| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Sameyaa
D00M. Northern Coalition.
15
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 17:54:00 -
[1] - Quote
Anyone else getting tired of this constant moaning and b****ing about "waaaa titan killed me... waaa nerf titan.. waaaa i should be able to kill titan... waaa OP tracking... waaaa i dont care if they spent 2 years and 100bil buying the ship and have dedicated character. My drake should be able to kill titan waaaa... waaa... waaa... My alliance blobs with 800 maels but dosent field any caps and still expects to be able to own titans.. waaa...
Let me tell you something, its NOT the 'OP' tracking of titans. Its 50 titans shooting at you. You can make a blob of ANYTHING, if you bring enough of it you will win.
Anyone ever wonder why NCDOT and PL have some of the biggest cap fleets in game? BECAUSE THEY ACTUALLY USE THEM. Now, lets assume that you have a titan (impossible i know). Now, lets say you were in an alliance that only fights with subcaps and never has the balls to field their caps. Would you not join an alliance that fields them instead?
Also, before you give me the arguement about "they have balls to field them only cause they got like 50 titans". No you are wrong. I know for a fact that when ncdot started off they only had a handfull of titans. Its the FC's that had the balls to field them and create a reputation for the alliance that made others with supers/titans join. Sometimes you welp a whole super fleet, but thats the risk you take. Also, having a program that builds free titans/supers for members might help instead of RMTing the tech isk.
So, everyone who moans about ncdot/pl having a monopoly with titans can blame your own alliance FCs/leaders. Maybe if other major alliances had the balls to field their own caps.. MAYBE... all your cap pilots wouldn't have left your alliance to join ncdot/pl. |

Themick Mccoy
23
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 17:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
As a pubbie who has never seen one, yes it gets annoying. Reminds me there is something I haven't tried to suicide myself into yet...
I'm training my dic up though!!! :D I'm a noob! If you catch me ingame, don't bother with a ransom, I ain't paying! I'm still learning the pvpies, plus, I'm a Jew. |

Blawrf McTaggart
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
388
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 18:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
this was a good post, well done.  |

low26
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 18:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
+ 1 like for truth RMT needs a nerf! |

de4deye
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
5
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 18:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
Sameyaa wrote:Anyone else getting tired of this constant moaning and b****ing about "waaaa titan killed me... waaa nerf titan.. waaaa i should be able to kill titan... waaa OP tracking... waaaa i dont care if they spent 2 years and 100bil buying the ship and have dedicated character. My drake should be able to kill titan waaaa... waaa... waaa... My alliance blobs with 800 maels but dosent field any caps and still expects to be able to own titans.. waaa...
Let me tell you something, its NOT the 'OP' tracking of titans. Its 50 titans shooting at you. You can make a blob of ANYTHING, if you bring enough of it you will win.
Anyone ever wonder why NCDOT and PL have some of the biggest cap fleets in game? BECAUSE THEY ACTUALLY USE THEM. Now, lets assume that you have a titan (impossible i know). Now, lets say you were in an alliance that only fights with subcaps and never has the balls to field their caps. Would you not join an alliance that fields them instead?
Also, before you give me the arguement about "they have balls to field them only cause they got like 50 titans". No you are wrong. I know for a fact that when ncdot started off they only had a handfull of titans. Its the FC's that had the balls to field them and create a reputation for the alliance that made others with supers/titans join. Sometimes you welp a whole super fleet, but thats the risk you take. Also, having a program that builds free titans/supers for members might help instead of RMTing the tech isk.
So, everyone who moans about ncdot/pl having a monopoly with titans can blame your own alliance FCs/leaders. Maybe if other major alliances had the balls to field their own caps.. MAYBE... all your cap pilots wouldn't have left your alliance to join ncdot/pl.
+1 for summing everything up - I still don't know why the cry babies complain about supers/titans even though they know their CEOs and Directors RMTed all their Alliance isk making it impossible to buy nice things LOL |

Feligast
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1029
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:02:00 -
[6] - Quote
Those 800 Maels cost well over 160 billion, so by your logic, they SHOULD own your titan. Thank you for proving our point, death2alltitans. |

low26
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
6
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:09:00 -
[7] - Quote
Feligast wrote:Those 800 Maels cost well over 160 billion, so by your logic, they SHOULD own your titan. Thank you for proving our point, death2alltitans.
they would if you knew how to fly them  |

de4deye
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:10:00 -
[8] - Quote
Feligast wrote:Those 800 Maels cost well over 160 billion, so by your logic, they SHOULD own your titan. Thank you for proving our point, death2alltitans.
So all 800 of those ships don't even cost enough to equal what 2 titans cost - I think you are missing the point. People who expect to just be able to kill a 100 bil isk ship with a Drake or Maelstrom and no capital support are out of their mind. When NC./PL brings out more than 50x the isk in ships on the field who do you think is gunna win?  |

Feligast
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1029
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
de4deye wrote:Feligast wrote:Those 800 Maels cost well over 160 billion, so by your logic, they SHOULD own your titan. Thank you for proving our point, death2alltitans. So all 800 of those ships don't even cost enough to equal what 2 titans cost - I think you are missing the point. People who expect to just be able to kill a 100 bil isk ship with a Drake or Maelstrom and no capital support are out of their mind. When NC./PL brings out more than 50x the isk in ships on the field who do you think is gunna win? 
Yes, because isk value is absolutely the best way to determine who should win. Why have weapons? |

low26
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
6
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:26:00 -
[10] - Quote
Feligast wrote:de4deye wrote:Feligast wrote:Those 800 Maels cost well over 160 billion, so by your logic, they SHOULD own your titan. Thank you for proving our point, death2alltitans. So all 800 of those ships don't even cost enough to equal what 2 titans cost - I think you are missing the point. People who expect to just be able to kill a 100 bil isk ship with a Drake or Maelstrom and no capital support are out of their mind. When NC./PL brings out more than 50x the isk in ships on the field who do you think is gunna win?  Yes, because isk value is absolutely the best way to determine who should win. Why have weapons?
So I suppose blobbing 800 people in a system is a good way to determine that then? Nothing left to tactics and different ship types? |

Sameyaa
D00M. Northern Coalition.
18
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:33:00 -
[11] - Quote
Feligast wrote:Those 800 Maels cost well over 160 billion, so by your logic, they SHOULD own your titan. Thank you for proving our point, death2alltitans.
Feligast wrote:Yes, because isk value is absolutely the best way to determine who should win. Why have weapons?
See what i did there? |

Feligast
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1029
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:38:00 -
[12] - Quote
I see irony is something else you ~~don't get~~
Oh, and in before the lock for crossposting. Nice alt in GD. |

Feligast
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1029
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:40:00 -
[13] - Quote
low26 wrote:Feligast wrote:de4deye wrote:Feligast wrote:Those 800 Maels cost well over 160 billion, so by your logic, they SHOULD own your titan. Thank you for proving our point, death2alltitans. So all 800 of those ships don't even cost enough to equal what 2 titans cost - I think you are missing the point. People who expect to just be able to kill a 100 bil isk ship with a Drake or Maelstrom and no capital support are out of their mind. When NC./PL brings out more than 50x the isk in ships on the field who do you think is gunna win?  Yes, because isk value is absolutely the best way to determine who should win. Why have weapons? So I suppose blobbing 800 people in a system is a good way to determine that then? Nothing left to tactics and different ship types?
50 titans is "tactics" now?
|

Sameyaa
D00M. Northern Coalition.
18
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:43:00 -
[14] - Quote
When did i talk about tactics? |

Feligast
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1029
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:46:00 -
[15] - Quote
Sameyaa wrote:When did i talk about tactics?
Did I quote you when I said that? Do I have to teach you how to read now? |

Sameyaa
D00M. Northern Coalition.
18
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:50:00 -
[16] - Quote
Feligast wrote:Sameyaa wrote:When did i talk about tactics? Did I quote you when I said that? Do I have to teach you how to read now?
You are not very bright are you? Please go ahead and quote ME where i supposedly talked about 'tactics'. If you are going to troll then you still need to be somewhat intelligent. |

de4deye
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
9
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:58:00 -
[17] - Quote
Sameyaa wrote:Feligast wrote:Sameyaa wrote:When did i talk about tactics? Did I quote you when I said that? Do I have to teach you how to read now? You are not very bright are you? Please go ahead and quote ME where i supposedly talked about 'tactics'. If you are going to troll then you still need to be somewhat intelligent.
You can't fix stupid  |

Feligast
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1029
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 20:08:00 -
[18] - Quote
Sameyaa wrote:Feligast wrote:Sameyaa wrote:When did i talk about tactics? Did I quote you when I said that? Do I have to teach you how to read now? You are not very bright are you? Please go ahead and quote ME where i supposedly talked about 'tactics'. If you are going to troll then you still need to be somewhat intelligent.
When did I say you did talk about tactics? Why you so ~mad~, bro? |

Sameyaa
D00M. Northern Coalition.
20
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 20:11:00 -
[19] - Quote
Feligast wrote:Sameyaa wrote:Feligast wrote:Sameyaa wrote:When did i talk about tactics? Did I quote you when I said that? Do I have to teach you how to read now? You are not very bright are you? Please go ahead and quote ME where i supposedly talked about 'tactics'. If you are going to troll then you still need to be somewhat intelligent. When did I say you did talk about tactics? Why you so ~mad~, bro?
Lol |

Temmu Guerra
Sickle Moon Intrepid Crossing
18
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 20:17:00 -
[20] - Quote
Very well said. +1 for you good sir |

Fighter26
Orion's Fist RED.Legion
9
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:08:00 -
[21] - Quote
Pretty much OP is right. Titans fit for tracking are woefully lacking effective hitpoints for such a expensive and difficult to make ship, with that risk comes the reward of killing things that are smallish. I should point out to those who cry about the half fits (like two tcs and a te) being to powerful don't bother to point out those require a support fleet of recons/t3s to play tackle and slow targets down enough to do real damage. CCP would like to see supers in the heart of fleets, why break that role?
Still, with so many **** one has to wonder if things are unfair for newcoming spaceholders- but even then what are you going to do? The 0.0 alliances have invested their entire future in their super fleets, should they not be rewarded for their hard work? |

Temmu Guerra
Sickle Moon Intrepid Crossing
19
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:14:00 -
[22] - Quote
I am not going to sit here and spew my ideas of how to balance it because my ideas are probably crap just like all the others. From my point of view the problem is that all the supers are concentrated in a few alliances instead of being distributed like ccp originally anticipated (by my guess).
However its what the OP said which is the reason. Super pilots are going to join an alliance that fields them. Same thing goes for pilots with subcaps and alliances. Just no one notices that ALL alliances need subcaps. Not all alliances need the super. To be honest the problem doesnt lay with ships themselves but how they are deployed. However that is a conversation for another thread. |

de4deye
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
11
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:25:00 -
[23] - Quote
Temmu Guerra wrote:I am not going to sit here and spew my ideas of how to balance it because my ideas are probably crap just like all the others. From my point of view the problem is that all the supers are concentrated in a few alliances instead of being distributed like ccp originally anticipated (by my guess).
However its what the OP said which is the reason. Super pilots are going to join an alliance that fields them. Same thing goes for pilots with subcaps and alliances. Just no one notices that ALL alliances need subcaps. Not all alliances need the super. To be honest the problem doesnt lay with ships themselves but how they are deployed. However that is a conversation for another thread.
It's not that other alliance cannot get the supers, It's that they can't keep their money grubbing hands off the isk long enough to buy anything. They'd rather have isk for themselves than give anything to the alliance. This is why so many alliances are fail. |

ScheenK
Constantine.
16
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:39:00 -
[24] - Quote
Sameyaa wrote:Feligast wrote:Those 800 Maels cost well over 160 billion, so by your logic, they SHOULD own your titan. Thank you for proving our point, death2alltitans. Feligast wrote:Yes, because isk value is absolutely the best way to determine who should win. Why have weapons? See what i did there?
owned, goonie is re-tarded
and i agree with said thread
eeeee |

Jalmari Huitsikko
draketrain Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
23
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:44:00 -
[25] - Quote
eve should be like good old archspace
EVERYONE BUILD BIGGEST SHIP WITH BIGGEST GUNS AS FAST AS POSSIBLE AND FIT CLOAKS ON THEM THEN GO INSTA EVERYTHING UNTIL IT COMES TO THAT THE FASTEST ONE TO CLICK ALPHA EVERYTHING BUTTON WILL WIN.
|

Temmu Guerra
Sickle Moon Intrepid Crossing
19
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 22:01:00 -
[26] - Quote
de4deye wrote: It's not that other alliance cannot get the supers, It's that they can't keep their money grubbing hands off the isk long enough to buy anything. They'd rather have isk for themselves than give anything to the alliance. This is why so many alliances are fail.
I was referring to pilots that already have gotten the supers and are looking to join an alliance that wields them. But I agree that most alliances are very selfish and all that fun stuff |

Doris Dents
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 22:09:00 -
[27] - Quote
Titans don't die enough - if you wreck a fleet of battleships it should come at the cost of one or two titans. Only dying if the titan pilot screws up or gets DC'ed isn't good enough, no ships should be nearly invulnerable in a blob. |

Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
370
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 22:19:00 -
[28] - Quote
itt people don't know that 50 titans are impossible to match in subcaps without fielding more people than eve can handle
you guys know that a blob of titans literally does not die right |

Sameyaa
D00M. Northern Coalition.
38
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 22:46:00 -
[29] - Quote
Killstealing wrote:itt people don't know that 50 titans are impossible to match in subcaps without fielding more people than eve can handle
you guys know that a blob of titans literally does not die right
That is why you bring your own caps along with your subcaps. I can gaurentee you that goons have as much supers/titans as ncdot/pl do. Difference is that they never put them to use. If goons actually field 800 maels like they do AND bring their cap fleet they could easily win. |

ScheenK
Constantine.
19
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 22:50:00 -
[30] - Quote
there are no goons |

Sverige Pahis
Thunderwaffe Goonswarm Federation
631
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 23:04:00 -
[31] - Quote
wow chill |

Doris Dents
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
18
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 23:15:00 -
[32] - Quote
Sameyaa wrote:Killstealing wrote:itt people don't know that 50 titans are impossible to match in subcaps without fielding more people than eve can handle
you guys know that a blob of titans literally does not die right That is why you bring your own caps along with your subcaps. I can gaurentee you that goons have as much supers/titans as ncdot/pl do. Difference is that they never put them to use. If goons actually field 800 maels like they do AND bring their cap fleet they could easily win. We don't deploy supers because all the elite pvp supercap alliances up here are blue and together vastly outnumber our fleet. Only need a sniff of goon supers to have the whole north alight with cynos scrambling for a counter drop. It's easy to swing your balls around when you can use supers with impunity. |

Sameyaa
D00M. Northern Coalition.
38
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 23:32:00 -
[33] - Quote
Doris Dents wrote:Sameyaa wrote:Killstealing wrote:itt people don't know that 50 titans are impossible to match in subcaps without fielding more people than eve can handle
you guys know that a blob of titans literally does not die right That is why you bring your own caps along with your subcaps. I can gaurentee you that goons have as much supers/titans as ncdot/pl do. Difference is that they never put them to use. If goons actually field 800 maels like they do AND bring their cap fleet they could easily win. We don't deploy supers because all the elite pvp supercap alliances up here are blue and together vastly outnumber our fleet. Only need a sniff of goon supers to have the whole north alight with cynos scrambling for a counter drop. It's easy to swing your balls around when you can use supers with impunity.
Sounds like a personal problem. lol.
But all joking aside - So, you would like ccp to nerf titans then so you can defeat them WITHOUT using your own caps (which is what they are designed for in the first place) ? |

Doris Dents
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
18
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 23:47:00 -
[34] - Quote
Nerfing so they can blap several fleets but lose a couple of guys in the process would be fine. Or making it so subcaps couldn't touch supers and vice versa would also do. But day-to-day 50 guys shouldn't decide a battle that involves hundreds or thousands, that's just bad design and unfun. |

Thomas Orca
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
33
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 00:07:00 -
[35] - Quote
Sameyaa wrote:
Sounds like a personal problem. lol.
But all joking aside - So, you would like ccp to nerf titans then so you can defeat them WITHOUT using your own caps (which is what they are designed for in the first place) ?
The problem with Titans, and Supercarriers to a certain degree, is that they have a very poorly defined purpose. It is difficult to balance a ship when it's unclear what it is even remotely designed to do. Titans at the moment are extremely versatile, excelling at killing battleship fleets, capitals, supercapitals, and providing power projection through titan bridges and amazing gang bonuses, and the sheer logistical capacity a titan gives is astounding. Even if Titans were unusable for combat, they would still be built, and used for their other purposes.
Of course, if Titans are useless in combat, that is removing a ship that can be used and lowering the dynamic, etc, and so is an incredibly ******** idea. So, Titans require a more defined combat role. If you want them to destroy battleship fleets, then they need to become more vulnerable to other capitals and have the Doomsday device either removed or changed once more. If you want them to remain excellent at killing Capitals, then you need to make them more vulnerable to subcaps, and lower their tracking so as to make subcaps more of a threat to them. |

Sameyaa
D00M. Northern Coalition.
38
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 00:17:00 -
[36] - Quote
Doris Dents wrote:Nerfing so they can blap several fleets but lose a couple of guys in the process would be fine. Or making it so subcaps couldn't touch supers and vice versa would also do. But day-to-day 50 guys shouldn't decide a battle that involves hundreds or thousands, that's just bad design and unfun.
But do you realize how vulnerable titans are already in these 'blap' fits they use to get aditional tracking to fight subcaps?
- An erebus for example will have at most 30mil ehp in a blap fit. - I know that goons for example are capable of fielding 3 full fleets of maels. Lets say, thats 750maels with 850 dps and 10k volley each. - That would be a combined 637500 dps and 7.5MIL alpha every 17 seconds. - That would also be as much dps as 90 avatars FYI - Erebus will die in 4 volleys, or 4x17 = 68 seconds (1 min) - That much dps will require reps from 386 capital reps to keep it alive (assuming 80% resist with blap fit). - Now, lets say we field on average 50 carriers along with titans. Each carrier would require more than 7 reps permarunning to keep erebus alive, which is not possible.
So your wish that
Quote:Nerfing so they can blap several fleets but lose a couple of guys in the process would be fine. Is already possible |

de4deye
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 02:23:00 -
[37] - Quote
Bring back AOE Doomsday!!  |

low26
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
10
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 02:32:00 -
[38] - Quote
Sameyaa wrote:Doris Dents wrote:Nerfing so they can blap several fleets but lose a couple of guys in the process would be fine. Or making it so subcaps couldn't touch supers and vice versa would also do. But day-to-day 50 guys shouldn't decide a battle that involves hundreds or thousands, that's just bad design and unfun. But do you realize how vulnerable titans are already in these 'blap' fits they use to get aditional tracking to fight subcaps? - An erebus for example will have at most 30mil ehp in a blap fit. - I know that goons for example are capable of fielding 3 full fleets of maels. Lets say, thats 750maels with 850 dps and 10k volley each. - That would be a combined 637500 dps and 7.5MIL alpha every 17 seconds. - That would also be as much dps as 90 avatars FYI - Erebus will die in 4 volleys, or 4x17 = 68 seconds (1 min) - That much dps will require reps from 386 capital reps to keep it alive (assuming 80% resist with blap fit). - Now, lets say we field on average 50 carriers along with titans. Each carrier would require more than 7 reps permarunning to keep erebus alive, which is not possible. So your wish that Quote:Nerfing so they can blap several fleets but lose a couple of guys in the process would be fine. Is already possible
This ^^^ And as I said earlier', If you knew how to fly the 800 mael's you would kill them.  |

Metal Dude
Destructive Influence Northern Coalition.
12
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 02:35:00 -
[39] - Quote
If goonies would spend as much effort on getting laid as they do on whining to nerf suppers, maybe they wouldGǪ.. naaa, never mind. Please continue. 
|

Xolve
The Suicide Kings Test Alliance Please Ignore
772
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 02:56:00 -
[40] - Quote
Gas Thread, Ban OP.
I'm not a Titan pilot, and never plan to be one- the obvious problem with Titans is literally the only counter to them is to have more Titans. You can talk all day about how vulnerable blap-titans are and how easily they are destroyed but factor in that most people that employ this bullshit do it from the relative safety of being inside POS shields, even with thier awkward ship agility, its simply not feasible to kill something that can be untargetable at will.
Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Sameyaa
D00M. Northern Coalition.
38
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 03:10:00 -
[41] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Gas Thread, Ban OP. I'm not a Titan pilot, and never plan to be one- the obvious problem with Titans is literally the only counter to them is to have more Titans. You can talk all day about how vulnerable blap-titans are and how easily they are destroyed  but factor in that most people that employ this bullshit do it from the relative safety of being inside POS shields, even with thier awkward ship agility, its simply not feasible to kill something that can be untargetable at will.
Don't know which server you are playing on if u think titans are only used in the safety of pos shields. Also,
Quote: only counter to them is to have more Titans
Is a poorly thought off and overused arguement, that makes absolutely no sense. I can also say that only counter to maels is more maels. Only counter to a tengu fleet is more tengus etc etc. |

Xolve
The Suicide Kings Test Alliance Please Ignore
772
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 03:41:00 -
[42] - Quote
Sameyaa wrote:
Is a poorly thought off and overused arguement, that makes absolutely no sense. I can also say that only counter to maels is more maels. Only counter to a tengu fleet is more tengus etc etc.
I simply meant that the only counter to titan spam, that the cluster can currently handle, even with TiDi is with more titans.
Maels are countered by TenguFleet. TenguFleet is countered by AHACs.
Etc, etc. almost every other fleet doctrine has a counter that involves other ships. Sure numbers will win regardless of skill level, but saying that there is a subcap/cap titan counter without an equal/greater number of titans is just absurd, or the hostiles are suffering from soul crushing lag (which seldom happens anymore).
To be honest, the "I got a titan and you don't, so I don't want them nerfed hurf blurf" argument is just as poorly though of and overused. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Sameyaa
D00M. Northern Coalition.
38
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 04:02:00 -
[43] - Quote
Xolve wrote:Sameyaa wrote:
Is a poorly thought off and overused arguement, that makes absolutely no sense. I can also say that only counter to maels is more maels. Only counter to a tengu fleet is more tengus etc etc.
I simply meant that the only counter to titan spam, that the cluster can currently handle, even with TiDi is with more titans. Maels are countered by TenguFleet. TenguFleet is countered by AHACs. Etc, etc. almost every other fleet doctrine has a counter that involves other ships. Sure numbers will win regardless of skill level, but saying that there is a subcap/cap titan counter without an equal/greater number of titans is just absurd, or the hostiles are suffering from soul crushing lag (which seldom happens anymore). To be honest, the "I got a titan and you don't, so I don't want them nerfed hurf blurf" argument is just as poorly though of and overused.
I guess you completely overlooked the part where i explain in detail how maels kill a erebus in 4 volleys. Also, even if u engage a group of titans with more titans, you will still sustain losses on your side. You dont magically take no losses because you have more titans. Same concept with maels, do you know how long titans will take to shoot down 700+ maels with tidi? lag works both ways my friend. And it would be easier for the maels since they do not have to constantly keep switching targets.
Heres another idea to counter titans. Bring like 300 dreads? even if 50 get dd, you still have 250 dreads left that will do 3.3 MIL DPS. Either way, there are many options - the fact that people ignore them and choose to cry for a nerf is sad.
No tengus are not countered by ahacs, these 'dongcat' setups rzr use will never work. Tengus work against maels only if you are in perfect range - too close and maels will instapop you, too far and you wont be doing dps. |

de4deye
Mortis Angelus Northern Coalition.
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 04:40:00 -
[44] - Quote
The fact is that it really doesn't need a nerf, above Sameyaa just told you - You can bring dreads to fight to counter that, or maybe bring some supers and titans too? Anyways, the whole argument is stupid, they don't need a nerf you just need to put in effort and learn to play. Begging CCP to nerf something that you don't have because you are too lazy to do what needs to be done to counter it or get it is plain selfish. TL;DR quit being babies and figure it out without begging for nerfs.
//To be honest, the "I got a titan and you don't, so I don't want them nerfed hurf blurf" argument is just as poorly though of and overused.//
Have you ever thought that the "I don't have a titan so nerf people who do because I'm lazy" argument is poorly thought out? |

ScheenK
Constantine.
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 04:44:00 -
[45] - Quote
I know its been mentioned earlier in the thread maybe as a joke, maybe not, but bringing back AOE dd with more realistic drawbacks would be a good idea, having its AOE reduced heavily and have the cycle time increased, and also maybe making the titan immobile for a certain longer period of time, would make it more vulnerable in certain ways etc,
As for the tracking issues, if a titan is going to gimp its tank so it can kill bs's then let it, like sameyaa keeps saying, goons should stop being nubbincakes and just field their supers, maybe do the same fit with your own supers? Maybe come up with a plan to kill them? maybe stop whining on the forums to ccp who arent going to do anything about it in the next few months? |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1865
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 04:56:00 -
[46] - Quote
Sameyaa wrote:Killstealing wrote:itt people don't know that 50 titans are impossible to match in subcaps without fielding more people than eve can handle
you guys know that a blob of titans literally does not die right That is why you bring your own caps along with your subcaps. I can gaurentee you that goons have as much supers/titans as ncdot/pl do. Difference is that they never put them to use. If goons actually field 800 maels like they do AND bring their cap fleet they could easily win.
"Guys the ~~~gooniez~~~ counterdropped batphone every supercap within 5 mids!"
i think you can see why we don't bother!
also I love the "I botted for 3 months I am ENTITLED to victory" mentality
lolnerds andski for csm7~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1865
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 05:01:00 -
[47] - Quote
lmao 9 months in tri mk. whatever and the titan blob is like the best friend you never had
joiners are hilarious! andski for csm7~ |

Grath Telkin
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
364
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 05:11:00 -
[48] - Quote
Xolve wrote: I simply meant that the only counter to titan spam, that the cluster can currently handle, even with TiDi is with more titans.
This isn't true
Xolve wrote:Maels are countered by TenguFleet.
This made you look dumb (because its also not true)
Xolve wrote:TenguFleet is countered by AHACs.
This made you look flat out ********, because AHAC's aren't a counter to anything anymore since people figured out their tricks, and most definitely not tengus, they'd rip standardized ahacs to shreds
Xolve wrote:Etc, etc. almost every other fleet doctrine has a counter that involves other ships. Sure numbers will win regardless of skill level, but saying that there is a subcap/cap titan counter without an equal/greater number of titans is just absurd,
No, its not absurd, you're just a ****** who knows jack **** about general fleet mechanics or tactics and somehow still manages to look like an *******. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1865
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 05:17:00 -
[49] - Quote
oh hi grath, any intel on that ~goonswarm botting guide~ you like to talk about? andski for csm7~ |

Sameyaa
D00M. Northern Coalition.
38
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 05:28:00 -
[50] - Quote
Andski wrote:lmao 9 months in tri mk. whatever and the titan blob is like the best friend you never had joiners are hilarious!
Has nothing to contribute to arguement, so resorts to personal attacks. Typical mindless troll.. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1865
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 05:32:00 -
[51] - Quote
it's a dumb thread
"titan tracking is overpowered"
"no it's not they cost 100b on the open market they should do everything perfectly"
take that bullshit back to FHC thanks! andski for csm7~ |

Xolve
The Suicide Kings Test Alliance Please Ignore
772
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 06:43:00 -
[52] - Quote
Thanks for biting mate, I had almost given up there. 
So much wrong in one paragraph.. bit anyway. ~srsbsns~ Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Xolve
The Suicide Kings Test Alliance Please Ignore
772
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 06:48:00 -
[53] - Quote
Sameyaa wrote:Andski wrote:lmao 9 months in tri mk. whatever and the titan blob is like the best friend you never had joiners are hilarious! Has nothing to contribute to arguement, so resorts to personal attacks. Typical mindless troll..
I think you should spend more time needlessly arguing against ~wrong~.
Your argument is invalid.
Argue with blues errryday. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |

Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
372
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 07:29:00 -
[54] - Quote
you guys realize supercaps don't need to solely passive tank and never use any RR right
you can't blap them to death, they rep too much for that. You'd need enough maels to volley one of them and that's not going to happen without crashing the node. |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1865
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 08:34:00 -
[55] - Quote
Killstealing wrote:you guys realize supercaps don't need to solely passive tank and never use any RR right
you can't blap them to death, they rep too much for that. You'd need enough maels to volley one of them and that's not going to happen without crashing the node.
please don't bring any realistic arguments to a dumb theorycrafting thread! andski for csm7~ |

Red Templar
Raging Ducks Goonswarm Federation
123
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 09:20:00 -
[56] - Quote
Did we really had 800/1000/1200 maels at the same time at any one battle? because i see these crazy numbers, especially Garth on kugu keeps whining about unbeatable 1k+ maels, and i ask myself where people get them?
At most CFC had something like 5 fleets running during the branch campaign. Maybe 2 or 3 of those fleets could be called alpha fleet. But even then, about half of them was scorpions/scimitars/recons and other misc ****. The other fleets were full of drakes/huricanes/rifters/whatever. But that was peak and people gathered for SOTG speech. not an everyday occurence.
We can bring 800-1000 rifters. No doubt about that. But 800 maels?? Hardly.
Anyway, i dont have problems with supercaps. But i think there is not enough of them dying. So amount of them being produced is much higher than amount of them being killed. And thats not a very good thing in a long run. Some kind of balance is needed. But how it will be achieved, by adding new ways to tackle supers, or by nerfing them, i dont care. For Love. For Peace. For Honor.
For None of the Above.
For Pony! |

Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
375
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 09:46:00 -
[57] - Quote
Thomas Orca wrote:Sameyaa wrote:
Sounds like a personal problem. lol.
But all joking aside - So, you would like ccp to nerf titans then so you can defeat them WITHOUT using your own caps (which is what they are designed for in the first place) ?
The problem with Titans, and Supercarriers to a certain degree, is that they have a very poorly defined purpose. It is difficult to balance a ship when it's unclear what it is even remotely designed to do. Titans at the moment are extremely versatile, excelling at killing battleship fleets, capitals, supercapitals, and providing power projection through titan bridges and amazing gang bonuses, and the sheer logistical capacity a titan gives is astounding. Even if Titans were unusable for combat, they would still be built, and used for their other purposes. Of course, if Titans are useless in combat, that is removing a ship that can be used and lowering the dynamic, etc, and so is an incredibly ******** idea. So, Titans require a more defined combat role. If you want them to destroy battleship fleets, then they need to become more vulnerable to other capitals and have the Doomsday device either removed or changed once more. If you want them to remain excellent at killing Capitals, then you need to make them more vulnerable to subcaps, and lower their tracking so as to make subcaps more of a threat to them. Hows this for an idea... Tie titans to the FC role. Specifically, titan has to be FC of a fleet of at least 200 before any systems other than drives will activate. They can move around and stuff, but unless they have a fleet, they are not going to do much.
After all, shouldn't titans be the flagship of a fleet, after all?
Oh, and on the thought of redoing titans, I still think the DD should be a wave motion gun. Point Titan, pull trigger, everything in front of titan dies. To much qq from that tho, me things. First time a titan wiped out his own supercap fleet because he was pointed the wrong way would end the coolest weapon evar  Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom. |

Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
603
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 10:29:00 -
[58] - Quote
I WANNA PIZZA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The Apostle : I want a kangeroo Captain Kirk : Silly Austrians Sarmatiko : Let me guess: you're from US? Captain Kirk : Yeah Riverside IA - why? |
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
956

|
Posted - 2012.02.01 11:53:00 -
[59] - Quote
Lacks constructive content.
Thread locked. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |