| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
|
CCP Navigator
C C P
C C P Alliance
1056
   |
Posted - 2012.03.24 17:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
A record voter turnout has resulted in some changes for CSM 7. Following the announcement at Fanfest 2012, CCP Diagoras has a list of the top 14 candidates and voting statistics from around the world. Check out the blog here.
CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|
Lan Staz
Aperture Harmonics
K162
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 17:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
Congratulations to Two step on a fantastic result with 2nd place.
Also: First! |
Ampoliros
Aperture Harmonics
K162
16
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 18:16:00 -
[3] - Quote
go twostep!  |
Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc.
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
36
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 18:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
This is the last year when you use an entirely unregulated system, right?
Career politicians, virtual and real, inevitably become corrupt (or in some cases, more corrupt) so a maximum term limit should be in place.
Eve is more than Blob-land/Bore-sec, there should be at least one seat per area of Eve (High/Low/Null). CSM6 and their complete ignorance in everything not bore-sec has already done heaps of damage to high/low, not their fault really as they are greedy egocentrics like everyone else, but a homogeneous council is BAD for Eve .. especially when you at CCP are even more clueless as to what is happening in the game (ref: FW presentation).
FW is pretty much dead for me. RP has been all but killed off, systems flip in less time than it takes for me to complete a work shift, visiting super-blobs and Titan bridges are becoming ever more frequent, it is still Rust'or'Bust (Winmatar) 90% of the time .. you have in short managed to make it BORING! |
Whiteknight03
Trilon Industries and Exploration
55
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 18:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Nice to see how much support wormholes (Two-Step) got |
Zowie Powers
Hole in the wall
56
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 18:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
Do you think CCP will ever divulge what they do with Abstain votes?
I'm not even asking any longer what it's for, or why they count them, I'm now just after wondering if CCP would ever care to say what the point of them is.
The number of Abstains is actually the number of active accounts that logged no vote. How many is that? It's enough to show you how relevant most people think the CSM is, so you don't like that number enough to count it, but the abstains you do like....
Would you ever tell us the purpose of them? |
Aineko Macx
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
158
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 18:51:00 -
[7] - Quote
Pretty decent CSM composition except for the guy that couldn't do a good presentation even if his life depended on it. |
D'Kelle
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 18:58:00 -
[8] - Quote
How on earth can the CSM be objective and representative of the bulk of EVE players with one sided narrow minded, griefing corps like GoonWaffe at the helm, where their only interest in EVE is only whats good for them.
Yours
Disgustedly |
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
Ferguson Alliance
104
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 19:10:00 -
[9] - Quote
In addition to 'abstain' there should have been 'abolish the csm' and 'none of the above' buttons.
I voted abstain on my 5 accounts and given the results, I think it was a good decision. |
khazak mokl
Black Viper Nomads
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 19:34:00 -
[10] - Quote
Congrats Twostep.
Just shows that hard work and determination can pay off.
Well deserved. |
|
|
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
559
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 19:39:00 -
[11] - Quote
There appear to be 5 separate election races:
Race 1:
1,561 Issler Dainze
1,533 Alekseyev Karrde
1,282 Darius III
Race 2:
2,845 Seleene
2,465 UAxDEATH
2,439 Hans Jagerblitzen
2,289 Meissa Anunthiel
2,284 Dovinian
Race 3:
3,714 Elise Randolph
3,329 Greene Lee
3,184 Trebor Daehdoow
3,163 Kelduum Revaan
Race 4:
4,150 Two Step
Race 5:
10,058 The Mittani
There was a disturbing number of young account voters. |
LegendaryFrog
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
22
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 19:51:00 -
[12] - Quote
Congratulations Mittani in once again showing that you have the overwhelming support of the EvE community! |
Ager Agemo
X-Factor Industries
Synthetic Existence
46
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 19:53:00 -
[13] - Quote
grats to twostep, good to know someone smart is in the top ranking. |
Indahmawar Fazmarai
The I and F Taxation Trust
355
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 20:17:00 -
[14] - Quote
So 8,477 voters were 30 days old... democracy at its finest. 
EVE residents: 5% WH; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec.
CSM 7: 1 highsec resident out of 14.-á
CSM demographics vs EVE demographics, nothing to worry about... |
Akrasjel Lanate
Black Thorne Corporation
Black Thorne Alliance
662
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 20:22:00 -
[15] - Quote
Tau Cabalander wrote:
There was a disturbing number of young account voters.
Yep thats a lot of one month chars - 8,447 of them
PS. Gratz Hans
|
Vertisce Soritenshi
Varion Galactic
Tragedy.
1324
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 20:28:00 -
[16] - Quote
Congrats to everybody with 4,150 votes or lower! You all worked hard and deserve your positions on the CSM. Looking forward to another year of EvE!
EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! - CCP!-á Open the door!!! |
EnslaverOfMinmatar
BRAPELILLE MACRO BOT MINERS
21
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 21:01:00 -
[17] - Quote
Zowie Powers wrote:Do you think CCP will ever divulge what they do with Abstain votes?
I'm not even asking any longer what it's for, or why they count them, I'm now just after wondering if CCP would ever care to say what the point of them is.
The number of Abstains is actually the number of active accounts that logged no vote. How many is that? It's enough to show you how relevant most people think the CSM is, so you don't like that number enough to count it, but the abstains you do like....
Would you ever tell us the purpose of them?
59,109 / 0.1663 - 59,109 = 296,326 accounts that didn't bother to click abstain
Every EVE player must read this http://www.eveonline.com/background/potw/default.asp?cid=29-01-07 or uninstall and DIAF |
Daedalus II
Helios Research
Combat Mining and Logistics
106
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 21:05:00 -
[18] - Quote
D'Kelle wrote:How on earth can the CSM be objective and representative of the bulk of EVE players with one sided narrow minded, griefing corps like GoonWaffe at the helm, where their only interest in EVE is only whats good for them.
Yours
Disgustedly
You should be happy about these numbers then, had they decided to vote more strategically those 10000 votes would have been enough to put up to 4 goons in the council giving them 4 votes instead of 1. |
Max Kolonko
High Voltage Industries
Ash Alliance
161
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 21:06:00 -
[19] - Quote
GO TWO STEP :)
Read and support:
Don't mess with OUR WH's
What is Your stance on WH stuff? |
|
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises
Otherworld Empire
2872
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 21:11:00 -
[20] - Quote
...
|
|
|
|
AfroOfDoom
Merch Industrial
Goonswarm Federation
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 21:14:00 -
[21] - Quote
10,058
Ten thousand and fifty eight.
MMMMMMMMMMLVIII
10011101001010
However you write it, it spells one thing: Mandate.
The people of EvE have spoken: ~ chairman for life ~ |
Indahmawar Fazmarai
The I and F Taxation Trust
355
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 21:30:00 -
[22] - Quote
AfroOfDoom wrote:10,058
Ten thousand and fifty eight.
MMMMMMMMMMLVIII
10011101001010
However you write it, it spells one thing: Mandate.
SOME people of EvE have spoken: ~ chairman for life ~
Corrected it for you.
EVE residents: 5% WH; 8% Lowsec; 20% Nullsec; 67% Highsec.
CSM 7: 1 highsec resident out of 14.-á
CSM demographics vs EVE demographics, nothing to worry about... |
MisterNick
The Sagan Clan
Pax Romana Alliance
53
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 21:41:00 -
[23] - Quote
Congrats to Hans for getting onto the CSM, though I thought you'd have got more votes than that 
"Fools! I'll show them all!"
What do you mean that one's already taken? |
Gevlin
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
114
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 22:14:00 -
[24] - Quote
congradulations
I agree with several people: CCP needs to focus most of eve's recources on FIS, but the development of WIS still needs to continue, just as a slower and more efficient pace.
In eve I wish to be more than just a machine. |
Plaude Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 22:15:00 -
[25] - Quote
Does it really make any difference who's in the CSM? They're all just out to shape EVE in whatever direction they'll benefit from the most, and we all know it. I'm just happy the guy I placed one of my 3 votes on was among the top-7 (the other two votes were Abstains). |
Duvida
The Scope
Gallente Federation
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 22:17:00 -
[26] - Quote
AfroOfDoom wrote:10,058
Ten thousand and fifty eight.
MMMMMMMMMMLVIII
10011101001010
However you write it, it spells one thing: Mandate.
The people of EvE have spoken: ~ chairman for life ~
If I understand correctly, many low, null and WH sec players have high-sec alts? But it still leaves anywhere from 1/2 to 1/3 of the EVE playerbase as purely high-sec.
I'd bet CCP would wonder about a CSM that was essentially saying that they didn't need to worry about that 1/2 to 1/3 of their subscription income.
Regardless of their origins, the CSM still has to look at the entire picture and present ideas that allow the whole of the game to grow. Now as to the idea that some parts might grow faster than other parts is a different deal, just as long as it results in benefit to the whole. But no neglect, please. |
Taedrin
Kushan Industrial
398
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 22:25:00 -
[27] - Quote
D'Kelle wrote:How on earth can the CSM be objective and representative of the bulk of EVE players with one sided narrow minded, griefing corps like GoonWaffe at the helm, where their only interest in EVE is only whats good for them.
Yours
Disgustedly
Because unlike many other candidates, The Mittani actually takes his position in the CSM seriously and doesn't treat it as a place to play "CCP Dev". His entire platform is based on what the CSM actually is: a sounding board for CCP to use and a shield to protect EVE Players from CCP's occasional stupidity. |
DarkAegix
Acetech Systems
983
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 22:25:00 -
[28] - Quote
Not amused |
Nalha Saldana
Eternity INC.
Goonswarm Federation
181
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 22:36:00 -
[29] - Quote
Riverini: "ERASING SMUGNESS ONE VOTE AT THE TIME"
I guess only 8991 smugness remains |
Xiaodown
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
47
|
Posted - 2012.03.24 23:12:00 -
[30] - Quote
D'Kelle wrote:How on earth can the CSM be objective and representative of the bulk of EVE players with one sided narrow minded, griefing corps like GoonWaffe at the helm, where their only interest in EVE is only whats good for them.
Yours
Disgustedly
I have been (publicly) pro-goons and anti-goons, as well as goon-neutral in my time in eve. Goonswaffe consider 0.0 to be the "end game" of Eve. I happen to share this view, as do many others, but I know that it's not universal.
However, I can tell you, categorically, that GoonWaffe (and Mittens, specifically) have the best interest of the 0.0 player in mind, be it casual players, hardcore addicts, three-day old noobs or 8 year veterans. Mittens, despite whatever affiliation you want to saddle him with, wants one thing where the CSM is concerned: CCP to be focused on making 0.0 the most fun possible for the most players possible.
I don't think that's a bad thing. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |