Fixing something means it was broken. What I wrote was not broken. You are welcome to say something else if that is what you feel, but please do not change something I wrote into something different. That is fundamentally dishonest as you are attributing a statement to me that I did not make.

That said, who are you to judge if a person feels remorse or not? Would you want people to treat you as if your apology is fake if you make one?

Was he drunk when he prepared that presentation? Was he drunk when he came up with the idea to mock a player contemplating suicide during a live event and in front of an audience? Was he drunk when he savored and relished on the victim's email? Was he drunk when he decided to keep this email as a prize for his accomplishments?

That is a high moral ground you are putting yourself on. I sincerely hope you are as perfect as you imply you are. Then and again, given that you misrepresent what I said probably not

I would love to hear your input.

You're right, that is a stupid argument.

Come on man, haven't you been reading these forums at all? Goons don't have any free will. The Mittani coerces their cooperation through terrorism and fear.

Come on man, haven't you been reading these forums at all? Goons don't have any free will. The Mittani coerces their cooperation through terrorism and fear.

In other words, you rather create an imaginary fetch than answer these questions.

I've read CCP's response on the matter (including that thread you linked above). And my questions are not directed at CCP. But I can see why you'd try and divert the issue.

In other words, you rather create an imaginary fetch than answer these questions.

I've read CCP's response on the matter (including that thread you linked above). And my questions are not directed at CCP. But I can see why you'd try and divert the issue.

It follows the Mittani or it gets the hose?

Luckily, this part "Was he drunk when he prepared that presentation?",

this part "Was he drunk when he came up with the idea to mock a player contemplating suicide during a live event and in front of an audience?",

this part "Was he drunk when he savored and relished on the victim's email?",

and this part "Was he drunk when he decided to keep this email as a prize for his accomplishments?"

are completely irrelevant to why he apologized.

Basically what I'm saying is that your whole post there is completely irrelevant to ANYTHING in this thread.

Of course they're irrelevant. They necessarily would need to be in order to consider his "apology" sincere .

"If you blot out the inconsistencies it makes perfect sense!"

Well, considering his apology was all about the drunken joke made during the Q&A, and not his presentation, which deserves it's own apology for being terribly presented, yeah, you're irrelevant.

Honestly, the presentation could have been much funnier if presented by Michael Bolton 3.

Why do you guys let him keep doing it? Every time has been terrible.

We thought we would have gotten better after the first time. You're at fault too, you know, being "goon pets" and all.

Well, considering his apology was all about the drunken joke made during the Q&A, and not his presentation, which deserves it's own apology for being terribly presented, yeah, you're irrelevant.

Considering he claims to be nothing like "The Mittani", being able to differentiate between real life and game, and apologizing for a "drunken joke" even though his actions extended days (weeks even) before this event these questions are quite relevant.

They highlight his hypocrisy and inconsistency. So I can definitely see why you would like for them to be irrelevant.

at the end of the day, hes just some dude that plays video games, human, and humans screw up.

10 years from now hell be balding , saddled with a few kids, and |Eve will be a interesting footnote in his life.