[quote=Andski]
There is far more evidence the Mittani is pro-RMT than there is for Issler.

So you're confirming your support for a pro-RMT candidate?

noneoftheabove is basically the only csm candidate who actually failed to get 100 likes

even darius III managed it

he's still a little bitter

Please elaborate.

Issler has a great thread right on the front page of this forum. That she is a woman shouldn't really be a factor in her getting voted into a CSM position tbh. People should vote on her positions and ability to change the game for the better.

So no evidence then. In other words, you did a red herring in order to detract from the point.

As I've pointed out several times, social gameplay is the mother of emergent gameplay. It needs a minimal investment in infrastructure and can keep players amused like forever. Just hand out some tools and allow people use them. Organized gameplay is cool to have, NPC interaction is cool, but from a cost/profit POV there is nothing as effective as just let people interact through avatars. Throw in some "hologram" technology so they're not forced to be aboard the same station and ther you go. Now add some advantages to physically being there (I already suggested stuff like kissing, caressing, punching, slapping... or dancing, if CCP were up to a tough ball; i've been iterating on the dance concept and I am figuring ways so two players can syncronize their moves within EVE's 1 second server frames... I don't mean "hit dance emote, do silly moves", rather "press the right keys at the right time so the server is fed the right "combos" from both sides at the right time and plays the right animation... in my limited knowledge, nobody ever tried that online...)

Err, to the point, there are lots of things that can be done as tools for friendly social interaction. If someone wants avatar PvP, they may have it, as long as it is not shoved down the throat of every player. Stations are griefing free zones and should stay like that. The worst that can happen in a station is being scammed and that must stay like that.

I would very much like if the short term focus for Incarna was on a three-fold approach:

- Avatar expression (emote system)
- Avatar customization (clothes, tattoos, hair styles, body elements etc)
- Avatar socializing (facilitating more avatars being in the same location as one another)

Customization, for the most part is stand-alone. Expression is tied to socializing though, so the issue with the graphical demands of having multiple avatars in the same location needs to be addressed. If we can get a system whereby the facility to invite a set amount of avatars to the same location is possible, then much has been achieved for future iteration.

I would talk about what type of environments and activities should follow these three themes, but that should be considered more long term, especially with just one Dev Team assigned right now.

I am unsure if the current team has the technical expertise to address the issues of having multiple avatars occupy the same CQs though, but perhaps the expansion of expression through emotes (likely through the chat system) could follow alongside the continued work on avatar customization.

Pot...kettle..black.

I personally have no evidence and don't make the accusation that the Mittani does support RMT.

I make the observation that more people have posted evidence and the accusations about Andski's chosen candidate being a supporter RMT than of Issler, who Andski rather unfoundedly accuses.

In fact I'd say Andski's accusation is the red herring.

Unlike apparently you and your leader. Who cares about going to iceland. We know The Mittani does that's why he wants chairman to guarantee his ride on a plane.

Issler cares about the future of EVE and its not 100% certain Mittens is chairman. I'm not going to say anything as silly as Issler is the new chaiman neither will I say The Mittani is either.

Frankly after reading all the hard work Issler has done on Wis and the long term future of EVE, bugger it if you need to call Issler a space barbie, Shut the hell up, if you need to cast slurs about RMT, shut the hell up. If you want to Drivel crap, Shut the hell up.

Clear?

I see you are still dribbling about the same rubbish with no proof or even a statement from someone else to claim as truthful. Change the tune or are the goons so worried about Issler to need to sink this low.