| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Psyrex
   |
Posted - 2004.05.19 17:50:00 -
[1]
I've just heard in game that Raven is to lose 100 cpu and 1000 grid power.
Is this true?
Are there to be any changes to the Raven Battleship?
i know of the missile changes and how that will effect the Raven.
Thanks for your help.
---------------------------------------------
The world is a battle field, pass me my gun!
The Black Ops Recruiting.
combat Your 425mm Railgun I perfectly strikes XXXXXXXX, wrecking for 518.0 damage. |
Bared Bel'Medar
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 17:55:00 -
[2]
no, the raven will GET 100 more CPU (YAY!) and loose 500 pg (Boo!)
I am Jack's broken moral compass. I am Jack's STILL trapped in eve limbo. maybe not for much longer... |
Psyrex
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 17:57:00 -
[3]
phew thats ok then.
that would of been such a problem
---------------------------------------------
The world is a battle field, pass me my gun!
The Black Ops Recruiting.
combat Your 425mm Railgun I perfectly strikes XXXXXXXX, wrecking for 518.0 damage. |
JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:00:00 -
[4]
It actually is a problem, because you must use Siege launchers with 1750 powergrid reqs then if you want to use Cruise Missiles or Torps. You'll be forced to pump your lowslots full of RCUs.
Still, there's hope, as these changes are still in balancing.
|
Baun
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:03:00 -
[5]
The hope lies in metamodded Siege Launchers, Cruise Launchers and X-L Boosters that lower PG requirements instead of CPU requirements. Perhaps an even greater hope lies in a PG reducing skill similiar to Weapon Upgrades.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Shimatu
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:07:00 -
[6]
which means that all those raven pilots who spent weeks sqeazing every last drop of CPU from theyre skills and modules have wasted theyre time... glad i'm not a raven pilot 
3-I's T2 sales can be found HERE
|
JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:10:00 -
[7]
Damn ****!! Someone bite my balls quickly for this can't be real!
|
Dust Puppy
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:15:00 -
[8]
I think there are mini siege launcher coming but I have forgotten which missile they can shoot probably at least cruise missiles.
__________
Capacitor research |
Baun
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:17:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Baun on 19/05/2004 18:19:20
 Originally by: Shimatu
which means that all those raven pilots who spent weeks sqeazing every last drop of CPU from theyre skills and modules have wasted theyre time... glad i'm not a raven pilot
YEP, but at least, if my proposed metamod changes are adopted then the best CPU metamods will become the best PG metamods :o (i.e clarity ward will use lowest PG and so will Malkuths)
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Baun
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:17:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Dust Puppy
I think there are mini siege launcher coming but I have forgotten which missile they can shoot probably at least cruise missiles.
They can only shoot Cruise Missles, nothing else (no torpedos). They also have a base rof of 30 seconds making them useless as a primary weapon system.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Dust Puppy
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:21:00 -
[11]
It was my understanding that ships werenŠt supposed to being able to equip all the largest guns without making some very big sacrifices. I donŠt know if other ships can do it easily as I donŠt know much about battleships (maybe I should get the hell out of this thread then ).
__________
Capacitor research |
JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:23:00 -
[12]
The Raven will have as much firepower as a Scorp. Are you serious?
|
Baun
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:26:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Baun on 19/05/2004 18:28:34
Originally by: Dust Puppy
It was my understanding that ships werenŠt supposed to being able to equip all the largest guns without making some very big sacrifices. I donŠt know if other ships can do it easily as I donŠt know much about battleships (maybe I should get the hell out of this thread then ).
Yes, and I am not adverse to this idea. As it currently stands, however, the Raven pilots don't have any real options. They HAVE to fit 6 Siege Launchers to have a viable offense and this leaves them without enough PG to fit an MWD or a Cap Injector or 2 of even the worst types of battleship turrets.
Turret ships can at least probably fit the cruiser launchers as a secondary weapon system after fitting their best turrets, but Raven pilots cannot even fit 2nd echelon BS turrets.
As it stands now a Raven pilot's best option is to try to fit 2 250mm Prototype Railguns ;/. In a certain sense this mirrors the setup of a Tempest or a typhoon which relied on Cruiser class missle launchers. Those launchers, however, were doing BS calibur damage while the 250mm prototype rail guns are doing crappy damage. Therefore the Raven pilot, who cannot even fit utility modules like shield transfers or energy neutrailizers, is really hamstrung.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Zu Lu
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:34:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Baun
Edited by: Baun on 19/05/2004 18:19:20
Originally by: Shimatu
which means that all those raven pilots who spent weeks sqeazing every last drop of CPU from theyre skills and modules have wasted theyre time... glad i'm not a raven pilot
YEP, but at least, if my proposed metamod changes are adopted then the best CPU metamods will become the best PG metamods :o (i.e clarity ward will use lowest PG and so will Malkuths)
While i agree that meta siege launchers that reduce grid is an excellent idea, if the meta shield boosters reduced grid rather than cpu the tempest would be really hard done by with this as it will be strapped for cpu after the changes anyway...
|
Serret
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:35:00 -
[15]
Perhaps this is completely unfounded, but sometimes it really seems that a lot of the game balancing work is based on the feedback of people who get on Chaos, sit at some arbitrary range, and spam each other until one person dies.
There seems to be very little consideration for fleet roles, likely scenarios for actual PvP combat on TQ server, etc.
'OMG I MUST SIT AT OPTIMAL AND MATCH DOT WHILE HAVING PROPER TANKING EPS HA MY SR IS ABLE TO CANCEL YOUR DB OOOOOH ROF HA MY GRID TRUMPS YOUR CPU WAH WAH LOOK YOU HAVE UNFAIR FS VS FO OR IS OK THO BUT YOU HAVE EXTRA LS TO CANCEL MY MS ADVANTAGE OF SR AND THIS GAME IS UNFAIR WAH WAH LOOK SOMEONE HAS A DIFFERENT SETUP THAN ME AND HE WON WE MUST REWRITE THE GAME AAAAAH!!!'
To me, not only is it destroying the variety in the game, but in that way it is also destroying the possibility for any sort of RP or tactical cleverness or anything else that has always had the potential to elevate Eve above simple die-rolling wish fulfillment.
|
Baun
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:36:00 -
[16]
I am aware of that. The minmatar represent a balancing problem in this respect.
I think, however, that if the Tempest, Dominix and both Caldari BSs were given larger CPU increases and the X-L boosters were increased in CPU then this could be balanced out.
The real issue is that the tempest can theoretically employ both types of tanking. I really have no idea how to balance for that scenario without making the tempest an incredible ship.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Baun
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:38:00 -
[17]
Quote:
To me, not only is it destroying the variety in the game, but in that way it is also destroying the possibility for any sort of RP or tactical cleverness or anything else that has always had the potential to elevate Eve above simple die-rolling wish fulfillment.
The ships will still be different. The difference, however, is largely going to be centered around range, speed and support capabilities. As it stands now this is already the case but certain ships just are not as useful as others in their given area of expertise. For this reason balancing is required so that everyone can fulfill the role they are meant to with equal effectiveness.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Bared Bel'Medar
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:51:00 -
[18]
Edited by: Bared Bel'Medar on 19/05/2004 18:53:03
I dont see the problem... really I dont. A good Raven set up will REQUIRE a pair of anti frig guns once shiva comes... the dual 180mm autocannon works wonders against cruisers and frigs, so I highly recommend them.
*EDIT* And I do use caldari ships and I do use Weapon Upgrades alot, in fact, its the skill I consider the most important.
I am Jack's broken moral compass. I am Jack's STILL trapped in eve limbo. maybe not for much longer... |
JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 18:59:00 -
[19]
Wrong. You must've been way too long on Chaos. I'll have a dedicated frigatekiller in my squadron.
|
Baun
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 19:02:00 -
[20]
Thats why we have all learned to fly interceptors, right? ;p
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Bared Bel'Medar
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 19:06:00 -
[21]
Originally by: JoCool
Wrong. You must've been way too long on Chaos. I'll have a dedicated frigatekiller in my squadron.
Can you say DUH? See, I'm tring to be ready for shiva, with the upcomming changes, and my moderate skills, the Dual 180mm has the appropriate range and damage required to combat frigs. Its got good refire and good tracking, making it so that with drones and a pair of guns I can avoid the frigate gankings while in transit.
I am Jack's broken moral compass. I am Jack's STILL trapped in eve limbo. maybe not for much longer... |
Zu Lu
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 19:22:00 -
[22]
Edited by: Zu Lu on 19/05/2004 19:28:20
Yes the tempest will still be able to use armor defence in a close range set up only, using 6 duel 425mm ac and 2 siege, cpu will not be tight in that set up but grid will but it's easily doable.
I do think that it appears too harsh on the raven in that close range set ups involving mwd and heavy cap booster are gonna be (without doing the calcaulations) very hard or impossible wheraes all the other ships will still be able to easily fit for either long or short range combat. The dominix may suffer the same fate as it stands...
|
Buddrow
|
Posted - 2004.05.19 23:10:00 -
[23]
*thanks someone for having the mindset to train 4+ million eng sp's* the raven is still going to wup ass.
----------------------------------
"Give me but one firm spot on which to stand, and I will move earth."
Archimedes c.287 - 212 BC
|
Redwolf
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 03:46:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Serret
Perhaps this is completely unfounded, but sometimes it really seems that a lot of the game balancing work is based on the feedback of people who get on Chaos, sit at some arbitrary range, and spam each other until one person dies.
There seems to be very little consideration for fleet roles, likely scenarios for actual PvP combat on TQ server, etc.
'OMG I MUST SIT AT OPTIMAL AND MATCH DOT WHILE HAVING PROPER TANKING EPS HA MY SR IS ABLE TO CANCEL YOUR DB OOOOOH ROF HA MY GRID TRUMPS YOUR CPU WAH WAH LOOK YOU HAVE UNFAIR FS VS FO OR IS OK THO BUT YOU HAVE EXTRA LS TO CANCEL MY MS ADVANTAGE OF SR AND THIS GAME IS UNFAIR WAH WAH LOOK SOMEONE HAS A DIFFERENT SETUP THAN ME AND HE WON WE MUST REWRITE THE GAME AAAAAH!!!'
To me, not only is it destroying the variety in the game, but in that way it is also destroying the possibility for any sort of RP or tactical cleverness or anything else that has always had the potential to elevate Eve above simple die-rolling wish fulfillment.
You hang around too many Calderi ship pilots.
|
Altai Saker
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 05:10:00 -
[25]
Edited by: Altai Saker on 20/05/2004 05:11:59
I don't see the problem with this, Raven pilots have just had it so good for so long.That it now seems like this is a huge nerf, it's not it's just balancing.
|
Baun
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 05:22:00 -
[26]
Edited by: Baun on 20/05/2004 05:26:49
Quote:
I don't see the problem with this, Raven pilots have just had it so good for so long.That it now seems like this is a huge nerf, it's not it's just balancing.
In what universe are you living?
The Raven's primary weapon has been useless at range since release. Raven's aren't the best shield tanks out there and don't pack that much fire power. All Raven's have at the moment is a nice balance of offense and defense for SHORT RANGE only. If you seriously think they are overpowered as it stands now, then you are living in a land of self-delusion.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Amy Foxx
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 05:25:00 -
[27]
the part that gets me though, is that the Raven needed the CPU boost badly, Seige launchers and 425 rails are the most CPU intensive weapons in the game 80/70... but with the PG nerf to the raven and the PG need boost to Seige launchers, a Raven will need 16k PG for 6 seige launchers and 2 425mm rails... the problem is the most a Raven can get is 11875 with engering V, Leaving me 4,125 grid short for weapons alone, not counting sheild tanking gear, or heaven forbid armour tanking.
|
Baun
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 05:28:00 -
[28]
Yes.
We got our CPU issue taken away from us and got handed an even more cumbersome powergrid issue. We have no skills and no improved mods at our disposal to deal with this issue. This means that whereas before we had 3 options, we now only have 1.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Shadow Knight
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 10:05:00 -
[29]
hmmm So i spend weeks/months skilling electronics V, weapon upgrades V and the rest of the CPU saving ones so i can fit a fairly good raven. Then they come out with this change - Its a complete reversal of the constraints on a raven!?! AND there is no skill to reduce PG requirements. So, in short, i hate it :P
-as for the guy who says you need frigate sized guns...I've not tried this on chaos, but on TQ heavy nosferatu/neutralisers work just fine against frigates
|
Matanga
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 10:49:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Shadow Knight
hmmm So i spend weeks/months skilling electronics V, weapon upgrades V and the rest of the CPU saving ones so i can fit a fairly good raven. Then they come out with this change - Its a complete reversal of the constraints on a raven!?! AND there is no skill to reduce PG requirements. So, in short, i hate it :P
Welcome to my World! 
Specialization is not the way to go on EVE 
They nerfed the Caldari ships so much that now their stats don't even match the ship description (Scorpion is the best example).
"ÆIn accordance with the principles of double-think it does not matter if the war is not real. For when it is, victory is not possible. The war is not meant to be won, but it is meant to be continuous.Æö
George Orwell ô1984ö |
KIAEddZ
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 13:18:00 -
[31]
ALL Tier 2 battle ships (Especcially with the coming "balancing") can fit 8 Battleship Weapons. Apoc Tempest and Mega can all fit 6 Primary Turrets and 2 Seige, with very little sacrafice, I can squeeze on to my Raven 6 Seige and 2 425s just at the moment, with no cpu spare for mwd etc. After the balancing, Apoc Mega and Temp will be able to fit 6 (8 or 7 if in apoc/mega respectively) of the Race Choice weps, whilst the Raven is going to struggle to fit 6 Seige and 2 Large BS weps (425 Tach or 1400)
I would rather CCP left it as it is, and just fixed missiles. After this patch, if the changes stay as they are, Raven pilots, will be trounced in any pvp (except maybe very large Fleet Battles) encounter they find themselves in.
As for those saying "the Raven pilots have had it easy for so long, look at them whine now", you do not know what your talking about, go back to noob land and stfu.
Ilove my raven, but I will jump ship to an Apoc if this patch stays as it is. I hope CCP liosten, and address this issue, the pg nerf on Siege is ridiculous.
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=176347
www.kia-corp.co.uk/killboard
CEO of KIA Corp - Been doing it for the Laydeez since 1993, now we i |
Synapse
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 13:30:00 -
[32]
Raven should be able to fit 6 siege + 2 medium/small guns + modules easily IMHO. Then if you want to fit 2 large guns and stil tank shields ect. fit a few rcu's.
- + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + - + -
In a future where freedom is outlawed,
outlaws will become heros |
Amy Foxx
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 14:32:00 -
[33]
Did I mind the low CPU on my Raven (Nevermore)? no not really I got around it.
Do I like what is happing to Nevermore's CPU after this change? hell yes! it'll free up three low slots for me.
Did I struggle to fit 6 seige launchers, 2 425mm rails, large sheild boost, sheild amp, and three sheild harderns on her, with her current 600 base CPU and 10k base PG? YES and I made it all work.
Am I going to take Nevermore out of the cage after this Raven 'adjustments' nope, she is going to sit in her cage, well I get my skills in place for a Megathorn or Apoc.
|
Admiral IceBlock
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 15:07:00 -
[34]
Edited by: Admiral IceBlock on 20/05/2004 15:08:33
Quote:
Apoc Tempest and Mega can all fit 6 Primary Turrets and 2 Seige, with very little sacrafice
lvl5 Engineering and Electronics on Apoc
24375 PG and 625 CPU
6 x Tachyons = 22500 PG and 360 CPU
2 x Siege Launchers = 3500 PG and 160 CPU
Sum = 26000 PG and 520
of course we want some defence to...
1 x XL Booster = 500 PG and 100 CPU
2 x Hardners = 10 PG and 100 CPU
7 x Cap Relays = 28 CPU
Total Sum = 26510 PG and 748 CPU
You would at least need 1 reactor control or 2 power diags + 3 co-processors... not much sacrifice huh?
that is of course IF MY calculations are correct, which i doubt! 
"We brake for nobody"
|
JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 15:23:00 -
[35]
You do not need any powergrid enhancing modules - and you'll still be able to fit 2 Tachs, 4 Megas plus 2 siege launchers, at least. By the way, Megabeams are the Apoc's primary weapon, not Tachyons.
|
Man'corr
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 15:30:00 -
[36]
though it might be worth mentioning, that an apoc gets NO Damage bonus as opposed to the raven........................
only on a side note though.......
All of above post was formulated wth 100% honesty and 100% sarcasm. Now i only need to get drunk
The 3rd turret is the Malediction is missing. Plz make as much noise as possible so that CCP gets us a remedy for that, possibly before X-Mas this year. |
KIAEddZ
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 15:45:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Amy Foxx
Did I mind the low CPU on my Raven (Nevermore)? no not really I got around it.
Do I like what is happing to Nevermore's CPU after this change? hell yes! it'll free up three low slots for me.
Did I struggle to fit 6 seige launchers, 2 425mm rails, large sheild boost, sheild amp, and three sheild harderns on her, with her current 600 base CPU and 10k base PG? YES and I made it all work.
Am I going to take Nevermore out of the cage after this Raven 'adjustments' nope, she is going to sit in her cage, well I get my skills in place for a Megathorn or Apoc.
Hit nail on head.
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=176347
www.kia-corp.co.uk/killboard
CEO of KIA Corp - Been doing it for the Laydeez since 1993, now we i |
Shevaun Ashnirelim
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 16:01:00 -
[38]
It's pretty obvious which race is the favorite. Caldari get nerf after nerf while the Gallente fly around with 7 turrets, an innate damage mod, 10 heavy drones and great EVERYTHING.
|
Admiral IceBlock
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 16:50:00 -
[39]
the Megathron will not be uber!
18750 PG and 687 CPU
6 x 425mm Rails = 16500 PG and 450 CPU
2 x Siege = 3500 PG and 160 CPU
Sum = 20000 PG and 610 CPU
and as always we want some good defence...
1 x XL Booster = 500 PG and 100 CPU
2 x Hardners = 10 PG and 100 CPU
1 x Warp Distruptor = 10 PG and 40 CPU
7 x Cap Relays = 28 CPU
Total Sum = 20520 PG and 878 CPU
you would need a reactor control unit and some co-processors...
but then again, my calculations are probably wrong!
"We brake for nobody"
|
Baun
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 17:01:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Admiral IceBlock
Edited by: Admiral IceBlock on 20/05/2004 15:08:33
Quote:
Apoc Tempest and Mega can all fit 6 Primary Turrets and 2 Seige, with very little sacrafice
lvl5 Engineering and Electronics on Apoc
24375 PG and 625 CPU
6 x Tachyons = 22500 PG and 360 CPU
2 x Siege Launchers = 3500 PG and 160 CPU
Sum = 26000 PG and 520
of course we want some defence to...
1 x XL Booster = 500 PG and 100 CPU
2 x Hardners = 10 PG and 100 CPU
7 x Cap Relays = 28 CPU
Total Sum = 26510 PG and 748 CPU
You would at least need 1 reactor control or 2 power diags + 3 co-processors... not much sacrifice huh?
that is of course IF MY calculations are correct, which i doubt!
Try using 425s and all of the fitting problems suddenly go away.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Baun
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 17:03:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Admiral IceBlock
the Megathron will not be uber!
18750 PG and 687 CPU
6 x 425mm Rails = 16500 PG and 450 CPU
2 x Siege = 3500 PG and 160 CPU
Sum = 20000 PG and 610 CPU
and as always we want some good defence...
1 x XL Booster = 500 PG and 100 CPU
2 x Hardners = 10 PG and 100 CPU
1 x Warp Distruptor = 10 PG and 40 CPU
7 x Cap Relays = 28 CPU
Total Sum = 20520 PG and 878 CPU
you would need a reactor control unit and some co-processors...
but then again, my calculations are probably wrong!
Change the mid slots to an MWD, Scram, Web, Cap Injector
High slots to Ion Blasters.
Low slots to armor tanking config.
You will do more damage and have a better defense than the setup you posted. The Megathron indeed will be unable to Shield Tank due to the CPU usage of hybrids, but Megathrons are already incredibly crappy shield tanks in PVP.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Admiral IceBlock
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 17:16:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Baun
Originally by: Admiral IceBlock
Edited by: Admiral IceBlock on 20/05/2004 15:08:33
Quote:
Apoc Tempest and Mega can all fit 6 Primary Turrets and 2 Seige, with very little sacrafice
lvl5 Engineering and Electronics on Apoc
24375 PG and 625 CPU
6 x Tachyons = 22500 PG and 360 CPU
2 x Siege Launchers = 3500 PG and 160 CPU
Sum = 26000 PG and 520
of course we want some defence to...
1 x XL Booster = 500 PG and 100 CPU
2 x Hardners = 10 PG and 100 CPU
7 x Cap Relays = 28 CPU
Total Sum = 26510 PG and 748 CPU
You would at least need 1 reactor control or 2 power diags + 3 co-processors... not much sacrifice huh?
that is of course IF MY calculations are correct, which i doubt!
Try using 425s and all of the fitting problems suddenly go away.
not really, the 425mm's need more CPU... go figure
"We brake for nobody"
|
Bared Bel'Medar
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 19:09:00 -
[43]
ok, I dont see the problem, sorry, but I dont. I am a PROUD caldari with level 5 Electronics, Engineering and Weapon Upgrades... I also fly cruisers and frigates, where weapon upgrades if even more prevalent. with a maximised shield tank (i.e. no non shield booster or amp stuff, like sensor jammers or boosters or a mwd)... Some people might call that newbish, I call that staying power. In shiva I think its going to be necessary to fit anti frig/cruiser guns, and the setup I have devised reflects that belief. also, look at the dual 250, really a great gun imho.
I am Jack's broken moral compass. I am Jack's STILL trapped in eve limbo. maybe not for much longer... |
Baun
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 22:15:00 -
[44]
Edited by: Baun on 20/05/2004 22:17:48
Quote:
Quote:
Originally by: Baun
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally by: Admiral IceBlock
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edited by: Admiral IceBlock on 20/05/2004 15:08:33
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apoc Tempest and Mega can all fit 6 Primary Turrets and 2 Seige, with very little sacrafice
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lvl5 Engineering and Electronics on Apoc
24375 PG and 625 CPU
6 x Tachyons = 22500 PG and 360 CPU
2 x Siege Launchers = 3500 PG and 160 CPU
Sum = 26000 PG and 520
of course we want some defence to...
1 x XL Booster = 500 PG and 100 CPU
2 x Hardners = 10 PG and 100 CPU
7 x Cap Relays = 28 CPU
Total Sum = 26510 PG and 748 CPU
You would at least need 1 reactor control or 2 power diags + 3 co-processors... not much sacrifice huh?
that is of course IF MY calculations are correct, which i doubt!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try using 425s and all of the fitting problems suddenly go away.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
not really, the 425mm's need more CPU... go figure
Wrong. Apparently you missed the fact that an Apoc can easily fit 8 425s a shield tanks setup and 7 CPRs and the only namaed module has to be an X-L clairty ward.
The Enemy's Gate is Down
|
Plasmatique
|
Posted - 2004.05.20 23:13:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Shimatu
which means that all those raven pilots who spent weeks sqeazing every last drop of CPU from theyre skills and modules have wasted theyre time... glad i'm not a raven pilot
Oh...you mean like training weapons upgrades to level 5? Yep, guilty. Oh well, at least its not ship specific.
On chaos its very hard to fit 6 siege and any large guns atm to raven
.....................................
Proud Owner of a Navy Issue Raven
|
Waagaa Ktlehr
|
Posted - 2004.05.21 11:43:00 -
[46]
2x Heavy NOS = dead frigate :)
Originally by: Bared Bel'Medar
Edited by: Bared Bel'Medar on 19/05/2004 18:53:03
I dont see the problem... really I dont. A good Raven set up will REQUIRE a pair of anti frig guns once shiva comes... the dual 180mm autocannon works wonders against cruisers and frigs, so I highly recommend them.
*EDIT* And I do use caldari ships and I do use Weapon Upgrades alot, in fact, its the skill I consider the most important.
------------------------------------------
I am a love machine, feeding my fantasy, give me a kiss or three, have fun!
|
Admiral IceBlock
|
Posted - 2004.05.21 12:56:00 -
[47]
Edited by: Admiral IceBlock on 21/05/2004 12:57:10
Quote:
Wrong. Apparently you missed the fact that an Apoc can easily fit 8 425s a shield tanks setup and 7 CPRs and the only namaed module has to be an X-L clairty ward
8 x 425mm = 22000 PG and 600 CPU
1 x XL Booster = 500 PG and 100 CPU
2 x Hardners = 10 PG and 80 CPU
1 x Shield Amp = 2 PG and 50 CPU
7 x Cap Relays = 28 CPU
Total Sum = 22512 PG and 858 CPU
"We brake for nobody"
|
JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.05.21 13:08:00 -
[48]
Iceblock, you didn't count in WUs.
|
KIAEddZ
|
Posted - 2004.05.21 13:56:00 -
[49]
Ditto what Jo said, Weapon Upgrades m8y.
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=176347
www.kia-corp.co.uk/killboard
CEO of KIA Corp - Been doing it for the Laydeez since 1993, now we i |
Hellek
|
Posted - 2004.05.21 13:59:00 -
[50]
Edited by: Hellek on 21/05/2004 14:01:42
with weapon upgrades 5 it still exceeds the 625 it has by a big amount, the apoc is so short on CPU that even lasers + armor reps can be hard to fit. (as we all know, its the BS with the smallest CPU).
(and no, I don't request a CPU boost but I think the CPU use of armor hardeners should get decreased by 10-20 or at least named hardeners should be introduced)
|
JoCool
|
Posted - 2004.05.21 16:20:00 -
[51]
To make rails viable for Apocs? I thought we wanted them to use Lasers instead, Hellek.
Now who let the troll out of his cage again ?
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |