| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
58
   |
Posted - 2012.01.27 09:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
A good portion of High Sec are alts of people that play elsewhere. Unlike Sov Null those that spend most of their time in High Sec don't have common interests, in fact many are diametrically opposed. Everyone in EVE knows the workings of High Sec space very well, but those that only stay in High Sec are often ignorant of Null, WH, and even Low Sec space, making them a poor choice of candidate.
I think despite their relatively small numbers Wormholers and Faction War players have a much better chance of getting good representation than any "High Sec candidate" that simply can't feasibly represent such a large diverse group of players. |
Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
59
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 11:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:
I'd like to know more in detail about this discriminating and provoking statement that null and high sec are diametrically opposed. Why can't certian aspects of regional areas work together if they wish?
That wasn't what I said. I said that High Sec residence themselves have diametrically opposed interests, unlike Sov Nullsec which have mostly common interests. This in relation to game development and issues.
You talk about Sov Nullsec groups coming and "griefing" High Sec, but to me that makes little sense. Most of Nullsec also has Highsec alts. The most well known groups that have terms like "griefing" labeled to them, like Privateers, Orphange, TEARS etc are all High Sec groups, not Null, only Goons really stand out as a Null based group in that category.
|
Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
65
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 20:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
Zytani wrote:i think there should be 4 CSM categories in which players can run for
1. High Sec CSM
2. Low Sec CSM
3. Null Sec CSM
4. Wormspace CSM
this way everyone in eve can have a voice to represent them.
You really believe that? And how exactly do you propose to determine who can run for each? How would voting differ from they way it does now? Also do you really believe each and every one of those categories represents a shared unified interest?
|
| |
|