You can't have a D3 thread without a few fireworks. It seems current CSM members are intent on slandering Fair Darius' campaign early. Let me just say this reeks of petty jealousy- and if you feel so threatened by Darius' popularity as to try and slander his good name on here then no one is going to think very highly of you. At all.

You can't have a D3 thread without a few fireworks. It seems current CSM members are intent on slandering Fair Darius' campaign early. Let me just say this reeks of petty jealousy- and if you feel so threatened by Darius' popularity as to try and slander his good name - then no one is going to think very highly of you.

Cognitive dissonance posting doesn't make that any less disturbing a point.

Them there is pretty big words from a goon.

Ok finally someone who speaks with reason then. To me NDA is a company thing, not something I care for as a gamer, I'd rather have more insight than less into what CSM and CCP does than the opposite.

So you are saying Darius never did a good job basically?

Breaking NDA isn't a reason not to vote for somebody honestly. That's a legal determination and between CCP and the CSM member. Being a CSM who never participated and was largely AWOL for the vast majority of his term is a bigger reason to not consider him.

What is your stance on low-sec?

It's obvious now Goons have a clear agenda based on slandering Darius' CSM7 campaign. If Goons feel so threatened by D3 then in my mind he is definitely doing something right.

You tried to hold space in null sec. You failed. It's understandable, it's a rough place.

You tried to go after carebears in incursions with your gimmick attempt to draw attention to yourself. You failed horribly. In fact, the carebears put aside their differences and turned your MOM liberation fleets into a prolific joke over and over again. They had lots of fun hearing your fleets burn, your ships go pop and your members cry about not getting paid. Now nobody trusts you in a leadership role (well, the smart ones can see through your steaming pile of stupid).

YOU FAILED AGAINST CAREBEARS AND THEY DRANK YOUR TEARS WITH PROLIFIC ORGASMIC LUST. This is unacceptable.

I couldn't care about the CSM until I heard about your infamous demonstration of incompetence. I'm going to throw all my votes on Drapo Llasa because if he wins and you don't, you will cocoon yourself into a pod in the fetal position and try to inject yourself into any womb that would support your poison presence. EVE will laugh and toast as another terrible representative of the human race is removed with a justified abortion.

Keep being you, but the jester cannot be king.

That's what the meeting minutes that get published are for.

Discussion happens outside of the two regular meetings as well. Leaking information is detrimental to the process because everyone has to stop and damage control, which is what happened when his leak was reported, also evident in the 'fearless' newsletter bit from last summer.

Honestly though, the bigger issue is two CSMs pointing out in this thread that D3 basically did nothing this term, which means he's not likely to do much next term either.

Yeah as a gamer, some people do take the game serious, as in knowing what the next flavor of the month ship is early on and training for it would give it an unfair edge. Or if you are industrial knowing of future changes to game mechanics or ships and building them early for many profits.

If you dont mind other players getting unfair advantages over you breaking the NDA doesnt matter at all. Just some people hate seeing people make ISK too easy and get ahead too easy, so they dont like it when the NDA is broken.

Companies dont like breaking NDA cause they lose money and subscribers maybe. Players hate breaking NDA since other players will have an unfair advantage and get ahead to easily.

Not if we all get the info, or do you think the CSMs don't tell their friends within corp/alliance over TS etc? RIGHT!

Goons definitely have an attraction to this thread. It's sorta sick that they only seem to care about the "Brick Squad." part in his title and nothing more. Any CSM/pilot posting about an alliance vs alliance issue seem to only care about the influence on the map and nothing more.

I think a TEST guy mentioned the brick thing. The rest of us are on top of him for being a troll CSM.

So he fulfilled his promise as CSM? Can any other CSM say the same?

Spread lies, it is the only recourse you have. Of course I cant defend myself by posting my many suggestions made in the official forums.Future CSM members will be able to see through your cheap veneer of lies and slander.

Lets talk about poor performance. You failed to show at the most important summit, then made poor excuses about it. Unfortunately what you say about me being largely absent is not true. Unfortunately, I cannot link my posts made as CSM that prove just how active I was during that time. With over 120 suggestions made, and some of them implemented as current gameplay, I feel just fine about my level of participation as CSM member.

Regarding the NDA: It is a very important agreement that allows CCP to speak to the CSM about future developments that can not, and should not, be made public until they have been flushed out. There was never an NDA breach, not "an insignificant breach."

The fact that Test and GSF have a CTA to post on my candidacy forum post tells just how important it is for them to try and spread their hate and tell lies in my campaign thread.

Fact is, the CSM don't like me because I was the only one not permanently lodged in the end organ of Mittani's digestive system. The same Mittani who wrongfully excluded me from the Skype discussion and removed me from said discussion three times without cause. Clearly a vote for Darius III is a vote against Mittani and the rest of the establishment.



I think that Lowsec should should get the most love of any segment in Eve. I have a few hundred kills there-and it is a bad place. I did write about lowsec getting a buff via the new deadspace Invuls, but it way too little, way too late.

I think Supercarriers and Titans should be nerfed in Low security space. I think that Fighter Bombers and Titan guns shouldnt be able to fire in Lowsec, or NPC nullsec for that matter. Supercapital proliferation has excluded most small and mid-sized alliances from having much of a chance in nullsec, which is a shame.

Your voice is muffled when you speak from the end of Mittanis digestive tract. Because I don't feel the need to be part of your Polly Pretty Pants Tea Party in Skype doent mean I didn't participate. Coming from a guy whose campaign focus was on the fact the he lived in a wormhole I take your tears as a sure sign I am doing things right. As you are one of the herd blindly following Mittani's every suggestion, I have to ask-did he ask you to post here? thanks for your interest in my campaign-D3

Fair Darius III for CSM.

Don't hate him cuz you aint him. Keep doing you Darius! You'll make a great CSM!

Lots of work get s done on Skype. You don't participate.

I'm not sure what my campaign focus has to do with you not doing work. Can you explain the relationship?

Nobody asked me to post here. I posted here because I don't want people to think that Vile rat has some problem with you, and because you running on your so called accomplishments on CSM 6 is laughable.

Vile isn't even running and, Goon or not, is one if the most stand up guys I've ever dealt with in or out of game. Two Step's work on the CSM was exemplary. D3 can't even stand in thier shadow. Take them at thier word and add mine to theirs.

Interesting development, but I will support whomever will advocate making low-sec as viable as other parts of EVE.

Now is there one candidate out there willing to push for the removal of local chat?? As in displaying all who are in system. If there is they got my support*

While I don't think there is a candidate who wants to remove of local outright, Elise Randolph has some ideas to mitigate the problem.

Interesting development, but I will support whomever will advocate making low-sec as viable as other parts of EVE.

Now is there one candidate out there willing to push for the removal of local chat?? As in displaying all who are in system. If there is they got my support*

There is also a guy from NOIR running, who's wanting to improve small gang PVP etc. He might be more up your street.

Neither The Mittani or Vile Rat leaked NDA protected information in even private channels that I'm in with them. In fact more often than not they refused to speak even broadly on a topic for fear that it would approach NDA limits too closely.