Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
blathering idiot
Helliburton Inc Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2008.10.17 18:39:00 -
[121]
No profit for the dead. |
Pallaxia
|
Posted - 2009.01.12 22:42:00 -
[122]
Inactive accounts should have no impact in-game: remove RP accumulation, market orders, contracts, corp standings, research/manufacturing jobs (both individual and corp) within a reasonable (48-72 hr) grace period. |
SencneS
Amarr Rebellion Against big Irreversible Dinks
|
Posted - 2009.01.12 23:23:00 -
[123]
Originally by: Tevlent Edited by: Tevlent on 15/10/2008 02:03:07
Your market orders and research points should stop if the account is inactive. After all, with market orders up you can make money while your account is expired. With research points you can continue to accumulate them while your account is expired, and when you re-subscribe you come back to a fat amount of RPs that you can cash in for ISK. That is entirely inconsistent with the ghost training thing.
If CCP wants to remove ghost training then they should also remove market orders from inactive accounts, and stop inactive accounts from acquiring RPs.
Dividend payouts to inactive shareholders as well, those should be stopped.
Capsuleers who actively put their time and energy into working on their characters should reap the benefits of the game, not inactive ones. TIMExENERGY=PROFIT! NOT TIMExINACTIVE=PROFIT!
While I whole heartedly support the idea of turning off RP generation and shutting down Market orders. This will not actually solve any problems.
You'll end up with thousands of corporate orders instead.
Say for argument sake I have 2 accounts. I use these two accounts to have 1,830 Market orders on the market (Max market slots).
I put all the slow moving orders on the account I'm going to unsubscribe to. Place them as "On behalf of the Corporation" then unsub.
I have 915 Corporate orders out there in which my active account can modify. I wait 90 days then resub for 1 month just to enter new orders. Wait another 90 days etc.
The ownership of the orders is the corporation, not the player. So although the logical choice would be "Remove them as well" you've now found a way to greif a corporation.
Load up the sell orders, subsub... It keeps that stuff locked away, but not on the market. Imagine doing that to come expensive BPOs etc. |
Axel Vindislaga
|
Posted - 2009.01.14 09:09:00 -
[124]
Now I understand how players can stand to have their BPs tied down for such a long time and clog up the research facilities. This will have serious repercussions that will not all be unhappily received but after the shock waves have finished rolling around New Eden players will just get used to the new rules. It just has to be supported...There is no other rational choice. It just isn't fair.
And as for CCP getting money well they are kinda running a business they have lives and need to eat. Take some time to actually consider their running costs. I for one and happy to pay because I think Eve is a project worth supporting and in hind sight Eve TV was worth supporting and would go back and chip some cash to help out. I am considering getting a second account but that might diminish my original and best guy. |
Orb Vex
R.U.R.
|
Posted - 2009.01.14 11:10:00 -
[125]
|
Ecatherina W
Gallente Dromedary Goat Albatross and Fish Big Bang Quantum
|
Posted - 2009.01.14 11:53:00 -
[126]
I am undecided about this... sounds fair in general, but how about market orders for a corp or research for a corp? The CEO does not get to know if an account is going idle - and so he/she has the problem of suddenly have BPOs not researching because someone did not pay his/her eve account for a week?
Hmmm
I guess that means I am not in support of the proposal. ***** Empress of the Multiverse ***** |
Hans Arienth
Lightspeed Logistics
|
Posted - 2009.01.14 19:57:00 -
[127]
|
Akadio
|
Posted - 2009.01.14 19:59:00 -
[128]
Edited by: Akadio on 14/01/2009 20:02:13 Edited by: Akadio on 14/01/2009 19:59:48 While i can agree with the original idea and many more that ive read in post that mess with markets etc since it does ultimatly mess with it in the long run i cant agree with
Originally by: Biscuit0 Hrm... just remove inactive chars from EVE altogether.
It's like they never existed. :iiam:
Well Pardon me for not been able to afford Eve all the time, some of us have other things to worry about other than Eve, so what your telling me is im to poor to afford eve and if if i cant play for say 9 months due to money problems that i should lose ALL my ships my isk my skills becasue i cant afford the subscription?
Well TBH thats whats happend to me i come back after 9 months inactive i had nothing in the market that would mess with it and give me an unfair returning advantage. What am i rewarded with for re subing?? 15 million ISK 6 Months of skill training multiple ships gone removed i dont even have the character Because that got deleted Too, so yeah understandbly im well and truly miffed, ive paid CCP to play thier game which i think is worth the time and effot to play, and i get kicked in the teeth and told that i need to place a pettion to resolve the issue
Signing With your Orginal Idea Not With Removing Characters Altogether, my counter argument to that is ive PAID CCP for that privledge why should they strip it from us? |
Draygo Korvan
Merch Industrial GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.01.14 22:05:00 -
[129]
Originally by: Akadio Edited by: Akadio on 14/01/2009 20:02:13 Edited by: Akadio on 14/01/2009 19:59:48 While i can agree with the original idea and many more that ive read in post that mess with markets etc since it does ultimatly mess with it in the long run i cant agree with
Originally by: Biscuit0 Hrm... just remove inactive chars from EVE altogether.
It's like they never existed. :iiam:
Well Pardon me for not been able to afford Eve all the time, some of us have other things to worry about other than Eve, so what your telling me is im to poor to afford eve and if if i cant play for say 9 months due to money problems that i should lose ALL my ships my isk my skills becasue i cant afford the subscription?
Well TBH thats whats happend to me i come back after 9 months inactive i had nothing in the market that would mess with it and give me an unfair returning advantage. What am i rewarded with for re subing?? 15 million ISK 6 Months of skill training multiple ships gone removed i dont even have the character Because that got deleted Too, so yeah understandbly im well and truly miffed, ive paid CCP to play thier game which i think is worth the time and effot to play, and i get kicked in the teeth and told that i need to place a pettion to resolve the issue
Signing With your Orginal Idea Not With Removing Characters Altogether, my counter argument to that is ive PAID CCP for that privledge why should they strip it from us?
You sir are a shining gem of intelligence in this otherwise mentally deprived thread. |
Mos7Wan7ed
|
Posted - 2009.01.14 22:59:00 -
[130]
Edited by: Mos7Wan7ed on 14/01/2009 23:06:08 depending in the market orders that could be alot of isk loss by having market orders suddenly end they would have to be suspended.
|
|
The Racketeer
|
Posted - 2009.01.14 23:04:00 -
[131]
Originally by: Zinnn This just sounds like a bunch of suicidal fans that want to make sure to nail in the final nails in Eve's coffin.
I agree. Strip all the features out of an unsubscribed account. Let's get this band-aid ripped off fast and let the hemmhoraging of CCP's cashflow begin.
how in the world will suspending income and rp of accounts that aren't being paid for going to hurt ccp? that one/two month a year that account logs in to harvest rp?
|
Saphirro
|
Posted - 2009.01.15 00:47:00 -
[132]
Originally by: Bunyip ...Players should have their characters dropped if the following three conditions apply: - They've been inactive for six or more months - They have less than 2m SP - They have not paid their account for six months.
I bet people are glad they voted for you.
____________________________________ Google - 'Rata Nrnima bunyip issler' |
Sir Ibex
|
Posted - 2009.01.15 15:39:00 -
[133]
Sure, let's butcher and destroy whatever little good is still left in this game. Let's make even more people cancel their subscription! After all why should YOU care? You ALREADY made your billions of isk by exploiting the heck out of eve when you could. Who cares about all those that have YET to make all that isk without all the benefits that you had all these years! Right?
No *uc* you buddy. BIG THUMBS DOWN.
|
Saphirro
|
Posted - 2009.01.15 19:20:00 -
[134]
Originally by: Sir Ibex Sure, let's butcher and destroy whatever little good is still left in this game. Let's make even more people cancel their subscription! After all why should YOU care? You ALREADY made your billions of isk by exploiting the heck out of eve when you could. Who cares about all those that have YET to make all that isk without all the benefits that you had all these years! Right?
No *uc* you buddy. BIG THUMBS DOWN.
Wow. You're angry. |
Gone'Postal
Aztec Industry
|
Posted - 2009.01.15 19:47:00 -
[135]
All or nothing. |
Dark Fairy
|
Posted - 2009.01.18 04:07:00 -
[136]
you shouldnt get isk like that |
Bunyip
|
Posted - 2009.01.18 07:00:00 -
[137]
Hello all,
IŠve been talking to the devs while here in Iceland, and they know about the problems. I canŠt go into details due to the NDA, but your cries have not fallen on deaf ears.
|
barvo
The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.01.18 13:01:00 -
[138]
Edited by: barvo on 18/01/2009 13:06:11 edit - in after CSM!
Originally by: Ecatherina W I am undecided about this... sounds fair in general, but how about market orders for a corp or research for a corp? The CEO does not get to know if an account is going idle - and so he/she has the problem of suddenly have BPOs not researching because someone did not pay his/her eve account for a week?
I would suggest that if you're a CEO and your member who was researching your BPOs has gone inactive, you've got more important issues than the level of ME of that BP, like, how the hell to get their blueprints back. |
William Pierce
Universal Army Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.01.22 04:19:00 -
[139]
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |