EVE Search - What is CCP Doing for 0.0 Sov Holders?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

What is CCP Doing for 0.0 Sov Holders?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Ferkimer Burns	Posted - 2007.12.07 18:40:00 - [61] Hmmm. I wonder if 0 rof works with mining lasers....
Harisdrop Gallente Omega Enterprises Mostly Harmless	Posted - 2007.12.07 18:46:00 - [62] I hope to test this soon.
Xaen Caldari Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2007.12.07 19:30:00 - [63] Originally by: Buyerr Originally by: Zavernus Hamarabi Lol, 0 rof dreads. Thats just epic. i see the caldari dreads and a lot of industrial ships to carry the ammo, shooting a full cargo hold of torps per sec :P well seriously, any one using this opportunity should get a warning for using exploits and a full ban if they keep doing it. FRAPS plz? Support fixing the EVE UI \| Suggest Jita fixes If you'd suicide gank yourself for what you're hauling, don't.
Oam Mkoll Caldari HUSARIA Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2007.12.07 19:47:00 - [64] Every second of this bull* means more confusion and grief when the rollback is finally decided. Too bad they lack the balls to make the call. --- I am violence boat**
Mextor Slacker Industries Cult of War	Posted - 2007.12.07 19:57:00 - [65] Originally by: Zavernus Hamarabi Lol, 0 rof dreads. Thats just epic. i've always said the Phoenix needed more DPS
ResearchBot 9	Posted - 2007.12.07 23:04:00 - [66] So, 3rd day and still no dev response. It would already be a 72-hour rollback. CCP? Hulloo?
Kirjava Lothian Quay Industries Zzz	Posted - 2007.12.07 23:11:00 - [67] Originally by: CCP kieron CCP is aware of the issue with certain game features and are working on resolving them. A patch will be deployed (to the server, client or both) when the issues have been resolved. In the interim, we do not think it prudent to take the entire server down due to issues which are affecting a smaller portion of the community. Rate my charecters please, updated so need 3 more, 2M isk for each good review
SnakeByte86	Posted - 2007.12.07 23:26:00 - [68] Originally by: Ares Splinter I think this warrants a GM response that they are at least looking into the issue. SO if someone looses a tower because of all these bugs i guess its petitionable and they can get it back then.. having towers replaced isnt even a big deal, its the BILLIONS sometimes 10s of billions in assets in the POS. CCP has a no reimbursement for looted items thing. So does that mean people are going to lose billions no matter what? I think it does. Then i think it means eve losses 1000s of subs, exactly what they deserve. They cant even tell us they will ban people exploiting the ****.
Kruel Blunt Force Syndicate	Posted - 2007.12.07 23:31:00 - [69] Originally by: SnakeByte86 having towers replaced isnt even a big deal, its the BILLIONS sometimes 10s of billions in assets in the POS. CCP has a no reimbursement for looted items thing. So does that mean people are going to lose billions no matter what? I think it does. Then i think it means eve losses 1000s of subs, exactly what they deserve. They cant even tell us they will ban people exploiting the ****. If people are losing 10s of billions of iskies with no petitionable way of getting them back, then there should be a rollback. Period. I thought my problems were bad... but this... wow.
Verite Rendition Caldari F.R.E.E. Explorer Atrum Tempestas Foedus	Posted - 2007.12.08 01:00:00 - [70] It would be really, really nice if they could at least fix the damn cyno jammers. ---- FREE Explorer Lead Megalomanic EVE Automated Influence Map

General Xenophon Caldari Infinite Improbability Inc Mostly Harmless	Posted - 2007.12.08 06:52:00 - [71] Best Patch Evar!111!!eleven!111!! New content FTL. Fix the damn test server so we can properly test this stuff out and this crap wouldn't happen nearly as often! -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men." - Boondock Saints
General Xenophon Caldari Infinite Improbability Inc Mostly Harmless	Posted - 2007.12.08 06:55:00 - [72] Second to the GM spawning BPOs for a player alliance, this is the next biggest mistake CCP made, although not intentional it's certainly worth a Darwin Award. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men." - Boondock Saints
SnakeByte86	Posted - 2007.12.08 06:56:00 - [73] Originally by: General Xenophon Second to the GM spawning BPOs for a player alliance, this is the next biggest mistake CCP made, although not intentional it's certainly worth a Darwin Award. Haha maybe i missed something, but wah?
Joana Darklight	Posted - 2007.12.08 07:02:00 - [74] Man this patch is brutal they should just roll back eve a day id gladly loose skill training time, work on the patch some more and bring it back in a month.
General Xenophon Caldari Infinite Improbability Inc Mostly Harmless	Posted - 2007.12.08 07:39:00 - [75] Originally by: SnakeByte86 Originally by: General Xenophon Second to the GM spawning BPOs for a player alliance, this is the next biggest mistake CCP made, although not intentional it's certainly worth a Darwin Award. Haha maybe i missed something, but wah? Just the error ridden patch expansion. I am sure they will fix it, but it's very frustrating to hear players loosing so much work to these errors. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "Now, we must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most, and that is the indifference of good men." - Boondock Saints
goodby4u Logistic Technologies Incorporated	Posted - 2007.12.08 07:42:00 - [76] Edited by: goodby4u on 08/12/2007 07:43:23 Originally by: Katamarino I can confirm that the Notoriety Alliance [NOTR] have been witnessed by multiple people to be using this known exploit. Name and shame, people, name and shame... I am not going to outright judge the people by the comment of one person,however if it proves this allience is actively using exploits such as these then i think they not only have dishonored themselves,but should be crippled by these acts. Ive always hated people acting dishonorably,and to me,the base of dishonoring oneself is warp core stabs and logging,higher up the scale going against your word etc,but i also feel very sorry for the people that lose their space,client,pos,time because of bugs like this. And lastly,im sure ccp is working on fixing this and possibly banning any person using these said exploits(hopefully they have a way to find out)and at the same time i'd hate to be a ccp customer support person atm,this is one hell of a cluster****.
Aunt Maud	Posted - 2007.12.08 07:52:00 - [77] well GM response was that attacking a system where the cyno jammer does not work is allowed and not a exploit!
Henrietta Dick	Posted - 2007.12.08 08:16:00 - [78] Originally by: Aunt Maud well GM response was that attacking a system where the cyno jammer does not work is allowed and not a exploit! If that is a genuine GM response then thats pretty **** up. Trinity is a steaming pile of horse where it comes to POS's. Moon harvesters and reactions aren't working. POS modules such as Ship arrays are offlined by trinity and cannot be onlined. POS guns do not attack hostiles. (How the can we defend the POS's if we cant get to our ***** ships anyway). And to top it off systems that have had a massive effort to keep clear of hostile cap ships and enemy movement are open to anyone to setup shop and move resources into, the cyno jammers are offline, so are the generators and the jumpbridges. Trinity is crippling, why on earth CCP did you release it in this state?
Rhe	Posted - 2007.12.08 08:21:00 - [79] I for one welcome the chaos in 0.0. Maybe 0.0 will actually become the bloodbath that it's supposed to be, instead of the collection of pseudo-states that it is now. And come on, you guys are complaining because you have to defend your space with *BATTLESHIP FLEETS and DREADS?!?!* WTF? You want the space but are too lazy to actually fight for it?
SnakeByte86	Posted - 2007.12.08 08:25:00 - [80] Originally by: Rhe I for one welcome the chaos in 0.0. Maybe 0.0 will actually become the bloodbath that it's supposed to be, instead of the collection of pseudo-states that it is now. And come on, you guys are complaining because you have to defend your space with *BATTLESHIP FLEETS and DREADS?!?!* WTF? You want the space but are too lazy to actually fight for it? Wow you really are clueless. There are at the very least, dozens of systems with POS, and 100s of POS in those systems, per 0.0 alliance. Shields and guns are not working. There is no way to defend every pos, thats why pos have shields. If you dont live in 0.0, please stop posting.

Grapez Advanced Security And Asset Protection	Posted - 2007.12.08 08:32:00 - [81] Edited by: Grapez on 08/12/2007 08:32:12 Originally by: SnakeByte86 Originally by: Rhe I for one welcome the chaos in 0.0. Maybe 0.0 will actually become the bloodbath that it's supposed to be, instead of the collection of pseudo-states that it is now. And come on, you guys are complaining because you have to defend your space with *BATTLESHIP FLEETS and DREADS?!?!* WTF? You want the space but are too lazy to actually fight for it? Wow you really are clueless. There are at the very least, dozens of systems with POS, and 100s of POS in those systems, per 0.0 alliance. Shields and guns are not working. There is no way to defend every pos, thats why pos have shields. If you dont live in 0.0, please stop posting. So... you're saying that many 0.0 alliances are overbuilt, and are able to survive merely because of recent additions such as jump-bridges? So why shouldn't these overbuilt alliances lose some space? Eve is, after all, a cold and dark universe. EDIT: LOL! Alt cover blown!
Zaethiel Murder-Death-Kill	Posted - 2007.12.08 08:38:00 - [82] I shot our corp tower (non aggression set on tower). I was gonna blow up a shuttle, but before i locked it a corp mate blew the shuttle up with 3 batteries. Those batteries turned on me without being controled and with the tower set to only shoot people below a certain standings. -------------------------- Piwate Bunny Wuv
SnakeByte86	Posted - 2007.12.08 08:56:00 - [83] Originally by: Grapez Edited by: Grapez on 08/12/2007 08:32:12 Originally by: SnakeByte86 Originally by: Rhe I for one welcome the chaos in 0.0. Maybe 0.0 will actually become the bloodbath that it's supposed to be, instead of the collection of pseudo-states that it is now. And come on, you guys are complaining because you have to defend your space with *BATTLESHIP FLEETS and DREADS?!?!* WTF? You want the space but are too lazy to actually fight for it? Wow you really are clueless. There are at the very least, dozens of systems with POS, and 100s of POS in those systems, per 0.0 alliance. Shields and guns are not working. There is no way to defend every pos, thats why pos have shields. If you dont live in 0.0, please stop posting. So... you're saying that many 0.0 alliances are overbuilt, and are able to survive merely because of recent additions such as jump-bridges? So why shouldn't these overbuilt alliances lose some space? Eve is, after all, a cold and dark universe. EDIT: LOL! Alt cover blown! Whose alt cover was blown? Certaintly not mine since i am not an alt. If alliances got rid of a bunch of POS, sure, the could do that, then t2 item prices would go up 1000% Do you really want to be paying 14million isk for a medium pulse II?
Grapez Advanced Security And Asset Protection	Posted - 2007.12.08 09:04:00 - [84] Originally by: SnakeByte86 If alliances got rid of a bunch of POS, sure, the could do that, then t2 item prices would go up 1000% Do you really want to be paying 14million isk for a medium pulse II? Sure, why not? It might actually give the empire carebears a reason to look into invention, since it would become profitable.
Selune Avril	Posted - 2007.12.08 09:05:00 - [85] Originally by: Rhe I for one welcome the chaos in 0.0. Maybe 0.0 will actually become the bloodbath that it's supposed to be, instead of the collection of pseudo-states that it is now. And come on, you guys are complaining because you have to defend your space with *BATTLESHIP FLEETS and DREADS?!?!* WTF? You want the space but are too lazy to actually fight for it? Some POSs have no forcefields and anything inside them can be freely shot. POSs that take damage can't be remote-repped and don't regen shields on their own, any tower put into reinforced actually has no shield bar at all when it exits reinforced mode. The broken POS guns don't shoot back and can't be manually controlled. The many bugged POSs can't be refueled or restronted. It's not a question of defending the towers, it's that the towers aren't actually defendable at all. It's like CCP replaced POSs with 600m ISK defenseless haulers. You shouldn't be flaming others when you have no understanding of the issues whatsoever.
SnakeByte86	Posted - 2007.12.08 09:07:00 - [86] Originally by: Selune Avril Originally by: Rhe I for one welcome the chaos in 0.0. Maybe 0.0 will actually become the bloodbath that it's supposed to be, instead of the collection of pseudo-states that it is now. And come on, you guys are complaining because you have to defend your space with *BATTLESHIP FLEETS and DREADS?!?!* WTF? You want the space but are too lazy to actually fight for it? Some POSs have no forcefields and anything inside them can be freely shot. POSs that take damage can't be remote-repped and don't regen shields on their own, any tower put into reinforced actually has no shield bar at all when it exits reinforced mode. The broken POS guns don't shoot back and can't be manually controlled. The many bugged POSs can't be refueled or restronted. It's not a question of defending the towers, it's that the towers aren't actually defendable at all. It's like CCP replaced POSs with 600m ISK defenseless haulers. You shouldn't be flaming others when you have no understanding of the issues whatsoever. Not just that, but you cant tell who killed something, unless you were there, so no ingame revenge. Oh and the ZERO rate of fire dreads i keep hearing about.
SnakeByte86	Posted - 2007.12.08 09:08:00 - [87] Originally by: Grapez Originally by: SnakeByte86 If alliances got rid of a bunch of POS, sure, the could do that, then t2 item prices would go up 1000% Do you really want to be paying 14million isk for a medium pulse II? Sure, why not? It might actually give the empire carebears a reason to look into invention, since it would become profitable. invention would do nothing to change the fact they would be carebears, it would also do nothing to effect the prices of t2 items, because t2 items are built with moon materials, which require POS at moons to harvest. Then those are combined into different levels of reactions, which have to be done in reactor arrays at POS. Surely you can not be so blind. You Ovuers alt?
Lowanaera Amarr Celestial Janissaries Curatores Veritatis Alliance	Posted - 2007.12.08 09:09:00 - [88] Originally by: Grapez Originally by: SnakeByte86 If alliances got rid of a bunch of POS, sure, the could do that, then t2 item prices would go up 1000% Do you really want to be paying 14million isk for a medium pulse II? Sure, why not? It might actually give the empire carebears a reason to look into invention, since it would become profitable. Invention has nothing to do with. T2 production, regardless of whether it comes from BPOs or invented BPCs, requires T2 components. T2 components come from where? 0.0 mining and reaction towers. If anything inventors would be even worse off since invention produces negative ME BPCs which require even more T2 components.
goodby4u Logistic Technologies Incorporated	Posted - 2007.12.08 09:18:00 - [89] Edited by: goodby4u on 08/12/2007 09:18:40 Originally by: Rhe I for one welcome the chaos in 0.0. Maybe 0.0 will actually become the bloodbath that it's supposed to be, instead of the collection of pseudo-states that it is now. And come on, you guys are complaining because you have to defend your space with *BATTLESHIP FLEETS and DREADS?!?!* WTF? You want the space but are too lazy to actually fight for it? A blood bath is always good dont get me wrong,however losing space because of things that arent suppose to be is utter bull,i mean,lets say ccp will let these bugs stay to maintain the"bloodbath"wouldnt that mean they just ninja'd through some epic nerfs past the paying class? Also,these"bugs"would point everything AGAINST the use of poses,due to the fact that a phoenix(with that dread glitch)can jump into a system no matter what and do about 100k dps to a pos within a very short time...And as the kicker he can outright destroy batteries with ease aswell as cause a whole pile of problems surface. CCP added jump jammers and bridges for a reason,that reason was to make pos warfare less humdrum and at the same time spice things up in the department of"pos command"...Making all those null and void is undoudtedly stupid.
tyrol E X O D U S Imperial Republic Of the North	Posted - 2007.12.08 10:20:00 - [90] Originally by: Rhe I for one welcome the chaos in 0.0. Maybe 0.0 will actually become the bloodbath that it's supposed to be, instead of the collection of pseudo-states that it is now. And come on, you guys are complaining because you have to defend your space with *BATTLESHIP FLEETS and DREADS?!?!* WTF? You want the space but are too lazy to actually fight for it? CCP put all this new pos stuff in place to actually make warefare MORE bloody. Now alliances have to work hard to take/defend space. Before the changes, it was whoever had the most dreads wins, and it got boring. Someone cynos in 30-40 dreads, unless you can match it, you pack up and leave. And most alliances in game actually had to fight to get the space they are in, not all, but a good majority. And yeh, you blew yur alt cover...DOH



Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.