EVE Search - i consider this cheating

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

i consider this cheating

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 3 post(s)
Empyre Domestic Reform	Posted - 2008.01.01 21:55:00 - [1] Originally by: Kransthow Originally by: GM Nova What the hell??? QFT yeah i know. privateers got months of coming and going in wars at their leisure before any stance was taken and changes made. i'll repost my questions from the iMune thread: Originally by: Empyre why allow pos in hi-sec at all? it sounds to me like people are wanting to bring pvp as a function of capitalization into hi-sec. if this is the case then ccp should come clear with the actual intentions for hi-sec altogether. you can't have it both ways. if its meant to be a buffer for new players to have a relative safe haven then pvpers need to start respecting this. on the other hand, if their intention was to allow and condone complete capitalization and the use of force to remove competition completely and entirely from the game then they need to stop playing around trying to please both sides as well. either allow full utilization of pos in hi-sec (minus sov) or take them and moons completely out of hi-sec because they're worthless. I <3 empire.. usually.
Empyre Domestic Reform	Posted - 2008.01.01 22:17:00 - [2] Originally by: steveid this was pre petitioned so I'll be interested to see how this turns out. that just makes it interesting then. so which gm will lose their job? one of them seems to be making it up as they go if the petition result said the opposite. I <3 empire.. usually.
Empyre Domestic Reform	Posted - 2008.01.01 22:27:00 - [3] Edited by: Empyre on 01/01/2008 22:28:52 Originally by: Wyliee it now seems we have upset imune - they have stated that they will contact every corp we ever war deck, and offer them the get out of jail free card. basicly wreaking our ability as a corp to do merc work in high sec. this leaves us with only a few choices. 1. not bother war deckin anyone ever again. 2. war deck random corps and use there arangement with imune to go after imune's core management (which i expect are a bunch of**gie alts). 3. petition them for game exploitation and harrasment. 4. cry. i think it wil be a combination of 2 and 3, but it is far from ideal. by calling them**gie alts it kind of seems like you're doing #4 right now. and as for #2, that sounds like using another game mechanic to get at those that used another game mechanic against you, hey! (ps bug hunters don't count.. might have lost this one iMune) I <3 empire.. usually.
Empyre Domestic Reform	Posted - 2008.01.03 21:01:00 - [4] Originally by: Ashley Sky But we did report it before using it and were told that it was not an exploit. Once, twice, three times a lady. Senior GM flip-flopper changed the rules because of a time-of-the month moodswing, so now it is indeed an exploit, and our use of it has come to its conclusion. i'm kind of hoping this thread is the result of another person 'knowing a gm on msn' and giving them a ring, then the gm responding with an 'off the cuff' response without actually checking the actual situation. i'm grabbing the popcorn. drama rocks when it has nothing to do with myself. I <3 empire.. usually.
Empyre Domestic Reform	Posted - 2008.01.04 07:42:00 - [5] Originally by: Wynona FYI The rules of reporting exploits are clear, they are handled through the petition system only, please take a moment to read them. If reporting exploits on the forums are against the rules, then encouraging them should be too. GM Nova should of locked this thread and followed company protocol by telling the OP to file a petition like everyone else. The handling of this issue here instead of through the standard protocol petition system is what created this matter of confused policies. Originally by: GM Nova This is cheating, plain and simple. CEOs exploiting this loophole will receive a warning from now on. GM Nova Senior Game Master EVE Online Customer Support to be fair, he did just say ceos would receive warnings from now on. that's it. hope you're not allergic to warnings. they sound pretty scary to me tbh. I <3 empire.. usually.
Empyre Domestic Reform	Posted - 2008.01.04 17:30:00 - [6] Originally by: PhantomVyper I'm guessing that not completly destroying the gameplay of the hundreds or possible thousands of paying customers that play EVE as empire Mercs / corp warfare / whatever else depends on this game mecanic must have something to do with the speed of CCPs reply... To all you carebears on this tread, just think of this as the equivalent to CCP placing all lvl4+ missions exclusively in low-sec / 0.0! ccp rarely responds quickly, especially on blurry matters such as these, which is where some of the surprise and speculation comes in with GM Novas statement. you MAY have a point but you're just plain speculating along with the rest of us here. don't pretend it's anything more. I <3 empire.. usually.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.