EVE Search - THE SINGLE BEST IDEA TO MAKE FW MORE ACCESSIBLE.

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

THE SINGLE BEST IDEA TO MAKE FW MORE ACCESSIBLE.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Agor Dirdonen	Posted - 2008.06.17 20:11:00 - [31] Don't like this idea at all. It's a 'want the benefits but not the risk' type of gameplay, which is not what Eve is about. If you don't want to risk your ship, don't enlist, it's that simple. CCP has created a great chance to try out PVP under the protection of a lot of teammates but if that's still not good enough to get a certain group of people to pvp, they should stick to pve. Nothing wrong with that though...
Ulstan State Protectorate	Posted - 2008.06.17 20:12:00 - [32] Fw is already extremely accessible. If you do not have expensive implants in your head, then getting podded doesn't matter. If you do have expensive implants in your head, then you are rich enough to pay someone for a jump clone service and you can go FW in an implantless clone.
Jenny Spitfire LoneStar Industries Veritas Immortalis	Posted - 2008.06.17 20:18:00 - [33] I think OP is assking fur pod insurances or sumething liek that. --------- Technica impendi Caldari generis. Pax Caldaria! Go vote! Put voice for silent majority. LOVE PVP, HATE grief
Morfane The IMorral MAjority Imorral Dragons	Posted - 2008.06.17 20:22:00 - [34] I also want to have cake and eat it too.
James Lyrus Lyrus Associates The Star Fraction	Posted - 2008.06.17 20:54:00 - [35] I'm afraid this isn't good. The point of factional warfare, is that factions, at war, are trying to kill each other. There are things to do whilst you're doing so. Things to make it 'interesting', like complexes and missions. But the point of the whole system is to make things more immersive, and add the true challenge that is other players in a 'comfortable' fashion. A factional war, where you're not acutally at war with a faction, sounds a bit like sex on your own. -- Crane needs more grid 249km locking?
Disteeler Segunda Fundacion T e r c i o s	Posted - 2008.06.17 20:56:00 - [36] OP is asking for another game :l Sig by Black Necris
Faife Kinda'Shujaa	Posted - 2008.06.17 21:27:00 - [37] I really wish CCP would consider a "weekend warrior" option for pilots wanting to do FW but still are afraid of the pod risks. I know a lot of people that are still not going to try this out because of this. jump clones?
Aknot Wat Carbide Industries	Posted - 2008.06.18 01:54:00 - [38] Wow, this is generally the largest collection of "you couldn't be more wrong" replies that I have ever seen! This new FW feature isn't for all you 0.0 gank-squad-hardcore-kill-and-take-all-you-sissy-if-you-can't-stand-the-risk-then-get-out-players. FW is to show carebears what the REST of the players in EVE are doing in 0.0 and even in lowsec. It's to give them a taste of the OTHER game we're all playing. But the reason for my feature idea was to increase this gaming audience. You need to give these people ANOTHER GAME, yes, I admit to that. And FW is it. Make it as SAFE as possible so they see what the potential is. For all you moaners, if you want FW(extreme) you have it already in your dealings in 0.0 battles! So GET OVER IT! That is not what FW should be about. I mean are all you real 0.0 players really ****ing about the lack of fun and combat in 0.0??? Why the hell would any 0.0 combat/gank player want to even sign up for FW? It's got nUUb candy written all over it, Christ. What the hell people? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please let us chose the old ship voice as an option.
Epegi Givo Demon Theory	Posted - 2008.06.18 02:01:00 - [39] One thing that really **ed me off in another game of mine (SWG) is when I was imperial, and a rebel ran up and shot a stormtrooper in front of me, and I couldn't raise a finger to help him because that person was set to "shoot NPCs but not players". I really don't want to see that happen in EVE. Originally by:** DroneCommander Originally by: Isiskhan My mother's name is Rolricka. Yes, I'm being 100% serious. Dude! Your mum got RolRick'd!
Hannobaal Federal Defence Union	Posted - 2008.06.18 02:07:00 - [40] Edited by: Hannobaal on 18/06/2008 02:11:32 Originally by: Aknot Wat Wow, this is generally the largest collection of "you couldn't be more wrong" replies that I have ever seen! This new FW feature isn't for all you 0.0 gank-squad-hardcore-kill-and-take-all-you-sissy-if-you-can't-stand-the-risk-then-get-out-players. FW is to show carebears what the REST of the players in EVE are doing in 0.0 and even in lowsec. It's to give them a taste of the OTHER game we're all playing. But the reason for my feature idea was to increase this gaming audience. You need to give these people ANOTHER GAME, yes, I admit to that. And FW is it. Make it as SAFE as possible so they see what the potential is. For all you moaners, if you want FW(extreme) you have it already in your dealings in 0.0 battles! So GET OVER IT! That is not what FW should be about. I mean are all you real 0.0 players really ****ing about the lack of fun and combat in 0.0??? Why the hell would any 0.0 combat/gank player want to even sign up for FW? It's got nUUb candy written all over it, Christ. What the hell people? You haven't even understood what faction warfare is actually like. Your "idea" is talking strictly about high sec (with Concord intervention), but faction warfare happens only in low sec. You really, truly couldn't be more wrong. You're talking about something that you very obviously have no clue about. As a Gallente militia, the best I could hope for if I go into Caldari high sec is to be able to quickly zip through it in a fast ship without blowing up. I definitely would not be able to engage anyone in there and survive. So, there is absolutely no need for your "idea".
Apoctasy The Python Cartel	Posted - 2008.06.18 03:29:00 - [41] Idea fails epicly Go away troll
Agor Dirdonen	Posted - 2008.06.18 10:14:00 - [42] Originally by: Aknot Wat Make it as SAFE as possible so they see what the potential is. Really, you don't get it..... it's the RISK that makes it what it is. It's the RISK that shows the potential it can have. If you make it SAFE, it's just highsec missioning. You already have that.
BigFleb	Posted - 2008.06.18 11:30:00 - [43] Use a jump clone
Acedias Atropos Asylum	Posted - 2008.06.18 11:37:00 - [44] Only thing I'd request is a 'Defect' button;) No loss of standings, just a direct inversion or swap to allow more free movement between the factions. Maybe some cost to it or summat.

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.