EVE Search - Industrial Ships in Combat: How much is too much?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Industrial Ships in Combat: How much is too much?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Yargo Metash Minmatar Heimatar Services Conglomerate	Posted - 2008.02.04 17:21:00 - [91] The exclusiveness of Badgers made me lulz. Now I simply have to fit my battleship-sized mammoth for pvp. Somehow. Somewhere. Sometime? -note to self, stealth bombers+electrical work+duct tape=lulz- Also: Mushroom Mushroom.
Bigeasy Caldari Shadow Of The Light Scorched Earth Directive	Posted - 2008.02.04 17:37:00 - [92] Originally by: OP ECM Badger Mk. 2 Cost: 0.6 Million ISK (ship) + 2-3 Million ISK (fittings) High: 2 small nosferatu Medium: 6 Multispectral ECM Low: 3 Signal Distortion Amplifiers Gives this thing a jamming strength of 25, which means it can perma-jam a BATTLESHIP! A battleship costs about 30 times as much as this setup With racial ECMs this ship can lock down TWO BATTLESHIPS which is just crazy. Can a Rook or Falcon do that? /facepalm You clearly have no idea about how ECM jammers work. The highest you could ever get your jam strenght is in the neighborhood of 14, and thats with recon to 5 and signal disruption to 5 and using racial jammers on a rook/falcon/kitsune. You apparently think that jammers stack, which they dont. After reading to just that part, I've come to the conclusion that your post is epic fail, and have read no further. But to answer your question, battle badgers are a perfectly viable tactic and will point you to this Video Good day to you sir. Let them hate, so long as they fear-Caligula
Threv Echandari Caldari Dragons Of Redemption Triumvirate.	Posted - 2008.02.04 17:44:00 - [93] Woo Hoo! Good one Tarminic I hop you got paid well! the Fits however are pretty good Badgers of Doom! If your into that kind of Masochism . But you forgot the "Recon Support Variant with Prototype Cloak and Cyno Generator (and Remote sensor boosting/ Target panting/ Tracj enhanvemnt and or / Projected ECM
Dianeces Minmatar Repo Industries	Posted - 2008.02.04 18:06:00 - [94] Originally by: Bigeasy Originally by: OP ECM Badger Mk. 2 Cost: 0.6 Million ISK (ship) + 2-3 Million ISK (fittings) High: 2 small nosferatu Medium: 6 Multispectral ECM Low: 3 Signal Distortion Amplifiers Gives this thing a jamming strength of 25, which means it can perma-jam a BATTLESHIP! A battleship costs about 30 times as much as this setup With racial ECMs this ship can lock down TWO BATTLESHIPS which is just crazy. Can a Rook or Falcon do that? /facepalm You clearly have no idea about how ECM jammers work. The highest you could ever get your jam strenght is in the neighborhood of 14, and thats with recon to 5 and signal disruption to 5 and using racial jammers on a rook/falcon/kitsune. You apparently think that jammers stack, which they dont. After reading to just that part, I've come to the conclusion that your post is epic fail, and have read no further. But to answer your question, battle badgers are a perfectly viable tactic and will point you to this Video Good day to you sir. ITT: You've been had. I would suggest reading threads in their entirety before posting next time.
Zeba Minmatar Pator Tech School	Posted - 2008.02.04 20:30:00 - [95] Wow. Someone sure got their isk's worth on this one. BTW. Originally by: Nice Guy This means that the writer epicaly fails at english. Irony. So delicious.
Micheal Dietrich Caldari The Delta Source Dread Sovereign	Posted - 2008.02.04 21:02:00 - [96] Owned the forum posters all the way to page 4 so far. I wish I had your skill Tarm. All I got was a dedicated @post. Unsuitable signature removed. Navgator Do you realize how long it took me to size that right to use!?!?!?!
L70Rogue	Posted - 2008.02.04 21:22:00 - [97] Originally by: Micheal Dietrich Owned the forum posters all the way to page 4 so far. I wish I had your skill Tarm. All I got was a dedicated @post. no he didn't, less than a handful of people were fooled...
Battleclash	Posted - 2008.02.04 21:57:00 - [98] Originally by: L70Rogue Originally by: Micheal Dietrich Owned the forum posters all the way to page 4 so far. I wish I had your skill Tarm. All I got was a dedicated @post. no he didn't, less than a handful of people were fooled... Now if he had said Originally by: Micheal Dietrich Owned ALL the forum posters all the way to page 4 then your point would be valid and justified. But for people with rank 4 reading comprehension you can clearly see that what he mentioned was that fools obviously looked at the original post then posted a rant without reading further into the thread, whereas they would have noticed on several occassions that this was a joke thread. The latest blatent show of stupidity is showing up on page for showing that Tarminic did in fact own people all the way to page 4 but did not own ALL the people to page 4 so the word ALL was omitted before people. Thank you and please troll again. Originally by: Vladimir Ilych Stupidity is universal.
Tarron Sarek Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2008.02.04 22:27:00 - [99] Edited by: Tarron Sarek on 04/02/2008 22:33:36 And the problem is? Creativity? edit: Forgot to mention - this is dangerous terrain. People might actually believe there's a problem with industrials.. ___________________________________ - Balance is power, guard it well - Please stop using the word 'nerf' Nothing spells 'incompetence' or 'don't take me serious' like those four letters
Yargo Metash Minmatar Heimatar Services Conglomerate	Posted - 2008.02.04 23:04:00 - [100] Edited by: Yargo Metash on 04/02/2008 23:04:41 Originally by: Tarron Sarek Edited by: Tarron Sarek on 04/02/2008 22:33:36 edit: Forgot to mention - this is dangerous terrain. People might actually believe there's a problem with industrials.. Shhh, I'm working on my Nano-mammoth. Or Nammoth. Speaking of: What about the Hurty V's? I know someone else mentioned a Battle Bestower... Quick! Before the nerf comes! CAREBEARS FIGHT BACK YET AGAIN!
Orgos Khenn Minmatar	Posted - 2008.02.04 23:44:00 - [101] So when did the OP get owned by haulers, how badly did his wallet suffer, and how much do we care? ---- One day...one day General will be worth reading.
Ricardo Phallus	Posted - 2008.02.04 23:46:00 - [102] Originally by: Orgos Khenn So when did the OP get owned by haulers, how badly did his wallet suffer, and how much do we care? Yep that's what happened Tarminic got WTFBBQPWNED an elite team of iteron 4's, 5's and mammoths. Welcome to the forums btw, it's obviously your first day.
Captain Organs	Posted - 2008.02.04 23:57:00 - [103] One of the major problems of changing industrials' maximum lockable targets to zero is they could always fit a auto-lock module which gives a bonus to max lockable targets and also I use tractor beams on my industrial to get the mining cans to it faster. Without lockable targets industrials would lose a bit of their usefulness. Honestly...just shoot the things all the 'battle badger' setups you have included have absolutely no tank. As a pvp fitted ship you should be locking onto the industrial much faster than the industrial would lock you, so use drones and use FoF missiles (they're good fun).
Tressin Khiyne Minmatar Interstellar Vacation Center	Posted - 2008.02.05 00:14:00 - [104] Originally by: Captain Organs One of the major problems of changing industrials' maximum lockable targets to zero is they could always fit a auto-lock module which gives a bonus to max lockable targets and also I use tractor beams on my industrial to get the mining cans to it faster. Without lockable targets industrials would lose a bit of their usefulness. Honestly...just shoot the things all the 'battle badger' setups you have included have absolutely no tank. As a pvp fitted ship you should be locking onto the industrial much faster than the industrial would lock you, so use drones and use FoF missiles (they're good fun). ^^Owned^^ Thank you Tarminac, best laugh I've had all week... -- There are 10 kinds of people in this world; Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
Tarminic Forsaken Resistance The Last Stand	Posted - 2008.02.05 00:19:00 - [105] Originally by: Tressin Khiyne Originally by: Captain Organs One of the major problems of changing industrials' maximum lockable targets to zero is they could always fit a auto-lock module which gives a bonus to max lockable targets and also I use tractor beams on my industrial to get the mining cans to it faster. Without lockable targets industrials would lose a bit of their usefulness. Honestly...just shoot the things all the 'battle badger' setups you have included have absolutely no tank. As a pvp fitted ship you should be locking onto the industrial much faster than the industrial would lock you, so use drones and use FoF missiles (they're good fun). ^^Owned^^ Thank you Tarminac, best laugh I've had all week... I don't know what you're talking about, this is a serious issue that needs to be addressed before it becomes a more prevalent problem. ---------------- Tarminic - 31 Million SP in Forum Warfare Play EVE: Downtime Madness v0.78.2
Johli Caldari AWE Corporation Intrepid Crossing	Posted - 2008.02.05 00:21:00 - [106] Shush, don't mess with my Estamel fitted Badger. I call it Estager. Or Badamel. But don't nerf it, I need the firepower to wtfbbqpwn carriers. Also, I loled at everybody who still took you seriously, even after 4 pages. Read the topic first, people. :P
Zeba Minmatar Pator Tech School	Posted - 2008.02.05 00:25:00 - [107] Originally by: Tarminic I don't know what you're talking about, this is a serious issue that needs to be addressed before it becomes a more prevalent problem. What? Spam for isk? In that case. /SIGNED Originally by: Nice Guy This means that the writer epicaly fails at english. Irony. So delicious.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.