Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 51 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Flette
Rosen Association
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:18:00 -
[661] - Quote
Luciana BlitzKriger wrote:CanGÇÖt we re-do the election again, move on from what has happen an start again without the incident that happen or is to late to do another Election process?
This is what alternates are for, and I believe there is an alternate in this case?
There are no do-overs in real life. |

Xenuria
Center Haus
477
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:19:00 -
[662] - Quote
The Mittani should have the right to give his votes to a person of his choice. That person should be me.
Hockles |

Madis Joringer
Ginger Marketing
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:19:00 -
[663] - Quote
What I find funny is all the rage coming from GSF over this. When they grief someone in-game, they find it funny enough to keep records of all the tears, as seen on the alliance panel that started all this. They take pleasure in seeing people complain about losing their internet spaceships and tell them they shouldn't be soo upset over pixels on a computer. But when something doesn't go their way, the whole of goonswarm comes out crying foul. As a CSM member, Mittens knew the rules, or at least he should have. One of those rules is abiding by the TOS/EULA and is clearly stated when a person enters the running for CSM. Whether GSF wants to believe it or not, he violated those rules and suffered the consequences of his actions, in this case a temp ban and removal from CSM7. Had this been any other member, I highly doubt GSF would be whining this much about it. Those 10k votes? Oh well. The vast majority voted for him because of his title and position in the GSF alone, regardless of his merits. You vote for a sociopath, you get a sociopath. Deal with it. If you want to blame someone for your vote not 'counting', blame Mittens. He is ultimately the reason for his own removal. He broke the rules, not CCP. And those people threatening to cancel their accounts over this? Good riddance! Eve will survive without you, and honestly would probably be better off. You shouldn't be soo upset over internet spaceship politics. Its a game folks. |

Diamonica Norya
University of Caille Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:21:00 -
[664] - Quote
Joe D'Trader wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:Joe D'Trader wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:
You are saying this isn't a democracy. It is very much a democracy and you knowing or not know WHY it was made should help you to understand why it is a democracy.
in an democracy you cannot buy the right to vote with just 15 bucks a month
if you know why it was formed , you would more see it as an guide to CCP, they may follow it or not
CCP is like putin
CCP is like Putin... so I shouldn't pay any attention to you then, ok. Have a nice day. Scroll up and see Jade's response. That is a semi well thought out response. another advice for you you will get badrepped from your buddies for praising jade ... You know nothing about me. You see unlike you I try very hard to be independent and as unbiased as I possibly can. I don't give a damn if people dislike Jade, read what he actually wrote and understand you ignorant kunt. The CSM should be a democracy, it is CCP's game, and they are well within their rights to disband the CSM, but not only would it be bad PR it would just be downright bad business decision. And this is also a bad decision. The CSM either is an actual body that is independent or it is a useless rubber stamp and either next month or 6 years from now another Incarna will occur because CCP doesn't listen to advice from the one body of players elected to give them advice.
Read Jade better, CSM is not a democracy, it just got elected democratically but it's function and powers are limited. Monoclegate and Incarna didn't get resolved because of the CSM, it's the entire majority of Eve players. In fact, CSM let bad things gets into development and was only appearing working on resolutions for their own political gains.
The last CSM failed us like what Jade says, and this one will too, i regret voting for mittens and now I'm reliefed that God is graceful in granting me the redemption. |

Della Monk
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:22:00 -
[665] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:The Mittani should have the right to give his votes to a person of his choice. That person should be me.
+1 |

Chokichi Ozuwara
Lucky Dragon Convenience
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:22:00 -
[666] - Quote
Madis Joringer wrote:What I find funny is all the rage coming from GSF over this. When they grief someone in-game, they find it funny enough to keep records of all the tears, as seen on the alliance panel that started all this. They take pleasure in seeing people complain about losing their internet spaceships and tell them they shouldn't be soo upset over pixels on a computer. But when something doesn't go their way, the whole of goonswarm comes out crying foul. Exactly. They can dish out the griefing, but they sure can't take it.
Start a corp and do it yourself. You'll fail, but you'll enjoy failing. Tears will be shed and pants will need to be changed all round. |

Joe D'Trader
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
90
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:24:00 -
[667] - Quote
Lt Pizi wrote:Joe D'Trader wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:Joe D'Trader wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:
You are saying this isn't a democracy. It is very much a democracy and you knowing or not know WHY it was made should help you to understand why it is a democracy.
in an democracy you cannot buy the right to vote with just 15 bucks a month
if you know why it was formed , you would more see it as an guide to CCP, they may follow it or not
CCP is like putin
CCP is like Putin... so I shouldn't pay any attention to you then, ok. Have a nice day. Scroll up and see Jade's response. That is a semi well thought out response. another advice for you you will get badrepped from your buddies for praising jade ... You know nothing about me. You see unlike you I try very hard to be independent and as unbiased as I possibly can. I don't give a damn if people dislike Jade, read what he actually wrote and understand you ignorant kunt. The CSM should be a democracy, it is CCP's game, and they are well within their rights to disband the CSM, but not only would it be bad PR it would just be downright bad business decision. And this is also a bad decision. The CSM either is an actual body that is independent or it is a useless rubber stamp and either next month or 6 years from now another Incarna will occur because CCP doesn't listen to advice from the one body of players elected to give them advice. the CSM never was and never will be the final ruling power in eve thats not how you run a company or an MMO i told you allready , in an democracy you cannot buy unlimit voting slots as long as you have the bucks for it and my dear unbaised friend dont curse at me , thx
You are ignorant, maybe not a kunt but very very ignorant. There is a difference between independence and final ruling power. The supreme court is independent, but isn't considered a ruling power. CCP interfering with the operation of the CSM when the CSM announced it would be meeting to discuss the situation interferes with it's independence. Also do you have a reading defecit?
I said
it is CCP's game, and they are well within their rights to disband the CSM |

Fahzja
Envirocore
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:27:00 -
[668] - Quote
All of this brings back grade school memories.
A student fails a subject, he blames the teacher... |

NiM Cal
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:28:00 -
[669] - Quote
In today's politically correct, marketing driven world, where the press are desperate for some reason to portray vidya games in a bad light, CCP really had no other option. For what it's worth, society does need to HTFU and stop pandering to bads, but CCP can't change that, they have to play by the rule book which is getting thicker every day thanks to ...lawyers.
He of all people should've known how this would end. The "I was drunk" defence was about as legit as OJ getting off. Should've gone down in flames fighting the power that is political correctness and stayed true to his words, but alas lawyers are not creatures renown for having spine~
Nelson: Ha Ha! I guess sums it up. |

Alexandra Alt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
133
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:29:00 -
[670] - Quote
I'm really happy to say Mittens has won my utmost respect after listening to state of the goonion, I do understand now why he is what he is inside the goons, where we can clearly extrapolate that in a land of blind the one with an eye is king into in a land of irrationals the one with the brain is king, Mittens is clearly a king.
He was objective enough to understand what he did and how serious given the context of what he did, repent, and realize he was in the wrong and pretty much all that was decided was actually deserved.
I do agree that the PR/Marketing blog was a bit too much on him, they could have phrased it a little bit less emphatically on blaming him for the next steps.
In the end, Mittens has won my utmost respect for his posture in state of the goonion regarding this issue. |
|

Viktor Villiance
The Milkmen Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:29:00 -
[671] - Quote
Neat. So CCP caves to pressure from some people, and now The Wis will be the one who really pays the ultimate price as players in game take their rage out on him.
Congratulations, CCP, you have done more to hurt The Wis (if he was ever depressed/unstable) than a slight, snarky comment made by a pseudo-intellectual douchebag could ever.
What are you going to do now? Ban anyone who dares to kill The Wis in game? Or send him eve mails?
Anyway you slice this, you screwed him royally. I feel bad for him most of all now. |

lol fourm troll
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:32:00 -
[672] - Quote
so...... when will jita 4-4 undock burn, i want to enjoy the show and watch so many goons lose sec status for no reason, a cause, but no reason |

Koby Botick
Eighty Joule Brewery Goonswarm Federation
63
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:33:00 -
[673] - Quote
The joke is that after having knowledge of a suizide-endangered player that is unable to cope with stress caused ingame, CCP is actually in the moral dilemma that they would need to terminate HIS account in order to prevent any escalation. They have brought themselves into a very very very bad spot.
If the dude in question can't take it anymore and actually goes through with it, then CCP will bleed for not having prevented it after being clearly aware of the situation.
Very very stupid CCP.
|

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:33:00 -
[674] - Quote
Quote:
You are ignorant, maybe not a kunt but very very ignorant. There is a difference between independence and final ruling power. The supreme court is independent, but isn't considered a ruling power. CCP interfering with the operation of the CSM when the CSM announced it would be meeting to discuss the situation interferes with it's independence. Also do you have a reading defecit?
I said
it is CCP's game, and they are well within their rights to disband the CSM
ccp is an pravate held company, not a state the CSm was fine with mittens stayin within CSM 7 , CCP was not so they overrule all as we both agree is within CCP-¦s power
also, as you may already noticed , English isnt my first language , i may have things misunderstood , for this i apology
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

sakurako
Eternal Darkness. G00DFELLAS
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:34:00 -
[675] - Quote
Viktor Villiance wrote:Neat. So CCP caves to pressure from some people, and now The Wis will be the one who really pays the ultimate price as players in game take their rage out on him.
Congratulations, CCP, you have done more to hurt The Wis (if he was ever depressed/unstable) than a slight, snarky comment made by a pseudo-intellectual douchebag could ever.
What are you going to do now? Ban anyone who dares to kill The Wis in game? Or send him eve mails?
Anyway you slice this, you screwed him royally. I feel bad for him most of all now.
stop trying to make this the other guys fault, its his fault and he has admited it. |

Flette
Rosen Association
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:34:00 -
[676] - Quote
Viktor Villiance wrote:Neat. So CCP caves to pressure from some people, and now The Wis will be the one who really pays the ultimate price as players in game take their rage out on him.
Congratulations, CCP, you have done more to hurt The Wis (if he was ever depressed/unstable) than a slight, snarky comment made by a pseudo-intellectual douchebag could ever.
What are you going to do now? Ban anyone who dares to kill The Wis in game? Or send him eve mails?
Anyway you slice this, you screwed him royally. I feel bad for him most of all now.
So, assuming CCP has already changed the name of this character, then what? The character is some 11 billion isk richer, and can then go in peace with a new name.
Your thinly veiled rant is just that. |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:35:00 -
[677] - Quote
Viktor Villiance wrote:Neat. So CCP caves to pressure from some people, and now The Wis will be the one who really pays the ultimate price as players in game take their rage out on him.
Congratulations, CCP, you have done more to hurt The Wis (if he was ever depressed/unstable) than a slight, snarky comment made by a pseudo-intellectual douchebag could ever.
What are you going to do now? Ban anyone who dares to kill The Wis in game? Or send him eve mails?
Anyway you slice this, you screwed him royally. I feel bad for him most of all now.
i think this guy will be the best prtected guy in eve ever at least i hope so
CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

Swearte Widfarend
Mortis Noir. Ineluctable.
59
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:35:00 -
[678] - Quote
Based on the reading of the TOS/EULA, The Mittani (as a character) has broken it. I guess a 30 day ban may be appropriate, although I'd like to know what CCP's track record on "threatening" characters is for ban duration, and if they are prepared for the oncoming ****storm of petitions for "threatening" behavior.
With the impending beginning of CSM 7, the choice of a 30 day ban became interesting, because The Mittani can't log in, and so it becomes an easy excuse to disenfranchise a significant portion of the players who voted in the CSM elections (for the record, I did not vote for The Mittani with any of my accounts). Alexander Gianturco did not resign independently, and CCP Games has turned the entire CSM voting process into a sham, unless they plan on wiping the slate clean and running a new election.
Alexander Gianturco did not resign from CSM 7. His post in these forums states clearly that he would be "just a member of the CSM, not the Chairman":
The Mittani wrote:With CSM7's term beginning on April 4th, I now exercise my right as the winner of the election with 10,058 votes to decline the office of Chairman. It will then be up to CSM7 as a group to decide how to proceed regarding the Chair. As a member of the CSM without a title, what I do as the leader of Goonswarm will no longer unfairly reflect on the CSM as a whole - leaving me and my people free to do as we please without needing to consider corporate, political, or media ramifications every time we make a **** joke, offend someone, or sell a supercap made of vapor.
If CCP does not allow Alexander Gianturco (aka The Mittani) to maintain a seat on CSM 7, then they might as well throw the entire concept of a democratically elected player representative group out the window - because that is what they have done by removing him from CSM 7. CCP is changing ship skill trees. How ship skills should be |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3778
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:35:00 -
[679] - Quote
Lt Pizi wrote:Quote:
You are ignorant, maybe not a kunt but very very ignorant. There is a difference between independence and final ruling power. The supreme court is independent, but isn't considered a ruling power. CCP interfering with the operation of the CSM when the CSM announced it would be meeting to discuss the situation interferes with it's independence. Also do you have a reading defecit?
I said
it is CCP's game, and they are well within their rights to disband the CSM
ccp is an pravate held company, not a state the CSm was fine with mittens stayin within CSM 7 , CCP was not so they overrule all as we both agree is within CCP-¦s power also, as you may already noticed , English isnt my first language , i may have things misunderstood , for this i apology
So CCP is reverting the CSM back to a useless PR/marketing tool rather than a player advocacy group. Cool beans.
"WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Raiykjab
Federal Navy Academy
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:35:00 -
[680] - Quote
Two step wrote:I disagree with this decision, and am working hard with CCP to make sure the 10,058 voters that voted for Alex have their voice heard.
More to come, just wanted to make sure I had a spot on the first page
This just show the integrity of the ppl representing us at CSM, 10058 yeah sure, we all know those guys probably voted with their 5 accounts.
Bill Clinton was also elected by a majority, but kinda resigned after the sex scandal, same for DSK the boss of the FMI, this dude was favorite for the next French presidentials and now is a nobody. If you represent something and are given powers you gotta show the exemple, or you are out, that's how it works in a democracy.
Seeing so many CSM members objecting about the decision is quiet disturbing, and just prove that I should get myself more accounts the next time I go vote to make it count.
Honestly yours
Raiykjab Eve has miners?! |
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3778
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:38:00 -
[681] - Quote
Raiykjab wrote:Two step wrote:I disagree with this decision, and am working hard with CCP to make sure the 10,058 voters that voted for Alex have their voice heard.
More to come, just wanted to make sure I had a spot on the first page This just show the integrity of the ppl representing us at CSM, 10058 yeah sure, we all know those guys probably voted with their 5 accounts. Bill Clinton was also elected by a majority, but kinda resigned after the sex scandal, same for DSK the boss of the FMI, this dude was favorite for the next French presidentials and now is a nobody. If you represent something and are given powers you gotta show the exemple, or you are out, that's how it works in a democracy. Seeing so many CSM members objecting about the decision is quiet disturbing, and just prove that I should get myself more accounts the next time I go vote to make it count. Honestly yours Raiykjab
1) 5 accounts are 5 accounts - they are paid for. 2) Bill Clinton served two full terms, he did not resign. 3) CSM members object to their opinions being discarded and CCP throwing their chairman under the bus. "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |

Qusal II
Viperfleet Inc. Narwhals Ate My Duck
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:38:00 -
[682] - Quote
With all things that happend this is a good decision of CCP, the most correct way to handle this, this shows noone has special treatment even if your chariman of csm!
And people should not feel sad about their votes it is something which you used, and should use every year! This reminds me of a time when President K got shot, the 2nd in command should just take over like back then. In this case Two Step which came in 2nd in votes, he was one of the more active members of the CSM6 council and i trust him completely for representing ALL eve-players.
And next year people can use their votes again to get The Mittani reelected. Maybe even with 15000 votes! |

Doc Severide
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
52
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:39:00 -
[683] - Quote
Kalunmaar wrote:If our votes are going to count for nothing, why hold an election in the first place? Exactly !!! With 10,000 votes out of how many account holders? It seems that most subscribers care absolutely nothing at all about the CSM. Just get rid of it already...
Madis Joringer wrote:...You vote for a sociopath, you get a sociopath. Deal with it. If you want to blame someone for your vote not 'counting', blame Mittens. He is ultimately the reason for his own removal. He broke the rules, not CCP. And those people threatening to cancel their accounts over this? Good riddance! Eve will survive without you, and honestly would probably be better off. You shouldn't be soo upset over internet spaceship politics. Its a game folks. Right on !!! |

Axhind
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:40:00 -
[684] - Quote
Temulkar Blaine wrote:Axhind wrote:Temulkar Blaine wrote:Axhind wrote:Temulkar Blaine wrote:I applaud CCP for this decision, I will explain why before I am accused of being a political tool. In the EU we have clear laws about behaviour on the internet and in public that differ dramatically from the US. in America your right to freedom of speech is guarenteed by the first ammendment. In Europe freedom of speech is limited by the law in ways your country does not it seems understand. Before you start to call us all fascists as has been said on some threads, think about the history of the last century in Europe and ask yourself why we have limited freedom of speech to protect against hate. In recent months in the UK in paticular the profile of cyber offences, cyber bullying, trolling has been very much in the public eye. Cases of teenage suicides after a message on a social networking site like this example http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hereford-worcester-14239702 made national headlines. EU law protects people from offensive behaviour on the internet and does not allow the anononymity of the web protect offendors when the use the internet as a medium to bully or spread hate. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-tayside-central-16144640 people have been given sentences lasting into years for offences carried out in the internet. Perhaps the timing of this incident was most ill fated for Alexander, In the last month we have had a high profile case of a celebrity being targetted by a cyber bully and anti social behavior on the internet has been on the news and on prime time TV and questions have been asked in paliament. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17399027 . Even worse timing wise is the very high profile case of a student jailed for a drunken abusive rant on twitter about a seriously ill footballer that aroused comdemnation from all quarters. The student was jailed in the last week. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-17434587I sympathise with americans who assume protection from the first ammendment gives you the right to say what you want be as offensive as you want on the internet press whatever. This is not the case in the rest of the world and certainly not in Europe and Alexander maybe forgot that in Iceland. Perhaps those members of the CSM who have objected to this decision need to consider this issue and see the wider impolications of this act and also the different international interpretatinos of both what is legal and what is decent and acceptable. Again I would actually like to stress this is not a political post not a wum, This is actually somthing very good that CCP has done in sending out a clear message that certain behaviour will not be tolerated. It sucks for Alexander yes Im sure but he will bounce back from it if he wants to. As another European I can freely call you fascist dog. Europe has benefits but fascist **** laws for censorship of speech are not it. At the same time as you have to ***** foot around serious issues we all get butt raped by our dear politicians but hey they are at least preventing us to say thing they don't like. This is one thing where europe should take after US instead of introducing just more and more idiotic censorship laws. clearly I disagree with you, so does the law fortunatly, did you think the muamba sentence was unfair then? OFC it was. Who cares what some dude writes? Far better to allow saying few things that might make someone upset than to start banning anything that might make someone upset. For anything you say there will be someone who will give you **** for it. UK especially is ******** to hell and back with it's laws about speech. Even more than germany and france who are both already bad enough with the laws controlling what people can say about ww2. It never ends. Just more and more things get censored until you will not be allowed to open your mouth for the fright of breaking some idiotic law. Or maybe we start treating each other with more consideration and respect, maybe we start to look past issues of gender, race sexuality, etc and actually learn to empathise.Freedom or speech is not without consequenses nor is it an absolute right in the EU. When I look at our past its pretty obvious why these principles are enshrined in European law or can you not see that?
Oh yes. Our past really benefited from that. Like today. Benefits of free speech are much higher than drawbacks of someone getting their panties in a twist over some internet talk. Censorship and repressive regimes in Europe have all been very much in favour of censorship and against speech. You are just latest one to fall for the bullshit arguments. Think of the children, evil terrorists and so on... |

Lt Pizi
Dark-Rising
31
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:40:00 -
[685] - Quote
Andski wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:Quote:
You are ignorant, maybe not a kunt but very very ignorant. There is a difference between independence and final ruling power. The supreme court is independent, but isn't considered a ruling power. CCP interfering with the operation of the CSM when the CSM announced it would be meeting to discuss the situation interferes with it's independence. Also do you have a reading defecit?
I said
it is CCP's game, and they are well within their rights to disband the CSM
ccp is an pravate held company, not a state the CSm was fine with mittens stayin within CSM 7 , CCP was not so they overrule all as we both agree is within CCP-¦s power also, as you may already noticed , English isnt my first language , i may have things misunderstood , for this i apology So CCP is reverting the CSM back to a useless PR/marketing tool rather than a player advocacy group. Cool beans.
no they just axed the one guy who broke the rule (by his own words ) and go on bussiness as usual
there was no outcry when they axed the dutch girl for ?NDA? CSM are expected to adhere to the EULA/TOS and carry themselves in a manner that sets an example for other players to follow. http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/What_is_the_CSM |

kdsjfjhiskhfs
University of Caille Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:42:00 -
[686] - Quote
Great job ccp i think you just killed the wis, not mittenz you killed him. |

Myz Toyou
Bite Me inc Exhale.
39
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:42:00 -
[687] - Quote
Blawrf McTaggart wrote:The last thing you ever want to do in EVE-Online is give goons & friends a cause to rally behind. We saw this most recently in the Branch invasion, which took under twenty days to completion, and perhaps most famously in the legendary threadnaught.
Unfortunately, we have a cause to rally behind.
You sound like old BOB, sad 
|

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
133
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:43:00 -
[688] - Quote
Lt Pizi wrote:Andski wrote: So CCP is reverting the CSM back to a useless PR/marketing tool rather than a player advocacy group. Cool beans.
no they just axed the one guy who broke the rule (by his own words ) and go on bussiness as usual there was no outcry when they axed the dutch girl for ?NDA?
No, they let the CSM come to consensus on the issue then overruled them when they made the "wrong" decision. For the CSM to have any legitimacy other than a PR tool CCP need to either respect their decisions or make it adequately clear a decision is not theirs to make. Not this worst of both worlds bullshit. |

Della Monk
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:44:00 -
[689] - Quote
Yeep wrote:Lt Pizi wrote:Andski wrote: So CCP is reverting the CSM back to a useless PR/marketing tool rather than a player advocacy group. Cool beans.
no they just axed the one guy who broke the rule (by his own words ) and go on bussiness as usual there was no outcry when they axed the dutch girl for ?NDA? No, they let the CSM come to consensus on the issue then overruled them when they made the "wrong" decision. For the CSM to have any legitimacy other than a PR tool CCP need to either respect their decisions or make it adequately clear a decision is not theirs to make. Not this worst of both worlds crap.
Hell, even acknowledging that "The CSM was consulted, but we felt that their response did not go far enough" would be a bit nicer |

Viktor Villiance
The Milkmen Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2012.03.29 01:46:00 -
[690] - Quote
Flette wrote:
So, assuming CCP has already changed the name of this character, then what? The character is some 11 billion isk richer, and can then go in peace with a new name.
Your thinly veiled rant is just that.
Nope. They haven't. And any special treatment CCP gives to him sets a dangerous precedent for developer->customer/player interactions. If they think the gaming media is shitstorming them over this, just wait till the media gets a hold of another T20-esque incident (special treatment of players by staff).
I won't even get into the legal ramifications they just exposed themselves to by policing player interactions out of game. Yeee-ouch.
But sure, strawman my point. It's cool. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 .. 51 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |