| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

thisisnotanalt
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 18:06:00 -
[1]
Never pay ransom! Fight to the bitter end!
1) There are too many variables. If they have you scrambled and webbed and demand ransom. Whats to say they won't blow your ship up after you pay? They are pirates afterall.
2) Your ransom directly funds pirate activity, don't pay and watch em squirm with just whatever mods you drop, if any.
3) Never, ever, smack talk, or whine in local, it fuels their rather low self esteem in RL. They are fond of mentioning that carebear tears fuel their POS (read self esteem). Nothing will be more confusing and irritating than a silent victim. Note they will typically open up a private chat for ransom. Your response should be 2 words: "fug off." Nothing more.
Some tips for everyone!
1) Set the pirate and his corp to red. Next time you know to avoid them like the plague. See red minus in local = time to leave.
2) Fly insured T1 ships. Let them blow you up. They get nothing. You get insurance payout!
3) Jump clones FTW!
4) On board ship scanner FTW!
So in short: NEVER PAY RANSOM! Stiffle the flow of big isk to the pirate "economy" which will consist of rats and 'roids only. And I'm not just talking about asteroids... the 'roids they will get from sitting around in local for hours waiting for a victim once more people become more educated about dealing with pirates. By not paying ransom you can rest assure your dignity is still intact, and they got nothing from you save a few random mods from your ship.
FLAME AWAY! I take pride that this post will **** off many and cause them to waste more collective man hours responding to this than the 5 minutes it took me to write this.
|

ponieus
the united
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 18:08:00 -
[2]
Real Pirates always honor their ransoms.
Do not lump in real pirates with the wanna be's out there.
Thats like saying all 0.0 alliances are crap like the NC.. Kinda dont make sense now does it.
|

Kaeten
Hybrid Syndicate
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 18:16:00 -
[3]
shoudl always get info on the corp befroe you pay ransom, see if they are trustworthy ________________________ I'M POOR
|

My'kel An'jelo
Amarr Synthetic Frontiers
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 18:26:00 -
[4]
Originally by: thisisnotanalt FLAME AWAY! I take pride that this post will **** off many and cause them to waste more collective man hours responding to this than the 5 minutes it took me to write this
I think you're overestimating the effect your poorly written and frankly inaccurate post will have on the world of EVE. hint: people will still pay ransoms hint2: people who are likely to be ransomed, don't read C+P hint3: get out
|

soldieroffortune 258
Gallente Trinity Council
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 18:42:00 -
[5]
lol
Originally by: soldieroffortune 258
"Eve is about making yourself richer while making the other guy poorer"
|

thisisnotanalt
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 18:56:00 -
[6]
ROFLMAO
Nobody reads what I wrote. I did not lump pirates into a category. I simply said, do not pay ransom and offered tips regarding this.
Please! For the love of whatever you hold dear, if you're going to insult my writing ability, use proper grammar. Complete sentences, capitalization and punctuation go a long way in making you sound more credible than a keyboard mashing chimpanzee.
Grammar tanking FTW!
|

Cyphah
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 19:06:00 -
[7]
Hmm.
So... grammar tanking eh?
I hope you don't "stiffle" your screams when I find you in low sec. I might "stiffle" your warp drive, y'see, and then "stiffle" your propulsion, and then "stiffle" your ability to breath.
Yeah, two can play at grammar ****. I think you might've forgotten the rules though eh kupo?
|

Cyphah
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 19:08:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Cyphah on 08/09/2008 19:09:11 PS It's "stifle".
PPS Only accuse people of having imperfect grammar (or spelling) if you are assured of your own perfection.
|

Jarek Switchblade
The Bastards
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 19:15:00 -
[9]
Quote: Never pay ransom! Fight to the bitter end!
Now this is what I don't understand, and, imo, it destroys your whole argument instantly.
I mean, if you stand a chance against the pirates, fair play. If you're hopelessly dying though, what's the point?
See the story below -
A while back we had a guy that thought like this, he was flying a ship that was, if I remember correctly, worth 150 mil - 100 of that was mods.
He was offered a TOTAL ransom of 50 mil, but he steadfastedly declined. Since there were several of us attacking him, the 50 mil wouldn't have "funded more piracy" that much anyway between us, and instead he popped and lost all that cash...much of which dropped and was worth much more than the ransom asked.
The result? Good times for us, and very bad times for him.
We now regularly ship-scan our targets while ransoming, to ensure fair ransoms.
And as ALWAYS, The Bastards personally honour ransoms - in threads like these, its pretty much mandatory to say.
So yeah, I've said it once and I'll say it again, if the guy who is ransoming you is a nervous fool that seems to scream obscenities into chat and smack like a idiot, paying up isn't clever.
If you're being ransomed by the real deal, it is often in your best interests to pay, regardless of whether "more piracy" is funded or not - your attackers will get cash anyway, and will not hesitate to kill you...plus if you're smart and you pay up, you will likely save a great deal of time and not get caught next time, as you will be aware of the dangers if you are smart.
Also, you say you are not tarring us all with the same immature, inaccurate brush, but then you go and throw out stuff like -
Quote: Whats to say they won't blow your ship up after you pay? They are pirates afterall.
Well, comments like that show a distinct ignorance, or a poor experience with nub wannabes in the past.
Show the profession some respect, and maybe people will respond in kind to you too 
|

Tchell Dahhn
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 19:19:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Cyphah Yeah, two can play at grammar ****. I think you might've forgotten the rules though eh kupo?
To be honest, he never mentioned proper spelling.

We're Recruiting! |

My'kel An'jelo
Amarr Synthetic Frontiers
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 19:28:00 -
[11]
Originally by: thisisnotanalt ROFLMAO
Nobody reads what I wrote. I did not lump pirates into a category. I simply said, do not pay ransom and offered tips regarding this.
Please! For the love of whatever you hold dear, if you're going to insult my writing ability, use proper grammar. Complete sentences, capitalization and punctuation go a long way in making you sound more credible than a keyboard mashing chimpanzee.
Grammar tanking FTW!
Hello. I believe if you check my posting history and my alt's posting history then you'll actually find out that the lower case typing is an affectation for when I'm feeling particularly lazy in my burns. But impressive, you managed to completely avoid the content/points in my post, major props. Come back once you've managed to compose a valid and coherent argument against my points rather than going "LOL YOU HAVEN'T CAPITALISED YOUR LETTERS SO MY POINT OF VIEW IS MORE VALID!!!!!!!!"
Love, Nexus
PS Originally by: thisisnotanalt Nobody reads what I wrote.
This should be in the past tense, nice one champ.
|

Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 19:28:00 -
[12]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 08/09/2008 19:29:59
Originally by: thisisnotanalt
1) There are too many variables. If they have you scrambled and webbed and demand ransom. Whats to say they won't blow your ship up after you pay? They are pirates afterall.
What's to say they will? They're pirates afterall, it's a money-making activity for them. You get the boot out of any respectable pirate corp if you dishonour ransoms.
Originally by: thisisnotanalt
2) Your ransom directly funds pirate activity, don't pay and watch em squirm with just whatever mods you drop, if any.
Don't pay and lose all you have. It hits you much harder then it hits the pirate.
Originally by: thisisnotanalt
3) Never, ever, smack talk, or whine in local, it fuels their rather low self esteem in RL. They are fond of mentioning that carebear tears fuel their POS (read self esteem). Nothing will be more confusing and irritating than a silent victim. Note they will typically open up a private chat for ransom. Your response should be 2 words: "fug off." Nothing more.
Rubbish. If the victim stays silent, fine. If the victim whines/etc, it's funny, but also fine. I'm after their stuff, after all. If a victim says 'f*ck off' in response to a ransom demand, well, OK, then they die and I scoop their corpse if I was ransoming the pod.
Now, can you please point out to your lossmail which made you so ****ed off at pirates that you demand the rest of EvE to nerf themselves in order to enact your revenge on pirates?
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 19:39:00 -
[13]
Ransoms are a pain in the ass just blow the freaks up and leave it up to the pirate gods what loot drops.
SKUNK
|

Chaplain''Dextomus
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 19:59:00 -
[14]
Edited by: Chaplain''''Dextomus on 08/09/2008 19:59:18 WHO is your main....
|

ponieus
the united
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 20:02:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Le Skunk Ransoms are a pain in the ass just blow the freaks up and leave it up to the pirate gods what loot drops.
SKUNK
maybe for the lazy.
|

Havohej
Minmatar Comply Or Die G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 20:17:00 -
[16]
Originally by: thisisnotanalt 1) Set the pirate and his corp to red. Next time you know to avoid them like the plague. See red minus in local = time to leave.
Don't learn to fight or anything silly like that, just run away.
Originally by: CCP Explorer You can still steal their st
|

DEATHsyphon
Gallente IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 20:22:00 -
[17]
IDLE EMPIRE Honors Ransoms And If you pay or not we dont care more points for us on the KB to win some isk from the allaince. 
-------------------- I'm not not going to pod you! |

AntonioBanderas
The Bastards
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 20:30:00 -
[18]
since z0de is slacking on this one... The Bastards will always, ALWAYS honour ransom. Bandy out. __________________________________________________ I can say ASS!!! And SHIT!!!! \o/
|

thisisnotanalt
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 20:53:00 -
[19]
Edited by: thisisnotanalt on 08/09/2008 20:53:12 I've just come to the realization that pirates are just glorified digital playground bullies.
There is proof! Please read on.
GTC ~ 400M ~ 30 USD
Pirate asks for ransom, ranging from 50M to 100M. This 50M to 100M amounts to 3.75 to 7.50 USD. So called pirate is effectively stealing your lunch money.
So sorry. I don't have any respect for the profession.
|

Silverskull7
Lazy Company
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 21:04:00 -
[20]
Someone who got bullied in school me thinks?
Anyway Pirates are actually very nice people (when were not shooting at you of course =), its the carebears you have to watch out for. Usually Pirates/PVP'ers in general are people who come home from work and wanna blow up some pixel spaceships to let off some steam.
Silver
|

thisisnotanalt
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 21:30:00 -
[21]
Show me a nice pirate then? One that goes, "Oh, I caught you, I will let you go peacefully if you send me some ISK for my hard work in catching you." As opposed to one that goes, "100M" in chat and leaves it at that while they take your ship into structure. Doesn't quite set the picture that you will make it out anyways.
I repeat, don't pay ransom. It just ain't worth it due to the many variables. I'm not going to check who will honor ransom if I'm stuck in a situation where I'm going into structure.
Maybe pirate corps could benefit from a public relations department. LMAO
|

My'kel An'jelo
Amarr Synthetic Frontiers
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 21:32:00 -
[22]
You've never actually spoken with a pirate have you?
|

Silverskull7
Lazy Company
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 21:33:00 -
[23]
Troll anyone?/WOW player?
Suggest ignoring the thread.
|

White Chasm
Caldari Blood In Blood Out
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 21:36:00 -
[24]
BIBO honors ransoms. All one of us. _________________
Originally by: CCP Mitnal Although it's comforting to note that the majority of pirates will be remaining single for the foreseeable future. 
|

Raven6213
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 21:45:00 -
[25]
Originally by: ponieus Real Pirates always honor their ransoms.
Do not lump in real pirates with the wanna be's out there.
Thats like saying all 0.0 alliances are crap like the NC.. Kinda dont make sense now does it.
Don't pay the ransom because Pirates are bed-wetting, mama's boys. They need to stay down in the lower, security zone where only the outcasts, and dysfunctional people belong.
I LAUGH so very hard in the face of the milk-toast Pirates. I'm laughing right now. I laugh very HARD.
|

Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 21:45:00 -
[26]
Originally by: thisisnotanalt Show me a nice pirate then? One that goes, "Oh, I caught you, I will let you go peacefully if you send me some ISK for my hard work in catching you." As opposed to one that goes, "100M" in chat and leaves it at that while they take your ship into structure. Doesn't quite set the picture that you will make it out anyways.
I'd think that "50M or die." quite clearly illustrates what I want, what you need to do, and what will happen unless you do it.
The algorithm I use is roughly this. (a) invitation into ISK for pod channel - all the rules are decribed there.
(b) You get a "50M or die." followed by a "X seconds to respond." - Failure to respond means death. - A response along the style of "I can't pay that much / my ship isn't worth that much to me / etc" leads to negotiations about what you can and will pay to save your ship and/or pod. We can always discuss pricing. - A response along the style of "no" or "lol" or "whiiiiiine" leads to the abrupt termination of your ship and/or pod. - A response along the lines of "yes, just a moment" will give you a bit of extra time required to pay. - Attempting to self-destruct your ship will lead to your ship and pod being killed. - Paying up results in you being let go.
(c) You get kicked off the ISK for pod channel after you are on your merry way (or dead if you didn't pay), so you don't interfere with other people being ransomed.
Is it worth paying? Yes. You will be released if you do pay. Will your refusal to pay do anything noticeable to us? No. We'll just take your modules and your corpse. It does far more to you.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

thisisnotanalt
|
Posted - 2008.09.08 23:39:00 -
[27]
Didn't intend for this to turn into a who-honors-ransom thread. Don't really care. But lets make the most of it for the pirates since they feel so strongly about their profession.
As per my suggestion on pirate corp public relations, maybe a posting of all pirate corps that do honor ransoms can be initiated and a subsequent black list for those who don't. This can be updated, confirmed by 3rd parties or whatnot.
Also, why don't you post your typical ransom prices for ships. Then those who do read C+P can mull over it over the course of a few days and make a more informed decision on which is best for them should they find themselves in that situation. Rather than being given a 10 second time frame to make a hasty decision.
I'm sure you pirates will get a better response to your lunch money stealing endeavors in the long run. In the meantime, feel free to donate ISK to me for my wonderful suggestion.
|

Kahega Amielden
Minmatar Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 00:36:00 -
[28]
Quote:
Anyway Pirates are actually very nice people (when were not shooting at you of course =), its the carebears you have to watch out for. Usually Pirates/PVP'ers in general are people who come home from work and wanna blow up some pixel spaceships to let off some steam.
Scarily enough this is actually true in my experience. So-called "Carebears" (mainly hisec missioners) are, on the whole, the most angry, spiteful group of EVE players I've ever played. On the contrary, the pirates tend to be pretty calm, collected and nice even while blowing up your internets spaceships.
|

Carrisa Montega
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 00:46:00 -
[29]
Never pay, fight to the death.
|

Ard UnjiiGo
The Bastards
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 00:51:00 -
[30]
Edited by: Ard UnjiiGo on 09/09/2008 00:54:24
Originally by: Kahega Amielden
Quote:
Anyway Pirates are actually very nice people (when were not shooting at you of course =), its the carebears you have to watch out for. Usually Pirates/PVP'ers in general are people who come home from work and wanna blow up some pixel spaceships to let off some steam.
Scarily enough this is actually true in my experience. So-called "Carebears" (mainly hisec missioners) are, on the whole, the most angry, spiteful group of EVE players I've ever played. On the contrary, the pirates tend to be pretty calm, collected and nice even while blowing up your internets spaceships.
QFT
A set list of ransom prices is generally unrealistic since we usually bring a ship scanner and the range of value of a BC can vary markedly depending on what's fitted.
We don't generally do the 'x' isk or die thing. I prefer "Ahoy Matey!! Show me some booty or I send your ship/pod to swim with the Quasars." 
And finally, to refuse every ransom offer is just silly and emo. Blew up a Raven the other day because he refused the convo invite. His ship loss was over 350mil because he was T2 fit and carrying around 10 implants and other assorted goodies in his hold. We had decided to ask for 50mil if he hadn't refused the convo invite. 
I think the pilot listened to angry idiots like the OP too much. His loss.
He dropped more in loot then we asked for in the ransom. Our win.
|

DEATHsyphon
Gallente IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 01:13:00 -
[31]
I ♥ This Thread. It covers everything from don't pay ransoms to pirates should ask nicely for ransom iskies before we pop there ship.
Oh and dont forget this thread was created by a noob alt who probly just lost his faction ship on his way to a mission in lowsec or even better mining in lowsec. Hugs man this thread is almost as great as hate mail. -------------------- I'm not not going to pod you! |

ceyriot
Entropians on Vacation
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 01:29:00 -
[32]
Awwwww, which pirates blew up your failboat?
Learn from your mistakes...not FLAMEPIRATESONFORUM***GOTRY
Faction Store - Killboard |

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 01:46:00 -
[33]
Edited by: Abulurd Boniface on 09/09/2008 01:50:00 Edited by: Abulurd Boniface on 09/09/2008 01:48:16 The only flaw in this equation is the 2 minute countdown to self-destruct. A useful self-destruct mechanism would be violent, instantaneous and unannounced. It would leave nothing more salvageable than its component minerals. A real self-destruct mechanism would also inflict some kind of area-of-effect damage to nearby vessels. By the way, it is only in movies that self-destruct mechanisms work like a carnival. The blinkenlights and disembodied voices performing the countdown are there for dramatic effect. In the real world, depending on the system, a code or a switch is used to arm the system. Detonation is timed or at will. If we are to believe that we can fly at superluminal speeds without the need to refuel [for most ships], an effective self-destruct mechanism cannot be too big a leap of the imagination.
The present system is worse than useless because it puts an already beleaguered party at an additional disadvantage. It offers no practical alternative to putting up any kind of fight. It forces the subject to submit to the indignation of being bullied by people who may, or may not, honor their part of the bargain. We are expected to take the word of the pirate, the gentleman thief. The very same person who will blow up your pod when their demands are not met.
I will petition CCP for a modification of the self-destruct mechanism that gives the victim of a ransom demand a workable alternative if they choose to use it. The victim should have a better choice than just to comply. The victim should not merely be there to offer entertainment value to the pirate.
Non tibi spiro.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 02:59:00 -
[34]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 09/09/2008 03:00:29
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
The only flaw in this equation is the 2 minute countdown to self-destruct.
It wasn't always there - at one point, you could self destruct at will and they changed that, so you cannot deny the spoils of war (or piracy) when you see a fight isn't going your way.
Basically, you already screwed up by getting caught in the first place. You don't get the 'deny all loot' button, and you shouldn't, either.
By the way, self-destruct getting you insurance and letting your pod live must be broken by your account, too ;)
Furthermore, you're just dead wrong about self-destruct. Try scuttling a ship. It takes a while. There's no 'insta-boom' mechanism.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 03:28:00 -
[35]
Originally by: DEATHsyphon IDLE EMPIRE Honors Ransoms And If you pay or not we dont care more points for us on the KB to win some isk from the allaince. 
hell it seems we just blow up the ship and sometimes ransom the pod
roll the loot dice! hope they have implants and want to keep them 
|

timov
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 05:36:00 -
[36]
Originally by: ceyriot Awwwww, which pirates blew up your failboat?
Learn from your mistakes...not FLAMEPIRATESONFORUM***GOTRY
hehe yes thats exactly the point ;)
and btw - its not that easy to say - pay or pay not. anyones would and shall make his / her decision. mine is: case the chat opens, i type in "kill me" and die then - and i dont accept ransom while i'm on a ride and someone would offer me one (what happenz more often then i thought) and whos flaming, whining (or whatever beside chatting) then would awake at station if i get it targeted. but there r situations when i would pay - case ship or loot is not mine e.g. or accept payment - case my FC wants to of coz or maybe if the mate i'm with wants to get the isk
--- ... have fun ;) |

H Lecter
Gallente The Black Rabbits The Gurlstas Associates
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 07:38:00 -
[37]
For reasons of completeness I wanna state that The Guristas Associates honor ransoms.
The OP is a good example for the kind of mentally imbalanced carebears who do not enjoy this game but rather see it as work. I almost wonder if he isn't selling ISK himself as this game money obviously has a big rl value for him...
To the OP: If I meet you I will remember not to ransom you...
|

thisisnotanalt
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 07:46:00 -
[38]
I don't recall in my OP whining about losing a ship. You assume I am whining about this. You obviously did not read the OP.
EPIC. FAIL.
On a side note, I am pleasantly surprised to see that more collective man hours have been wasted on this thread than I put into it. 
|

timov
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 07:49:00 -
[39]
Originally by: H Lecter
The OP is a good example for the kind of mentally imbalanced carebears who do not enjoy this game but rather see it as work. I almost wonder if he isn't selling ISK himself as this game money obviously has a big rl value for him...
=> what is "OP"? case u mean me - u fail in 5 points here 
--- ... have fun ;) |

H Lecter
Gallente The Black Rabbits The Gurlstas Associates
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 07:52:00 -
[40]
Originally by: timov => what is "OP"? case u mean me - u fail in 5 points here 
OP = original poster = thisisnotanalt
|

Anhammerad
Nearly Feared
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 08:19:00 -
[41]
I would just like to say that all ransoms by my corp are honoured. It is an integral part of our corp rules and anyone dishonouring ransoms (or indeed 1v1s) will be paying you back or kicked.
If you have an accusation along these lines; we first check the corp combat log to see if there was actually a kill, and then cross reference with the member's transaction logs to see if a ransom was received.
Don't lump everyone in with the same lot...
|

Solomon XI
Hoist The Colors.
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 08:19:00 -
[42]
Edited by: Solomon XI on 09/09/2008 08:22:30
For the record ... for as long as I am CEO ... Hoist The Colors will *always* honor 1v1's and *always* honor ransoms. And those who do not, members of our corp or not, will suffer to the fullest extent our wrath when confronted. Honoring these two thing's is just good business. 
~Solo Hoist The Colors. (CEO) |

timov
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 08:48:00 -
[43]
thx @ H Lecter, i still hang in my english a 1000 times a day 
Originally by: thisisnotanalt You obviously did not read the OP.
we did. its just - who is playing eve shall not care that much about loosing a ship or some isk or whatever. or shall not whine about that there r other players, running the "dark way". there is no black or white. not even in eve most of all the one crying r some who get into low sec - coz there is some more $$$$$ to get. and wont realize that all comes at a price.
but closer to the OP then:
Originally by: thisisnotanalt
1) There are too many variables. If they have you scrambled and webbed and demand ransom. Whats to say they won't blow your ship up after you pay? They are pirates afterall.
wrong. in RL as in eve - most of them would honor ransom. oh and btw - there is as much of honor among pirate - players then among the carebears, anti-pirates and whatever. i could bring a million of exaples but i wont wast my (wo-)manhours
Originally by: thisisnotanalt
1) Set the pirate and his corp to red. Next time you know to avoid them like the plague. See red minus in local = time to leave.
YEAH, that is funny. set my corp RED! u'll have thousands of red noobs then  and another funny thing: if u jump into a low - system as blinky or dark yellow player local drops vom 20 active to 3 docked people - no matter what "the baaaad ones" wanna do there
Originally by: thisisnotanalt
2) Fly insured T1 ships. Let them blow you up. They get nothing. You get insurance payout!
EPIC.FAIL. we get some loot. who cares. we get KB - points (some better). and most of all - we have the fun. in killing some fools, or if were lucky in some good fights.
Originally by: thisisnotanalt
3) Jump clones FTW! 4) On board ship scanner FTW!
true.
Originally by: thisisnotanalt
Stiffle the flow of big isk to the pirate "economy" which will consist of rats and 'roids only.
lol. ahm... no. many pirates r mission runners, that f***s up the sec-standing again and u have the fighting skills anyway.
so MY tips for everyone!
1) when jumping in low sec (and didnt deactivate it) u'll get a message that u may attacked. READ IT! if u wont get attacked, dont jump into low. that wont prevent u from all, but from many attacks.
2) while beeing in low, be always prepeared to defend yourself. if u "just wanna do some mining" - who cares, u r free to attack there.
3) what ship ever - insured is correct. pvp - reading fitting. not a ship u cant loose. if u have only the one ship that u get all ur isk with - stay in carebear city till u have one to loose. better a smaller ship u could use well then a bigger ship u havent rdy skilled. lookes like many players have no idea how NICE a BS fitted with med modules is going down ^^
well... the other things u could find out urself :P just one important: learn to enjoy a fight. learn that it doesnt really matter to win or loose. learn to make ur own desicions ;)
--- ... have fun ;) |

H Lecter
Gallente The Black Rabbits The Gurlstas Associates
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 08:54:00 -
[44]
Originally by: timov just one important: learn to enjoy a fight. learn that it doesnt really matter to win or loose. learn to make ur own desicions ;)
THIS
It's a game - you should play to enjoy, not to be angry...
|

Lars Lodar
Suicidal Tendencies Ltd
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 08:55:00 -
[45]
Most pirates honor ransoms because its generally more profitable since it's liquid isk.
Ransoms are easier to split between gang mates and you don't have to risk or be bothered to transport the mods for resale. Running loot logistics is a pain in the butt and people prefer profit straight up.
When you roam a lot, sometimes multiple regions at a time, I would always take a ransom over collecting loot 30 jumps from base.
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 09:25:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Cpt Branko Edited by: Cpt Branko on 09/09/2008 03:00:29
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
The only flaw in this equation is the 2 minute countdown to self-destruct.
It wasn't always there - at one point, you could self destruct at will and they changed that, so you cannot deny the spoils of war (or piracy) when you see a fight isn't going your way.
Basically, you already screwed up by getting caught in the first place. You don't get the 'deny all loot' button, and you shouldn't, either.
By the way, self-destruct getting you insurance and letting your pod live must be broken by your account, too ;)
Furthermore, you're just dead wrong about self-destruct. Try scuttling a ship. It takes a while. There's no 'insta-boom' mechanism.
When self-destructing a ship the owner loses: - the space frame - the fitting - the rigging - the contents of the hold - potentially the loss of implants when the pirates decides to pod the victim.
Do you perceive any advantage for the victim? Please elaborate.
Your argument about insurance would hold water only, I drive a Hulk. Oops, I cannot have insurance. If I were to be ransomed, blowing up the Hulk gives me no advantage [and CCP could easily build in a clause into the insurance stating "self-destructing the space frame voids the warranty"]. Again, not an advantage to the victim.
Scuttling a ship, having it fill up with water to sink it would take time. Carefully placed explosives blowing massive holes in the ship will prevent any leisurely looting. Of course we are not discussing water entering a vessel. We are discussing charges already in place, activated by a simple procedure and set off at will. For a space faring species this should not be an insurmountable challenge.
I read in this thread that the procedure was changed to give the pirates an advantage. Very sweet and endearing. EVE emulates real life: the criminal has more rights than the victim.
Whether the victim gets away with the space frame and the pod intact is entirely up to the pirate. The victim cannot fight back, cannot defend himself, cannot count on the generosity of the very people who are in the process of robbing him and may be rewarded with the soul-affirming gift of public smack talk to celebrate how badly he was screwed over. On top of all that he doesn't even get the leverage of using spite, as a final act of defiance, to deny the pirate the prize. There is no measure of winning for the victim, there is only a degree of losing. A self-destruct scenario [if a workable one would be in place and the victim would choose to use it] is not a boon to the victim. Time, effort and resources have to be allocated to recover the loss.
A self-destruct that would deny the pirate the prize would the be sole avenue for the victim to keep honor to himself. Instead he is denied even the small measure of satisfaction to know that the pirate did not get to benefit from his loss. Does any of this sound the least bit lopsided to you?
If capsuleers are to grin and bear the hazards of space faring life, pirates should equally be willing to live with the real possibility that they won't benefit from their actions. But it appears they don't appreciate having the knife cut both ways because they have had the constructors of the environment take away the last resort of their victims. They then get to gloat over the fact that their victims complain about being unfairly disadvantaged.
It boils down to this: the victim is forced to eat the loss one way or another, however small or big it is, while the pirate gets the crutch to support their ego.
There is no guarantee that the self-destruct would be used. The victim may consider the payment of a ransom an acceptable cost of doing business. They should at least have the opportunity to make their own choice.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Kaya Valda
Caldari Neo Spartans
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 09:50:00 -
[47]
Originally by: thisisnotanalt Never pay ransom! Fight to the bitter end!
1) There are too many variables. If they have you scrambled and webbed and demand ransom. Whats to say they won't blow your ship up after you pay? They are pirates afterall.
I would hazard a guess that at least 95% of pirates honour ransoms, probably more. It hurts their long term business otherwise.
Originally by: thisisnotanalt 2) Your ransom directly funds pirate activity, don't pay and watch em squirm with just whatever mods you drop, if any.
Whatever. We frequently earn more out of the mods than we would have done the ransom.
Originally by: thisisnotanalt 3) Never, ever, smack talk, or whine in local, it fuels their rather low self esteem in RL. They are fond of mentioning that carebear tears fuel their POS (read self esteem). Nothing will be more confusing and irritating than a silent victim. Note they will typically open up a private chat for ransom. Your response should be 2 words: "fug off." Nothing more.
Carebears have self esteem? Whilst having someone whine at you is fun, I really couldn't give a stuff if they say nothing, and it certainly isn't going to irritate me.
Originally by: thisisnotanalt Some tips for everyone!
1) Set the pirate and his corp to red. Next time you know to avoid them like the plague. See red minus in local = time to leave.
The one piece of good advice in this post.
Originally by: thisisnotanalt 2) Fly insured T1 ships. Let them blow you up. They get nothing. You get insurance payout!
And if you don't want to live your Eve life in a T1 ship?
Originally by: thisisnotanalt So in short: NEVER PAY RANSOM! Stiffle the flow of big isk to the pirate "economy" which will consist of rats and 'roids only. And I'm not just talking about asteroids... the 'roids they will get from sitting around in local for hours waiting for a victim once more people become more educated about dealing with pirates. By not paying ransom you can rest assure your dignity is still intact, and they got nothing from you save a few random mods from your ship.
Well we make plenty on the cargo and wrecks. You not paying a ransom is not going to change that. The more intelligent players will still pay ransoms if it is going to save them isk.
|

whisk
The Movement
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 09:53:00 -
[48]
Adapt or Die
|

Andrea Skye
Caldari The Python Cartel
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 10:04:00 -
[49]
Python cartel always hnors ransoms. If someone dishonours a ransom in our corp the the boss will kick em out. No real excuse for not honouriong them and its bad for business.
Its totaly the victims chioce if he decides to pay or not.
|

Artemis Rose
Varion Galactic Accord Corporate Enterprise Syndicate
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 10:11:00 -
[50]
As being stated many times in this thread, the majority of pirates will honor ransoms. They can kill just fine without having to dishonor ransoms to pile up kill mails/loot.
It may be really shocking, but just because they shot at you for being in range, doesn't make them griefers, low self-esteem bullies or whatever assumption you want to make against them.
*** Currently Playing: Trolls from Outer Space Current Equipment: VISAcard chain mail, +2 Amulet of Epic Whine, Self Banstick +2 WTB: +666 E-peen killboard stats |

spudzonatron
Excession Enterprises
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 10:19:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Cyphah So... grammar tanking eh?
Sorry, i stopped reading after i read this. Laughing too hard.
|

Soporo
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 17:17:00 -
[52]
TBH I might let a younger pirate ransom me, but most of you old farts can kma. Cept VETO. I'd let them ransom me just for the coolness factor.
|

Solomon XI
Hoist The Colors.
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 18:12:00 -
[53]
Originally by: Soporo TBH I might let a younger pirate ransom me, but most of you old farts can kma. Cept VETO. I'd let them ransom me just for the coolness factor.
Hey bro, it's cool. You don't pay, we make what we can off of your loot and salvage. =)
~Solo Hoist The Colors. (CEO) |

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 18:22:00 -
[54]
Edited by: Abulurd Boniface on 09/09/2008 18:24:34
Originally by: Artemis Rose As being stated many times in this thread, the majority of pirates will honor ransoms. They can kill just fine without having to dishonor ransoms to pile up kill mails/loot.
It may be really shocking, but just because they shot at you for being in range, doesn't make them griefers, low self-esteem bullies or whatever assumption you want to make against them.
Apparently some concepts have a hard time sinking in. It is not about honorable pirates versus dishonorable pirates. It is not about the pirates. It is about the right to say "no" to the oppressor.
Having an effective self-destruct mechanism in place that robs the pirate of the prize is a choice the victim makes for themselves. Being denied the option means they can only stand in the corner with their hat in their hand, baas Ganzendonk style, and say please and thank you and 'can I go now, please?'
The reason why the self-destruct mechanism was rendered useless, it turns out, is that too many people used it, thereby depriving the pirate from the prize. Because the pirate learned a lesson about the human condition: that people, if given the choice, would rather say "kust gij ne kier dik mijn kluuten, smeerlap" than to bow down and give in to their bullies.
And the pirates can't have that, and CCP appears to be of the same opinion.
See how effective piracy would be if people had the ability to deny the pirate the prize, how many people don't care about the honor-among-thieves and rather leave with nothing than to hand it over.
It is not about honoring ransoms, it is about the fact that it's not the pirate's stuff and they can't have it and the only way for the pirate to inflict themselves upon people is to whine at CCP's doorstep to take away the one tool for the victim to say "From Hell's heart I stab at thee" and rather lose everything than to part with anything.
I shall strive to restore the self-destruct mechanism to useful functionality: to violently, instantaneously and without warning beforehand destroy the space frame and its contents and render it unsalvageable.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Moric Longshanks
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 18:26:00 -
[55]
Originally by: thisisnotanalt Whats to say they won't blow your ship up after you pay? They are pirates afterall.
As is noted in this thread quite often, all respectable pirates honor their deal.
Carebears, however, appear not to be so trustworthy . . . I caught a guy AFK after he undocked. He was *so* AFK that he had cruised outside the range of the sentries *and* I managed to catch up to him in a slow boat cruiser. I scrammed him and went about my handywork. Before he popped, I turned off the damage and offered him a ransom just in case he had come back to the keyboard.
"I'll do it," were his exact words. After the bargain was agreed to, he then began to pine about how he didn't have any money and started attacking. Turns out he was trying to jam me. I quickly finished the job, pod included.
I wonder how many pirates have had similar experiences, where their clients agreed to a deal and then stalled for time? Quite a few, I imagine. Between trusting a carebear and trusting a pirate -- I'll side with the pirates.
|

My'kel An'jelo
Amarr Synthetic Frontiers
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 18:46:00 -
[56]
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface It is about the right to say "no" to the oppressor.
THE OPPRESSOR
|

thisisnotanalt
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 18:49:00 -
[57]
Originally by: My'kel An'jelo
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface It is about the right to say "no" to the oppressor.
This. Congratulations for hitting the nail on the head.
|

My'kel An'jelo
Amarr Synthetic Frontiers
|
Posted - 2008.09.09 19:03:00 -
[58]
Originally by: My'kel An'jelo
THE OPPRESSOR
|

Avan Sercedos
The Magnificents
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 00:13:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface to violently, instantaneously and without warning beforehand destroy the space frame and its contents and render it unsalvageable.
iirc, the contents of an internet spaceship include something called a capsule. You know, the thing where the pilot is? Also, you by some ungodly farce manage to convince CCP to listen to you, I want there to be a .001% chance every second that one's internet spaceship will randomly self-destruct, because the pilot sneezed and hit the insta-self destruct switch or something. _________________________
OMG, EXCLAMATION MARK! |

Transval
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 06:37:00 -
[60]
Quick question...
Is it the case that self destruct is announced in local when activated?
If so, would it make any significant difference to either party involved if this feature was removed? What would it mean to either party?
Just curious as i don't know much about the piracy side of things but i would hate to see more nerfs to the feel of this game. Even though you guys are a pain in the arse this game would be crap without the YARRR! In fact it is BECAUSE you guys are a pain in the arse that this game is so much fun.
Cheers!
|

timov
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 07:11:00 -
[61]
Originally by: Transval Quick question...
Is it the case that self destruct is announced in local when activated?
If so, would it make any significant difference to either party involved if this feature was removed? What would it mean to either party?
self destruction is useless at all. just usefull to take pod-express bk home or to say it in other words - quick question ... why the hell shall someone self destruct who has at least 2 min to be alive? there r that many other opportunities in that case. when ure done anyway - that means u have lesser then 30 sec and could hope for any gods intervention only - self destructing wont do anything, coz of the 2 min timer
--- ... have fun ;) |

Mankirks Wife
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 07:50:00 -
[62]
Edited by: Mankirks Wife on 10/09/2008 07:50:22 Depends - I've always considered my wallet to be my greatest asset in surviving lowsec.
I fly pimp ships because I can afford to - if I can't T2/best named fit, blow it up, and do it again 20 times I generally don't bother.
So no, I never pay ransoms. I don't do something silly like self-destruct either though. If I don't want to fight I'm not going to get caught - I'm really good at being slippery.
But when I do want to fight, it's actually good for pirates - when it becomes painfully obvious that I'm not going to win / get away I'll generally eject about halfway through structure, since I care about my pod a lot more than my ship. So if you can stop shooting quickly enough you might get one better than a ransom  ---
|

Gilgamesh1980
The Black Rabbits The Gurlstas Associates
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 08:10:00 -
[63]
damn, after this thread I better go and find another business. 
a Lot of pirates corps honour ransoms, at least the ones that are worth mentioning.
most of the times I would say these would be the bigger Pirate groups though, who have been in the trait much longer than all the smaller corps.
if you want proof then track me down and I will prove it to you
Supreme Commander and Diplomat of the Black Rabbits and Gurlstas associates |

Nuts Nougat
SniggWaffe
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 12:34:00 -
[64]
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface We are discussing charges already in place, activated by a simple procedure and set off at will. For a space faring species this should not be an insurmountable challenge.
Does this also mean every time I shoot at your ship, I have a chance to hit one of your self destruct charges, blowing your ship up instantaneously? Does this also work for rats? Is it optional?
If not, this is wrong. ---
Originally by: CCP Mitnal My daddy told me to lock this thread.
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 13:41:00 -
[65]
Edited by: Abulurd Boniface on 10/09/2008 13:43:21
Originally by: Nuts Nougat
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface We are discussing charges already in place, activated by a simple procedure and set off at will. For a space faring species this should not be an insurmountable challenge.
Does this also mean every time I shoot at your ship, I have a chance to hit one of your self destruct charges, blowing your ship up instantaneously? Does this also work for rats? Is it optional?
If not, this is wrong.
That is a legitimate question. If it was true we would also have to consider cook-offs of missiles in launchers and storage, which in real warfare is a most serious issue indeed.
We would then also have to consider hits on the capacitor which might also result in catastrophic failure of the space frame.
And we can go so far as to consider damage to some types of cargo.
My issue was not with these technicalities. My concern is only that the victim of a request of ransom does not have the tool of the self-destruct button [again: if they so chose to use it] as a last resort.
It is not a boon to the victim who stands to lose everything, it should be a tool to deny the prize to the pirate. That is my sole consideration.
Whether it was smart of the victim to be there or whether the pirate is honorable [most of the time] or whether there is no better way for the victim to get out of the situation is entirely beside the point.
The present implementation of the self-destruct mechanism is useless to the point of being a waste of code.
The victim has a right to decide what to do with his or her assets, whatever the opinion of interested parties.
A working self-destruct sequence, violent, instantaneous and without warning, is an option that should not be denied the capsuleer.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Agor Dirdonen
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 15:59:00 -
[66]
It's quite simple in my opinion.
When you're ransomed, you have two options: a) you don't pay. You are guaranteed that your ship will go *poof*. b) you pay. Depending on who's ransoming, you have a chance to get your ship out alive. No guarantees though.
with b) you might be lucky. With a) you're always screwed.
|

Lubomir Penev
interimo
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 16:50:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Kaeten shoudl always get info on the corp befroe you pay ransom, see if they are trustworthy
Pie > 40M within 30 sec and you can leave Victim > damnit eve-search is slow, trying to check C&P archives to see if you have a good reputation Pie > time is out, bye bye
A little bit impractical maybe? -- I'm done whining about AFs, it looks like they are making them right \o/ |

White Chasm
Caldari Blood In Blood Out
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 17:48:00 -
[68]
As I stated previously, BIBO honors ransoms.
Point by point rebuttals.
1. Too many variables.
Eve is a game whose foundation may as well be risk versus rewards. Telling everyone never to take a risk isn't going to solve your problem, it will, however, ensure that no one ever has any chance of a way out.
2. Ransoms directly fund pirate activity.
Carebearing in general both directly and indirectly fuels piracy. Who buys all those mods you make/sell? Pirates their alts, and their victims
3. Never smack.
I agree. The same should be said about the forums mr. alt. Post with your main.
Some tips for everyone.
Don't pay EVERY ransom, but if you REALLY need to get that ship out, it has to be worth the risk than just giving up. Most pirates will give a very reasonable ransom rate and chances are, if your insured, it wont be that big a deal to lose that AND your ship. Then you can name and shame and cause those guys to (in theory) lose many millions of isk more in ransoms because they've proven they can't be trusted.
Of course if they let you go, then you've cut the amount you've stood to lose by a vast amount and the pirate gets a little dough.
Flame away? OK. You're an idiot. You expect everyone to just do what you say because YOU weren't careful, and YOU shelled out money to disreputable folks and then YOU weren't brave enough to name and shame with YOUR main? Idiot. _________________
Originally by: CCP Mitnal Although it's comforting to note that the majority of pirates will be remaining single for the foreseeable future. 
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 18:26:00 -
[69]
Originally by: White Chasm As I stated previously, BIBO honors ransoms.
====
When you're ransomed, you have two options: a) you don't pay. You are guaranteed that your ship will go *poof*. b) you pay. Depending on who's ransoming, you have a chance to get your ship out alive. No guarantees though. [Agor Dirdonen] ====
Some tips for everyone.
Don't pay EVERY ransom, but if you REALLY need to get that ship out, it has to be worth the risk than just giving up. Most pirates will give a very reasonable ransom rate and chances are, if your insured, it wont be that big a deal to lose that AND your ship. Then you can name and shame and cause those guys to (in theory) lose many millions of isk more in ransoms because they've proven they can't be trusted.
Of course if they let you go, then you've cut the amount you've stood to lose by a vast amount and the pirate gets a little dough.
Flame away? OK. You're an idiot. You expect everyone to just do what you say because YOU weren't careful, and YOU shelled out money to disreputable folks and then YOU weren't brave enough to name and shame with YOUR main? Idiot.
The lack of imagination in this thread is disheartening.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Solomon Caselle
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 18:44:00 -
[70]
I don't suppose you stopped to consider that pirates are not exactly a huge chunk of this game. What about the thousands of people just fighting out in 0.0? Putting back in an instant self-destruct would take away a valuable tool in help buffering the costs of combat in general.
Honestly, it's not about what the big bad pirates do. If you're dumb enough to get caught doing the same crap over and over, then you don't deserve what you have.
Beyond that, the theory-crafting on it is pointless. If you want to give the middle finger to the pirates, here's an idea; stop getting caught and going into low sec where you can be caught and ransomed. Really, that's all you're asking for. You can say "**** you" just as easily in chat.
|

Newbear
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 18:56:00 -
[71]
I run a whois check on their corp website and get the name of their webmaster, who is usually also their ceo. Then I send them one of my old stuffed bears though the mail as ransom payment. Click here for my High Security POS Service
|

Hells Reclaimer
Amarr The Racketeers
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 18:59:00 -
[72]
The Racketeers always honor ransom's 
|

Terianna Eri
Amarr Scrutari
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 22:55:00 -
[73]
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface Edited by: Abulurd Boniface on 09/09/2008 18:27:47 Edited by: Abulurd Boniface on 09/09/2008 18:24:34
Originally by: Artemis Rose As being stated many times in this thread, the majority of pirates will honor ransoms. They can kill just fine without having to dishonor ransoms to pile up kill mails/loot.
It may be really shocking, but just because they shot at you for being in range, doesn't make them griefers, low self-esteem bullies or whatever assumption you want to make against them.
Apparently some concepts have a hard time sinking in. It is not about honorable pirates versus dishonorable pirates. It is not about the pirates. It is about the right to say "no" to the oppressor.
Having an effective self-destruct mechanism in place that robs the pirate of the prize is a choice the victim makes for themselves. Being denied the option means they can only stand in the corner with their hat in their hand, baas Ganzendonk style, and say please and thank you and 'can I go now, please?'
The reason why the self-destruct mechanism was rendered useless, it turns out, is that too many people used it, thereby depriving the pirate of the prize. Because the pirate learned a lesson about the human condition: that people, if given the choice, would rather say "kust gij ne kier dik mijn kluuten, smeerlap" than to bow down and give in to their bullies.
And the pirates can't have that, and CCP appears to be of the same opinion.
See how effective piracy would be if people had the ability to deny the pirate the prize, how many people don't care about the honor-among-thieves and rather leave with nothing than to hand it over.
It is not about honoring ransoms, it is about the fact that it's not the pirate's stuff and they can't have it and the only way for the pirate to inflict themselves upon people is to whine at CCP's doorstep to take away the one tool for the victim to say "From Hell's heart I stab at thee" and rather lose everything than to part with anything.
I shall strive to restore the self-destruct mechanism to useful functionality: to violently, instantaneously and without warning beforehand destroy the space frame and its contents and render it unsalvageable.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
Your idea would destroy piracy and PVP forever. Nobody would ever get any loot from PVP - why would they? The targets would always just self-destruct.
Your idea smacks of "aww whaaaa, someone actually caught me, well nyah nyah you can't have my stuff, so there, I WIN!"
Did you get harassed by bullies a lot when you were a kid? __________________________________
Originally by: Arthur Frayn How much to ruin all your holes, luv?
|

Dhaaka Vincatar
|
Posted - 2008.09.10 23:25:00 -
[74]
To Abulard:
I am not a pirate.
Pirates enjoy PvP in the game. Any money from ransoming and looting ships helps fund their PvP, but it is hardly essential. Pirates can still rat, plex, mission, trade and build to make money, just like non-pirates.
If you implemented your self-destruct idea, pirates would stop ransoming altogether and simply blow everyone up, no questions asked, no mercy. You still wouldn't have the option to 'say no to the oppressor', as you noted in your ludicrously overdramatic way, because you wouldn't have the oppourtunity to say 'no'. You would simply be routinely blown up and podded.
People aren't going to stop attacking your ships just because there is no ISK in it for them. People like to blow people up, especially in this game. They get the killmail, they get the ego boost, and they get the adrenaline rush of participating in PvP.
In short, CCP will never reverse their self-destruct mechanic, for several reasons:
1. they like that some modules recirculate into the EvE economy.
2. they like that some players (via ransoms) are not driven out of the game due to drive-by poddings by more experienced pirates (as it would be in your system, as the choices then would be to 'blow my own ship up' and 'get blown up by the pirate'), but instead get the oppourtunity to pay isk and keep their ship and/or implants.
And finally,
3. CCP likes that their game is open-ended enough to support any playstyle, even the greedy, criminal, serial killer playstyle. It expands their playerbase and gives them more money.
Hope you get some perspective,
Dhaaka Vincatar
|

Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 00:03:00 -
[75]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 11/09/2008 00:03:51
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
The victim has a right to decide what to do with his or her assets, whatever the opinion of interested parties.
No, he doesn't. The moment you get caught is the moment someone is holding your assets at his mercy.
Fact is, you just want to kill piracy on the spot, and leave it only to the people who kill for fun (and would just kill & pod you, no questions asked, no ransoms offered).
So take your rubbish ideas somewhere else.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 01:40:00 -
[76]
Originally by: Terianna Eri
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface Edited by: Abulurd Boniface on 09/09/2008 18:27:47 Edited by: Abulurd Boniface on 09/09/2008 18:24:34
Originally by: Artemis Rose
Your idea would destroy piracy and PVP forever. Nobody would ever get any loot from PVP - why would they? The targets would always just self-destruct.
Your idea smacks of "aww whaaaa, someone actually caught me, well nyah nyah you can't have my stuff, so there, I WIN!"
Did you get harassed by bullies a lot when you were a kid?
What part of losing a space frame, plus rigging and content, feels like winning to you? Are you familiar with basic economics?
Writing off assets is the ultimate executive decision. Is it your contention that the owner should be denied the privilege of deciding what the best use of their assets is and when and how that judgment should be exercised? Are you comfortable with the idea of strangers accosting you in the street and telling you what you should do with your belongings? Are you at peace to be the minder of your assets at the behest of third party aggressors?
If you are, that would go a long way to explain the poor lack of understanding of basic economic concepts on display and I would know you thanks if you would forego the opportunity to inflict your warped sense of property ownership on me.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Rudy Metallo
The Bastards
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 01:56:00 -
[77]
Are you comfortable with the idea of people simply killing you instead of giving you the choice to throw said belongings away or taking your money and leaving?
Than I suggest you sit down and shut up, young one. --
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 01:58:00 -
[78]
Originally by: Cpt Branko Edited by: Cpt Branko on 11/09/2008 00:03:51
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
The victim has a right to decide what to do with his or her assets, whatever the opinion of interested parties.
No, he doesn't. The moment you get caught is the moment someone is holding your assets at his mercy.
Fact is, you just want to kill piracy on the spot, and leave it only to the people who kill for fun (and would just kill & pod you, no questions asked, no ransoms offered).
So take your rubbish ideas somewhere else.
The owner of an asset has the right to choose what to do with the asset. The mere fact that someone wants to steal it is not a reason to have to give in to the demand. Is that a difficult concept for you?
Is piracy a coveted cultural expression that needs to be protected at all cost? Since when? Elaborate.
Your contention that I want to kill piracy is utter nonsense. EVE is an environment where everybody should be able to do and say exactly what they feel. For precisely that reason I see no motivation at all that a pirate's request should be granted by default. If it is the pirate's liberty to restrain players and hold them ransom is it not the victim's privilege not to comply? Does freedom in your universe only work one way? Am I making too big a leap of faith when I surmise that this freedom somehow always seems to work out your way?
Let us repair to the start of the argument: it is not the pirate who decides what should and should not be done with assets that they find themselves in close proximity of. It is the owner who makes that decision. If the pirate does not like the outcome of that decision, what possible motive do you perceive that the owner should care about that fact?
Would you perchance appreciate receiving some kind of small stuffed animal to accompany you on your voyages through the timeless void?
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 01:59:00 -
[79]
Originally by: Rudy Metallo Are you comfortable with the idea of people simply killing you instead of giving you the choice to throw said belongings away or taking your money and leaving?
Than I suggest you sit down and shut up, young one.
Please, don't do that. It's not your talent.
Be good.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Dhaaka Vincatar
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 02:35:00 -
[80]
Despite the way he said it, Rudy is 100% correct, just like I noted myself. Your choice is as follows:
Currently:
1. Pay isk and save your ship and/or implants. 2. Try to commit suicide and die before it triggers. 2. Die.
After Abulurd self-destruct change:
1. Commit suicide. 2. Die.
I don't think this is a really a step forward.
|

Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 06:25:00 -
[81]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 11/09/2008 06:27:15
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
The owner of an asset has the right to choose what to do with the asset. The mere fact that someone wants to steal it is not a reason to have to give in to the demand. Is that a difficult concept for you?
Self destructing takes time, but that is a difficult concept for you somehow.
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
Your contention that I want to kill piracy is utter nonsense. EVE is an environment where everybody should be able to do and say exactly what they feel.
Since when? EvE is a game with mechanics. They enable you to do certain things (or prevent you from doing them). You can't do all you want to be able to, particularly not with people holding a gun to your head. Why can't I rob the contents of your hangar in station, for instance? Surely in a environment where I should be able to do exactly what I feel it should be possible!
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
If it is the pirate's liberty to restrain players and hold them ransom is it not the victim's privilege not to comply? Does freedom in your universe only work one way?
Does freedom outside EvE work when you get caught with a gun pointing to your head? Does your car have a self-destruct mechanism when someone's robbing you? Your assets? Can you in fact press a button and make them all vanish when there's a risk of someone robbing them? Really?
You can't have a 0 second self-destruct (in fact, it was changed a long time ago - it did exist at one point and it was indeed horrible). You've got precisely all the same tools pirates do (and more, in fact) to defend your assets. Use them. Stop being the poor victim, maybe?
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 07:08:00 -
[82]
Originally by: Dhaaka Vincatar Despite the way he said it, Rudy is 100% correct, just like I noted myself. Your choice is as follows:
Currently:
1. Pay isk and save your ship and/or implants. 2. Try to commit suicide and die before it triggers. 2. Die.
After Abulurd self-destruct change:
1. Commit suicide. 2. Die.
I don't think this is a really a step forward.
A number of options is missed here, which makes your case that of the pondering sauropod. I have mentioned my disappointment with regards to the pitiful lack of imagination in this thread before.
The breaking point where we do not seem to be able to advance beyond is that apparently the victim has not right to a choice. This is not an issue of game mechanics, this is an issue of world view. Do you appreciate the difference?
The idea that the victim is more likely to self-destruct than to yield is so appalling to you that the option has to be removed by any means. I have mentioned repeatedly that this choice would not have to be automatic. On the other hand there are no game mechanics that force the pirate to engage in hijacking a victim. It is a positive choice the pirate makes. They do it anyway. Your vaunted PvP element, the savory syrup of salacious snatching without which the game loses all its rousing vigor.
The pirate has a choice and the option to engage or decline. The victim lacks a vital choice [the qualitative aspect of that word does not seem to sink in] and is robbed of an option to choose the game play they prefer. You, and many others, have no problem with this.
If you ever find yourself part of the leadership of a country, would you please be so kind and oblige us by warning us about this fact so that we may make arrangements never to visit there?
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Jarek Switchblade
The Bastards
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 07:09:00 -
[83]
Abulurd, I think you're looking at this from one side only, and it's making for an extremely biased point of view.
While you take into consideration the rights of the victim in every post, you seem to fail to see the "rights" of a pirate, ironically.
When a pirate undocks, he doesn't immediately see a passing shiny ship which he can insta-web-scram-and-shoot from station before ransoming for ludicrous amounts of cash and lazily reclining in his chair.
No.
A pirate undocks, and depending on the region, can spend hours searching belts looking for targets before he happens upon something he can take on, whether that be the same class ship as his, or different.
So, when he does finally find a target, beat him in combat, AND get him to submit to demands to stop firing and negotiate a ransom, why should the victim (which is a bad term by the way - more on that in a sec) get a "LOL I WIN" button that makes hours of scanning and searching worthless?
It's kind of like a high-sec player mining for hours, only to have their can self destruct on its own, or a missioner being told by his agent that "Oh sorry, you can't have the reward for that last one."
Basically, if you lose the fight, you are PUT into that "helpless" position, it's not that a pirate just walks up and says "O HAI, U HELPLESS NOW KK?"
Now, why "victims" is a bad term is because NO ONE is a victim until they lose the engagement...if you don't want to be put in the situation in the first place, FIGHT, and try to kill the pirate. If you can't beat him, strive to MWD away. If you can't fight, don't get caught! Prevention is better than cure, so just use the scanner wisely.
Pirates, especially solo, often warp into danger themselves, and these "hapless victims" are often far from defenceless - pirates often risk losing their ship in combat just as much as the victim, with only a better knowledge of how their ship runs well dictating the winner.
So, please try to consider the rights of the pirate as well as a defeated "victim", and try to shake this unrealistic attitude of all pirates being seemingly invincible forms of THE OPPRESSOR - far from it, pirates are players that work extremely hard in most cases for their targets, and do often risk themselves in the process.
|

Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 07:27:00 -
[84]
You're not seriously suggesting that 'victims' are flying warships with guns? That's like blasphemous.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 07:28:00 -
[85]
Originally by: Cpt Branko Edited by: Cpt Branko on 11/09/2008 06:27:15
Self destructing takes time, but that is a difficult concept for you somehow.
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
Your contention that I want to kill piracy is utter nonsense. EVE is an environment where everybody should be able to do and say exactly what they feel.
Since when? EvE is a game with mechanics. They enable you to do certain things (or prevent you from doing them). You can't do all you want to be able to, particularly not with people holding a gun to your head. Why can't I rob the contents of your hangar in station, for instance? Surely in a environment where I should be able to do exactly what I feel it should be possible!
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
If it is the pirate's liberty to restrain players and hold them ransom is it not the victim's privilege not to comply? Does freedom in your universe only work one way?
Does freedom outside EvE work when you get caught with a gun pointing to your head? Does your car have a self-destruct mechanism when someone's robbing you? Your assets? Can you in fact press a button and make them all vanish when there's a risk of someone robbing them? Really?
You can't have a 0 second self-destruct (in fact, it was changed a long time ago - it did exist at one point and it was indeed horrible). You've got precisely all the same tools pirates do (and more, in fact) to defend your assets. Use them. Stop being the poor victim, maybe?
I know that the self-destruct sequence takes time, that was my whole point. Apparently it existed before and it worked well. So good in fact that the poor pirates were left without a crutch to limp through existence.
The pirate apparently -must- have a choice to engage, the victim -must not- have the option to accept or decline the aggression.
I appreciate that the game mechanics do not allow for any and all action the player chooses. I used the word 'should' for a reason. But this functionality has in fact existed so I'm not asking for a feature that cannot be implemented. It is just being denied to the victim and was replaced with a feature that robs the action of all meaning. It does not bother you that the game contains useless code as long as it does not interfere with how you want to play the game. You are absolutely at ease with the fact that it takes away a choice about how someone else may choose to play the game. Whatever doesn't inconvenience you is fine so long as you can keep the choice to inconvenience others.
When you have guests at your house, do they have to fight and defend the food on their plate or don't you bother with quaint antics that involve some of the finer social graces?
Also, you seem to lack any grasp of the freedom to act outside of EVE, even with a gun pointed to your head. Which is why we are having this whole discussion in the first place. Don't fret about it. It'll be fine, I'm here. You will be educated. It will take time but we'll get there. Such is my love for my fellow human.
About that stuffed animal, any preference as to color, texture, fabric, size and shape?
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 08:06:00 -
[86]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 11/09/2008 08:09:46
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
I know that the self-destruct sequence takes time, that was my whole point. Apparently it existed before and it worked well. So good in fact that the poor pirates were left without a crutch to limp through existence.
The pirate apparently -must- have a choice to engage, the victim -must not- have the option to accept or decline the aggression.
The "victim" has the option to fight back or run.
Would it be balanced if the victim could fight, if he sees he can win, win and get loot, if he sees he can't, just self-destruct? Balanced much? 
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
But this functionality has in fact existed so I'm not asking for a feature that cannot be implemented. It is just being denied to the victim and was replaced with a feature that robs the action of all meaning.
It has fixed the feature to do what it was supposed to do (keeping someone pernamently scrambled/webbed and therefore prevent him from playing), while killing the undesired side-effect (capability to just deny all spoils to the victor when you see fight isn't going your way). The feature has been fixed a long time ago.
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
Whatever doesn't inconvenience you is fine so long as you can keep the choice to inconvenience others.
So you're saying victims cannot fly warships with guns which can, shock horror, fight back? They cannot run?
Originally by: Absurd Boniface
RABBLE RABBLE
Lolwhat?
Can I give you a counter-suggestion? When you first log into EvE, let's give players a choice. You can play "evil opressor" with current mechanics and "victim", where victims do not get to use combat ships and weapons ever and can self-destruct at will, but never fight back or run.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 08:16:00 -
[87]
Quote:
Originally by: Absurd Boniface
RABBLE RABBLE
Lolwhat?
You have no argument, you lack fluency and you put words in my mouth I never used.
I'm not arguing with children.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 08:19:00 -
[88]
Originally by: Jarek Switchblade Abulurd, I think you're looking at this from one side only, and it's making for an extremely biased point of view.
While you take into consideration the rights of the victim in every post, you seem to fail to see the "rights" of a pirate, ironically.
A pirate undocks, and depending on the region, can spend hours searching belts looking for targets before he happens upon something he can take on, whether that be the same class ship as his, or different.
So, when he does finally find a target, beat him in combat, AND get him to submit to demands to stop firing and negotiate a ransom, why should the victim (which is a bad term by the way - more on that in a sec) get a "LOL I WIN" button that makes hours of scanning and searching worthless?
It's kind of like a high-sec player mining for hours, only to have their can self destruct on its own, or a missioner being told by his agent that "Oh sorry, you can't have the reward for that last one."
Now, why "victims" is a bad term is because NO ONE is a victim until they lose the engagement...if you don't want to be put in the situation in the first place, FIGHT, and try to kill the pirate. If you can't beat him, strive to MWD away. If you can't fight, don't get caught! Prevention is better than cure, so just use the scanner wisely.
Pirates, especially solo, often warp into danger themselves, and these "hapless victims" are often far from defenceless - pirates often risk losing their ship in combat just as much as the victim, with only a better knowledge of how their ship runs well dictating the winner.
So, please try to consider the rights of the pirate as well as a defeated "victim", and try to shake this unrealistic attitude of all pirates being seemingly invincible forms of THE OPPRESSOR - far from it, pirates are players that work extremely hard in most cases for their targets, and do often risk themselves in the process.
I say 'victim' because that is what somebody is when they are the subject of unwanted aggression. I'm not trying for drama.
I have not heard any argument about why the 'LOL I WIN' button is in fact a win for someone who may have just lost a space frame, rigging and content running into the hundreds of millions or even billions of ISK. What component of the equation turns this into a win for you? My argument is that of spite. If the victim cannot have the benefit of their assets, why should the pirate?
Which brings us to 'the rights of the pirate'. You scouted for hours, you hemmed and you hawed, you despaired "Maybe not this night? Maybe tomorrow?". Then you see the ship, your first kill of the day. Now what? Do you want fire works, a band to play your favorite music, a welcoming committee, a speech on the merits of free enterprise on the high seas?
Rights for pirates?!? When did that happen? You sat around for hours, actively planning to make a dent in someone's day. At what point did this transition into a right to the prize?
It is true that the game mechanics allow for this kind of action and it is lawful within the confines of the environment to engage in this activity. I can accept that not every engagement by default means the pirate wins. I do not accept any claim to a right to someone's assets. It is the owner who has executive privilege of what to do with their assets. If those prerogatives interfere with your perception of rights, tough cookies.
You want the law of the jungle. That's fine. So be it. But if it is to be there then it has to work both ways [which I have always maintained]. If you cannot accept the hazard of being denied the prize don't be a pirate. The victim is not put in place for your convenience. You just choose to play that way.
The argument about the popping jet can and the denied mission prize is nonsense.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 08:24:00 -
[89]
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
If the victim cannot have the benefit of their assets, why should the pirate?
Because he won?
Winners get the spoils of war. I hope it's not a hard concept to grasp.
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
Rights for pirates?!? When did that happen? You sat around for hours, actively planning to make a dent in someone's day. At what point did this transition into a right to the prize?
When you killed the target?
Simple. Get this. You win, you get the spoils. You want nobody to get spoils for winning fights. Well, tough luck. There's really no point in discussing this with people like you.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 08:27:00 -
[90]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 11/09/2008 08:28:33 Edited by: Cpt Branko on 11/09/2008 08:27:43
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
You have no argument, you lack fluency and you put words in my mouth I never used.
You have no argument, really. All you are really giving here is "law of the jungle"*, "oh, but guests at the dinner table" RL crap, which is not really worth of a reply.
You also have the misguided opinion that you should be able to deny the spoils of war at the press of a button for some reason - because of loser rights?
All the time parading about 'victim' status. Win the fight next time, maybe? 
*In response to your comment, it does work both ways. When CCP exclusively prohibits victims from using warships with guns, maybe you'll have a case.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

H Lecter
Gallente The Black Rabbits The Gurlstas Associates
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 09:20:00 -
[91]
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface You have no argument, you lack fluency and you put words in my mouth I never used.
I'm not arguing with children.
Your eloquent style of argumentation leaves me deeply impressed. You have now convinced me - I will end this gruesome way of playing the game and defend the poor helpless victims of New Eden side by side with you Sir!
I shall send daily petitions to CCP to ban piracy from EVE forever. Instead they should offer activities like pony riding or bible quizzes! We will all enjoy a much brighter world with no harm to anybody.
...NOT!
I guess this is the right game for you!
And can I haz your stuff?
|

Da SoulSteala
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 09:26:00 -
[92]
I've heard rumours that there are some people that fly around in low sec with something worth alot to lure pirates or other pvpers into a trap and anyway we can do nearly what ever we want which is how the CCP made it.
PS I have nearly no idea what im talking about |

Blood Bathroom
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 09:28:00 -
[93]
Edited by: Blood Bathroom on 11/09/2008 09:30:05
Originally by: Jarek Switchblade
Quote: Never pay ransom! Fight to the bitter end!
Now this is what I don't understand, and, imo, it destroys your whole argument instantly.
I mean, if you stand a chance against the pirates, fair play. If you're hopelessly dying though, what's the point?
See the story below -
A while back we had a guy that thought like this, he was flying a ship that was, if I remember correctly, worth 150 mil - 100 of that was mods.
He was offered a TOTAL ransom of 50 mil, but he steadfastedly declined. Since there were several of us attacking him, the 50 mil wouldn't have "funded more piracy" that much anyway between us, and instead he popped and lost all that cash...much of which dropped and was worth much more than the ransom asked.
The result? Good times for us, and very bad times for him.
We now regularly ship-scan our targets while ransoming, to ensure fair ransoms.
And as ALWAYS, The Bastards personally honour ransoms - in threads like these, its pretty much mandatory to say.
So yeah, I've said it once and I'll say it again, if the guy who is ransoming you is a nervous fool that seems to scream obscenities into chat and smack like a idiot, paying up isn't clever.
If you're being ransomed by the real deal, it is often in your best interests to pay, regardless of whether "more piracy" is funded or not - your attackers will get cash anyway, and will not hesitate to kill you...plus if you're smart and you pay up, you will likely save a great deal of time and not get caught next time, as you will be aware of the dangers if you are smart.
Also, you say you are not tarring us all with the same immature, inaccurate brush, but then you go and throw out stuff like -
Quote: Whats to say they won't blow your ship up after you pay? They are pirates afterall.
Well, comments like that show a distinct ignorance, or a poor experience with nub wannabes in the past.
Show the profession some respect, and maybe people will respond in kind to you too 
Almost cared... well not really
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 09:34:00 -
[94]
Edited by: Abulurd Boniface on 11/09/2008 09:36:03
Originally by: H Lecter
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface You have no argument, you lack fluency and you put words in my mouth I never used.
I'm not arguing with children.
Your eloquent style of argumentation leaves me deeply impressed. You have now convinced me - I will end this gruesome way of playing the game and defend the poor helpless victims of New Eden side by side with you Sir!
I shall send daily petitions to CCP to ban piracy from EVE forever. Instead they should offer activities like pony riding or bible quizzes! We will all enjoy a much brighter world with no harm to anybody.
...NOT!
I guess this is the right game for you!
And can I haz your stuff?
Your HelloKitty suggestion is not original, it has been brought up before.
I highly doubt there would even be 1% of the EVE population with the stomach for playing HelloKitty. Almost this entire thread is a testament to the lack of raw endurance in the EVE community that would be required for such an activity.
The bible quiz is a nice touch but if you don't mind I prefer better fiction to quote from, you must have heard about the Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
You can absolutely have my stuff... for the right price.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Katie Door
the united
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 09:39:00 -
[95]
Edited by: Katie Door on 11/09/2008 09:42:41
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
Originally by: Cpt Branko Edited by: Cpt Branko on 11/09/2008 06:27:15
Self destructing takes time, but that is a difficult concept for you somehow.
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
Your contention that I want to kill piracy is utter nonsense. EVE is an environment where everybody should be able to do and say exactly what they feel.
Since when? EvE is a game with mechanics. They enable you to do certain things (or prevent you from doing them). You can't do all you want to be able to, particularly not with people holding a gun to your head. Why can't I rob the contents of your hangar in station, for instance? Surely in a environment where I should be able to do exactly what I feel it should be possible!
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
If it is the pirate's liberty to restrain players and hold them ransom is it not the victim's privilege not to comply? Does freedom in your universe only work one way?
Does freedom outside EvE work when you get caught with a gun pointing to your head? Does your car have a self-destruct mechanism when someone's robbing you? Your assets? Can you in fact press a button and make them all vanish when there's a risk of someone robbing them? Really?
You can't have a 0 second self-destruct (in fact, it was changed a long time ago - it did exist at one point and it was indeed horrible). You've got precisely all the same tools pirates do (and more, in fact) to defend your assets. Use them. Stop being the poor victim, maybe?
I know that the self-destruct sequence takes time, that was my whole point. Apparently it existed before and it worked well. So good in fact that the poor pirates were left without a crutch to limp through existence.
The pirate apparently -must- have a choice to engage, the victim -must not- have the option to accept or decline the aggression.
I appreciate that the game mechanics do not allow for any and all action the player chooses. I used the word 'should' for a reason. But this functionality has in fact existed so I'm not asking for a feature that cannot be implemented. It is just being denied to the victim and was replaced with a feature that robs the action of all meaning. It does not bother you that the game contains useless code as long as it does not interfere with how you want to play the game. You are absolutely at ease with the fact that it takes away a choice about how someone else may choose to play the game. Whatever doesn't inconvenience you is fine so long as you can keep the choice to inconvenience others.
When you have guests at your house, do they have to fight and defend the food on their plate or don't you bother with quaint antics that involve some of the finer social graces?
Also, you seem to lack any grasp of the freedom to act outside of EVE, even with a gun pointed to your head. Which is why we are having this whole discussion in the first place. Don't fret about it. It'll be fine, I'm here. You will be educated. It will take time but we'll get there. Such is my love for my fellow human.
About that stuffed animal, any preference as to color, texture, fabric, size and shape?
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
CCP saw fit in their infinite wisdom to change the self destruct mechanismn to what it is today, you don't like it, that's fine, but live with it. you also state that its useless code, while other people in this thread have stated they use it to get back to 0.0 in a hurry, therefor its not useless.
The victim does have choices, he can choose to ignore the warning that pops up when trying to enter low-sec, he can choose not to use a scout while traveling thru low-sec, he can choose to ignore the statistics function of the map (you know, the thing that pops up when u press F10), the victim, or customer as like to call them, has the choice to accept the convo for a ransom or choose not to accept the ransom convo. that's alot of choices.
|

Da SoulSteala
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 10:04:00 -
[96]
Don't gamble stuff you arn't willing to lose.
|

cpt Mark
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 10:45:00 -
[97]
Pirate: Pay me 100M or i'll blow your ship up You: How about you pay me for disrupting my day Pirate: LOL? pay or I take you down You: You pay me and leave now or you wont see that nice ship of yours for much longer
*true pirate personality kicks in (coward) and he warps away.
or
*idiotically the pirate blows you up
You: Now look what you've done. Hurting my nice ship.
and now you have somebody to hunt down and kill repeatably.
|

Tashajan
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 10:53:00 -
[98]
Originally by: thisisnotanalt 3) Never, ever, smack talk, or whine in local, it fuels their rather low self esteem in RL. They are fond of mentioning that carebear tears fuel their POS (read self esteem). Nothing will be more confusing and irritating than a silent victim.
Originally by: thisisnotanalt ROFLMAO
Nobody reads what I wrote. I did not lump pirates into a category. I simply said, do not pay ransom and offered tips regarding this.
you kinda lump them into a category there..
|

Kaya Valda
Caldari Neo Spartans
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 12:04:00 -
[99]
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
A load of shit.
You sir are an idiot. You're proposed use of Self-destruct would make Piracy pointless, and therefore effective remove that aspect of Eve. It seems you mistakenly believe that this game is some kind of trading sim, and not a complicated combination of war, industry, trading, piracy etc.
The thing you seem to be missing here is that Eve is a GAME, and not supposed to be an extension of real life. As such a good game has lots of different and often contradictory elements to its game play. Eve is that good game I speak of.
|

Jarek Switchblade
The Bastards
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 15:25:00 -
[100]
Quote: Almost cared... well not really
Ah, at least you didn't care enough to come on the forums, read all my post, quote pretty much all of it and a couple more and then make a weak remark before posting yourself?
Oh wait...

|

White Chasm
Caldari Blood In Blood Out
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 17:04:00 -
[101]
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface Your HelloKitty suggestion is not original, it has been brought up before.
The originality of the statement doesn't have an impact on accuracy, Absurd Bonerface! I bet my dad could beat up your dad! _________________
Originally by: CCP Mitnal Although it's comforting to note that the majority of pirates will be remaining single for the foreseeable future. 
|

Hells Reclaimer
Amarr The Racketeers
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 18:35:00 -
[102]
It's still more fun to lock them down get your ransom.. then kill the noob anyways.. kinda win win
Ransom + mods+ crying noob = Pure Enjoyment 
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.11 20:35:00 -
[103]
Originally by: Kaya Valda
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
A load of shit.
You sir are an idiot. .
I assure you, madam, that your generous, heartfelt sentiment is most warmly reciprocated.
I have yet to hear one argument that stands the test of reason why piracy would no longer be possible if both sides of the argument engage on an equal footing.
However, by this time my hopes of being presented with such argument have been reduced to the far more realistic expectation of a dimwitted and rather less inspired riposte.
I expected more from the EVE forums but clearly I came to the wrong place for a spirited exchange.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO |

ScaR97731
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 02:49:00 -
[104]
Originally by: Hells Reclaimer It's still more fun to lock them down get your ransom.. then kill the noob anyways.. kinda win win
Ransom + mods+ crying noob = Pure Enjoyment 
You are a total poster child representing the trash-people of EVE. You have serious issues. Do you take medication? If not you should.
Also, I say never pay the ransom; don't give them any money, and always make it a habit before your ship gets blown up to insult the pirate. Also if you plan to fly in a risky area, do it in a cheap ship with all lame, t1 parts. Keep those filthy animals living on welfare down in the lower sectors where they belong.
Pirates = Trash which = Scum
|

Da SoulSteala
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 04:40:00 -
[105]
Originally by: ScaR97731
Originally by: Hells Reclaimer It's still more fun to lock them down get your ransom.. then kill the noob anyways.. kinda win win
Ransom + mods+ crying noob = Pure Enjoyment 
You are a total poster child representing the trash-people of EVE. You have serious issues. Do you take medication? If not you should.
Also, I say never pay the ransom; don't give them any money, and always make it a habit before your ship gets blown up to insult the pirate. Also if you plan to fly in a risky area, do it in a cheap ship with all lame, t1 parts. Keep those filthy animals living on welfare down in the lower sectors where they belong.
Pirates = Trash which = Scum
rofl thats prolly thisisnotanalts main
|

Jarek Switchblade
The Bastards
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 07:33:00 -
[106]
Quote: I have yet to hear one argument that stands the test of reason why piracy would no longer be possible if both sides of the argument engage on an equal footing.
What? Seriously, what sort of reason do you need? You're either an extremely successful troll, or you have no idea what goes on in low-sec and below.
As has already been pointed out, these "victims" often also fly enormous battleships, which are often more expensively equipped and often more lethal (if used well...) than the stuff I fly myself.
So why are you acting like they are forced to fly untanked haulers full of billions in blueprints?
And, more fundamentally, why do you seem to think that if someone wins a fight, they shouldn't get a reward? If anything's lacking, it's reason on your part - you continue to post the same psuedo-profundic drivel over and over.
Note - this is a game forum, there is no need to address people as "Sir", "Madam", or "Archbishop of Canterbury", and doing so actually comes across as pompous and sarcastic...
So anyway, please define why exactly the "victim" and pirate don't engage on "equal footing"? If the victim isn't "engaging" on equal footing, it's his fault for
A: Not bringing a ship prepared for combat B: Knowingly going to parts of space where he can't handle the inhabitants.
It's the same if you're a pirate and your victim is better prepared.
Also, if someone were to just mug you on the street, would you really expect to engage in "fair terms"? Would you like a big knife too, y'know, just to balance things out a bit? Oh, and of course if the guy gets your wallet it'll explode, so it's all good ¼_¼
There's no logic in your posts. At all.
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 12:17:00 -
[107]
Edited by: Abulurd Boniface on 12/09/2008 12:21:33 Edited by: Abulurd Boniface on 12/09/2008 12:20:29 Edited by: Abulurd Boniface on 12/09/2008 12:19:50 Edited by: Abulurd Boniface on 12/09/2008 12:18:55
Originally by: Jarek Switchblade
Quote: I have yet to hear one argument that stands the test of reason why piracy would no longer be possible if both sides of the argument engage on an equal footing.
What? Seriously, what sort of reason do you need? You're either an extremely successful troll, or you have no idea what goes on in low-sec and below.
As has already been pointed out, these "victims" often also fly enormous battleships, which are often more expensively equipped and often more lethal (if used well...) than the stuff I fly myself.
So why are you acting like they are forced to fly untanked haulers full of billions in blueprints?
And, more fundamentally, why do you seem to think that if someone wins a fight, they shouldn't get a reward? If anything's lacking, it's reason on your part - you continue to post the same psuedo-profundic drivel over and over.
Note - this is a game forum, there is no need to address people as "Sir", "Madam", or "Archbishop of Canterbury", and doing so actually comes across as pompous and sarcastic...
So anyway, please define why exactly the "victim" and pirate don't engage on "equal footing"? If the victim isn't "engaging" on equal footing, it's his fault for
A: Not bringing a ship prepared for combat B: Knowingly going to parts of space where he can't handle the inhabitants.
It's the same if you're a pirate and your victim is better prepared.
Also, if someone were to just mug you on the street, would you really expect to engage in "fair terms"? Would you like a big knife too, y'know, just to balance things out a bit? Oh, and of course if the guy gets your wallet it'll explode, so it's all good ¼_¼
There's no logic in your posts. At all.
I keep re-iterating because I have a ****ens of a time making a simple point. I thought I provided enough information on first contact to support my claim. I derive no joy from having to repeat myself. The universe, as I'm sure you'll agree, does not revolve around me.
Quote: And, more fundamentally, why do you seem to think that if someone wins a fight, they shouldn't get a reward?
Why do you believe the pirate should receive a reward? In the case of a duel with preset goals, a prize might be determined beforehand. I don't think I'm very much mistaken when I say that the victim does not enjoy the idea of having to part with their assets more after the fight than they did before. What possible claim do you believe you can make to someone's assets and more importantly to their right to decide what the best use of those assets is? You win the fight therefore 'you can haz l3wtz?'
The corruption of the self-destruct mechanism has robbed the victim of the right to make that decision.
I keep refering to these people as 'victim' because what they happen to be using in the way of transportation and how that transportation is equipped is immaterial to the argument.
I express myself the way I do because: a) I believe in respectful discourse even though this forum feels like the Mos Eisley canteen. b) I have looked at some of the language formation in this forum and tried to emulate it because it helps with assimilation.
It hurts.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Jarek Switchblade
The Bastards
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 20:38:00 -
[108]
Quote: Why do you believe the pirate should receive a reward?
Read what you quoted again.
I didn't say "the pirate", I said "someone". If ANYONE wins a fight, it is reasonable to assume that you will get some reward for winning - not only from a "risk vs. reward" standpoint, but also from a realism standpoint.
If something goes bang, there will 9 times out of 10 be something juicy left over. Salvageable stuff wouldn't just open a transdimensional portal and vanish.
As for "methods of transportation" being "immaterial" to the argument, I disagree.
A person flying an untanked Badger I through low-sec on their first day playing is far more likely to be a "victim" than someone piloting a Megathron armed to the teeth.
If this is "immaterial", then you are assuming that the above Mega pilot auto-loses to attackers, pirate or otherwise.
Which is, of course, wrong.
So, it is far from immaterial, in my opinion.
Also, "someone's assets" being "claimed" after a fight...the point is, if they are now debris and/or a corpse, those assets are no longer "someone's" they are "anyone's".
Ownership in EVE only consists, truly, of your wallet and what you have parked in a station. Nothing more, nothing less. Your wreck does not belong to you, or anyone else.
But that doesn't mean the stuff in it can't be stolen 
Also, I'm afraid you didn't really answer directly any points I made in my last post here.
Such as, why shouldn't you get a reward for winning a fight?
Why do "victims" and "pirates" not engage on "equal footing" as you put it, assuming equal ship type? It's not like the "victim" auto-loses...as I keep saying.
Quote: I derive no joy from having to repeat myself.
And neither do I. It just merely baffles me how this doesn't seem to sink in. I can appreciate your viewpoint, in a way, but it seems to totally contradict not only basic "risk-reward" systems that are in place in just about every game, ever, including EVE, but also against logical thought too.
Winning a fight is an effort, an activity. Why should there be no spoils of war, or any kind of incentive for fighting?
Answer the questions I have bolded and maybe I will try to respond with less circle-running. That is, assuming that you can open your mind up to what I'm trying to get across. I'm about done with this thread.
EVE is a violent, immoral, dark world...regardless of what side of the fence you are on.
|

Concorduck
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 21:14:00 -
[109]
Remember kids, if you're not paying the ransom. once you get money from someone, you go hunt for someone's else, most unlekely he won't pay twice. when you get a killmail from someone, you keep hunting him till he pays the ransom. and be sure, there are people with fuel tanks full of patience.
-----------------------------------------
Originally by: Crumplecorn Contact the CSM about it, voting themselves into disbandment wouldn't be pushing the boundaries of absurdity for them.
|

My'kel An'jelo
Amarr Synthetic Frontiers
|
Posted - 2008.09.12 23:57:00 -
[110]
look at all these words about e-honour
|

Hells Reclaimer
Amarr The Racketeers
|
Posted - 2008.09.13 04:36:00 -
[111]
TBH the way i look at it is the person whom you are going to ransom 9 times out of 10 is not going to make the same mistake twice.. so as for repeat business from said person it's well probley not going to happen....
So to max your profit Get your ransom then kill the person.. collect your Mods + mail. and go find the next victim.. or are they really a victim or just someone not paying attention..
I know if i go into a bad area of town at 2am on a saturday night and start walking around well i'm gonna run into a problem. i might win the fight i might not.. point is i put myself into a bad spot by not READING THE SIGNS.
I'm sure alot of you will not understand my point or my way of thinking but this is how i have and will keep playing the game.
Plus there is nothing more sweet then a noob crying.. and some isk to boot  
|

thisisnotanalt
|
Posted - 2008.09.13 09:56:00 -
[112]
Originally by: Hells Reclaimer It's still more fun to lock them down get your ransom.. then kill the noob anyways.. kinda win win
Ransom + mods+ crying noob = Pure Enjoyment 
You just made my case. Thanks.
I think the intelligent reader can deduce for themself the quality of character from their responses in these forums.
Those who resort to name calling amongst other purile behaviors as a debate strategy need to grow up.
Now... why would I want to be harrased by this kind of immature behavior in game? Or become a target for so-and-so to make my game play a little more difficult than it needs to be?
Now you know why I won't post with my main.
Abulurd Boniface: You've put the issues out there quite eloquently and I totally agree with you.
|

Tristen Orde
Friendly Neighbourhood Protection Racket
|
Posted - 2008.09.13 10:17:00 -
[113]
Originally by: Hells Reclaimer TBH the way i look at it is the person whom you are going to ransom 9 times out of 10 is not going to make the same mistake twice.. so as for repeat business from said person it's well probley not going to happen....
So to max your profit Get your ransom then kill the person.. collect your Mods + mail. and go find the next victim.. or are they really a victim or just someone not paying attention..
I know if i go into a bad area of town at 2am on a saturday night and start walking around well i'm gonna run into a problem. i might win the fight i might not.. point is i put myself into a bad spot by not READING THE SIGNS.
I'm sure alot of you will not understand my point or my way of thinking but this is how i have and will keep playing the game.
Plus there is nothing more sweet then a noob crying.. and some isk to boot  
Signed.
|

Da SoulSteala
|
Posted - 2008.09.13 10:55:00 -
[114]
Edited by: Da SoulSteala on 13/09/2008 11:04:19
Originally by: thisisnotanalt
Originally by: Hells Reclaimer It's still more fun to lock them down get your ransom.. then kill the noob anyways.. kinda win win
Ransom + mods+ crying noob = Pure Enjoyment 
You just made my case. Thanks.
I think the intelligent reader can deduce for themself the quality of character from their responses in these forums.
Those who resort to name calling amongst other purile behaviors as a debate strategy need to grow up.
Now... why would I want to be harrased by this kind of immature behavior in game? Or become a target for so-and-so to make my game play a little more difficult than it needs to be?
Now you know why I won't post with my main.
Abulurd Boniface: You've put the issues out there quite eloquently and I totally agree with you.
Rofl thats his alt making it look like he didnt accidently post with his main.
Originally by: Jarek Switchblade
Also, if someone were to just mug you on the street, would you really expect to engage in "fair terms"? Would you like a big knife too, y'know, just to balance things out a bit? Oh, and of course if the guy gets your wallet it'll explode, so it's all good ¼_¼
There's no logic in your posts. At all.
LOL Imangine the mugger's face.
|

Terra Mikael
The Aduro Protocol
|
Posted - 2008.09.13 15:21:00 -
[115]
You know I still don't get this whole thing. **** honoring ransoms - I just do it because my corp now requires it.
But honestly, besides lying, I don't really see what's wrong with doing it. Most people don't read forums, so word doesn't get out, and if it does, the life expectancy of a shaming is somewhere between 24-72 hours tops, and then it gets buried. Return customers is just funny - if you actually have people dumb enough to come through the same pirate infested territory more than once, they are obviously ****** or don't care about their cargo. In that case, try to ransom & pop them a second time - something i have done to the same person twice in one day, believe it or not.
But I enjoy the "ur not a real pirate" stuff. I could say the same thing to people who don't have eyepatches, hooks, and peg legs - you know, cause all real pirates have those.
but seriously i'm a real pirate because I uploaded copyrited content on youtube and stuff. omgyar!  
|

Terra Mikael
The Aduro Protocol
|
Posted - 2008.09.13 15:25:00 -
[116]
Originally by: My'kel An'jelo look at all these words about e-honour
Hollow, are they not?
|

Solomon XI
Hoist The Colors.
|
Posted - 2008.09.13 16:39:00 -
[117]
As a fellow pirate, I must say that not honoring ransoms is bad for business. Those who do not honor ransoms are the lowest of the low and will quickly find themselves public enemy #1 to most pirate corporations. Not like it'd matter anyway.  ~Solo Hoist The Colors. (CEO) |

Hells Reclaimer
Amarr The Racketeers
|
Posted - 2008.09.13 17:18:00 -
[118]
Originally by: Solomon XI As a fellow pirate, I must say that not honoring ransoms is bad for business. Those who do not honor ransoms are the lowest of the low and will quickly find themselves public enemy #1 to most pirate corporations. Not like it'd matter anyway. 
First off this is not a alt of whatever that guys name is.
Why honor ransoms as i pointed out your not gonna get return business and if you do you it's maybe and maybe 1 out of 50 times the same idiot lets you ransom him twice.. Your expecting me to believe that people say hey thats such a nice pirate he treated me so well i think i'll let him ransom me again :) ROFL wake up m8..
Start to max your profit and get some laughs out of it!
Get your ransom get the mods get the kill mail and get another victim and hell maybe your "Victim" will be so ****ed he will come looking for you again... Now that i call repeat business :) more mods... maybe not the ransom again but hey look another mail :)
And Terra baby when ya commin home m8
|

Tristen Orde
Friendly Neighbourhood Protection Racket
|
Posted - 2008.09.13 18:08:00 -
[119]
Originally by: Solomon XI As a fellow pirate, I must say that not honoring ransoms is bad for business. Those who do not honor ransoms are the lowest of the low and will quickly find themselves public enemy #1 to most pirate corporations. Not like it'd matter anyway. 
Because, you know, pirates aren't all about extorting as much as possible from someone.
Hells is right, although we do need you 'real' pirates to keep the norm of 'ransoms are honored' up for those of us who play like an actual pirate.
|

Greckor Monmouth
THE FINAL STAND
|
Posted - 2008.09.13 18:43:00 -
[120]
Edited by: Greckor Monmouth on 13/09/2008 18:44:02
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface subject of unwanted aggression
I did everything I could to point out this sentence to you. Just because you don't want something to happen, doesn't mean you can make it so it can't. Let me put it this way. I go to college, in college I have homework. Do I WANT to do this homework? No. Is it required? Yes.
This translates into eve because by undocking, you sign an agreement that you CAN and most likely WILL get shot at. It is a feature of the game, get over it.
Your moronic and absurd suggestions frankly disgust my sensibilites. Why should I have to play your version of a game because you don't like to do what I like to do? Stay in high sec if you don't want to have a chance of getting attacked.
In your view, someone who harms someone else doesn't deserve any enjoyment in the game? Then I demand that all those people that make mods and sell them n the market get nerfed!!! They keep undercutting me and I am not making money!! THIS IS AN OUTRAGE
EDIT-WoW might be a better option to you. I say this not because it is an overused meme, but because that fits better your idea of what you want PvP to be.
|

Da SoulSteala
|
Posted - 2008.09.14 01:58:00 -
[121]
What if you don't do your homework?
|

Rellana
DAB G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.09.14 11:09:00 -
[122]
About ransoming someone twice,if there an alt of an active PVPER,they may not have the iskies to do that,as I use an alt to fund my main,and I'm in the habit of transferring all my isk to my main at regular invervals,but again you wouldn't catch me or my alt anywhere near low-sec space anyways,not solo anyway.
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.14 12:22:00 -
[123]
Originally by: Greckor Monmouth Edited by: Greckor Monmouth on 13/09/2008 18:44:02
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface subject of unwanted aggression
I did everything I could to point out this sentence to you. Just because you don't want something to happen, doesn't mean you can make it so it can't. Let me put it this way. I go to college, in college I have homework. Do I WANT to do this homework? No. Is it required? Yes.
This translates into eve because by undocking, you sign an agreement that you CAN and most likely WILL get shot at. It is a feature of the game, get over it.
Your moronic and absurd suggestions frankly disgust my sensibilites. Why should I have to play your version of a game because you don't like to do what I like to do? Stay in high sec if you don't want to have a chance of getting attacked.
In your view, someone who harms someone else doesn't deserve any enjoyment in the game? Then I demand that all those people that make mods and sell them n the market get nerfed!!! They keep undercutting me and I am not making money!! THIS IS AN OUTRAGE
EDIT-WoW might be a better option to you. I say this not because it is an overused meme, but because that fits better your idea of what you want PvP to be.
You disgust yourself. This appears to be a function of your lack of close-reading ability. You may want to work on that, it will serve you well.
I will not argue against your post because you make assumptions about me and the game that, as Wolfgang Pauli once said with green-envy inducing eloquence: "That's not right, it's not even wrong." There is no point elaborating on them any further other than to train my typing skills and I'm pretty happy about them as they are.
Because I am nothing if not the milk of human kindness and I want to prevent at all costs that your undoubtedly stunning features are marred by the grooves of deep frowns that will form when you try to figure out what it is that I actually said, I will, for one more time only, restate my original case: the self-destruct button should be configured to violently, instantaneously and without warning destroy the ship. Or, if that is too big a leap [as it appears to be for many people here], that the original feature, deemed already too heinous and unjust by the greater pirate community, be restored to its original functionality.
All other arguments are just derivatives, mostly going toward intent and establishing the various sizes of our peens, e- or otherwise, which do not help the narrative along in any appreciable capacity.
If your sensibilities continue to be disgusted, I will take that atom of information, meaningless though it is, as my reward for participating in what has turned out to be a totally uninspiring exercise.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Terra Mikael
The Aduro Protocol
|
Posted - 2008.09.14 14:57:00 -
[124]
Edited by: Terra Mikael on 14/09/2008 14:59:35
Originally by: Hells Reclaimer And Terra baby when ya commin home m8
/me wipes a single tear from me eye
I didn't know I had one \o/
If racketeers is anything like nightcrew, you can bet I'll be over faster than you can say "e-honor"
Originally by: Hells Reclaimer Ransom + mods+ crying noob = Pure Enjoyment 
oh, and uh, THIS.
|

Eljar Kjeldsson
Caldari Modern-Warfare
|
Posted - 2008.09.15 06:46:00 -
[125]
I only care if pirates kill people("victims" as some people call em) that pass though/mine if the pirates make the fight unfair like 20 battle ships vrs some crap ship like a frigate or industrial rofl if that actually happens the "pirates" should go back to being carebears.
PS if i find that guy that said "grammar tanking" ftw his gunna be blown up alot
 ^ | thats supposed to say I WANT YOU FOR MODERN WARFARE with uncle sam on it but its stuffed up |

Xi Tzu
Amarr Relentless Storm Cartel
|
Posted - 2008.09.16 11:40:00 -
[126]
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
The pirate apparently -must- have a choice to engage, the victim -must not- have the option to accept or decline the aggression.
Your supposed victim made the choice to accept any and all aggression the moment they chose to go through the gate into the 0.4 or below system, there is a warning screen, you ignore it at your peril.
The place for having the choice to accept aggression is Hisec.
|

Zedrik Cayne
Gallente Session9 Malum Exuro
|
Posted - 2008.09.16 19:56:00 -
[127]
Originally by: Xi Tzu
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
The pirate apparently -must- have a choice to engage, the victim -must not- have the option to accept or decline the aggression.
Your supposed victim made the choice to accept any and all aggression the moment they undock.
The place for having the choice to accept aggression is in a station.
Fixed it for you. While concord's buff makes suicide runs harder, its not impossible. If you are in space, someone can try and wtfbbqpwn you into a new clone even with The Pilot, Concord and sentries at the ready. --
Remember: Carebears aren't people. They are giant flying pi±atas.
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.16 21:14:00 -
[128]
Originally by: Xi Tzu
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
The pirate apparently -must- have a choice to engage, the victim -must not- have the option to accept or decline the aggression.
Your supposed victim made the choice to accept any and all aggression the moment they chose to go through the gate into the 0.4 or below system, there is a warning screen, you ignore it at your peril.
The place for having the choice to accept aggression is Hisec.
The supposed victim has no choice but to venture out into low-sec when they need to gather minerals that are simply not available in hi-sec.
If they were available in hi-sec, the pirates would be chasing each other exclusively.
Your statement about accepting the choice for aggression is patently false. There is no such thing as safe space. If minerals are required that can only be found in low/nul-sec space, that is where the prospector needs to go to.
You offer no argument why the victim should have no choice. You only join the consensus in this thread that holds that the victim has to accept that he has no choice.
Am I wrong when I suspect you also believe that winning a fight automagically transfers ownership rights of assets? Aside from having to find profitable routes towards essential minerals and the hazards of deep space the prospecting capsuleer also has to endure facing the cost of acting as a crutch for the pirate's emotional needs. It is unconscionable that to accommodate the more fragile personalities in the game they should also have to give up their assets to pay for the wants of the egos they meet. There is no ISK enough in all the vast expanse of the EVE demesne to pay for that preposterous luxury.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Candice Dice
|
Posted - 2008.09.16 23:48:00 -
[129]
Never pay the "Ransom", go down fighting and just accept the loss, better to die on your feet than be stabbed in the back on your knees and let's face it, the whole, 'we honour ransoms' to be mostly bullshit since they always find a 'loophole' or reason not to pay which usually ends up with an e-peen thread on whine and punishment.
|

Moric Longshanks
|
Posted - 2008.09.17 15:46:00 -
[130]
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface The supposed victim has no choice but to venture out into low-sec when they need to gather minerals that are simply not available in hi-sec.
Open "Market" interface --> Search --> Enter desired mineral --> Success!
You do have a choice. Always.
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface You offer no argument why the victim should have no choice. You only join the consensus in this thread that holds that the victim has to accept that he has no choice.
Total logic failure here based on the first thing I quoted.
|

Eljar Kjeldsson
Caldari Modern-Warfare
|
Posted - 2008.09.19 11:02:00 -
[131]
Originally by: Candice Dice Never pay the "Ransom", go down fighting and just accept the loss, better to die on your feet than be stabbed in the back on your knees and let's face it, the whole, 'we honour ransoms' to be mostly bullshit since they always find a 'loophole' or reason not to pay which usually ends up with an e-peen thread on whine and punishment.
Only proper way to die but you've got a target to blow up for awhile(if his mates are smart they'll use em as bait).
 ^ | thats supposed to say I WANT YOU FOR MODERN WARFARE with uncle sam on it but its stuffed up |

Rhak Amharr
Minmatar Genos Occidere
|
Posted - 2008.09.19 12:12:00 -
[132]
Originally by: thisisnotanalt Show me a nice pirate then? One that goes, "Oh, I caught you, I will let you go peacefully if you send me some ISK for my hard work in catching you." As opposed to one that goes, "100M" in chat and leaves it at that while they take your ship into structure. Doesn't quite set the picture that you will make it out anyways.
I repeat, don't pay ransom. It just ain't worth it due to the many variables. I'm not going to check who will honor ransom if I'm stuck in a situation where I'm going into structure.
Maybe pirate corps could benefit from a public relations department. LMAO
I'm a nice pirate, cause if I offer you a ransom (which I don't do always), I'll honor it. It just depends on my mood at that particular time HOW I ask for it. It might be anything from "100m or you're toast" to "Good day, dear Sir, do you want to save your ship from destruction by paying a small 100mil protection fee?".
And about the structure part: That is standard process when ransoming. Your tank will be broken and you will be put into structure regardless of if a ransom is offered or not, just to be sure you still die if you call in the cavalry. It does not mean that you will die after you paid. Oh, and if you're active tanked and boosting/repairing while in the ransom process, your tank will be broken again, until a conclusion has been reached. After which you will either leave in your ship if you pay, or in your pod if you don't. Well, if I catch the pod after you refused to pay, I'll even give you a quick ride home, or try to ransom you again.
|

Muah Diib
|
Posted - 2008.09.22 20:58:00 -
[133]
it is the players assets and he can choose what to do with them if he chooses to fly into lowsec and risk his ship thats what he choses to do with his assets. if a pirate like myself ransomes he should hold true to what he says no matter what. if not then he dies simple. its not that we are hatred filled people just wanting to destroy every thing and make people cry (if thats how you take it you are way to much into eve) we just are having a good time pvping playing the game the way we can. pirates normaly dont have hours on end to play like most care bears becouse of work and such, so we play a faster paced game style that fills our nerdy needs
ps: our corp is new but we are all legit pirates and honor ransomes. dont think otherwise or we wont even bother to ransome 
|

Muah Diib
|
Posted - 2008.09.22 21:01:00 -
[134]
meh im to drunk for this
|

Drunk Driver
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.09.22 21:08:00 -
[135]
I don't understand ransom.
Just blow up the ship and see what pops out. You know, like a space pinata!
You may not make as much money, but it's more fun that way.

. |

pony2slow
|
Posted - 2008.09.22 21:48:00 -
[136]
Originally by: Drunk Driver
I don't understand ransom.
Just blow up the ship and see what pops out. You know, like a space pinata!
You may not make as much money, but it's more fun that way.

.
you would be amazed to see what some are willing to pay to keep those ships of theirs.
|

SunGod RA
Ministry of Destruction
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 02:00:00 -
[137]
oh hi
i herd ma mo0se waz in dis thread
SO WHEREZ IT |

Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 03:24:00 -
[138]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 23/09/2008 03:23:56
Originally by: Drunk Driver
I don't understand ransom.
Just blow up the ship and see what pops out. You know, like a space pinata!
You may not make as much money, but it's more fun that way.
 .
And then go do L4 missions on your alt to make ISK? 
Fun.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

JackofHearts
Together We Form Voltron
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 03:52:00 -
[139]
Originally by: thisisnotanalt Never pay ransom! Fight to the bitter end!
1) There are too many variables. If they have you scrambled and webbed and demand ransom. Whats to say they won't blow your ship up after you pay? They are pirates afterall.
2) Your ransom directly funds pirate activity, don't pay and watch em squirm with just whatever mods you drop, if any.
3) Never, ever, smack talk, or whine in local, it fuels their rather low self esteem in RL. They are fond of mentioning that carebear tears fuel their POS (read self esteem). Nothing will be more confusing and irritating than a silent victim. Note they will typically open up a private chat for ransom. Your response should be 2 words: "fug off." Nothing more.
Some tips for everyone!
1) Set the pirate and his corp to red. Next time you know to avoid them like the plague. See red minus in local = time to leave.
2) Fly insured T1 ships. Let them blow you up. They get nothing. You get insurance payout!
3) Jump clones FTW!
4) On board ship scanner FTW!
So in short: NEVER PAY RANSOM! Stiffle the flow of big isk to the pirate "economy" which will consist of rats and 'roids only. And I'm not just talking about asteroids... the 'roids they will get from sitting around in local for hours waiting for a victim once more people become more educated about dealing with pirates. By not paying ransom you can rest assure your dignity is still intact, and they got nothing from you save a few random mods from your ship.
FLAME AWAY! I take pride that this post will **** off many and cause them to waste more collective man hours responding to this than the 5 minutes it took me to write this.
Thanks for this info know I know how to avoid them pirates.
|

Tai Paktu
Beyond Divinity Inc
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 06:40:00 -
[140]
Epic thread.
Should state that BYDI honours all ransoms, but beyond that I'm just enjoying this thread and believe that the OP has a well structured argument and has thoroughly researched the subject.
|

Tai Paktu
Beyond Divinity Inc
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 06:57:00 -
[141]
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface stuff
Man, you're using big words. Some of us are drunk and can't comprehend your argument.
Basically, I disagree with you on almost all fundamental points which means this argument is going nowhere. In my opinion, anyone who undocks from station has consented to some form of PvP. Even in station, you can engage in PvP, via scams or undercutting someone else's market orders. EvE survives on conflict and destruction.
Your miner has no market for his minerals if the manufacturer can't sell his finished product to someone who needs a new ship. Now I'm no mathemtist, but I'd guess that the premier cause of needing new ships in EvE is the exlpoding of old ones, and pirates provide that service in spades.
Basically, the victim does have a choice, several in fact. In your scenario, the adventerous pilot ventures to low sec to get hard to find minerals and refuses to pay the ransom. They chose to fly to low sec, too bad. It's dangerous there. They chose to try to mine the minerals themselves to maximize profit margins. Too bad, next time just by the minerals on market. And finally, they chose not to pay the ransom. No sweat off my back, I'll scoop the loot all the same. I'd much rather let you keep your ship and not violence it too much. Hell, I may even let you finish your mission or haul your can for an extra fee.
But that's your choice, not mine. I just chose to be an emotionally un-adjusted 40-something (or 11 year old) virgin living in my parents basement. (I recognize you didn't say that per se, but it's implied in a lot of carebear propaganda). At the end of the day, I chose to be an evil pirate and violence your spaceboat. You can choose to come to low sec and let me, not come to low sec and let me do it to someone else, or come to low sec and pay me not to do it. Choices are great, aren't they?
|

Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 13:30:00 -
[142]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 23/09/2008 13:34:42
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface I'll make demands and spew BS.
And we should care because?
You get a warning saying "You know, you're going to die." when you jump into low-sec. You click "Yes, get on with it." and then you want a previously broken mechanic to be broken again just so you can say 'ha ha, can't get my stuff'. Right.
It has nothing to do with ransoming at all - you just want to deny the victor any loot, even if you initiated agression and saw you were going to lose.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

Boomershoot
Caldari Insurgent New Eden Tribe Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 13:51:00 -
[143]
i was about to say something intelligente about ransoms. then, i remembered where i was about to post.
If you don't want to pay ransom, you die. if you're willing to pay ransom and won't, you die. if you pay ransom, well done, now you have 9% to get your ship out intact. the other 90% of the times, you die.
that's all ______________________________________________
|

Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 13:53:00 -
[144]
Originally by: Boomershoot if you pay ransom, well done, now you have 9% to get your ship out intact. the other 90% of the times, you die.
Orly? 
So are you just shitpoasting or actually pulling statistics out of your arse?
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

Boomershoot
Caldari Insurgent New Eden Tribe Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 13:57:00 -
[145]
Originally by: Cpt Branko
Originally by: Boomershoot if you pay ransom, well done, now you have 9% to get your ship out intact. the other 90% of the times, you die.
Orly? 
So are you just shitpoasting or actually pulling statistics out of your arse?
both of them, actually. ______________________________________________
|

Ana Vyr
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 14:09:00 -
[146]
Pirates, no matter how nice or polite they are, make their living ripping off other players. They are criminals. While the game mechanics allow this, and the game is structured so that it's a perfectly viable way to play...why should they be treated with anything but contempt? They are criminals.
Hisec mission runners, who may be complete idiots/jerks, are not interfering with other players. These folks hold the moral high ground in this case no matter what the pirates may think.
Seems pretty simple to me. However, this observation has nothing to do with whether you should pay a ransom. That depends completely on how much you stand to lose if you don't pay (or do pay for that matter...criminals remember?).
Since they are criminals in the first place, pirates cannot be trusted to hold true to any rules of conduct. They can argue this all they want, but you know damned well they crossed the morality line long ago for their own reasons.
|

Jaro Brutus
La Isla del Mono
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 14:50:00 -
[147]
Originally by: Ana Vyr Pirates, no matter how nice or polite they are, make their living ripping off other players. They are criminals. While the game mechanics allow this, and the game is structured so that it's a perfectly viable way to play...why should they be treated with anything but contempt? They are criminals. (...) Since they are criminals in the first place, pirates cannot be trusted to hold true to any rules of conduct. They can argue this all they want, but you know damned well they crossed the morality line long ago for their own reasons.
You contradict yourself..
Yes pirates make money via ransoms (partially) so most pirates honore ramsons so they built some "reputation" and the next victim may choose to pay as well
Additionally you can trust no one in Eve, not even a Hi sec mission runner, not a pirate in particular
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 19:34:00 -
[148]
Originally by: Tai Paktu
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface stuff
Man, you're using big words. Some of us are drunk and can't comprehend your argument.
Your miner has no market for his minerals if the manufacturer can't sell his finished product to someone who needs a new ship. Now I'm no mathemtist, but I'd guess that the premier cause of needing new ships in EvE is the exlpoding of old ones, and pirates provide that service in spades.
Basically, the victim does have a choice, several in fact. In your scenario, the adventerous pilot ventures to low sec to get hard to find minerals and refuses to pay the ransom. They chose to fly to low sec, too bad. It's dangerous there. They chose to try to mine the minerals themselves to maximize profit margins. Too bad, next time just by the minerals on market. And finally, they chose not to pay the ransom. No sweat off my back, I'll scoop the loot all the same. I'd much rather let you keep your ship and not violence it too much. Hell, I may even let you finish your mission or haul your can for an extra fee.
But that's your choice, not mine. I just chose to be an emotionally un-adjusted 40-something (or 11 year old) virgin living in my parents basement. (I recognize you didn't say that per se, but it's implied in a lot of carebear propaganda). At the end of the day, I chose to be an evil pirate and violence your spaceboat. You can choose to come to low sec and let me, not come to low sec and let me do it to someone else, or come to low sec and pay me not to do it. Choices are great, aren't they?
I never claimed that players did not have the right to engage in combat and subterfuge.
The miner wants to mine. That is why they become miners. It's inherent to the profession. The miner did not choose to make some ore available only in low-sec [with the exception of some sites that can be surveyed]. For those ores that are available only in low-security space, the miner needs to venture there. This is not an implicit invitation for aggression.
Twice the argument of 'buying minerals on the market' is offered. I thought of making an Oompa Loompa rhyme for that one. Instead, I'm thinking of what Dorothy said to the scarecrow: "What would you do with a brain if you had one?" How do you think the minerals reach the market? Osmosis?
I do not begrudge the pirate the desire for privateering. I am not indignant because the pirate wants to assault people. I begrudge the pirate the fact that they want the choice of what happens to the assets, for they overwhelmingly refuse to give the victim of a ransom demand the same choice: to do with their assets as they please.
Proximity does not equate to ownership.
I will keep saying it because the point deserves to be made: when making the choice to self-destruct, the victim of a ransom demand would stand to lose their ship, its fitting and its contents. It is != a benefit. It should be their choice to destroy their vessel at will. The pirate has no rights. "But I won the exchange" is not an argument for the transfer of property rights. It has been stated in this thread that some people prefer to pay a ransom. That is their choice. By the same token it should be their choice to destroy their ship.
The only reason why I have to keep repeating the point is that you do not want to accept the point that choice should work both ways. You choose not to hear the argument. I have not seen anyone offer a valid reason why the owner of a vessel would justly be denied the right to do with their assets as they see fit. No argument. None.
The functionality of the self-destruct button should be restored. Otherwise it serves merely as a reminder that the pirate needs a crutch to support their ego, that the gleeful shouts of victory are merely the onset of the wailing of the whaaaaaambulance when they are denied their prize.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Tai Paktu
Beyond Divinity Inc
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 19:44:00 -
[149]
Edited by: Tai Paktu on 23/09/2008 19:51:54 Drone materials from hundreds of mission runners, freighter runs to high sec from 0.0 and refining trash loot are all ways that the market can become saturated with high-end minerals that don't actually include risking a trip to pirate-infested low sec. Working out a deal with the local pirate corp, cutting them in on the profits or flying in low sec run by some sort of NAP or medium sized alliance can also yield relatively safe mining space.
If the miner chooses to go to low sec, they have no reason to whine about being killed by a pirate. The consent was given when they agreed to the jump promt from the stargate. They don't have to pay a ransom, but they have no right to whine about it.
As far as self-destructing goes, you do have the choice to do it. It just takes two minutes. If you want an instant self-destruct, I want an instant kill module. There's really no reason I can see for a ship to explode instantly, either via game-mechanics or an RP explanation.
Ultimately, this thread was about ransoms and got derailed. If you want to suggest a self-destructing change, features and ideas is . This is C&P son, what were you all expecting? Unless of course, you're a well spoken troll, in which case I've thoroughly enjoyed this thread.
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 19:54:00 -
[150]
Originally by: Cpt Branko Edited by: Cpt Branko on 23/09/2008 13:37:43 Edited by: Cpt Branko on 23/09/2008 13:34:42
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface I'll make demands and spew BS.
And we should care because?
You get a warning saying "You know, you're going to die." when you jump into low-sec. You click "Yes, get on with it." and then you want a previously broken mechanic to be broken again just so you can say 'ha ha, can't get my stuff'. Right.
It has nothing to do with ransoming at all - you just want to deny the victor any loot, even if you initiated agression and saw you were going to lose.
The idea is roughly equivalent to someone saying "hey, guys, I have a great idea, how about we remove all missions/rats/asteroids from high-sec, and make missions & rats 0.0 only?" in general discussion. The fact we didn't flame you that badly just proves how nice and considerate the pirate community is to the chronically stupid.
And the victim should care about the pirate's argument because?
If the self-destruct mechanism is manifestly incapable to work as advertised, what good is it on a ship [I hear people use it to transfer to nul-sec, the "newbie gate" of EVE].
I am not talking about my personal experience, you have not seen me form language like that. I make the point, because it is what the thread is about, of the choice of paying ransom. The choice, the stuff you like so much. The potential to say "yea" or "nay". You contend that the victim of an aggression [and I made that point, I did -not- make the point of someone initiating aggression and then chickening out] does not have a choice [and by dint of not having an effective self-destruct mechanism, you're right]. Why is that? Why is it so important that the victim of an aggression be denied the choice while you claim the right to have all the choice you want?
Your point about missions and rats being confined to nul-sec is nonsense.
I couldn't care less about the kind consideration of the pirate community. From what I've read in this thread so far, your collective verbal assault would be somewhat akin to being struck by warm lettuce. Actually, I had some hopes of doing some fine sparring with the wits of the kind of people who enjoy "spaceships on the internet". I am sorely disappointed in that ambition. I clearly came to the wrong place for a spirited joust. It robs me of an opportunity to offer a stinging rebuke. I cannot do that now.
It would be a violation of the Prime Directive.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Moric Longshanks
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 20:09:00 -
[151]
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface Twice the argument of 'buying minerals on the market' is offered. I thought of making an Oompa Loompa rhyme for that one. Instead, I'm thinking of what Dorothy said to the scarecrow: "What would you do with a brain if you had one?" How do you think the minerals reach the market? Osmosis?
What would I do with brain if I had one? Hmm . . .
I would probably use it to point out the fact the apparently there are some miners out there smart enough to make it back to high sec with their cargo. Since this is the case, you don't personally "need" to go to low sec. Somebody better will do it for you, and you will pay him for it.
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 20:25:00 -
[152]
Originally by: Moric Longshanks
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface Twice the argument of 'buying minerals on the market' is offered. I thought of making an Oompa Loompa rhyme for that one. Instead, I'm thinking of what Dorothy said to the scarecrow: "What would you do with a brain if you had one?" How do you think the minerals reach the market? Osmosis?
What would I do with brain if I had one? Hmm . . .
I would probably use it to point out the fact the apparently there are some miners out there smart enough to make it back to high sec with their cargo. Since this is the case, you don't personally "need" to go to low sec. Somebody better will do it for you, and you will pay him for it.
"All too easy" [Darth Vader]
|

LS Sledgehammer
Diablo Advocatus Chain of Chaos
|
Posted - 2008.09.23 21:16:00 -
[153]
I rarely demand a ransom, but when I do I pop them anyway, cause I'm a c**t. But still sleep sound at night 
|

Avalaren
|
Posted - 2008.09.24 00:24:00 -
[154]
Edited by: Avalaren on 24/09/2008 00:28:36 I retract my statement. This isnt worth the time to argue over.
lawl
|

Seth McKenzee
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.09.24 00:37:00 -
[155]
Morale/Solution of this whole thread, scout + scanner ='s win. Otherwise don't cry and whine about 2 minute self destruct counters and denying us pirates our loot. Its called 'low-sec' for a reason and upon entering it you leave the lovely land of sunshine and rainbows you carebears so endear. IMHO this thread fails to deliver pay your ransom if you get crapped on post it in C&P don't generalize the whole pirate population of Eve because of one douchebag.
Seth McKenzee CEO of Surge.
|

O'CRUNK
|
Posted - 2008.09.24 04:37:00 -
[156]
1) Set the pirate and his corp to red. Next time you know to avoid them like the plague. See red minus in local = time to leave.
i like this tip, ty
|

Capt Willard
Section Nine
|
Posted - 2008.09.24 15:39:00 -
[157]
The uncertainty of ransoming etc is a great part of Eve, another 'feature' that makes the sense of society more realistic. This post was written by someone who seems to care about spelling and grammer etc, and smells emo to extent i almost think it's a parody, then remember this is sci-fi, and the class of geek it atracts.
To the OP: Yes eve is somewhere that does provide the gaming equivilent of getting a wedgie or your lunch money stolen, and we like it.
P.S My daddies legal team could beat up your daddies legal team The Horror...... |

Saniyya Najat
|
Posted - 2008.09.24 19:26:00 -
[158]
Edited by: Saniyya Najat on 24/09/2008 19:33:45
Originally by: Moric Longshanks
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface Twice the argument of 'buying minerals on the market' is offered. I thought of making an Oompa Loompa rhyme for that one. Instead, I'm thinking of what Dorothy said to the scarecrow: "What would you do with a brain if you had one?" How do you think the minerals reach the market? Osmosis?
What would I do with brain if I had one? Hmm . . .
I would probably use it to point out the fact the apparently there are some miners out there smart enough to make it back to high sec with their cargo. Since this is the case, you don't personally "need" to go to low sec. Somebody better will do it for you, and you will pay him for it.
...so pirates don't have mining alts? My mining alt has had some (limited) experience in low sec mining.....always with a group of BS and other various ships. Also, much of the high-end ore is also available through exploration. While it is certainly probable that some miners are good enough to sneak into low sec and mine, I would be more likely to believe that pirate corps run their own mining ops.
nice try though
ps....to Seth, The generalization of an experience w/one pirate to many would seem to be similar to your comment about carebears. Oh the irony. Since pirates are whining about how deserted low sec is I would say that you all have the ability (given the sandbox nature of this game) to police yourselves to a larger extent. You all are whining so you all can fix the problem. If a trip into low sec was worth my time and isk I would go. I would even pay handsomely for the chance to mine or mission in low sec. My problem with trusting pirates to honor a ransom has to do with the number of pirates I have met. Doesn't take more than one or two un-honored ransoms to show a loss on any economic endeavor. I know its hard to have to rely on carebears for your entertainment and profit, but many of you do. Don't blame the herd, learn how to manipulate the herd.
|

Karrade Krise
|
Posted - 2008.09.25 04:57:00 -
[159]
Are you r3tarded? 
Well...anyways obvious troll is obvious even if a bit on the stupid side...
As stated many times in this thread. Only a small fration of people dishonor ransoms. Do me a favor and stop trying to ruin our payouts.
|

Saniyya Najat
|
Posted - 2008.09.25 16:06:00 -
[160]
Originally by: Karrade Krise Are you r3tarded? 
Well...anyways obvious troll is obvious even if a bit on the stupid side...
As stated many times in this thread. Only a small fration of people dishonor ransoms. Do me a favor and stop trying to ruin our payouts.
Not sure if your talking to me or one of the posters above me. Since my post is closest I will retort. Since there are no numbers to quote your assertion is empty supposition. I am not claiming to know anything about pirate behavior beyond my own experience. I have been ransomed on occasion and while many pirates honored the deal they made others have not. There was even a group of pirates that would only ransom pods. Carebears aren't ruining your sweet payout, your own fellow pirates are. I will state my main point one last time (just in case). If going to low-sec paid off for me I would gladly risk the ships to go there. Simply put, if I get ransomed two or three times, or if I loose more than two or three ships I will show a loss on that particular endeavor. I understand that many of you can loose dozens of ships and not feel it in the wallet too bad. I, however, cannot. No big pay-out, no leaving high-sec. You want me to join you in low-sec then you all figure out a way to do it. Nerfing lvl 4 missions won't do it. I can still make the money I need and not have to run the risk of losing isk in low-sec.
Simply put, pirates need to stop claiming that ransoms are a sure thing, 'cause they are not. Make all the claims you want, I know better from experience.
|

Bluetippedflyer
|
Posted - 2008.09.25 20:15:00 -
[161]
i've always honoured ransoms. In the end i'm saving you isk from buying a new ship. Please thank me next time it happens to you and be glad a ransom is even offered.
|

Saniyya Najat
|
Posted - 2008.09.26 01:42:00 -
[162]
Originally by: Bluetippedflyer i've always honoured ransoms. In the end i'm saving you isk from buying a new ship. Please thank me next time it happens to you and be glad a ransom is even offered.
Wow, I could have made my point w/an alt but this is better. thx
|

Caveat Empt0r
|
Posted - 2008.09.26 23:07:00 -
[163]
Don't go into low sec.
/thread
|

Karrade Krise
|
Posted - 2008.09.27 04:28:00 -
[164]
Originally by: Saniyya Najat
Originally by: Karrade Krise Are you r3tarded? 
Well...anyways obvious troll is obvious even if a bit on the stupid side...
As stated many times in this thread. Only a small fration of people dishonor ransoms. Do me a favor and stop trying to ruin our payouts.
Not sure if your talking to me or one of the posters above me. Since my post is closest I will retort. Since there are no numbers to quote your assertion is empty supposition. I am not claiming to know anything about pirate behavior beyond my own experience. I have been ransomed on occasion and while many pirates honored the deal they made others have not. There was even a group of pirates that would only ransom pods. Carebears aren't ruining your sweet payout, your own fellow pirates are. I will state my main point one last time (just in case). If going to low-sec paid off for me I would gladly risk the ships to go there. Simply put, if I get ransomed two or three times, or if I loose more than two or three ships I will show a loss on that particular endeavor. I understand that many of you can loose dozens of ships and not feel it in the wallet too bad. I, however, cannot. No big pay-out, no leaving high-sec. You want me to join you in low-sec then you all figure out a way to do it. Nerfing lvl 4 missions won't do it. I can still make the money I need and not have to run the risk of losing isk in low-sec.
Simply put, pirates need to stop claiming that ransoms are a sure thing, 'cause they are not. Make all the claims you want, I know better from experience.
Bah, you gotta be kidding me...wrote a ridiculously long post...and Internet explorer decides to take a dump on it....grrrrr..
Anyways....I was refferring to the OP. Dang it this would have been a good post too 
|

Ji Sama
Caldari Department of Defence
|
Posted - 2008.09.27 05:10:00 -
[165]
i just wanna say that i have personally been ransomed more than 5 times, and every time the pirates have honored thier ransom. most of the time, the pew pew players i meet, say NO to ransom, and just blow my ship up.... but the ones agreeing, hold their bargain imo.-!
"the majority of men has been dealt cards to a game they do not know how to play" FORUM USE |

Juan Ignacio
|
Posted - 2008.09.27 05:46:00 -
[166]
jeez guys why talk to much about the same thing. I been playing this game for like 8 months and i been a pirate since i started ... well for like 5 months ..and even i know this .. nub piwate = not honour ransom ( becouse he is so mad for kills and got blow up so many times that well he is a nub).. smart piwate = honour ransom ( becouse that little raven got corpmates that can be next ransoms )
My corpmates and me just blow up the ship and ransom the pod .. the other day we ransomed a pod of a NH .. for 100mil and the dude gave us another 100mil cuz was the 1st time that he get ransomed and not blowed up.So it just depend what pirate u find.. you have the choice of paying the ransom anyway or not .. most of the pirates dont care if can get money from your ship/pod ..
Duuuuuuuuuude victims??? you get a little warning b4 entering low sec, so you know what u dealing with.. there is no victims in this game maybe those who are like in trial but most of the ppl know .
Also Victims have the choice of getting other victims and making a huge blob of victims and kill the bad piwat. But nooo u guys are so mad about making money that dont have time to kill the "opressor" or watever u guys call it lolx.
I read b4 that pirates said that we were criminals / scammers/ f*****s (well maybe we are criminals :D ) .. duuuuuuuude we just blow up ships thats all .. the worst criminal actions are in higth sec.
Well sorry for my spelling english is not my 1st lenguage so who cares :D
pd = Cpt branko i remember you !!! you killed my mining badger in tama !!! becouse of u i turned to piwat .. ty for blowing me up lolx
|

Eljar Kjeldsson
Caldari Modern-Warfare
|
Posted - 2008.09.27 06:58:00 -
[167]
boniface is now KOS just to **** em off
 ^ | thats supposed to say I WANT YOU FOR MODERN WARFARE with uncle sam on it but its stuffed up |

Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.09.27 13:12:00 -
[168]
Originally by: Juan Ignacio
pd = Cpt branko i remember you !!! you killed my mining badger in tama !!! becouse of u i turned to piwat .. ty for blowing me up lolx
Oh, my god, I remember. Badger and Hulk mining in Tama VI-1, I was 100% sure it was bait and 5 cloaked recons were going to uncloak and massacre me, but I couldn't resist giving it a shot. Turned out it was legitimate miners, in Tama VI-1 of all the places (which was, at the time, a "here be bait ships" belt).
Nice to see I helped another pilot discover the joys of EvE piracy How are things going for you?
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

Moya81
|
Posted - 2008.09.27 19:07:00 -
[169]
Edited by: Moya81 on 27/09/2008 19:09:01 Edited by: Moya81 on 27/09/2008 19:08:17 Ok i stopped reading this thread after page 2 simply because the discussion was moving in circles and not bringing up anything really interesting.
As to the discussion about ransoms being honored or not etc etc I simply wonder what would happen if we pirates wich you guys ***** about simply stopped asking for ransoms? Thus not giving anyone no matter what you're flying or transporting a chance to survive. No big deal heh?
Our corp honors ransoms but has simply stopped asking for them, we now simply kill anything that enters our territory. Believe it or not, some people would have favoured being given the chance to save their ships and pods, and where surprised we didn't give them a chance to.
If our policy would happen to spread to other pirate corps, what are you guys going to be complaining about in the forums then? I have a pretty good idea what the subject will be...
|

Cybele Lanier
Amarr The Graduates Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2008.09.28 11:19:00 -
[170]
Originally by: Candice Dice Never pay the "Ransom", go down fighting and just accept the loss, better to die on your feet than be stabbed in the back on your knees and let's face it, the whole, 'we honour ransoms' to be mostly bullshit since they always find a 'loophole' or reason not to pay which usually ends up with an e-peen thread on whine and punishment.
Best play on this I saw (in Local, while doing something else) was:
"Okay, pay us fifty million and we won't blow up your carrier."
"Okay, okay! Here's the money."
"Oh sorry, I meant fifty million for each of us. Didn't I mention that? I think I mentioned that."
"WTF?! I don't have that."
"Too bad." (boom) --------------- ""Minimum collateral damage" and "Entire star system" do not belong in the same sentence." |

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.28 15:16:00 -
[171]
Originally by: Eljar Kjeldsson boniface is now KOS just to **** em off
An interesting development.
I am a student of humanity. A life long interest of mine.
What specific aspect of my participation in this discussion triggers this reaction? I am genuinely curious.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.28 15:40:00 -
[172]
Edited by: Abulurd Boniface on 28/09/2008 15:40:43
Originally by: Karrade Krise
Originally by: Saniyya Najat
Originally by: Karrade Krise Are you r3tarded?  ].
Bah, you gotta be kidding me...wrote a ridiculously long post...and Internet explorer decides to take a dump on it....grrrrr..
Anyways....I was refferring to the OP. Dang it this would have been a good post too 
Try this: type your post in Notepad, save it to MyDocuments, copy/paste it into a forum text field.
When something goes wrong, a common event, you can recall your text instantly and you didn't spend all that time crafting a good argument just to see it sent to /dev/null.
Just a friendly suggestion.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.09.29 04:23:00 -
[173]
This is a troll thread anyway.
"Victims of ransoming", rubbish! We're doing people a favour in letting them keep their stuff / implants in compensation for a small financial reward  Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |

Salen Kane
|
Posted - 2008.09.29 12:26:00 -
[174]
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
Apparently some concepts have a hard time sinking in. It is not about honorable pirates versus dishonorable pirates. It is not about the pirates. It is about the right to say "no" to the oppressor.
Having an effective self-destruct mechanism in place that robs the pirate of the prize is a choice the victim makes for themselves. Being denied the option means they can only stand in the corner with their hat in their hand, baas Ganzendonk style, and say please and thank you and 'can I go now, please?'
The reason why the self-destruct mechanism was rendered useless, it turns out, is that too many people used it, thereby depriving the pirate of the prize. Because the pirate learned a lesson about the human condition: that people, if given the choice, would rather say "kust gij ne kier dik mijn kluuten, smeerlap" than to bow down and give in to their bullies.
And the pirates can't have that, and CCP appears to be of the same opinion.
See how effective piracy would be if people had the ability to deny the pirate the prize, how many people don't care about the honor-among-thieves and rather leave with nothing than to hand it over.
It is not about honoring ransoms, it is about the fact that it's not the pirate's stuff and they can't have it and the only way for the pirate to inflict themselves upon people is to whine at CCP's doorstep to take away the one tool for the victim to say "From Hell's heart I stab at thee" and rather lose everything than to part with anything.
I shall strive to restore the self-destruct mechanism to useful functionality: to violently, instantaneously and without warning beforehand destroy the space frame and its contents and render it unsalvageable.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
I can really picture this guy (who in my mind is a slightly overweight emo kid, but that's just my imagination) shouting "From hells heart I stab at thee!" and "Death to the oppressors!" as his ships gets blown up. I never actually tried any piracy, but now I feel tempted! However, being a victim is NOT the only option here. You could get some friends and fight back. Might require more effort than dedicating your life to getting the self destruct mechanisms changed, though.
On a side note, I find it amusing with all these pirate corps saying "we always honor randsoms and anyone not doing so will get kicked out" because its so obvious that any corp that does NOT honor randsoms would say exactly the same thing.
Oh, and it has been said before but it can be said again: dont fly it unless you can afford to lose it.
|

H Lecter
Gallente The Black Rabbits The Gurlstas Associates
|
Posted - 2008.09.29 13:12:00 -
[175]
Originally by: Salen Kane On a side note, I find it amusing with all these pirate corps saying "we always honor randsoms and anyone not doing so will get kicked out" because its so obvious that any corp that does NOT honor randsoms would say exactly the same thing.
No, not really that obvious. Many of those who don't honor them usually admit it freely on the forums - they know exactly that most of their potential victims do not read it anyway. See here for example...
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.29 15:45:00 -
[176]
Originally by: Salen Kane
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
I can really picture this guy (who in my mind is a slightly overweight emo kid, but that's just my imagination) shouting "From hells heart I stab at thee!" and "Death to the oppressors!" as his ships gets blown up. I never actually tried any piracy, but now I feel tempted! However, being a victim is NOT the only option here. You could get some friends and fight back. Might require more effort than dedicating your life to getting the self destruct mechanisms changed, though.
On a side note, I find it amusing with all these pirate corps saying "we always honor randsoms and anyone not doing so will get kicked out" because its so obvious that any corp that does NOT honor randsoms would say exactly the same thing.
Oh, and it has been said before but it can be said again: dont fly it unless you can afford to lose it.
I will send you a million ISK in game to get a better imagination. Whatever you are using to serve the purpose is sorely lacking.
Trust me, I know these things.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
|

Salen Kane
|
Posted - 2008.09.29 18:58:00 -
[177]
From the bowels of hell, your sarcasm fails.
|

Abulurd Boniface
|
Posted - 2008.09.29 19:14:00 -
[178]
Originally by: Salen Kane From the bowels of hell, your sarcasm fails.
The money is in your wallet. I doubt a million will cover your needs. Consider it a first step. And by all means, do keep going. You have a ways to cover.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO |

Eljar Kjeldsson
Caldari Modern-Warfare
|
Posted - 2008.09.30 06:07:00 -
[179]
Originally by: Salen Kane
Originally by: Abulurd Boniface
Apparently some concepts have a hard time sinking in. It is not about honorable pirates versus dishonorable pirates. It is not about the pirates. It is about the right to say "no" to the oppressor.
Having an effective self-destruct mechanism in place that robs the pirate of the prize is a choice the victim makes for themselves. Being denied the option means they can only stand in the corner with their hat in their hand, baas Ganzendonk style, and say please and thank you and 'can I go now, please?'
The reason why the self-destruct mechanism was rendered useless, it turns out, is that too many people used it, thereby depriving the pirate of the prize. Because the pirate learned a lesson about the human condition: that people, if given the choice, would rather say "kust gij ne kier dik mijn kluuten, smeerlap" than to bow down and give in to their bullies.
And the pirates can't have that, and CCP appears to be of the same opinion.
See how effective piracy would be if people had the ability to deny the pirate the prize, how many people don't care about the honor-among-thieves and rather leave with nothing than to hand it over.
It is not about honoring ransoms, it is about the fact that it's not the pirate's stuff and they can't have it and the only way for the pirate to inflict themselves upon people is to whine at CCP's doorstep to take away the one tool for the victim to say "From Hell's heart I stab at thee" and rather lose everything than to part with anything.
I shall strive to restore the self-destruct mechanism to useful functionality: to violently, instantaneously and without warning beforehand destroy the space frame and its contents and render it unsalvageable.
Abulurd Boniface ME ME CEO
I can really picture this guy (who in my mind is a slightly overweight emo kid, but that's just my imagination) shouting "From hells heart I stab at thee!" and "Death to the oppressors!" as his ships gets blown up. I never actually tried any piracy, but now I feel tempted! However, being a victim is NOT the only option here. You could get some friends and fight back. Might require more effort than dedicating your life to getting the self destruct mechanisms changed, though.
On a side note, I find it amusing with all these pirate corps saying "we always honor randsoms and anyone not doing so will get kicked out" because its so obvious that any corp that does NOT honor randsoms would say exactly the same thing.
Oh, and it has been said before but it can be said again: dont fly it unless you can afford to lose it.
lol Where did u get "From hells heart I stab at thee!". If you want the self destruct timing changed go ***** to the ccp staff and not to us and why has the op guy gone quiet?
 ^ | thats supposed to say I WANT YOU FOR MODERN WARFARE with uncle sam on it but its stuffed up |

Su Ra
|
Posted - 2008.09.30 11:56:00 -
[180]
1) There are too many variables. If they have you scrambled and webbed and demand ransom. Whats to say they won't blow your ship up after you pay? They are pirates afterall.
There are only a few "pirates" who do that.... Most will stick to their word... cos they can catch u again later :) .
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/7643561.stm
Why not read up on RL pirates ?
|

wdwjhdw
|
Posted - 2008.09.30 12:08:00 -
[181]
I would never trust to pay a ransom. Yeah it sucks for the "honest" pirates, but Ive heard too many bad stories to have any faith in people who play this game. I would rather just blow myself up and deny them the kill.
|

Mr Daytrading
|
Posted - 2008.09.30 13:21:00 -
[182]
how about this: u are ratting in 0.0 and u hit a officer with 2 bil worth mods. Then u hit a gatecamp and they ransom u for 200 m and u are in a raven. U still dont pay ransome?
|

Hyveres
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.09.30 13:39:00 -
[183]
Edited by: Hyveres on 30/09/2008 13:39:31
Originally by: ponieus Real Pirates always honor their ransoms.
Do not lump in real pirates with the wanna be's out there.
Thats like saying all 0.0 alliances are crap like the NC.. Kinda dont make sense now does it.
On my 3 ships lost to pirates I paid 2 ransoms neither were honoured. As far as I am concerned no pirates honour their ransoms.
"I dont need facts when I have the truth" |

ZeCamerone
Caldari 20th Legion
|
Posted - 2008.09.30 13:57:00 -
[184]
Originally by: Mr Daytrading how about this: u are ratting in 0.0 and u hit a officer with 2 bil worth mods. Then u hit a gatecamp and they ransom u for 200 m and u are in a raven. U still dont pay ransome?
What's to say that a gatecamp group in 0.0 isn't going to have a ship w/ a cargo scanner, and know you've got 2b in officer mods aboard once you're locked down? They'd certainly up the ransom, and might pop you after paying anyway and take the chance that the mods would drop.
Variables, variables, variables...
|

Demitria Fernir
Caldari Science and Trade Institute
|
Posted - 2008.09.30 14:01:00 -
[185]
Originally by: Goyda I have been reading this thread and I came up with an idea, I think it will work for about 80% of the people but there will be 20% who don't like it (well knowing this crowd more like 50/50) it's not perfect or I'm sure completely thought out, But here's the link
Linkage
Do 0.0 gatecamps actually ransom ?
changes by where you are in 0.0
10100110010100101010011010100101001100101110101001 I will Conquer My Signature Somewhere in the future 10100110010100101010011010100101001100101110101001 |

kalistax
|
Posted - 2008.10.03 14:43:00 -
[186]
where would the fun be on EVE without pirates? you got to love them. PS: Im not a pirate btw
|

Aalana
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.10.03 15:04:00 -
[187]
In 0.0 getting them to come on TS and sing for their ship is far more fun.
Typically I'd just blow you up. But the comedy value of you singing for your internet spaceship is a guaranteed way to get me to let you go.
|

Saniyya Najat
|
Posted - 2008.10.03 15:36:00 -
[188]
Originally by: Aalana Edited by: Aalana on 03/10/2008 15:09:15 In 0.0 getting them to come on TS and sing for their worthless ratting raven is far more fun.
Typically I'd just blow you up. But the comedy value of them singing for their internet spaceship is a guaranteed way to get me to let them go.
This is probably the one and only ransom request to which I would respond. If you can stand even a few seconds of my singing voice that is. 'course the pirate would prolly blast me to fragments instead of letting me go.
|

Eljar Kjeldsson
Caldari Modern-Warfare
|
Posted - 2008.10.04 11:11:00 -
[189]
rl pirates sometimes ransom too but mostly there in a boat with a machinegun fixed to it\alot of guys with ak47s and you know what happens next...
 ^ | thats supposed to say I WANT YOU FOR MODERN WARFARE with uncle sam on it but its stuffed up |

Terra Mikael
Repo Industries
|
Posted - 2008.10.05 13:57:00 -
[190]
Although I now honor ransoms, back when I used to not to I would hear that level-up sound every time I popped a victim. You know, the one from final fantasy....
du-du-du duuuuuh du-du duuu-d-d-duuuuuuh!!
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: [one page] |