Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

DarkAegix
Acetech Systems
1063
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 03:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hey everybody, In the fanfest ship balancing presentation, there was a chart shown with all the T1/T2/T3/Faction ships, colour-coded according to how CCP sees them. Red = Broken Yellow = Semi-broken Green = Working as intended
Unfortunately, the names of the ships were kept hidden. Fortunately, the structure was kept intact, allowing me to discern all of the hidden ships!
All races (hidden): http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/9098/baseao.png Revealed Amarr chart: http://img829.imageshack.us/img829/7751/amarr.png
Now then, I don't have enough time to do a fancy reveal of all the races, but the structure remains the same. You should be able to figure out the other races for yourself!
Here are some very quick insights, from the other races: Tengu: Working as intended Proteus: Broken Loki: Semi-broken All Black Ops ships: Broken Falcon: Semi-broken All tier-1 battlecruisers: Semi-broken
So, what do you think about CCP's opinion of the current ship balance? It's all subject to change, so share your opinion. |

Enkryption
Intergalactic Pool Boys
7
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 04:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
Wondered why they needed a panel to tell everyone what they already knew. |

JamesCLK
Lone Star Exploration Lone Star Partners
159
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 04:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
So apparently the Merlin is broken but the-
/suddenly Kestrels, hundreds of them. |

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1376
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 04:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
JamesCLK wrote:So apparently the Merlin is broken but the-
/suddenly Kestrels, hundreds of them.
..... Because of Kestrel .. I remember that meme. 
Sorry for spam* |

Koban Agalder
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 05:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
It's very funny that Naglfar is marked as OK. |

Doggy Dogwoofwoof
Doggy Missions
14
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 05:07:00 -
[6] - Quote
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:[quote=JamesCLK]
Sorry for spam*
Spam was made... BECAUSE OF KESTREL. |

Daniel L'Siata
Echelon Conflict Resolution. Psychotic Tendencies.
92
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 05:10:00 -
[7] - Quote
I don't quite understand how they missed the Nid and Chimera, they really aren't even close to equal. |

Alain Kinsella
100
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 05:41:00 -
[8] - Quote
I don't see the issue with the normal Omen. At low skills you can run a 4-turret config, then at higher skills graduate to a 5-turret setup (5 high-end Beams can be tricky IIRC). I grew into that ship rather nicely actually.
Same with the Sigil. Smaller and agile, a nice step down from an Impel if you're just doing casual shuffling things about (like a bunch of P1s from a planet). And it was free if you did the career tutorials. What's not to like?
Maller and Aug I can understand being a problem. Never seen much of a use for those. I may have come here from Myst Online, but that does not make me any less bloodthirsty than the average Eve player.
Just more subtle.
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
408
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 05:46:00 -
[9] - Quote
Hmm, supercarriers and titans: only half-broken. Not bad. Take all the tech Build all the titans Drop all the POSes
Bees incoming, nerf ERRYTHING ERRYDAY |

Xurr
Angelic Insurrection Corp
17
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 06:05:00 -
[10] - Quote
Its a bit interesting they consider all the marauders to be fine.
With the coming drone changes i see them losing what little value they have now. |

Nedes Betternaem
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
95
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 06:10:00 -
[11] - Quote
Xurr wrote:Its a bit interesting they consider all the marauders to be fine.
With the coming drone changes i see them losing what little value they have now. Same here... damn shame, I was planning on buying one in the somewhat near future too. |

Imajitaaltofanalt ofanalt
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 06:18:00 -
[12] - Quote
Xurr wrote:Its a bit interesting they consider all the marauders to be fine.
With the coming drone changes i see them losing what little value they have now.
What drone changes?? |

Farang Lo
State War Academy Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 06:22:00 -
[13] - Quote
cant understand why proteus is broken, loki is ok, legion is really really broken |

Nedes Betternaem
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
95
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 06:23:00 -
[14] - Quote
Imajitaaltofanalt ofanalt wrote:Xurr wrote:Its a bit interesting they consider all the marauders to be fine.
With the coming drone changes i see them losing what little value they have now. What drone changes?? They plan on adding salvaging drones. |

marVLs
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 06:23:00 -
[15] - Quote
Are You F... Kidding me? Golem on green?
I don't want to live on this planet anymore... |

DarkAegix
Acetech Systems
1063
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 06:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
Imajitaaltofanalt ofanalt wrote:Xurr wrote:Its a bit interesting they consider all the marauders to be fine.
With the coming drone changes i see them losing what little value they have now. What drone changes?? Salvage drones |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
2040
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 06:26:00 -
[17] - Quote
Imajitaaltofanalt ofanalt wrote:Xurr wrote:Its a bit interesting they consider all the marauders to be fine.
With the coming drone changes i see them losing what little value they have now. What drone changes??
There are several drone user buffs coming, but I'm guessing he refers to the introduction of salvage drones. |

Nedes Betternaem
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
95
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 06:32:00 -
[18] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:Imajitaaltofanalt ofanalt wrote:Xurr wrote:Its a bit interesting they consider all the marauders to be fine.
With the coming drone changes i see them losing what little value they have now. What drone changes?? There are several drone user buffs coming, but I'm guessing he refers to the introduction of salvage drones. There are several changes to drones, but the ones that are relevant to marauders are salvage drones. |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1435
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 06:33:00 -
[19] - Quote
The chart was definitely made prior to the AF buff. They have the Harpy as "broken" and I doubt they mean it in the "OMGLOLOP" way that it is now.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Xurr
Angelic Insurrection Corp
17
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 06:35:00 -
[20] - Quote
The ones i were referring too was the addition of a bounty to the drones. |

Nedes Betternaem
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
95
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 06:40:00 -
[21] - Quote
Xurr wrote:The ones i were referring too was the addition of a bounty to the drones. Eh... I guess if you live in drone space that might be important. Otherwise, I still think salvage drones will do more to lower demand for marauders than the removal of rogue drone mineral drops. |

Xurr
Angelic Insurrection Corp
17
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 06:49:00 -
[22] - Quote
Well for mission running the only time i'd consider a marauder is for the drone missions. Unless they are only changing the drone region drones, not the mission ones.
For infiltrated outposts and that convoy one i currently blitz them with my nightmare. With a marauder they might be worth looting. If drones get bounties i just don't see the point in ever taking out a marauder. |

Benny Ohu
The Lazy Dragoons True Apathy
47
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 07:02:00 -
[23] - Quote
Confirming Arbitrator is the only Amarr cruiser worth flying for a newbie :D
The Omen is too difficult to fit for a ship that should probably be considered the 'step up' for Amarr lazor users. Why not train directly for a Harby?
I do not understand why one of the Amarrian recons is marked in red? Both appear to be good ships. (I M NUB)
The Naug, like the Prophecy, is tank and not much more. |

Dato Koppla
Perkone Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 07:08:00 -
[24] - Quote
Weird about the Pilgrim, I always though it was one of the premier cloaky ships to uncloak on unsuspecting noobs and neut them to hell and set drones on em.
Yeah recon changes puzzle me a little, they marked one of the Caldari recons as yellow as well, probably the Rook but I don't see what they can do to fix that. |

Donedy
The Scope Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 08:00:00 -
[25] - Quote
Proteus is broken? oO I dunno what they mean by "broken", but im a bit affraid.  |

Tobiaz
Spacerats
116
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 09:15:00 -
[26] - Quote
Nedes Betternaem wrote:Xurr wrote:Its a bit interesting they consider all the marauders to be fine.
With the coming drone changes i see them losing what little value they have now. Same here... damn shame, I was planning on buying one in the somewhat near future too.
If you're planning on flying them eventually, now is probably the best time to buy them.  http://go-dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Tobiaz/sig_complaints.gif
How about fixing image-linking on the forums, CCP? I want to see signatures! |

Baneken
Hyvat Pahat ja Eric The Polaris Syndicate
95
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 09:39:00 -
[27] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Hmm, supercarriers and titans: only half-broken. Not bad.
Well technically titans and SC aren't broken, theres just too damn many of them.  |

ElQuirko
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
491
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 09:42:00 -
[28] - Quote
I'd like to know how the ships are broken - the proteus fills a very nice high dps/massive buffer role, as well as (post-crucible) being quite a nice active tanker. Could do with being a bit faster, but that's my only complaint. Don't hurt my proteus!
If we distribute pictures of people, does that mean God can file copyright claims under SOPA? |

Gnidex
Eclectic Electric
6
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 10:09:00 -
[29] - Quote
I'm surprised they think the Sacrilege is fine. |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
404
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 10:21:00 -
[30] - Quote
ElQuirko wrote:I'd like to know how the ships are broken - the proteus fills a very nice high dps/massive buffer role, as well as (post-crucible) being quite a nice active tanker. Could do with being a bit faster, but that's my only complaint. Don't hurt my proteus!
I would guess they refer to it's complete uselesness in PVE, after all the T3s should be versatile and adaptable to various roles. Proteus is imo a pure PVP ship, but yeah, is pretty damn nice in that role.
Myrmidon needs to be rated as semi-borked, though.
|

Keen Fallsword
The Scope Gallente Federation
63
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 10:48:00 -
[31] - Quote
I dont care anymore |

Koban Agalder
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 11:00:00 -
[32] - Quote
But what about a broken Naglfar?! |

Greg Valanti
Looney Clones
34
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 11:20:00 -
[33] - Quote
Roime wrote:
Myrmidon needs to be rated as semi-borked, though.
In what way? It is one of the most versatile BCs in the game. |

Liz Arji
Gothic Unlimited
21
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 11:31:00 -
[34] - Quote
So the Nighthawk and Vulture are considered broken. I wonder if this only concerns their link module bonus or also their offensive/defensive abilities. |

Reaver Glitterstim
Resurrected Darkness
108
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 11:31:00 -
[35] - Quote
Was unable to see Minmatar industrials but I'm gonna go out on a limb and say: yellow (Wreathe) and green (Hoarder).
I see the Badger Mark II listed as green. I'd say it needs a cargo space buff, but it's nice for a defensive industrial. Though it's only marginally better than the Bestower in the few ways it is.
Also I disagree with the Cyclone being red. They might not have had much experience with those, but they are a very satisfying ratting ship if nothing else. A cyclone can tank very well for a tier 1 bc and though its damage output is lowish (not terrible, mind you!), the moderately large drone bay plus autocannons make it really easy to tear through frigate and cruiser rats alike. I've not yet flown any ship that was better at going through level 3 missions. -edit- but hey, I won't cry if they buff it. -á"The Mittani: Hated By Badposters i'm strangely comfortable with it" -Mittens |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
404
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 11:48:00 -
[36] - Quote
Greg Valanti wrote:Roime wrote:
Myrmidon needs to be rated as semi-borked, though.
In what way? It is one of the most versatile BCs in the game.
Yes, that's why only semi-broken. The problem I have with it is it's dps compared to Vexor. Same bandwidth, no weapon bonus.
Myrm should get the 100mbit/s to bring it's damage output over a Vexor.
It's very slow, and because of that it's often unable to apply the turret dps, and only relying on it's drones.
OTOH, one could also argue that Vexor is OP for a cruiser, and I wouldn't disagree 
|
|

CCP Ytterbium
C C P C C P Alliance
416

|
Posted - 2012.04.03 11:49:00 -
[37] - Quote
Clever girl.
OP is too smart for his own good, please all look at this magic flashy-thing pen while we put some sunglasses on...
More seriously, there are reasons why no ship names were on that chart.
- The list is by no mean fixed, and ships we consider to be broken change all the time. Especially since this is a long term planned change.
- The list is also highly biased to the reader. Depending on your experience, profession in EVE you may not find it accurate, and for good reasons. For instance, a Raven may be quite ok for mission running pilot, but far less appealing for a player engaged in long null-sec fleet warfare.
- We wanted to avoid nitpicking discussions about which exact ships can be considered as broken, and just a provide a general review of the game status. During Fanfest, we were far more interested to move the discussion forward during the roundtables / questions on how to improve the ship status, not to spend most of our time arguing on which vessels are broken or not
.
|
|

Killer Gandry
V I R I I Ineluctable.
221
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 12:02:00 -
[38] - Quote
People love to speculate.
I can easy fill any name in any place in that chart. Then tunble all around and put different names in places and still have a perfect explenation.
I saw someone saying " Sacrilege is fine?" If propperly fit it can hold it's ground to various other ships and fail horribly to others. But then again that is something true for every ship. If you want a pure I-Win ship you should become a Dev and get a nice frig with 2,000,000 HP, 99% resist over the board in shield and armor and 8 DD's high. |

Arkady Sadik
Gradient Electus Matari
596
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 12:36:00 -
[39] - Quote
As "broken" can mean "too good" or "too bad", that list says preciously little.
But, well, for Minmatar, with the similar guesswork:
- All frigates except for Rifter and Firetail are broken - Wolf, Jaguar are semi-broken (before the last changes, I guess) - Hyena is broken - All cruisers except the Rupture are broken. The Stabber is semi-broken. - Muninn, Huginn are semi-broken - Loki is semi-broken - Cyclone is broken - Prowler or Mastodon (not sure which) is broken - Navy phoon, navy pest are semi-broken - Panther is broken - Hel and Ragnarok are semi-broken
Some of those are part of a ship class that is considered "(semi-)broken" across all races (e.g. blackops, supercaps), so might not even be ship-specific, but class-specific. |

Hashi Lebwohl
Oberon Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 12:59:00 -
[40] - Quote
The minmatar are always the step child when in comes to handing out the presents. Typically , Amarr get the great armour buff, caldari get the shield buff, gallente get the damage buff , (pause whilst searching the bottom of the bag) minmatar gets the furry sweet nobody else wanted. |

Grimpak
Midnight Elites Echelon Rising
404
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 13:09:00 -
[41] - Quote
Arkady Sadik wrote:- Navy phoon, navy pest are semi-broken
while I agree that the navy pest is semi-broke, the case of the navy phoon is quite relative.
unless it's the looks, then the phoon is, indeed, broken, independently of whatever version you're talking about. [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |

Jame Jarl Retief
Corps Diplomatique Terrestrienne
22
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 13:35:00 -
[42] - Quote
Well, if nothing else, the chart puts the whole "Gallente are fine" argument to rest. Finally. 
Now, to see what actually gets fixed, and how. Just hope they remember that drones were meant to be a Gallente racial weapon, just like missiles on Caldari and projectiles on Minmatar, and treat them accordingly. |

Fidelium Mortis
Quantum Cats Syndicate Villore Accords
75
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 13:39:00 -
[43] - Quote
Alain Kinsella wrote:I don't see the issue with the normal Omen. At low skills you can run a 4-turret config, then at higher skills graduate to a 5-turret setup (5 high-end Beams can be tricky IIRC). I grew into that ship rather nicely actually.
Same with the Sigil. Smaller and agile, a nice step down from an Impel if you're just doing casual shuffling things about (like a bunch of P1s from a planet). And it was free if you did the career tutorials. What's not to like?
Maller and Aug I can understand being a problem. Never seen much of a use for those.
The cap bonus on the omen is practically a waste for a ship that is supposed to be the primary gun-based damage ship for the Amarr cruisers. Compare the omen to the viability of the thorax, vexor, caracal, and especially the rupture and it just doesn't match up. ICRS - Intergalactic Certified Rocket Surgeon |

IGNATIUS HOOD
Zephyr Corp Black Thorne Alliance
296
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 13:56:00 -
[44] - Quote
Nedes Betternaem wrote:Xurr wrote:The ones i were referring too was the addition of a bounty to the drones. Eh... I guess if you live in drone space that might be important. Otherwise, I still think salvage drones will do more to lower demand for marauders than the removal of rogue drone mineral drops.
I'm not sure I agree. I think what I'll do is swap out the lone salvager and replace it with a 3rd tractor beam and use salvage drones while I loot the wrecks that I pull in close. Dragging the wrecks in close will let the drones work faster since they won't be flying all over the place.
Although if salvage drones are anything like mining drones they will be less than useless IMO. 'perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim'
Be patient and tough; some day this pain will be useful to you. |

stoicfaux
910
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 13:58:00 -
[45] - Quote
marVLs wrote:Are You F... Kidding me? Golem on green?
I don't want to live on this planet anymore... Agreed, the Golem is Meh.
DarkAegix wrote:Imajitaaltofanalt ofanalt wrote:Xurr wrote:Its a bit interesting they consider all the marauders to be fine.
With the coming drone changes i see them losing what little value they have now. What drone changes?? Salvage drones Meh, if the drones can't loot, then they're not adding a whole lot of value since salvage prices are so low (and will get lower if people start using salvage drones.) OTOH, a Vargur, which doesn't deploy drones too often, could fit three tractors and a flight of salvage drones, thus maximizing loot gathering and mitigating salvage drone flight time.
You can tell me what is and isn't Truth when you pry the tinfoil from my cold, lifeless head.
|

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
123
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 14:07:00 -
[46] - Quote
Are you sure with the T1 Amarr frigs
I don't belive the Punisher is "OK". I'd rather say the Executioner is "OK" but the Punisher .... well, ALL Amarr ships with "xx cap/level for guns" are broken as they are have a fake-bonus instead of a real bonus
There is a reason why people fly nearly all of them with Projectil weapons instead of Lasors
Why should I use cap at all if I can do the same damage with damage type selection without using cap
This is true for - Crucifir - Magna - Punishe - Malle - Legion Drone offens - Legion Covert offens - Prophec
And it is partial true for all other with cap/level laser as all this ships miss a TRUE bonus like RoF, Damage, Resist, range, tracking. Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

Jerick Ludhowe
Wraiths of Abaddon CELESTIAL ORDER RISING PHEONIX
59
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 14:09:00 -
[47] - Quote
Roime wrote:
Yes, that's why only semi-broken. The problem I have with it is it's dps compared to Vexor. Same bandwidth, no weapon bonus.
Myrm should get the 100mbit/s to bring it's damage output over a Vexor.
QFT
|

Dato Koppla
Perkone Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 14:35:00 -
[48] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:Are you sure with the T1 Amarr frigs
I don't belive the Punisher is "OK". I'd rather say the Executioner is "OK" but the Punisher .... well, ALL Amarr ships with "xx cap/level for guns" are broken as they are have a fake-bonus instead of a real bonus
There is a reason why people fly nearly all of them with Projectil weapons instead of Lasors
Why should I use cap at all if I can do the same damage with damage type selection without using cap
This is true for - Crucifir - Magna - Punishe - Malle - Legion Drone offens - Legion Covert offens - Prophec
And it is partial true for all other with cap/level laser as all this ships miss a TRUE bonus like RoF, Damage, Resist, range, tracking.
QFT, useless bonus is useless, if lasers were a whole lot better than the other weapon systems I'd understand, but they aren't and forcing the ships to take on a bonus that isn't really bonus but rather just making the ship useable. |

Rimase
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
12
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 14:40:00 -
[49] - Quote
I think they're doing alright. Leave CCP to it because they know they're in **** already, and surely only good can from now on. :P |

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
3639
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 14:52:00 -
[50] - Quote
Cept in CCPs labeling of 'broken' is ships are nobody flies in its grouping.
|

Andrea Griffin
220
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 14:54:00 -
[51] - Quote
Hashi Lebwohl wrote:The minmatar are always the step child when in comes to handing out the presents. Typically , Amarr get the great armour buff, caldari get the shield buff, gallente get the damage buff , (pause whilst searching the bottom of the bag) minmatar gets the furry sweet nobody else wanted. And yet Minmatar is still considered king in certain styles of combat. You also forget the significant projectile buff that wasn't too long ago, where all of the ammunition was improved upon. CCP Sreegs is my favorite developer. |

Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
576
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 14:59:00 -
[52] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:Hey everybody, In the fanfest ship balancing presentation, there was a chart shown with all the T1/T2/T3/Faction ships, colour-coded according to how CCP sees them. Red = Broken Yellow = Semi-broken Green = Working as intended
The funny thing is that all the broken ships overlap across the races (mostly). Its more a situation of faulty classes. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |

ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers Galactic-Rangers
93
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 15:12:00 -
[53] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:Clever girl.OP is too smart for his own good, please all look at this magic flashy-thing pen while we put some sunglasses on... More seriously, there are reasons why no ship names were on that chart.
- The list is by no mean fixed, and ships we consider to be broken change all the time. Especially since this is a long term planned change.
- The list is also highly biased to the reader. Depending on your experience, profession in EVE you may not find it accurate, and for good reasons. For instance, a Raven may be quite ok for mission running pilot, but far less appealing for a player engaged in long null-sec fleet warfare.
- We wanted to avoid nitpicking discussions about which exact ships can be considered as broken, and just a provide a general review of the game status. During Fanfest, we were far more interested to move the discussion forward during the roundtables / questions on how to improve the ship status, not to spend most of our time arguing on which vessels are broken or not
.
can we please get a dev blog on some proposed changes to be coming to at least the frigates in the next few weeks or so, or least some comments on what may be happening here. the suspense is killing me ... quite literealy. thouhg im mostly looking to see the T1 Cruiser changes tbh esepculy to the omen. and tbh the navy omen should be what the T1 Omen should have been if you ask me.
|

Plyn
Random Jedi Industries KRYSIS.
47
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 15:32:00 -
[54] - Quote
ITTigerClawIK wrote:CCP Ytterbium wrote:Clever girl.OP is too smart for his own good, please all look at this magic flashy-thing pen while we put some sunglasses on... More seriously, there are reasons why no ship names were on that chart.
- The list is by no mean fixed, and ships we consider to be broken change all the time. Especially since this is a long term planned change.
- The list is also highly biased to the reader. Depending on your experience, profession in EVE you may not find it accurate, and for good reasons. For instance, a Raven may be quite ok for mission running pilot, but far less appealing for a player engaged in long null-sec fleet warfare.
- We wanted to avoid nitpicking discussions about which exact ships can be considered as broken, and just a provide a general review of the game status. During Fanfest, we were far more interested to move the discussion forward during the roundtables / questions on how to improve the ship status, not to spend most of our time arguing on which vessels are broken or not
.
can we please get a dev blog on some proposed changes to be coming to at least the frigates in the next few weeks or so, or least some comments on what may be happening here. the suspense is killing me ... quite literealy. thouhg im mostly looking to see the T1 Cruiser changes tbh esepculy to the omen. and tbh the navy omen should be what the T1 Omen should have been if you ask me. Chances are, if you're this excited you probably already read this, but I think this is the best way to unbrake most of the ships.
Tiericide will allow all those unflown ships to finally be able to fill the roles they were designed for. Come2Nullsec |

Rimase
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
12
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 15:32:00 -
[55] - Quote
I'd like to Faction Warfare shiplines been in the loop, too, by being all 'Improved' variations of Standard / Economized TECH1. KEY: These Militia variations and their modules cannot be placed on Market nor Reprocessed but can be Traded via Stations. They are Military-standard (not Civilian-sandard) and thus are Improved.
DarkAegix wrote:Hey everybody,
All Black Ops ships: Broken That may be so, and so I've already suggested something that can so easily tie-in with most Fanfest concepts and in-developments. I had a cool idea for a new shipline with the introduction of the whole shiplines, which make sense for Black Ops, smuggling, marauders and pirates. Also introducing new sub-legalities into EVE.
Here it is: Clandestine Shiplines (Hidden identities, sub-legal ships, Black Ops, contraband & Smugglers!) |

Imajitaaltofanalt ofanalt
State War Academy Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 15:53:00 -
[56] - Quote
Hashi Lebwohl wrote:The minmatar are always the step child when in comes to handing out the presents. Typically , Amarr get the great armour buff, caldari get the shield buff, gallente get the damage buff , (pause whilst searching the bottom of the bag) minmatar gets the furry sweet nobody else wanted.
Is this why Minmitar>Gallente? |

Rimase
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
12
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 15:56:00 -
[57] - Quote
a 'Logistics Shipline' really ought to be considered, too, right? The ships that support and command.
|

Lili Lu
194
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 16:11:00 -
[58] - Quote
So many people falling for the OP. 
Yes, yes of course this person was able to decifer the chart and what CCP will be doing.  |

Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
452
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 16:43:00 -
[59] - Quote
Hashi Lebwohl wrote:The minmatar are always the step child when in comes to handing out the presents. Typically , Amarr get the great armour buff, caldari get the shield buff, gallente get the damage buff , (pause whilst searching the bottom of the bag) minmatar gets the furry sweet nobody else wanted.
yea but projectiles aren't considered the best weapons or anything |

ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers Galactic-Rangers
94
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 16:55:00 -
[60] - Quote
Plyn wrote:Chances are, if you're this excited you probably already read this, but I think this is the best way to unbrake most of the ships. Tiericide will allow all those unflown ships to finally be able to fill the roles they were designed for.
i have indeed read all the way through that and watched the ship balancing panel but what i ment was some more specific stuff like to the individual ships like giving us a look at what they had in mind towards changing HP amount and slots and the like for the frigates and such as well as perhaps bonus changes and preferably a racial inherent bonus to free up a bonus no ships so we have another damage or resist bonus for amarr ships rather than the dam cap bonus..
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
491
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 17:19:00 -
[61] - Quote
Imajitaaltofanalt ofanalt wrote:Hashi Lebwohl wrote:The minmatar are always the step child when in comes to handing out the presents. Typically , Amarr get the great armour buff, caldari get the shield buff, gallente get the damage buff , (pause whilst searching the bottom of the bag) minmatar gets the furry sweet nobody else wanted. Is this why Minmitar>Gallente?
It's always fun to be the cool boy up to BS but then have to waste ages to xtrain another race capitals. C/D? Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
491
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 17:20:00 -
[62] - Quote
Herping yourDerp wrote:Hashi Lebwohl wrote:The minmatar are always the step child when in comes to handing out the presents. Typically , Amarr get the great armour buff, caldari get the shield buff, gallente get the damage buff , (pause whilst searching the bottom of the bag) minmatar gets the furry sweet nobody else wanted. yea but projectiles aren't considered the best weapons or anything
Because ships live in a vacuum, where their cap and their tank capabilities don't matter in the overall balance at all. Oh wait. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Karash Amerius
Sutoka
42
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 18:33:00 -
[63] - Quote
Regarding the fake bonuses of energy turrets to Amarr ship designs: It has been said since '03, just increase their damn capacitors and give them real bonuses to weapon systems. Sure the capacitor increase in either total capacity or recharge time is useful in many areas, but that is a GOOD THING, and not overpowered, especially since Amarr designs have pioneered capacitor nuets.
Just increase the Cap on hulls, and remove the energy turret fake bonuses. That would solve a LOT of problems with Amarr hulls. |

Arkady Sadik
Gradient Electus Matari
597
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 18:45:00 -
[64] - Quote
The fake bonus to RoF for projectiles is annoying, too. Just make the weapons better. Also, this fake bonus to speed for the Vagabond is annoying. Could you please incorporate that into the base hull. Speaking of which, the Drake's fake resist bonus is annoying. Just give it better base resists.
Yes, this is silly.
Balance is not achieved by calling individual items "bad". There are excellent Amarr laser ships. There is no problem with the capacitor bonus. Quite to the contrary, giving them a flat-out better cap would make some ships incredibly silly, because - believe it or not - cap is used for other things than shooting, too.
Luckily, CCP is well aware of this. |

Hainnz
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
115
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 22:40:00 -
[65] - Quote
Quit being so damned conservative and just change the ships around already. You guys act like everything is so damned hard. It's not rocket science. Just ******* do it. |

Masamune Dekoro
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
82
|
Posted - 2012.04.03 23:14:00 -
[66] - Quote
Hashi Lebwohl wrote:minmatar gets the furry sweet nobody else wanted.
Confirming all Minmatards are furries. |

Reaver Glitterstim
Resurrected Darkness
112
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 00:23:00 -
[67] - Quote
Karash Amerius wrote:Regarding the fake bonuses of energy turrets to Amarr ship designs: It has been said since '03, just increase their damn capacitors and give them real bonuses to weapon systems. Sure the capacitor increase in either total capacity or recharge time is useful in many areas, but that is a GOOD THING, and not overpowered, especially since Amarr designs have pioneered capacitor nuets.
Just increase the Cap on hulls, and remove the energy turret fake bonuses. That would solve a LOT of problems with Amarr hulls. The cap bonus is not a fake bonus. Let me clarify it for you:
Normal ship gets +5% damage bonus to turret Amarr ship gets -10% capacitor bonus to turret instead
Normal turret does xx damage which varies by range and overall utility Laser turret does xx * 1.25 damage and just costs a ton of capacitor to compensate.
THE CAPACITOR BONUS IS A DAMAGE BONUS BECAUSE LASERS DO MORE DAMAGE AND COST MORE CAPACITOR -á"The Mittani: Hated By Badposters i'm strangely comfortable with it" -Mittens |

Jojo Jackson
Dead Red Eye
124
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 03:54:00 -
[68] - Quote
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:Karash Amerius wrote:Regarding the fake bonuses of energy turrets to Amarr ship designs: It has been said since '03, just increase their damn capacitors and give them real bonuses to weapon systems. Sure the capacitor increase in either total capacity or recharge time is useful in many areas, but that is a GOOD THING, and not overpowered, especially since Amarr designs have pioneered capacitor nuets.
Just increase the Cap on hulls, and remove the energy turret fake bonuses. That would solve a LOT of problems with Amarr hulls. The cap bonus is not a fake bonus. Let me clarify it for you: Normal ship gets +5% damage bonus to turret Amarr ship gets -10% capacitor bonus to turret instead Normal turret does xx damage which varies by range and overall utility Laser turret does xx * 1.25 damage and just costs a ton of capacitor to compensate. THE CAPACITOR BONUS IS A DAMAGE BONUS BECAUSE LASERS DO MORE DAMAGE AND COST MORE CAPACITOR Sorry but this is not true anymore. It might be like this in the past ... but stuff changed.
Maller with 3 Heat Sink T2 + 5 Heavy Pulse + Multi = 299 DPS (same as Covert Legion as you can get MAX 5 unbonused guns!!) Maller with 3 Gyro T2 + 5 425mm Auto + EMP = 268 DPS Just 31 more DPS
Legion Drone Offense with 5 Hammer II + guns 3 HS + 4 HP + Conf = 544 DPS 3 Gyro + 4 425mm + Hail = 513 DPS Again just 31 more DPS
For the maller it's less then +15%, for the Legion not even +10% damage. So they miss 10-15% damage! If I have to decide to do 31 more DPS or can chose damage type AND need SERO cap ... **** this +31 DPS ;).
PS: just for joke Rupture: 3 Gyro + 4 425mm (4 NOT 5) + EMP = 358 dps +3 Hammerhead = 453 DPS + 2 HAM launcher = 515 DPS (no Balistics till now). That's not to far away from Legion with Drone sub and tops Legion with Cover sub (rofl) using Laser. Maller is overshadowed by nearly 75%. Why the hell can't I fitt capital repairs or shield booster on an Orca ... it's an CAPITAL ship! |

General Shogun
Shogun Corp
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 04:03:00 -
[69] - Quote
Enkryption wrote:Wondered why they needed a panel to tell everyone what they already knew.
They are not from Texas |

Reaver Glitterstim
Resurrected Darkness
112
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 04:25:00 -
[70] - Quote
Jojo Jackson wrote:stuff. You might be right. O.o If you are, then......who's idea was it to nerf laser damage? -á"The Mittani: Hated By Badposters i'm strangely comfortable with it" -Mittens |

Benny Ohu
The Lazy Dragoons True Apathy
47
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 04:30:00 -
[71] - Quote
I think the only 'fake' bonuses are things like the Amarr Industrial bonuses for the Prorator (blockade runner)... Plus 5% cargo and velocity? And I needed level five to climb into the ship anyway? :D
The Amarr Frigate bonuses for the Retribution (assault frigate), on the other hand, are 'real' bonuses, even if they act more like role bonuses because I had level five already.
Or is there some freaky maths thing about the Prorator's Amarr Industrial bonuses that I'm missing? |

Selinate
781
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 04:35:00 -
[72] - Quote
I'm glad the legion is red, then. There are only a select few subsystem combos that work well, a few that *work* and a lot that are completely useless. |

Markus Reese
Debitum Naturae ROMANIAN-LEGION
99
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 05:58:00 -
[73] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:I think the only 'fake' bonuses are things like the Amarr Industrial bonuses for the Prorator (blockade runner)... Plus 5% cargo and velocity? And I needed level five to climb into the ship anyway? :D
The Amarr Frigate bonuses for the Retribution (assault frigate), on the other hand, are 'real' bonuses, even if they act more like role bonuses because I had level five already.
Or is there some freaky maths thing about the Prorator's Amarr Industrial bonuses that I'm missing?
That is because the T2 variants of many ships maintain the T1 version they are built off of if applicable. I would need to actually do work for the check, but I bet if you looked at the sigil, it has the same T1 bonuses. Or something less useful |

Cyrina Manto
Masons of New Eden The Laughing Men
8
|
Posted - 2012.04.04 06:18:00 -
[74] - Quote
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:Jojo Jackson wrote:stuff. You might be right. O.o If you are, then......who's idea was it to nerf laser damage?
Umm... get t2 lasers already? If you are whining about cap usage or "only" 30 more dps when scorch has a wtf optimal range... And conflag is not half bad either, take already high per turret DPS and boost it moar. |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |