| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Abim Starkiller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 05:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
so ive tested its
it. My level 4 mission runnner with noctis support (bountys + selling salvage and loot in jita) - makes 45% more isk per hour than my hulk with orca support (perfect mining an refining skills selling minerals in jita).
just to be clear i run level 4 security mission with caldari navy / corp police force. In a max out tengu (little i could do to improve it) I fly a maxed hulk with T2 mining drones, with a orca that has max boosters and the 3 minning links. (nothing i could do to improve it)
Is this working as intended? |

Nedes Betternaem
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 05:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
Silly OP, mining is for bots. |

Tobiaz
Spacerats
90
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 05:09:00 -
[3] - Quote
Nedes Betternaem wrote:Silly OP, mining is for bots.
So is running missions.
Check the slides from fanfest, mining and mission running are just as heavily botted. http://go-dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Tobiaz/sig_complaints.gif
How about fixing image-linking on the forums, CCP? I want to see signatures! |

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
183
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 05:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
More isk for things that shoot back. Seems fair. |

ACE McFACE
Acetech Systems
599
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 05:36:00 -
[5] - Quote
This isnt about the goon's massive failure! i want my money back! Real men wear goggles and a Navy shirt! |

Adunh Slavy
Ammatar Trade Syndicate
457
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 05:37:00 -
[6] - Quote
Jake Warbird wrote:More isk for things that shoot back. Seems fair.
By the time you can run lvl 4s in a tengu, they are shooting fluffy kittens. |

Abim Starkiller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 05:39:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jake Warbird wrote:More isk for things that shoot back. Seems fair.
Thier is no chance of loseing a ship none at all. Im fine with low sec missions making isk as thier is reel risk. And trust me you have more chance of having your hulk ganked by players in high sec, than a few rats killing your mission runner unless your ******** and newb. |

Markus Reese
Debitum Naturae ROMANIAN-LEGION
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 05:44:00 -
[8] - Quote
The core of the issue is that mission running isn't affected by supply and demand. The mass alt mining has a majority that doesn't worry about isk per hour, but just the bot ATM. Result is all things industry related drop below what is considered a reasonable isk/hour line. |

knobber Jobbler
141
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 05:47:00 -
[9] - Quote
Do incursions instead. Less risk, much more reward. |

Abim Starkiller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 05:52:00 -
[10] - Quote
in that case i demand that all bots be band.. here is how you do it CPP destroy all miners in space twice a week for a few months. Refund every one that opens i ticket within 1 hour. Ban every one els. |

Asuka Solo
Stark Fujikawa Stark Enterprises
1320
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 05:53:00 -
[11] - Quote
Tobiaz wrote:Nedes Betternaem wrote:Silly OP, mining is for bots. So is running missions. Check the slides from fanfest, mining and mission running are just as heavily botted.
So is blobbing and gate camping and POS bashing |

Nedes Betternaem
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
78
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 05:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
Asuka Solo wrote:Tobiaz wrote:Nedes Betternaem wrote:Silly OP, mining is for bots. So is running missions. Check the slides from fanfest, mining and mission running are just as heavily botted. So is blobbing and gate camping and POS bashing In actuality, everything is botted. I am relatively sure that the only person who plays eve and is not a bot is the OP.
Most forum posters are actually bots as well. |

Shadowsword
The Scope Gallente Federation
116
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:04:00 -
[13] - Quote
Abim Starkiller wrote:Jake Warbird wrote:More isk for things that shoot back. Seems fair. Thier is no chance of loseing a ship none at all. Im fine with low sec missions making isk as thier is reel risk. And trust me you have more chance of having your hulk ganked by players in high sec, than a few rats killing your mission runner unless your ******** and newb.
Hostile player activity is not to be taken into acount when balancing pve income sources. First because it's not relevant when in the same "safe" area, second because it isn't a fixed data and can change a lot over time. And mission runners get ganked on a regular basis, too.
On top of that, mission running take more SP, more initial investment (a faction BS cost a ton more than a Hulk), some prior mission running experience, and require you to actually pay attention at what happens. (Even if the tengu is broken, yes. you can blame overpowered complex shield mods and oversized extenders). |

Abim Starkiller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:07:00 -
[14] - Quote
Nedes Betternaem wrote:Asuka Solo wrote:Tobiaz wrote:Nedes Betternaem wrote:Silly OP, mining is for bots. So is running missions. Check the slides from fanfest, mining and mission running are just as heavily botted. So is blobbing and gate camping and POS bashing In actuality, everything is botted. I am relatively sure that the only person who plays eve and is not a bot is the OP. Most forum posters are actually bots as well.
Dont say that im already paranoid to the point thinking my real life is full of acters like the tuman show. Last thing i need my hobbie is be me 40k bots.
On the other hand.. is thier a probeing bot, im so bad at it id love to have a bot map out a system for me. |

Raiykjab
Federal Navy Academy
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:09:00 -
[15] - Quote
Posting in the rare non Mittani related thread on the forum.
And see my sig. Eve has miners?! |

Abim Starkiller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:10:00 -
[16] - Quote
Shadowsword wrote:Abim Starkiller wrote:Jake Warbird wrote:More isk for things that shoot back. Seems fair. Thier is no chance of loseing a ship none at all. Im fine with low sec missions making isk as thier is reel risk. And trust me you have more chance of having your hulk ganked by players in high sec, than a few rats killing your mission runner unless your ******** and newb. Hostile player activity is not to be taken into acount when balancing pve income sources. First because it's not relevant when in the same "safe" area, second because it isn't a fixed data and can change a lot over time. And mission runners get ganked on a regular basis, too. On top of that, mission running take more SP, more initial investment (a faction BS cost a ton more than a Hulk), some prior mission running experience, and require you to actually pay attention at what happens. (Even if the tengu is broken, yes. you can blame overpowered complex shield mods and oversized extenders).
so training to a raven and a noctis alt. takes more isk and time than a hulk and orca alt? im not to sure on that buddy. |

Abim Starkiller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:16:00 -
[17] - Quote
Lets face it mining in with perfect skills. should make as much isk as mission running with perfect mission skills. And fleet mining should make as much isk as incursions... its called balance.
Dont blame the bots.. i blame ccp for not clamping down harder. IP BAN ALL BOTS.
how can thier be so many bots? fire the dude incharge of baning bots he is slacking. |

Raiykjab
Federal Navy Academy
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:21:00 -
[18] - Quote
Abim Starkiller wrote:Lets face it mining in with perfect skills. should make as much isk as mission running with perfect mission skills. And fleet mining should make as much isk as incursions... its called balance.
Dont blame the bots.. i blame ccp for not clamping down harder. IP BAN ALL BOTS.
how can thier be so many bots? fire the dude incharge of baning bots he is slacking.
Man really, join the witch hunt, the current mining system must die. If you want to kill a witch you must ignore her, forget her.
If you want to fix mining, don't mine until CCP decide it's time to fix it. Eve has miners?! |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
388
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:24:00 -
[19] - Quote
Mineral prices might go up when the botted mineral supply from Drone Regios ends. Also Inferno might bring enough incentives for large conflicts to bump up the demand. Mine now, sell later!
I think everybody agrees that L4 missions need to move to lowsec.
|

Abim Starkiller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:27:00 -
[20] - Quote
Raiykjab wrote:Abim Starkiller wrote:Lets face it mining in with perfect skills. should make as much isk as mission running with perfect mission skills. And fleet mining should make as much isk as incursions... its called balance.
Dont blame the bots.. i blame ccp for not clamping down harder. IP BAN ALL BOTS.
how can thier be so many bots? fire the dude incharge of baning bots he is slacking. Man really, join the witch hunt, the current mining system must die. If you want to kill a witch you must ignore her, forget her. If you want to fix mining, don't mine until CCP decide it's time to fix it.
I would do that. But the real miners quiting will not stop all the botters- so as far as ccp would know thier are 20k happy miner's so happy that they mine 20 hours a day.
I cant belive that ccp are unaware of who the botters are. I have to come to the conclusion that they dont care as they still get the money and do not want to lose subscriber's. |

Abim Starkiller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:29:00 -
[21] - Quote
Roime wrote:Mineral prices might go up when the botted mineral supply from Drone Regios ends. Also Inferno might bring enough incentives for large conflicts to bump up the demand. Mine now, sell later!
I think everybody agrees that L4 missions need to move to lowsec.
O god moving level 4s to low sec.. that would work. but i bet the people running level 4s for years would quit :-). Its got my vote anyway. |

Joseph Sulaco
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
20
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:30:00 -
[22] - Quote
Raiykjab wrote:Abim Starkiller wrote:Lets face it mining in with perfect skills. should make as much isk as mission running with perfect mission skills. And fleet mining should make as much isk as incursions... its called balance.
Dont blame the bots.. i blame ccp for not clamping down harder. IP BAN ALL BOTS.
how can thier be so many bots? fire the dude incharge of baning bots he is slacking. Man really, join the witch hunt, the current mining system must die. If you want to kill a witch you must ignore her, forget her. If you want to fix mining, don't mine until CCP decide it's time to fix it.
That won't fix anything. If people stop mining, the market will shift to reflect this. Bots will then pick up the slack and now we are back to were we actually are now. The only people who aren't bots that mine don't do it for money, they do it to relax or watch a movie.
If you want to make a difference get involved with the CSM, go to Fanfest, go to gaming conventions, and bring your concerns directly to CCP. |

DarthNefarius
Ssssansha'S Deathhead Einsatzgruppen
111
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:33:00 -
[23] - Quote
Umlike missions or mining INCURSIONS can't be botted WHY ARE INCURSIONS getting the nerf bat before boutnies are CCP... do you like botters so much more then Incursion runners? And Caesar's spirit, raging for revenge, With Ate by his side come hot from hell, Shall in these confines with a monarch's voice Cry "Havoc!" and let slip the dogs of war,That this foul deed... -á |

Nedes Betternaem
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
79
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:35:00 -
[24] - Quote
Abim Starkiller wrote:
I have to come to the conclusion that they dont care as they still get the money and do not want to lose subscriber's.
Yep, you also have to realize that banning all these bots will make everything more expensive in game. Also CCP realizes that no one in their right mind would mine as a primary profession for more than a few weeks unless it is an alt character that they mostly afk mine with or its botted.
|

Abim Starkiller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:36:00 -
[25] - Quote
Joseph Sulaco wrote:Raiykjab wrote:Abim Starkiller wrote:Lets face it mining in with perfect skills. should make as much isk as mission running with perfect mission skills. And fleet mining should make as much isk as incursions... its called balance.
Dont blame the bots.. i blame ccp for not clamping down harder. IP BAN ALL BOTS.
how can thier be so many bots? fire the dude incharge of baning bots he is slacking. Man really, join the witch hunt, the current mining system must die. If you want to kill a witch you must ignore her, forget her. If you want to fix mining, don't mine until CCP decide it's time to fix it. That won't fix anything. If people stop mining, the market will shift to reflect this. Bots will then pick up the slack and now we are back to were we actually are now. The only people who aren't bots that mine don't do it for money, they do it to relax or watch a movie. If you want to make a difference get involved with the CSM, go to Fanfest, go to gaming conventions, and bring your concerns directly to CCP.
Yeah because the CSM are great lol. Pahaps the CSM should do thier job and spend a few hours a day reading these threads and pass the valid ones onto ccp? Fire every one on the csm or just stop the csm, and hire some comunity managers. |

Raiykjab
Federal Navy Academy
17
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:40:00 -
[26] - Quote
Abim Starkiller wrote: I would do that. But the real miners quiting will not stop all the botters- so as far as ccp would know thier are 20k happy miner's so happy that they mine 20 hours a day.
I cant belive that ccp are unaware of who the botters are. I have to come to the conclusion that they dont care as they still get the money and do not want to lose subscriber's.
Yeah, so at some point miner = botter = good to gank
Make mining and miners look like ****, make them eat dust, gank them, bully them.
Then rejoice as CCP announce the long awaited mining overhaul.
It's an attrition war, but as long as people "just do it", it gonna work, and it already started. Eve has miners?! |

Abim Starkiller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:41:00 -
[27] - Quote
Nedes Betternaem wrote:Abim Starkiller wrote:
I have to come to the conclusion that they dont care as they still get the money and do not want to lose subscriber's.
Yep, you also have to realize that banning all these bots will make everything more expensive in game. Also CCP realizes that no one in their right mind would mine as a primary profession for more than a few weeks unless it is an alt character that they mostly afk mine with or its botted.
Then you sir are condoneing bots in order to keep your ships and mods cheap. What about the real miners every thing looks expensive because we cant make as much money as anyone els.. To put it into perspective, we make 45% less than a mission runner, so imagine if everything you had to buy was 45% more expensive, thats how we feel now. |

Nedes Betternaem
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
80
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:43:00 -
[28] - Quote
Abim Starkiller wrote:Nedes Betternaem wrote:Abim Starkiller wrote:
I have to come to the conclusion that they dont care as they still get the money and do not want to lose subscriber's.
Yep, you also have to realize that banning all these bots will make everything more expensive in game. Also CCP realizes that no one in their right mind would mine as a primary profession for more than a few weeks unless it is an alt character that they mostly afk mine with or its botted. Then you sir are condoneing bots in order to keep your ships and mods cheap. What about the real miners every thing looks expensive because we cant make as much money as anyone els.. To put it into perspective, we make 45% less than a mission runner, so imagine if everything you had to buy was 45% more expensive, thats how we feel now. Oh no no, I am not defending botting at all... I hate bots. I am just saying CCP does have its reasons that they are hesitant to ban bots. And also some very powerful eve alliances use bots to fuel their nullsec functions (I will not name names, but I am relatively sure that if you have heard of them, they use bots or at least knowingly tolerate them) |

Abim Starkiller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:51:00 -
[29] - Quote
Nedes Betternaem wrote:Abim Starkiller wrote:Nedes Betternaem wrote:Abim Starkiller wrote:
I have to come to the conclusion that they dont care as they still get the money and do not want to lose subscriber's.
Yep, you also have to realize that banning all these bots will make everything more expensive in game. Also CCP realizes that no one in their right mind would mine as a primary profession for more than a few weeks unless it is an alt character that they mostly afk mine with or its botted. Then you sir are condoneing bots in order to keep your ships and mods cheap. What about the real miners every thing looks expensive because we cant make as much money as anyone els.. To put it into perspective, we make 45% less than a mission runner, so imagine if everything you had to buy was 45% more expensive, thats how we feel now. Oh no no, I am not defending botting at all... I hate bots. I am just saying CCP does have its reasons that they are hesitant to ban bots. And also some very powerful eve alliances use bots to fuel their nullsec functions (I will not name names, but I am relatively sure that if you have heard of them, they use bots or at least knowingly tolerate them.... and CCP is a little too friendly to many of these alliances) Also you are correct, bots do make mining for the real miners that are bots far less profitable. If mining was as profitable as running missions I would mine as much as I run missions. Since its such a massive loss to mine I don't bother with it anymore.
Just say it.. goonswarm are mine bots. i knew it.
Thier is NO excuse not to ban all of them. Let the economey sort its self out afterwards and tweak where needed but you can balance untill the bots are gone. |

Reaver Glitterstim
Resurrected Darkness
88
|
Posted - 2012.03.30 06:53:00 -
[30] - Quote
Abim Starkiller wrote:Is this working as intended? No, it isn't. CCP has for a long time been noting that mineral prices are getting out of hand. More recently, it has come to their attention that the problem is "gunmining" or that more than half of the minerals in EVE come from shooting guns (drone compounds and tech 1 modules mostly) vs. less than half from mining. That means that the popularity of mining vs. mission-running are not significant factors in their payout.
Expect a fix soon(tm)...but I'm betting they do something about it as early as Inferno. -á"The Mittani: Hated By Badposters i'm strangely comfortable with it" -Mittens |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |