Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
0uch
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 15:55:00 -
[1]
All has been cancelled, i'm doing my time payed out and parking my accounts (so leave the can i have your stuff posts out please)
I hope a lot of people follow in my footsteps, a +150 pages post on the forums from them against the nerf didnt help, maybe if we take the $ signs out of there eyes they'll listen. I invested to much time in one of the chars to get him where he is now, and now that i can finally use it decently they think they can nerf it even if 2/1 is against it?
And dont give me the adapt or die thingie.. i always adapt IRL but i'm not planning skilling again for ages before i'm adapted enough. The changes on SISI are plain stupid.
So people of new eden, lets show them how much we like the nanonerf! |
Sheriff Jones
Amarr Clinical Experiment
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 15:57:00 -
[2]
Even if i'm tempted to say somethng else, i'll just say "won't matter what you do, will happen, leaving people are calculated risk." |
knifee
Caldari Euphoria Released
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 15:57:00 -
[3]
Yer! you stick it to the man! |
An Anarchyyt
Gallente Battlestars GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 15:59:00 -
[4]
Oh no!
What will Eve do without this faceless alt? |
Furb Killer
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 15:59:00 -
[5]
Removed. Please do not spam. Navigator |
Gaius Weyland
Caldari Sankkasen Mining Conglomerate EVESpace
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:00:00 -
[6]
Yeah! Down with the system!
...or not...meh |
AkRoYeR
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:02:00 -
[7]
I just reactivated this alt because of the nerfs..so there you big meanie! |
Crackzilla
The Shadow Order
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:04:00 -
[8]
Originally by: 0uch I invested to much time in one of the chars to get him where he is now,
You trained a flavor of the month and you expect something different?
|
Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:12:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Le Skunk on 24/10/2008 16:14:44 Edited by: Le Skunk on 24/10/2008 16:12:59 Respect to the OP for putting his moeny where his mouth is.
With luck, CCPs recent shocking behavior towards the gamebase, will be punished by many more people quitting/suspending alt accounts etc.
whether your gripe is suicide ganks, speed, blasters, ghost training, GTC timecodes, or just the fashion they have been interacting with the gamebase over the past year.. do something positive and kill off an alt.
With the people in control of the game atm, big drops in income is the only hope for them to get the message and mend their ways before what is at heart a truely excellant game does die out.
SKUNK |
Brodde Dim
Unseen University
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:13:00 -
[10]
Originally by: 0uch and now that i can finally use it decently they think they can nerf it even if 2/1 is against it?
I am sorry you were late on the bandwagon, but this is exactly why nerf is necessary. Soon everyone would be specialized in flying nanoed HACs, and nanos would be the only way to pvp (atleast sub capital). |
|
An Anarchyyt
Gallente Battlestars GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:14:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Le Skunk Edited by: Le Skunk on 24/10/2008 16:12:59 Respect to the OP for putting his moeny where his mouth is.
With luck, CCPs recent shocking behavior towards the gamebase, will be punished by many more people quitting/suspending alt accounts etc.
With the people in control of the game atm, big drops in income is the only hope for them to get the message and mend their ways before what is at heart a truely excellant game does die out.
SKUNK
You next. |
Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:15:00 -
[12]
Originally by: An Anarchyyt
Originally by: Le Skunk Edited by: Le Skunk on 24/10/2008 16:12:59 Respect to the OP for putting his moeny where his mouth is.
With luck, CCPs recent shocking behavior towards the gamebase, will be punished by many more people quitting/suspending alt accounts etc.
With the people in control of the game atm, big drops in income is the only hope for them to get the message and mend their ways before what is at heart a truely excellant game does die out.
SKUNK
You next.
Am suspending two alt accounts when they run out next.
So shut your face ;p
SKUNK |
Haraldhardrade
Amarr Pax Amarr
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:26:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Haraldhardrade on 24/10/2008 16:26:17
Originally by: 0uch All has been cancelled, i'm doing my time payed out and parking my accounts (so leave the can i have your stuff posts out please)
I hope a lot of people follow in my footsteps, a +150 pages post on the forums from them against the nerf didnt help, maybe if we take the $ signs out of there eyes they'll listen. I invested to much time in one of the chars to get him where he is now, and now that i can finally use it decently they think they can nerf it even if 2/1 is against it?
And dont give me the adapt or die thingie.. i always adapt IRL but i'm not planning skilling again for ages before i'm adapted enough. The changes on SISI are plain stupid.
So people of new eden, lets show them how much we like the nanonerf!
So you fitted nanos since you started playing? If not, what did you do before nanos were the win?
edit : I'm not going to ask, in stead I'm going to tell you to give me your stuff. |
S1r Minealot
Shade.
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:30:00 -
[14]
Edited by: S1r Minealot on 24/10/2008 16:30:06 Same here. *sigh*
|
Zalathar
Minmatar Stellar Research Incorporated DEFI4NT
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:32:00 -
[15]
looking around my friends, and people i know, i do not have any idea where you get the number that people are 2/1 in being opposed to it. if anything look like the opposite to me, if not 5 to 1 in favour. personally i think the nano nerf is a good idea, and playing around on sisi has given me the impression of more balanced combat.
By training FOTM you asked to be eventually nerfed, and nanos have been like this for a while, so you got to enjoy it while it lasted.
PS: 150 people posting in a thread is not enough wehn you condier over 200K active subscriptions. while your opinion is valued, it is not valued over everyone else's. |
Ksane Nkkpokm
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:34:00 -
[16]
|
Zyck
KDS Navy
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:35:00 -
[17]
Yeah, this nano nerf sucks!
There's no other ships, mods, weapons, or tactics in the game at all! |
Highwind Cid
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:40:00 -
[18]
I like how people point out how massive X or Y thread is. Funny thing is that's just a number, not much in the thread. It's usually the same 30 people going back and forth in a seemingly never ending smack/troll/occasional good point posts. |
Jago Kain
Amarr Pan Galactic Traders
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:47:00 -
[19]
Oh noes!
Some total tool with no imagination is quitting the game rather than use his brain and work out a decent set-up that does not revolve around nanos.
Must have come as a huge surprise as well; after all, CCP have never nerfed an obviously overpowered tactic or ship before in the name of game balance, have they?
I guess we'd all better follow suit and quit too; after all, we wouldn't want the OP to think we didn't agree with his narrow minded view of things would we?
Incidentally Ouch, I don't want your stuff; I have enough of my own and I got it without the EVE equivalent of waiting in dark alleys for old grannies to walk past and then running quickly up behind them with a crowbar in hand.
Bye Ouch... it's a big universe and whatever happens, you won't be missed.
|
Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:50:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Zalathar
1)looking around my friends, and people i know, i do not have any idea where you get the number that people are 2/1 ...
2)PS: 150 people posting in a thread is not enough wehn you condier over 200K active subscriptions. while your opinion is valued, it is not valued over everyone else's.
1) Look in the Assembly parts of the forums
Currently
1582 AGAINST NANO NERF (votes) 785 FOR NANO NERF (votes)
Which is the 2 to 1 hes talking about.
2) Until it is mandatory to vote, figures smaller the 200k are proportionaly high.
1585 people is the strongest support by far ANY issue has ever had in the CSM. Issues which have had 100 supports have been brought to the CSM, then CCP, hen actioned by CCP so CCP have established they think a couple of hundred votes is a significant amount (let alone 1500)
Unfortunately, what "you and your mates think" is irrelevant unless you vote for or against.
SKUNK
|
|
Uzume Ame
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 16:59:00 -
[21]
People can go on sisi before talking crap at least? |
Tiirae
The New Era HUZZAH FEDERATION
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 17:02:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Le Skunk
Unfortunately, what "you and your mates think" is irrelevant unless you vote for or against.
There's so many reasons why that vote thread achieves nothing that I can't begin to list them. But the most important reason is that CCP didn't create that thread, they didn't suggest people vote in it, and they sure as hell aren't bothered by it's contents.
Citing the CSM in any of this is pointless as it's only been around a few months, you can't draw any conclusions from such a small sample.
When pvp'ers leave because of stuff like this, it just hurts the pvp'ers that stay, because proportionately, we now represent less of their customers than before. it doesn't hurt CCP, because the bulk of their customers are carebears who didn't even vote in the csm elections and i'm sure don't give a toss about nanos.
By leaving, you are in effect making things worse. |
Aurora148
Gallente DBCI
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 17:03:00 -
[23]
the amount of people who are having emorage after the various nerfs and saying they will cancel all their accounts is laughable. people can whine and say they will cancel but in reality very few people will actually quit. ccp know this and just because 1/200th dont agree doesnt mean anything will change.
Be thankfull that the devs even take notice at all, in the majority of games its done their way with feck all communication between devs and players at all. |
Highwind Cid
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 17:16:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Le Skunk
Originally by: Zalathar
1)looking around my friends, and people i know, i do not have any idea where you get the number that people are 2/1 ...
2)PS: 150 people posting in a thread is not enough wehn you condier over 200K active subscriptions. while your opinion is valued, it is not valued over everyone else's.
1) Look in the Assembly parts of the forums
Currently
1582 AGAINST NANO NERF (votes) 785 FOR NANO NERF (votes)
Which is the 2 to 1 hes talking about.
2) Until it is mandatory to vote, figures smaller the 200k are proportionaly high.
1585 people is the strongest support by far ANY issue has ever had in the CSM. Issues which have had 100 supports have been brought to the CSM, then CCP, hen actioned by CCP so CCP have established they think a couple of hundred votes is a significant amount (let alone 1500)
Unfortunately, what "you and your mates think" is irrelevant unless you vote for or against.
SKUNK
Is it possible to create alt's trials to 'beat' the voting system?
|
Malen Nenokal
Eden Federal Recon
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 17:19:00 -
[25]
I like the nanonerf.
Eden Federal Recon
|
TimMc
Gallente The Motley Crew
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 17:30:00 -
[26]
1. Nanonerf is not *that* bad 2. It hasn't even happened yet 3. Who the heck are you? |
4nic8
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 17:44:00 -
[27]
I had a character called viqtoria (look for them on forums, then try to ingame...), after some of the recent ****zle (the repeated lying over ghost training, the bizzzzarrrre reasoning over GTC changes, WoW-esk game rebalancing, countless other serious issues with a 5 year old game, etc) and my feeling that ccp just ain't up to it, I deleted them. full +5 implants, 5% hardwirings, billions of isk and assets all given away and gone.
I wish other people would, instead of whining in limbo, just do what they feel is the right course of action. make yer choice or stfu. fyi I agree with the OP, rebalancing in a game where it takes yonks to actually get anywhere or do anything just ain't this gamers cup of tea! :)
|
Slade Trillgon
Masuat'aa Matari Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 18:45:00 -
[28]
I don't really get it, that is all the hate against the nerf.
I by no means know all the skill training that goes into flying a nano HAC, but could someone enlighten me to what skills need to be trained that can not be used with every other ship? I assume that the rigging skills to fit the speed rigs are pretty heavy but outside of that what other skills do not cross over?
Oh yes. See you later /0
Slade
Originally by: Crumplecorn NerfBat is now known as the WaveMachine.
≡v≡ |
Patch86
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 18:51:00 -
[29]
Lol ------
Originally by: Micheal Dietrich You can even get a midget with a camera to sit on the floorboard.
|
Haraldhardrade
Amarr Pax Amarr
|
Posted - 2008.10.24 19:04:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Le Skunk
Originally by: Zalathar
1)looking around my friends, and people i know, i do not have any idea where you get the number that people are 2/1 ...
2)PS: 150 people posting in a thread is not enough wehn you condier over 200K active subscriptions. while your opinion is valued, it is not valued over everyone else's.
1) Look in the Assembly parts of the forums
Currently
1582 AGAINST NANO NERF (votes) 785 FOR NANO NERF (votes)
Which is the 2 to 1 hes talking about.
2) Until it is mandatory to vote, figures smaller the 200k are proportionaly high.
1585 people is the strongest support by far ANY issue has ever had in the CSM. Issues which have had 100 supports have been brought to the CSM, then CCP, hen actioned by CCP so CCP have established they think a couple of hundred votes is a significant amount (let alone 1500)
Unfortunately, what "you and your mates think" is irrelevant unless you vote for or against.
SKUNK
I wonder how many of the subscribers who actually bothers reading the whine threads on the forums. Something tells me the nano whiners are a groups of well....whiners with nothing better to do because they are lazy at pvp. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |