quite content with getting my ships replaced ;) Free Scimitars! |

Jafit McJafitson
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
190
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 16:19:00 -
[46] - Quote
Orion GUardian wrote:I believe that most Alliance leaders do not **** their members, but I thinks its highly possible some do (especially my enemies :P) I am quite content with getting my ships replaced ;) Free Scimitars!
Let me tell you about OWN alliance and how they were allowed to live in Deklein with Tech moons, they only partially reimbursed their pilots for some fleet ships, and how TEST sent a UN aid convoy of badgers to anchor cans full of water, grain and livestock outside their station to help their impoverished peoples.
They eventually got kicked out and paid White Noise something like 40bn a month to rent a constellation in Vale with no access to tech, which they could afford due to hoarding their moon income and exploiting their members.
I'd like to think that cases like OWN are rare. |

Orion GUardian
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 16:25:00 -
[47] - Quote
Jafit: I remember OWN and the stuff that happened in Deklein and I myself like to think that there are very few alliance leaderships doing such stuff.
I myself get reimbursed 100% for every ship I lose so I cannot complain, but I lose this ships for the alliance anyway, so it only seems natural to be reimbursed ;) |

Rel'k Bloodlor
Mecha Enterprises Fleet
94
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 16:27:00 -
[48] - Quote
I think the making moon mining deplete and spawn at diffident moons in a constellation every couple of months give or take the intensity of how their mined could shake things up. But all n' all my understanding of moon goo is rather limited to blowing up POS parts and taking the goo.
I am in Factional Warfare. Have been from day one.-á-áI will never work for a mega corp in null-sec. Do not make FW like null-sec.-áMake FW worth our time. Reword us for what we already do.Give us some more activities to do. |

Captain Carius
Deathshead Inc.
7
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 16:47:00 -
[49] - Quote
What an innocent bunch you people are.
You know, if I was an investor that was really focussed on making money out of a game like EVE, I wouldn't change the moons because it is one of the primary mechanisms designed into the game that funnels isk into the Zero RMT Corps that supply RMT websites. Furthermore, I would own and operate those RMT Corps and websites through third party ownership and farm the crap out of it. Then I would charge players in the game monthly isk "rentals" to participate as a defender of the isk printing Zero RMT operations. So those players not only pay a monthly subscription fee for Eve, but they are also being farmed for additional isk.
Now that would truly be the greatest scam of New Eden's history.
But , of course, this could never happen, could it?
|

Mr R4nd0m
Retribution. Shit.Happens
50
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 16:52:00 -
[50] - Quote
Jafit McJafitson wrote:Orion GUardian wrote:I believe that most Alliance leaders do not **** their members, but I thinks its highly possible some do (especially my enemies :P) I am quite content with getting my ships replaced ;) Free Scimitars! Let me tell you about OWN alliance and how they were allowed to live in Deklein with Tech moons, they only partially reimbursed their pilots for some fleet ships, and how TEST sent a UN aid convoy of badgers to anchor cans full of water, grain and livestock outside their station to help their impoverished peoples. They eventually got kicked out and paid White Noise something like 40bn a month to rent a constellation in Vale with no access to tech, which they could afford due to hoarding their moon income and exploiting their members. I'd like to think that cases like OWN are rare.
would you like to post your accounts please? I mean dont you and goons feck over their own new members by scamming them?
Jeezzz
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1672
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:17:00 -
[51] - Quote
Captain Carius wrote:What an innocent bunch you people are.
You know, if I was an investor that was really focussed on making money out of a game like EVE, I wouldn't change the moons because it is one of the primary mechanisms designed into the game that funnels isk into the Zero RMT Corps that supply RMT websites. Furthermore, I would own and operate those RMT Corps and websites through third party ownership and farm the crap out of it. Then I would charge players in the game monthly isk "rentals" to participate as a defender of the isk printing Zero RMT operations. So those players not only pay a monthly subscription fee for Eve, but they are also being farmed for additional isk.
Now that would truly be the greatest scam of New Eden's history.
But , of course, this could never happen, could it?
nope because they really wouldn't last long as a sov-holding entity |

Captain Carius
Deathshead Inc.
7
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:21:00 -
[52] - Quote
Andski wrote:Captain Carius wrote:What an innocent bunch you people are.
You know, if I was an investor that was really focussed on making money out of a game like EVE, I wouldn't change the moons because it is one of the primary mechanisms designed into the game that funnels isk into the Zero RMT Corps that supply RMT websites. Furthermore, I would own and operate those RMT Corps and websites through third party ownership and farm the crap out of it. Then I would charge players in the game monthly isk "rentals" to participate as a defender of the isk printing Zero RMT operations. So those players not only pay a monthly subscription fee for Eve, but they are also being farmed for additional isk.
Now that would truly be the greatest scam of New Eden's history.
But , of course, this could never happen, could it?
nope because they really wouldn't last long as a sov-holding entity
and that would be because???? |

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
256
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:23:00 -
[53] - Quote
Remove everything from the game that dosen't directly benefit me personally. |

sasuk
New Eden Construction Holdings
4
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:25:00 -
[54] - Quote
put moon goo in 0.5 and 0.6 systems that would sort out the issue lol |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1672
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:29:00 -
[55] - Quote
Captain Carius wrote:Andski wrote:Captain Carius wrote:What an innocent bunch you people are.
You know, if I was an investor that was really focussed on making money out of a game like EVE, I wouldn't change the moons because it is one of the primary mechanisms designed into the game that funnels isk into the Zero RMT Corps that supply RMT websites. Furthermore, I would own and operate those RMT Corps and websites through third party ownership and farm the crap out of it. Then I would charge players in the game monthly isk "rentals" to participate as a defender of the isk printing Zero RMT operations. So those players not only pay a monthly subscription fee for Eve, but they are also being farmed for additional isk.
Now that would truly be the greatest scam of New Eden's history.
But , of course, this could never happen, could it?
nope because they really wouldn't last long as a sov-holding entity and that would be because????
"Hey guys our sov is under attack, I expect you all to fight for it without reimbursements or any ship replacement whatsoever" |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1672
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:31:00 -
[56] - Quote
sasuk wrote:put moon goo in 0.5 and 0.6 systems that would sort out the issue lol
ahahahahah no |

Captain Carius
Deathshead Inc.
7
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:39:00 -
[57] - Quote
Andski wrote:Captain Carius wrote:Andski wrote:Captain Carius wrote:What an innocent bunch you people are.
You know, if I was an investor that was really focussed on making money out of a game like EVE, I wouldn't change the moons because it is one of the primary mechanisms designed into the game that funnels isk into the Zero RMT Corps that supply RMT websites. Furthermore, I would own and operate those RMT Corps and websites through third party ownership and farm the crap out of it. Then I would charge players in the game monthly isk "rentals" to participate as a defender of the isk printing Zero RMT operations. So those players not only pay a monthly subscription fee for Eve, but they are also being farmed for additional isk.
Now that would truly be the greatest scam of New Eden's history.
But , of course, this could never happen, could it?
nope because they really wouldn't last long as a sov-holding entity and that would be because???? "Hey guys our sov is under attack, I expect you all to fight for it without reimbursements or any ship replacement whatsoever"
Except that the RMT Corp is manned by chinese who work for fish tacos and bankrolled by the RMT websites for which this is a business and not your SOV chestbeating rights. Sorry, you lose. (If this isn't so Goon, then why haven't you wiped out the Russian element yet? Or is Novator and company too good for your Leet skills to deals with. Or maybe, just maybe, the Goons are in on it too? Nooo, couldn't be.) |

WhyTry1
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
56
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 17:57:00 -
[58] - Quote
Andski wrote:Captain Carius wrote:Andski wrote:Captain Carius wrote:What an innocent bunch you people are.
You know, if I was an investor that was really focussed on making money out of a game like EVE, I wouldn't change the moons because it is one of the primary mechanisms designed into the game that funnels isk into the Zero RMT Corps that supply RMT websites. Furthermore, I would own and operate those RMT Corps and websites through third party ownership and farm the crap out of it. Then I would charge players in the game monthly isk "rentals" to participate as a defender of the isk printing Zero RMT operations. So those players not only pay a monthly subscription fee for Eve, but they are also being farmed for additional isk.
Now that would truly be the greatest scam of New Eden's history.
But , of course, this could never happen, could it?
nope because they really wouldn't last long as a sov-holding entity and that would be because???? "Hey guys our sov is under attack, I expect you all to fight for it without reimbursements or any ship replacement whatsoever"
risk free pvp?? i know we shall just lose 200 ships, dont worry theres plenty more... gtfo... you basically saying shoot and lose as much as you want with no consequences? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1672
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 18:17:00 -
[59] - Quote
WhyTry1 wrote:risk free pvp?? i know we shall just lose 200 ships, dont worry theres plenty more... gtfo... you basically saying shoot and lose as much as you want with no consequences?
nobody asked for your worthless forum alt opinion |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1672
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 18:21:00 -
[60] - Quote
Captain Carius wrote:Except that the RMT Corp is manned by chinese who work for fish tacos and bankrolled by the RMT websites for which this is a business and not your SOV chestbeating rights. Sorry, you lose. (If this isn't so Goon, then why haven't you wiped out the Russian element yet? Or is Novator and company too good for your Leet skills to deals with. Or maybe, just maybe, the Goons are in on it too? Nooo, couldn't be.)
maybe you haven't noticed but we kinda kicked white noise out of branch
now who the **** is novator |

Ehn Roh
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 19:08:00 -
[61] - Quote
Ned Black wrote:The major problem with moon mining is that it is completely static. If you have a tech moon then you have free isk in abundance.
Until someone takes it from you.
EVE still needs more reasons not just to kill your neighbor, but kill specific ones in specific places and steal their stuff. This is one of those reasons. |

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
27
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 19:27:00 -
[62] - Quote
Andski wrote:clearly there are no massive conflicts and battles taking place over moons, nope not at all
the DRF and ncdot/raiden/PL took over the north for gudfitez
You know once upon a time people took space, well just to take space. Then again once upon a time most mods were T1/meta. You can excuse folks for being a bit pissy when they realize that 0.0 alliances are taking a cut of a huge number of market transactions (much more then where possible when supply was bottlenecked by limited T2 BPO availability).
So yeah we want to take your cash cow out, roast it, and have a BBQ.
Also Moon Goo as a PI good would be cool. |

Jas Dor
Republic University Minmatar Republic
27
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 19:33:00 -
[63] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:[
would you like to post your accounts please? I mean dont you and goons feck over their own new members by scamming them?
Jeezzz
Um Goons are actually pretty good about not scamming folks who are cluefull enough to join the SA website. On the other hand SA gets your $10 on the deal.
|

Plyn
the recon inc
12
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 20:04:00 -
[64] - Quote
+1 for making moons work like PI... AND rotation... both at the same time if it could be managed, but I doubt that would happen.
PI: Alliance members get to profit some off of good moons, as opposed to them being "alliance owned only" which they typically are. Alliances still make good iskies off of the moon being mined, as they surely own the customs office and will get a cut. Could add moon levels to DUST with cool reduced gravity crazy fights.
Rotation: Tech depletes slowly as it is harvested, as do all the good ones, eventually moon becomes barren. Other moons start to yield the good stuff, cyclical. More people that come to feast on the good minerals, the faster the moon depletes. Make space feel big again. Make dotlan moon charts pointless. Let people's eyes widen when they survey the moon they were going to set up on and suddenly discover a gold mine that no one knew was there.
It's less about "oh noez who owns all the good moons this season?!?!", or "all the stuff is bunched up!". It's more about making game content dynamic. Sure it'd be a hassle for some people, but no one said it should be easy. I love the idea of discovering new things, or finding out that something isn't what everyone thought it would be.
It would be a huge conflict driver, as alliances are forced to move around trying to keep tabs on where they should strike next. Which region has the best combination of moons this season, easier to defend, and easiest to take?
Even if it did affect T2 production, which I doubt it would have as huge an impact as everyone is trying to claim (just would be different people selling the tech at different times), is that a bad thing? Are alternating periods of stability and instability a bad thing for markets? This would actually make market pvp 100 times better.
It's whatevs, though. Arguing about this kind of stuff is like trying to argue with people about religion. Everyone has their own idea of how everything works, and they'll be damned if you could convince them one iota of anything went the other way. Come2Nullsec |

SenshiMaru
Idiots In Spaceships Psychotic Tendencies.
3
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 20:32:00 -
[65] - Quote
sasuk wrote:put moon goo in 0.5 and 0.6 systems that would sort out the issue lol
What about 0.4 moon mining, which the material is there, it is just unaccessible? |

Orion GUardian
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 20:41:00 -
[66] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:Jafit McJafitson wrote:Orion GUardian wrote:I believe that most Alliance leaders do not **** their members, but I thinks its highly possible some do (especially my enemies :P) I am quite content with getting my ships replaced ;) Free Scimitars! Let me tell you about OWN alliance and how they were allowed to live in Deklein with Tech moons, they only partially reimbursed their pilots for some fleet ships, and how TEST sent a UN aid convoy of badgers to anchor cans full of water, grain and livestock outside their station to help their impoverished peoples. They eventually got kicked out and paid White Noise something like 40bn a month to rent a constellation in Vale with no access to tech, which they could afford due to hoarding their moon income and exploiting their members. I'd like to think that cases like OWN are rare. would you like to post your accounts please? I mean dont you and goons feck over their own new members by scamming them? Jeezzz
You got that very wrong
Goons NEVER **** goons they only scam other people. The so called "new members" are just scammed and never made members. Afaik only members of the "Something awful" forums can become Goons through the forum (and the forum has a entrance fee to hold of spammers)
Anyway: No I am not a Goon and this IS my main Account. You can find this character and his corp+alliance ingame I just don't see a point to have it display in the forum so it becomes a factor in my arguments everytime. |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
356
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 21:00:00 -
[67] - Quote
I dunno about anyone else, but I know plenty of people who hold personal moon mining ops in 0.0. Alliances need the high paying moons to pay the bills and make sure I can keep getting blown up, but the low end ones can be claimed by anyone whos corp trusts them with the roles to run one. Fill out the proper forms(to prevent fighting with each other over moons) and hooray, your own personal moons.
Guess thats not as common as I thought, but I coulda sworn I've heard plenty of other people say they had personal moon goo. o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |

Orion GUardian
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 21:03:00 -
[68] - Quote
Tallian: Ok I do not know anyone with a personal Moon, I know of Corporations getting Moons from Alliance though (mostly lower ends ofc) to finance their own agenda.
At least I dont know of that, may have eluded me ofc ;) |

Kessiaan
Greater Order Of Destruction Happy Endings
45
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 21:04:00 -
[69] - Quote
I don't see anything wrong with high-end moon goo as it is right now. The big alliance need big assets to fight over, as has been said several times the money is used to fund alliance operations.
If people want to mine high-end moon materials elsewhere, perhaps randomly spawned discoverable deposits (which disappear once depleted) could be worked into PI somehow.
Any 'nerf' should be focused on increasing overall supply. I likes my cheap T2, thanks. My killboard - http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/combat_record.php?type=player&name=Kessiaan |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
791
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 21:08:00 -
[70] - Quote
saltrock0000 wrote:A Simple quote from another thread which i think deserves a thread of its own:
Moon mining has horribly unbalanced nullsec pvp. Remove moon mining and make people play eve to earn isk again so that the blobbers have to run around in pve ships and get shot at too.
Now this to me sounds like a eureka moment!
There's no real reason why moons specific materials shouldn't deplete and re pop at some random location.
I'm quite sure this would bring a lot more fights and ships destroyed, would also spare the gazillions free isk between more people = more conflicts, more explosions, more ships destroyed
yey, awesome stuff, sure. |

Tanya Powers
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
791
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 21:11:00 -
[71] - Quote
Kessiaan wrote:I don't see anything wrong with high-end moon goo as it is right now. The big alliance need big assets to fight over, as has been said several times the money is used to fund alliance operations.
If people want to mine high-end moon materials elsewhere, perhaps randomly spawned discoverable deposits (which disappear once depleted) could be worked into PI somehow.
Any 'nerf' should be focused on increasing overall supply. I likes my cheap T2, thanks.
Your alliance mates and pos/stations/whatever stuff belonging to them IS the best asset you can have. You look dumb with your tech moons and no one to defend them with you/for you and a very good reason for grieffing corps/alliances to attack your stuff with corp A and sell you merc services with corp B.
Sometime people should make their brains work a little bit...
|

Feligast
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
993
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 21:20:00 -
[72] - Quote
Orion GUardian wrote:Tallian: Ok I do not know anyone with a personal Moon, I know of Corporations getting Moons from Alliance though (mostly lower ends ofc) to finance their own agenda.
At least I dont know of that, may have eluded me ofc ;)
... I have a personal platinum moon myself. It's not that uncommon.
|

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
255
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 21:32:00 -
[73] - Quote
Tanya Powers wrote:There's no real reason why moons specific materials shouldn't deplete and re pop at some random location.
Here's 3 reasons:
1: Moon shuffling is a disincentive to combat - why would I invade your region full of tech moons if they were going to despawn and pop up somewhere else by the time we'd finished fighting over them? May as well sit tight and wait to see if next month's shuffle drops them into our lap.
2: Instead, it rewards low-risk, tedious and repetitive activities like flying around in a probing prowler moonscanning entire regions on a regular basis. Eve doesn't need more boredom, thanks.
3: It also benefits large alliances with the manpower to delegate enough players carry out organised scanning sweeps. The little 30 man lowsec corp might be sitting with a tech moon right under their nose but if they don't have enough masochists to spend hours of their lives looking for them the first they'll know about it is when us or PL or Solar Fleet plonk down a tower in their back yard.
Quote:I'm quite sure this would bring a lot more fights and ships destroyed, would also spare the gazillions free isk between more people = more conflicts, more explosions, more ships destroyed
Except it would produce the exact opposite.
Tech is stupidly broken and badly needs to be devalued, preferably by switching the material requirements for the T2 production chain so the R64s and other R32s are in greater demand. Moon shuffling soves nothing. ~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |

Orion GUardian
97
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 21:46:00 -
[74] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:Tanya Powers wrote:There's no real reason why moons specific materials shouldn't deplete and re pop at some random location. Here's 3 reasons: 1: Moon shuffling is a disincentive to combat - why would I invade your region full of tech moons if they were going to despawn and pop up somewhere else by the time we'd finished fighting over them? May as well sit tight and wait to see if next month's shuffle drops them into our lap. 2: Instead, it rewards low-risk, tedious and repetitive activities like flying around in a probing prowler moonscanning entire regions on a regular basis. Eve doesn't need more boredom, thanks. 3: It also benefits large alliances with the manpower to delegate enough players carry out organised scanning sweeps. The little 30 man lowsec corp might be sitting with a tech moon right under their nose but if they don't have enough masochists to spend hours of their lives looking for them the first they'll know about it is when us or PL or Solar Fleet plonk down a tower in their back yard. Quote:I'm quite sure this would bring a lot more fights and ships destroyed, would also spare the gazillions free isk between more people = more conflicts, more explosions, more ships destroyed Except it would produce the exact opposite. Tech is stupidly broken and badly needs to be devalued, preferably by switching the material requirements for the T2 production chain so the R64s and other R32s are in greater demand. Moon shuffling soves nothing.
This is how I know Eve to be true, yes..... |

Umega
Solis Mensa
59
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 21:57:00 -
[75] - Quote
Just a friendly reminder for some people to add to their own mental equations of 'perfection in EVE'..
There needs to be reasons for people to fight. More than just 'I want to pew-pew'.. which isn't enough to fuel a player driven economy of pop-n-gone. You, I, everyone needs these '900 ships destroyed in last 24 hours in ::insert null/low system here::'
If you flood materials in all over the place. the desire to go fight for some things shrinks, cause quite simply you don't need to. And some of you will become what you seem to 'hate'.. fatcats, lazy and fat with no reason to change n adapt. Like it or not.. this is infact a stronger stigma tied to 'carebears' hugging highsec-only when you actually give it serious, unbiased thought. Chances of being uprooted lowering is a bad.. bad.. bad idea. Prime example.. Incursion debate. Players are having their Incursion money tree uprooted.. welcome to the feeling of being invaded and losing moons/systems/sanctums/and so on. Sucks doesn't it. Welcome to EVE.
Ontop of that.. a surplus of materials driving down profits. Sure you can argue.. lower costs will equal more pew-pew because of ship/mod cost. In my experince.. while I agree I am some one that will fight for absolutely no reason.. I think some of you are hypocritically in this arguement. Fighting some one for no reason is.. 'griefing'. You believe there should be a reason to fight between people. I also agree that fighting for a reason makes it feel.. Better, more fulfilling, and epic in quality...
Fighting for resources is fighting for Power. Don't take this way of overpopulating resources.. or there will end up being an empty void in EVE and it'll roll down a slippery slope to feeling utterly bland and tasteless.
And if you cut down on how much materials is coming in.. obviously costs will go up as supply goes down. CCP has to tight rope walk this.
And as someone else stated.. while in principle that idea of rotating moons will push fights around null/low.. from an RP athestics standpoint, UGH terrible to wrap around the notion.. lots don't care about such. Fair enough.. but one problem it will have is it will create a serious bottleneck in materials as people try to find the hot spots.. and then time spent to take them. And some wars take longer than a month.. even before the war ends, the materials move. Leaving not much chance, effort, ability to harvest n move.
And.. you can't fix stupid and some of you are just flat out stupid. Deal with it. |

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
548
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 22:09:00 -
[76] - Quote
A little over a year ago we actually owned a tech moon. Had it most of a year. Turned a tidy profit. Almost bought a mother ship until we realized we had no use for one and it would likely be expoded immediately. So strange things can happen even with such valuable moons.
I used to be a fan of tech moons moving over time. I am starting to lose confidence in that as the correct solution. I would propose some combination of the following.
- Some scannable "new item" like comets for example. New mining skills and modules, maybe for the lowest of the T2 barges to make them interesting for folks not deep core mining. Put random moon minerals in these new elements. So they are active and spawn for limited periods. Maybe they end up mostly in low sec to make low sec interesting again.
- Make a replacement version of everything that needs Technetium that can be built with larger mount of lower materials. So Technetium could still be the "best" way to profit but make alternative "recipes" with more comment moon elements.
- Make every moon material available on every moon, but in very low mining rates for the rare stuff. So a variation of the suggestion to make it more PI like. This would let a smaller T2 building operation be able to source enough to support smaller qty production independently.
Anyways, I agree there is a problem with the price of Technetium (it is so valuble I felt it deserves capitalization) and like the idea of anything that makes fixed isk printing machines less common in Eve. I hope CCP takes a look at this soon. A number of good suggestions have been made to make the situation better. I hope the ultimate solution throws some of us miner types a bone and gives us a new dynamic mining experience.
Issler
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |