|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
RuleoftheBone
Minmatar
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
   |
Posted - 2008.08.01 12:51:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Slade Hoo
Edited by: Slade Hoo on 01/08/2008 12:13:07
Originally by: Cpt Branko
If you get a 100-man gang protecting a gate, 20-man gangs (of any composition) simply should not have the option of driving through that camp.
this
It's the purpose of camps to let no one drive through
Ahahahahahaha.....wow  .
The real purpose is generally to sit there and play Duck Hunt.
The only reason Duck Hunters get kills is because the game mechanics funnel every sub-capital ship (weak exception BOBS) through the artificial means of jump gates that happen to land targets on a platter within a 15km radius.
What if CCP ditched the 15km spawn point and made it random within the system?
Result: Tears. En masse. Because then you might actually have to use the scanner and defend more than one crappy chokepoint.
It's space. It's open. Just because "xyz alliance" has some claim to it does not preclude other players from visiting at will for whatever purpose (exploration, pewpew, because they simply CAN).
Just don't try to justify nerfing speed with stupid arguments while padding your killboard stats with noob ships and shuttles .
"Lead Me..Follow Me..Or get the **** out of my way"
General George Patton USA
|
RuleoftheBone
Minmatar
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 13:24:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Seren Khi
Originally by: RuleoftheBone
What if CCP ditched the 15km spawn point and made it random within the system?
This, together with the nerfing of local, could be interesting
Sadly CCP is going in a different direction....or appear to be at the moment.
It is funny that the anti-speed folks would cry about this stating "oh more ways to run" and those that actually have-again the 's' word-skill-would call it "attacking from a different direction" or even "creating an engagement"  .
How dare I suggest such a fallacy  .
"Lead Me..Follow Me..Or get the **** out of my way"
General George Patton USA
|
RuleoftheBone
Minmatar
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 14:47:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Cpt Branko
Originally by: Roy Batty68
Since this one is 90% debate team on the "to nerf or not to nerf" topic. Not saying there's anything wrong with that debate, there's a need for it. But this thread has gotten pretty unmanageable as far as trying to find what has or hasn't been found on the test server so far.
Mmmm, yes, it has turned into a 'to nerf or not to nerf' debate rather then discussions about ship testing on SISI, but it appears that most of the people against the changes are against nerfing nanoships in principle (so any specific changes which are seen as a severe nanoHAC/nanorecon nerf they'll dispute on basis of principle rather then specific changes), as they hold that nanoships are necessary for them.
If you want to discuss SISI changes, basically, start another thread.
Only reason I actually posted in this particular thread is I wanted to discover the actual effects pertaining to certain ships and if they still work in a realistic fashion.
Sadly...the majority appears to be point-counterpoint and trying to find hard data on the ships that concern me (Minmatar+Curse...Pilgrim seems irrelevant) is impossible with all the noise.
I would do the test server myself...but have no desire to inadvertently wreck a TQ client that has worked without a hitch for going on 2 years  .
But it is also equally hard to resist responding to stupidity as well  .
"Lead Me..Follow Me..Or get the **** out of my way"
General George Patton USA
|
|
|
| |
|