| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Rinaldo Titano
Caldari
Caldari Elite Force
   |
Posted - 2008.07.09 08:50:00 -
[91]
/Signed
|
dolmant
|
Posted - 2008.07.10 13:32:00 -
[92]
/signed
/salute to MalVortex the bug and trollhunter
Fantastic. Im about to go to bed - ill check the thread in the morning - but how about HAM precisions: how do they shape up? do they look like current HML precisions or are they a different style? Sorry for the noobish q ;)
|
Felix Dzerzhinsky
Wreckless Abandon
Un-Natural Selection
|
Posted - 2008.07.10 23:07:00 -
[93]
I think this needs a look at - missles in general are in need of a little more 'oomph'
----
GO BLUE!! |
Ulstan
Caldari
State Protectorate
|
Posted - 2008.07.16 16:52:00 -
[94]
 Originally by: Jade Constantine
Originally by: Ulstan
Sadly I don't think there are any caldari PvP'ers on the CSM. If the Nighthawk issue is anything to go by, the CSM will just say "lolcaldari - go pve" and vote it down.
You are very wrong Ulstan. I love my caldari ships for pvp and if I was allowed to post killboard links on the forums I'd be happy to prove it.
I voted for the Nighthawk Issue and I'm voting for this Issue too.
Support.
Good point. You and Hardin are doing good work on this issue which I very much appreciate, so it's unfair for me to say there are no people who understand about pvp'ing in caldari ships.
Amend my post to "sadly I don't think there's a majority of caldari PvP'ers..."
My faith was severely rattled by the off hand manner in which the exhaustively well researched and presented nighthawk issue was dismissed.
"It's ok in pve"
"It's ok for ships to suck"
"Not worthy of our time, too small an issue"
|
Solara Astaris
Agronards Haulage Company
|
Posted - 2008.07.17 03:37:00 -
[95]
Edited by: Solara Astaris on 17/07/2008 03:46:17
/signed
Good post. I hope the CSM gives this serious consideration... |
hired goon
Infinite Improbability Inc
Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2008.07.17 12:01:00 -
[96]
-omg-
|
Mika Meroko
Crayon Posting Inc
|
Posted - 2008.07.19 09:29:00 -
[97]
oui
Originally by: CCP Atropos
I pod people because there's money to be made in selling tears.
|
Mamba Lev
The Legion of Spoon
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.19 10:47:00 -
[98]
|
WishBlade
League of Disgruntled Fast Food Employees
|
Posted - 2008.07.19 13:57:00 -
[99]
/signed
Signature |
Thorradin
State Protectorate
|
Posted - 2008.07.19 16:21:00 -
[100]
The stats on these have to have been an oversight that is simply in dire need of being properly fixed.
|
Calla Vee
|
Posted - 2008.07.20 19:46:00 -
[101]
|
reklawer
|
Posted - 2008.07.24 13:54:00 -
[102]
Edited by: reklawer on 24/07/2008 13:55:19
I completely agree
CCP please fix our (broken) Precision Heavy Missiles
|
Mister Xerox
|
Posted - 2008.07.24 14:23:00 -
[103]
FIX ALL T2 AMMO, not just missiles.
|
darkmancer
|
Posted - 2008.07.24 18:07:00 -
[104]
Please make this useless ammo work :)
---------------------------------
There's a simple solution to every problem. It is always invariably wrong |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2008.07.24 18:11:00 -
[105]
Originally by: Gypsio III
Precision Heavies as currently fired by a Drake have a top speed of 4875 m/s/
With the proposed boost, it will be 5625 m/s/
Outrunning either in an inty is trivial.
this is way I like this idea, your not asking for "incease it by 2000% velocity!" but are in fact just looking for something more balanced without baing game breaking.
|
Pwett
QUANT Corp.
QUANT Hegemony
|
Posted - 2008.07.24 19:29:00 -
[106]
signed, signed, a thousand times signed.
_______________
Pwett
CEO, Founder, & Executor
<Q> QUANT Hegemony
|
Malcanis
We are Legend
|
Posted - 2008.07.24 20:32:00 -
[107]
I support the OP.
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |
Onar Maldarian
3B Legio IX
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 01:07:00 -
[108]
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |