| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [24]:: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 96 post(s) |
Mithrantir Ob'lontra
Gallente
Ixion Defence Systems
The Cyrene Initiative
   |
Posted - 2007.11.18 02:40:00 -
[691]
 Originally by: Velas Opium
blizzard are paying off certain ccp devs to make eve ****
Since you are unwilling to read the whole thread and see what the Devs are saying, while in the same time emerge from your own little world and see (and comprehend) the bigger picture, i assume you will quit.
So can i have your stuff?
Contract them to me 
-------
Nobody can be exactly like me. Even I have trouble doing it. |
Ottman
|
Posted - 2007.11.18 03:54:00 -
[692]
i wont quit, many other ppl maybe do, and they dont will hand over their stuff, just erase their character with all the stuff, try that somewhere else 
MfG ottman
|
Original Copy
|
Posted - 2007.11.18 04:53:00 -
[693]
Yeah. Screwing logistics and grinding our nose in the stinky pile someone left in the corner saying "Bad, bad, you MUST use 20 billion ISK jump freighter to fuel your POS!!! Nothing else is allowed!"
CCP is wonderful for f'ing people a year after they've learned how best to use a thing.
I just wish they'd fix invention (mech eng), normalize ammo invention, and get rid of the idiot nerfs on T2 ammo!!! that makes it utterly pointless in comparison to faction ammo.
Example:
Med Projectile V & Faction guns (425mm auto) & Faction EMP
vs
Med Autocannon Spec IV & T2 425mm auto) & Hail
Hail beats faction by only 11 DPS.
No nerf to faction boat. Hail boat can't recharge.
Nerf faction, or un-nerf T2 to make it useful.
(Knowing CCP, they'll nerf before they 'repair' something they broke (unless it negatively affects people who have trained up to use the 'broken' item... i.e. carriers, NOS, EW other than ECM).
Yadda, yadda bullsh*t.
|
SiJira
|
Posted - 2007.11.18 20:11:00 -
[694]
Originally by: Mithrantir Ob'lontra
Originally by: Velas Opium
blizzard are paying off certain ccp devs to make eve ****
Since you are unwilling to read the whole thread and see what the Devs are saying, while in the same time emerge from your own little world and see (and comprehend) the bigger picture, i assume you will quit.
So can i have your stuff?
Contract them to me
cant you afford newbships on your own?
____ __ ________
_sig below_
devs and gms cant modify my sig if they tried!
_lies above_
CCP Morpheus was here
Morpheus Fails. You need colors!! -Kaemonn
[yellow]Kaem |
Agif
Templar Republic
R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2007.11.18 20:50:00 -
[695]
Originally by: Elendar
Supply convoys should be vulnerable and be forced to actually move through space, not untouchable jump boats.
Personally i'd prefer it if they removed jump logistics altogether.
Its a game, adapt to the new meta rather than crying about the loss of the old one
contradiction as you say stop whining but you started ur comment with a whine?
I am surrounded by .......
|
Agif
Templar Republic
R0ADKILL
|
Posted - 2007.11.18 21:01:00 -
[696]
Originally by: CCP Nozh
Originally by: Semkhet
People log in EvE to have fun. Logistics are a pain in the ass. You should think twice before altering the balance between fun & boredom. Your customers aren't all kiddies paying the subs with daddy's CC.
Yeah but too easy logistics are also a pain in the ass. We've been making logistics a lot easier with "jump bridges" and the POS fueling change, the hauling carriers were over the top.
LOL hauling carriers are over the top and its taken how long for you to realize you think you made a mistake. Well guess what you are over the top with your nerf bat and TBH id petition for you to get the sack along with your so called "BALANCING TEAM"
Dont nerf the carrier its stupid and bring back NOS and stop this stupid nerf with the Myrm and ......
u seeing a pattern in all these posts????
We all ask you to fix things but we get no results or we get hot fix's....
Concentrate on lagg i mean seriously put some thought into that and stop fraking this game up and making it more worse than its getting.
+ Id love to know where you get these stupid ideas for nerfing from i mean what bunch o idiots decided it would be beneficial to the players to do this? I mean this is what were talking about right, making the game better for us not p1ssing everyone off. So where did this nerf come from as clearly we dont want it!
|
shinsushi
|
Posted - 2007.11.19 01:58:00 -
[697]
Originally by: Goumindong
Comp skills boosting passive hardeners would have other, more widespread effects, and would probably single handedly break current balance as we know it.
What balance?
We have Speed > bubbles > everything.
The counter to speed? two recons and faction toys.....
The counter to bubbles? A smartbomb if you are right on top of the bubble.....
We have a capless/worry free 30km range vessel about to completely annihilate blaster boats......
Ships that don't use cap to fire have nearly identical capacitor profiles as those that do.....
everything else is upside down and inside out. This isn't balance, this is madness....
An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. |
skipper johnson
The Arrow Project
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2007.11.20 19:35:00 -
[698]
So I see all the whining killed this thread, and thats a pity because I felt we were really getting somewhere (I know I was moaning a bit, but at least I tried to put it in a constructive manner).
One question weighing heavily on my mind is...
Why slow down interdictors? I'd really like to hear CCP's reasoning behind this.
|
eyesinthesky
|
Posted - 2007.11.20 20:11:00 -
[699]
Here's an idea, lets nerf shuttles and nood ships!
|
skipper johnson
The Arrow Project
Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2007.11.22 18:32:00 -
[700]
Bumpage:
And I'll repeat my question for CCP.
WHY do you want to slow down interdictors?
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [24]:: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |