| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tusko Hopkins
HUN Corp.
HUN Reloaded
   |
Posted - 2008.05.31 14:22:00 -
[1]
Cynosular jammers are primarily aimed at prohibiting hostile capital deployment in one's home systems. Since the introduction of cynosular jammers covert cyno generators have been introduced, which are designed in a way that they cannot be used to capital or blob deployment.
As blackops need boosting anyways, I suggest to revisit the operation of cynosular jammers and make game mechanic changes to allow the usage of covert cynos in cyno jammed systems.
First alternate to CSM.
|
Exodus Alpha
|
Posted - 2008.05.31 15:39:00 -
[2]
Letting blackops/covertops do their job? Who wouda thunk it? 
/signed
|
Herschel Yamamoto
Bloodmoney Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.05.31 15:43:00 -
[3]
I heartily endorse this product and/or service!
------------------
Fix the forums! |
Jason Edwards
|
Posted - 2008.05.31 15:45:00 -
[4]
Certainly. I actually was under the impression they did get passed cynojammers because of their different module system entirely.
------------------------
"There was this bright flash of light - and now this egg shaped thing is on my screen - did I level up?" |
Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2008.05.31 15:53:00 -
[5]
Although its covered in the Black-ops re-balance general topic on the agenda today - I do think it is useful to have simple and straightforward issues as an option for us too. Supported.
CSM Manifesto 2008 | Destroy Outposts! |
Heartstone
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2008.05.31 17:16:00 -
[6]
Very defintly. I assumed they would when they were first announced to the extent I didn't bother to even test this. This capability would make them FAR more attractive (Assuming the Covert Jump Bridges function like this as well)
---
|
Dlardrageth
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 17:05:00 -
[7]
Depending on if and how cynojammers might become re-balanced this might be moot, but anyway worth supporting.
|
Goumindong
Merch Industrial
GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 17:49:00 -
[8]
 Originally by: Tusko Hopkins
Cynosular jammers are primarily aimed at prohibiting hostile capital deployment in one's home systems. Since the introduction of cynosular jammers covert cyno generators have been introduced, which are designed in a way that they cannot be used to capital or blob deployment.
As blackops need boosting anyways, I suggest to revisit the operation of cynosular jammers and make game mechanic changes to allow the usage of covert cynos in cyno jammed systems.
|
Havohej
The Defias Brotherhood
DEFI4NT
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 17:56:00 -
[9]
I'm wit dat.
Originally by: techzer0
I'm invincible until proven wrong
|
Kovid
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2008.06.01 21:11:00 -
[10]
I always heard it was a mistake in implementation for them not to work this way.
So yes, lets get this going.
|
Efa Morgan
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 16:30:00 -
[11]
of course
|
Sabrina Al'Kian
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 16:34:00 -
[12]
Absolutely. Anything to make the Black Ops more usable.
|
Eleana Tomelac
Through the Looking Glass
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 16:37:00 -
[13]
Good idea, covert is covert!
--
Pocket drone carriers (tm) enthousiast !
Assault Frigates MK II |
Allaria Kriss
Elipse Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.06.02 16:58:00 -
[14]
I support this product and/or service.
|
Tarun Thred
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 00:11:00 -
[15]
That they can't must have been an oversight, surely?
|
Alex Shurk
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 00:14:00 -
[16]
Support this, albeit conditionally. There should be some drawback to using a covert cyno in a cyno jammed system - for example it could show up on the overview like a normal cyno, or its fuel use could be increased, or its activation time increased. Unrestricted use in a restricted system would be backward.
|
Acidictadpole
ADVANCED Combat and Engineering
Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 01:16:00 -
[17]
Supported.
To the above poster, technically the cyno itself IS restricted since capitals can't move through it.
|
Irista Ari'star
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 01:44:00 -
[18]
|
Lasha Lancaster
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 01:45:00 -
[19]
It would make sense to me if this was the case.
|
John Tanashima
Ekchuah Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 06:01:00 -
[20]
I am John Tanashima and I support this product/message. |
Viragarus
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 09:41:00 -
[21]
sure
|
Toramii
Le Moulin Rouge
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 12:07:00 -
[22]
/Yay
|
AltBier
Blue.
Blue Federation
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 13:58:00 -
[23]
|
Tarminic
Black Flame Industries
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 16:22:00 -
[24]
Absolutely supported.
----------------
Play EVE: Downtime Madness v0.81 (Updated 4/8) |
Tarminic
Black Flame Industries
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 16:22:00 -
[25]
Whoops. 
----------------
Play EVE: Downtime Madness v0.81 (Updated 4/8) |
LaVista Vista
Conservative Shenanigans Party
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 16:36:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Tarminic
Whoops.
You can edit your post to show support. Just press edit and tick the checkbox! 
|
James Lyrus
Lyrus Associates
The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 16:53:00 -
[27]
I agree.
Cynojammers and a short jumprange make blackops very hard to use effectively.
--
Crane needs more grid
249km locking? |
Illrae Pyou
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 17:25:00 -
[28]
Edited by: Illrae Pyou on 04/06/2008 17:25:31
I shoop-da-whoop it.
|
Ral YoungBeard
AWE Corporation
Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 20:14:00 -
[29]
Yep.
|
Dinique
The Illuminati.
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.06.04 20:36:00 -
[30]
Definitely agree with this. I can't think of a single good reason why this would be a bad thing.
_____
The species has amused itself to death
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |