| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Five Thirty
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 19:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
The truth of the matter is that you cannot FORCE someone to PvP.
I personally don't PvP. I absolutely detest PvP, and have avoided it in every game I've ever played. If my alliance gets a war dec, I simply stay in station and spend my time on EvE playing the market. If the war dec lasts too long, I will simply stop playing, logging on only to update skill queues.
I don't shoot ninjas who invade my mission space. Instead, I abandon all wrecks immediately. If there is a mission completion item, I will dock up and complete the mission later. Losing the time bonus doesn't bother me at all versus accidentally gaining agro from the invader. I don't want to fight you, and I will do everything in my power to make that abundantly clear.
I do not venture into lowsec space. I know that I am a huge target and that there are players all over that area of space looking to take me down at their first opportunity.
My question is:
Why does this bother some of you?
I enjoy the PvE aspect of the game, I really do. How does this affect the PvP players in any way? Are you trying to lower the subscriber base of EvE by driving out the people who don't see things the same way you do? I know that I am not alone in my playstyle, in fact most of my alliance members are mission runners or industrialists.
Can the blood hungry PvPers not see that blowing away industrialists is equivalent to shooting yourself in the foot? Who makes your ships that you so happily blow into space dust? Who mines the minerals? Who risks their freighter every time they jump into Jita?
Carebears do.
So, does it really make sense to push them out of the game in hopes that spaceships will start growing on trees? |

mxzf
Shovel Bros
1205
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 19:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
Ah, you have stumbled upon the cruel irony of the PvPer's dilema. |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
161
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Fun fact: We don't need you for the game to run smoothly. Most big alliances have their own industrial complex.
And yes, we can force you to pvp. You might not fight back, and that is your option. Things are only impossible until they are not. |

Dark Pangolin
Snuff Box
64
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:The truth of the matter is that you cannot FORCE someone to PvP.
I personally don't PvP. I absolutely detest PvP, and have avoided it in every game I've ever played. If my alliance gets a war dec, I simply stay in station and spend my time on EvE playing the market. If the war dec lasts too long, I will simply stop playing, logging on only to update skill queues.
I don't shoot ninjas who invade my mission space. Instead, I abandon all wrecks immediately. If there is a mission completion item, I will dock up and complete the mission later. Losing the time bonus doesn't bother me at all versus accidentally gaining agro from the invader. I don't want to fight you, and I will do everything in my power to make that abundantly clear.
I do not venture into lowsec space. I know that I am a huge target and that there are players all over that area of space looking to take me down at their first opportunity.
My question is:
Why does this bother some of you?
I enjoy the PvE aspect of the game, I really do. How does this affect the PvP players in any way? Are you trying to lower the subscriber base of EvE by driving out the people who don't see things the same way you do? I know that I am not alone in my playstyle, in fact most of my alliance members are mission runners or industrialists.
Can the blood hungry PvPers not see that blowing away industrialists is equivalent to shooting yourself in the foot? Who makes your ships that you so happily blow into space dust? Who mines the minerals? Who risks their freighter every time they jump into Jita?
Carebears do.
So, does it really make sense to push them out of the game in hopes that spaceships will start growing on trees?
I have no idea what you are talking about. I <3 you. I do not like PvE, I have avoided it as much as i can in every game I have played. I love PvP. Why does that bother you so much? I do everything in my power to violence as many internet space ships as possible in as many places as possible as often as possible. Stop pushing people like me out of the game and lowering EvEs player base.
Don't you industrialists understand that without us rabid PvPers there would be virtually no demand for your manufactured products? What will you do with all your shiny mission loots when no one buys it!?!? I make ships explode FOR YOU! EVERYTHING I DO I DO IT FOR YOU!
Enjoy internet space ships. I'll be watching you...all the time...one day you will make a mistake...and I'll be there...pew pew!
|

Deen Wispa
Screaming War Eagles Incorporated
226
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
Half the playerbase is only capable of thinking from their perspective and no one else. Don't let it bother you. Everyone bears in this game in one form or another.
Though I do frown on any corp pilot that will hide in station during a wardec and choose to not help their fellow corpmates. That makes you a selfish team mate in my eyes. With respect to running a hisec corp, I always say that the true character of a pilot comes out when a wardec occurs. Some will go off and selfishly do their own thing while others will proudly defend their home until the last Ibis goes down in a flame of glory.
Edit: with the price of ships rising making PVP more expensive, you would think some people would appreciate the bears and miners more but it's unlikely  . |

Five Thirty
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:09:00 -
[6] - Quote
Deen Wispa wrote:Half the playerbase is only capable of thinking from their perspective and no one else. Don't let it bother you. Everyone bears in this game in one form or another.
Though I do frown on any corp pilot that will hide in station during a wardec and choose to not help their fellow corpmates. That makes you a selfish team mate in my eyes. With respect to running a hisec corp, I always say that the true character of a pilot comes out when a wardec occurs. Some will go off and selfishly do their own thing while others will proudly defend their home until the last Ibis goes down in a flame of glory.
It's really not about helping corpmates. We cannot win a war with PvP combat, none in my alliance are trained or prepared to fight people who PvP on a daily basis. Instead, we win the war by wasting their time so much that they go away. As I mentioned in the OP, you cannot force someone into PvP. |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
161
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:17:00 -
[7] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:Deen Wispa wrote:Half the playerbase is only capable of thinking from their perspective and no one else. Don't let it bother you. Everyone bears in this game in one form or another.
Though I do frown on any corp pilot that will hide in station during a wardec and choose to not help their fellow corpmates. That makes you a selfish team mate in my eyes. With respect to running a hisec corp, I always say that the true character of a pilot comes out when a wardec occurs. Some will go off and selfishly do their own thing while others will proudly defend their home until the last Ibis goes down in a flame of glory. It's really not about helping corpmates. We cannot win a war with PvP combat, none in my alliance are trained or prepared to fight people who PvP on a daily basis. Instead, we win the war by wasting their time so much that they go away. As I mentioned in the OP, you cannot force someone into PvP.
Instead of commiserating, you should learn how to do it.
Everyone is a noob once in every area. You have to try to learn.
Explain to me why PVE people are so slow to uptake the fact that they can learn to pvp too? Things are only impossible until they are not. |

Five Thirty
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:23:00 -
[8] - Quote
masternerdguy wrote:Instead of commiserating, you should learn how to do it.
Everyone is a noob once in every area. You have to try to learn.
Explain to me why PVE people are so slow to uptake the fact that they can learn to pvp too?
For the exact same reason that PVP people are so slow to uptake the fact that some players DO NOT WANT TO PVP. I have over 70 million skillpoints, none of which are PvP related. Hell, I can't even fit a warp scrambler to my ship. My active avoidance of all things PvP is due to the fact that I do not enjoy it in the slightest.
No, I don't have to try and learn PvP if I do not want to. I will continue to run missions and do other carebear activities for many more years, because I love this game.
|

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
161
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:25:00 -
[9] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:masternerdguy wrote:Instead of commiserating, you should learn how to do it.
Everyone is a noob once in every area. You have to try to learn.
Explain to me why PVE people are so slow to uptake the fact that they can learn to pvp too? For the exact same reason that PVP people are so slow to uptake the fact that some players DO NOT WANT TO PVP. I have over 70 million skillpoints, none of which are PvP related. Hell, I can't even fit a warp scrambler to my ship. My active avoidance of all things PvP is due to the fact that I do not enjoy it in the slightest. No, I don't have to try and learn PvP if I do not want to. I will continue to run missions and do other carebear activities for many more years, because I love this game.
I don't care if you want to PVP! This is EVE, and you signed up for a game which is one big giant open pvp arena. Things are only impossible until they are not. |

Rezig Huruta
Pale Horse Ministry
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:25:00 -
[10] - Quote
masternerdguy wrote:
Everyone is a noob once in every area. You have to try to learn.
Explain to me why PVE people are so slow to uptake the fact that they can learn to pvp too?
I think you missed the point about him saying that he has no interest in it.
The general question he's asking is "why does it bother the PVP players if someone doesn't want to PVP?"
|

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
161
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:27:00 -
[11] - Quote
Rezig Huruta wrote:masternerdguy wrote:
Everyone is a noob once in every area. You have to try to learn.
Explain to me why PVE people are so slow to uptake the fact that they can learn to pvp too?
I think you missed the point about him saying that he has no interest in it. The general question he's asking is "why does it bother the PVP players if someone doesn't want to PVP?"
To that question, it bothers me they want to change game mechanics to make themselves safer to avoid any unwanted pvp, thus ruining the game I love. Things are only impossible until they are not. |

Five Thirty
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:28:00 -
[12] - Quote
masternerdguy wrote:I don't care if you want to PVP! This is EVE, and you signed up for a game which is one big giant open pvp arena.
Then why does CONCORD shoot you when you agress me in highsec? |

Silas Shaw
Coffee Hub
14
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:29:00 -
[13] - Quote
With respect, just being a carebear doesn't mean you can't be dangerous. It just means that "PVP" is not your forte. And the bears make this game alive in the same way that PVPers do. A world in which EVERYONE is hostile isn't realistic. People ignore one another. People avoid one another. It makes the world make sense.
Also: you do PVP. Every time you touch the market you are undercutting someone else, buying something someone else had their eye on, or building something that someone else was planning to. For most people, that doesnt seem like PVP because there are no fireworks at the end, but trust me: you just alpha'd someone's profit margin. |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
161
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:29:00 -
[14] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:masternerdguy wrote:I don't care if you want to PVP! This is EVE, and you signed up for a game which is one big giant open pvp arena. Then why does CONCORD shoot you when you agress me in highsec?
Because people like you cried on the forums back in 2003 enough to make CCP introduce concord. Besides, I can still gank you or get you to aggress me in lots of ways. Things are only impossible until they are not. |

Five Thirty
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:30:00 -
[15] - Quote
masternerdguy wrote:To that question, it bothers me they want to change game mechanics to make themselves safer to avoid any unwanted pvp, thus ruining the game I love.
You still haven't answered my question. Why do you insist on PVPING people who aren't interested in, or cannot, fight back? |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
161
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:32:00 -
[16] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:masternerdguy wrote:To that question, it bothers me they want to change game mechanics to make themselves safer to avoid any unwanted pvp, thus ruining the game I love. You still haven't answered my question. Why do you insist on PVPING people who aren't interested in, or cannot, fight back?
Because it's funny. Things are only impossible until they are not. |

Five Thirty
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:32:00 -
[17] - Quote
masternerdguy wrote:Because people like you cried on the forums back in 2003 enough to make CCP introduce concord. Besides, I can still gank you or get you to aggress me in lots of ways.
Yes, you can attempt to gank me. You have less than 30 seconds to take down my 100k+ EHP mission boat. Good luck.
And no, I've been around long enough that you will NEVER trick me into agressing you.
BTW - I looked up your alliance kb, and I nearly fell out of my chair laughing. I'm pretty sure more mission runners have died from NPC rats than you guys. |

Silas Shaw
Coffee Hub
14
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:32:00 -
[18] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:masternerdguy wrote:To that question, it bothers me they want to change game mechanics to make themselves safer to avoid any unwanted pvp, thus ruining the game I love. You still haven't answered my question. Why do you insist on PVPING people who aren't interested in, or cannot, fight back?
Often because they "need" a quick kill. someone who knows how to fight back is less likely to give them one. |

Rezig Huruta
Pale Horse Ministry
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:35:00 -
[19] - Quote
masternerdguy wrote:Five Thirty wrote:masternerdguy wrote:To that question, it bothers me they want to change game mechanics to make themselves safer to avoid any unwanted pvp, thus ruining the game I love. You still haven't answered my question. Why do you insist on PVPING people who aren't interested in, or cannot, fight back? Because it's funny.
That's unfortunate. Honestly, your first answer was much better. "Changing game mechanics". This, "Because it's funny" is one of the worst reasons in any game whatsoever to take delight in ruining another person's game experience.
"For the thrill" "For the kill mail" "For the loot" etc... Those are good reasons.
Because you want to **** on someone isn't. |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
161
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:37:00 -
[20] - Quote
Rezig Huruta wrote:
That's unfortunate. Honestly, your first answer was much better. "Changing game mechanics". This, "Because it's funny" is one of the worst reasons in any game whatsoever to take delight in ruining another person's game experience.
"For the thrill" "For the kill mail" "For the loot" etc... Those are good reasons.
Because you want to **** on someone isn't.
Those answers go together. It's funny because of how lolwutmad they get about losing anything, then they go cry to CCP to get it "fixed". Things are only impossible until they are not. |

roboto212
Hull Breach Inc. Double Tap.
17
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:37:00 -
[21] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:masternerdguy wrote:To that question, it bothers me they want to change game mechanics to make themselves safer to avoid any unwanted pvp, thus ruining the game I love. You still haven't answered my question. Why do you insist on PVPING people who aren't interested in, or cannot, fight back? You say you have no interest in pvp yet you admit you take part in the market. That is a form of pvp just not shooting ships or seeing they guy you are fighting . The only way to not pvp in this game is to run missions. If you do any thing else you are compeating with other players. What you mean to say is why to people indigo on pvp against you on there terms and not yours. |

Lost Greybeard
Fenrir's Dogs of War Union 0f Revolution
12
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:38:00 -
[22] - Quote
You realize that the markets are entirely player-determined, so if you're mining or reprocessing for minerals, or even selling mission loot, you're engaging in PvP, right?
Just because the points in play are isk and time spent instead of HP and ammo doesn't make it any less pvp. "Legit" trading strategies like price-fixing, undercutting, intentional underproduction and sitting on reserves, and so on are all part of the same overall player conflict as protection rackets, sabotage, theft, and general crime sprees that involve actually blowing things up.
There is literally only one thing in the game that isn't tied to PvP with one degree of separation or less, and that's ship spinning. HTFU and deal with it. |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
161
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:38:00 -
[23] - Quote
roboto212 wrote:Five Thirty wrote:masternerdguy wrote:To that question, it bothers me they want to change game mechanics to make themselves safer to avoid any unwanted pvp, thus ruining the game I love. You still haven't answered my question. Why do you insist on PVPING people who aren't interested in, or cannot, fight back? You say you have no interest in pvp yet you admit you take part in the market. That is a form of pvp just not shooting ships or seeing they guy you are fighting . The only way to not pvp in this game is to run missions. If you do any thing else you are compeating with other players. What you mean to say is why to people indigo on pvp against you on there terms and not yours.
Look a wartarget o/
And yes, you can't do any true PVE in this game. You are always competing with someone. Things are only impossible until they are not. |

roboto212
Hull Breach Inc. Double Tap.
17
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:41:00 -
[24] - Quote
masternerdguy wrote:roboto212 wrote:Five Thirty wrote:masternerdguy wrote:To that question, it bothers me they want to change game mechanics to make themselves safer to avoid any unwanted pvp, thus ruining the game I love. You still haven't answered my question. Why do you insist on PVPING people who aren't interested in, or cannot, fight back? You say you have no interest in pvp yet you admit you take part in the market. That is a form of pvp just not shooting ships or seeing they guy you are fighting . The only way to not pvp in this game is to run missions. If you do any thing else you are compeating with other players. What you mean to say is why to people indigo on pvp against you on there terms and not yours. Look a wartarget o/ And yes, you can't do any true PVE in this game. You are always competing with someone.
You are right o/ a war target.
And with the exception of running missions you are correct
Btw thanks for the tower. |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
161
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:42:00 -
[25] - Quote
roboto212 wrote: Btw thanks for the tower.
Don't mention it. We're all one big happy fleet Things are only impossible until they are not. |

Lyron-Baktos
Selective Pressure Rote Kapelle
88
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:44:00 -
[26] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:The truth of the matter is that you cannot FORCE someone to PvP.
I personally don't PvP. I absolutely detest PvP, and have avoided it in every game I've ever played. If my alliance gets a war dec, I simply stay in station and spend my time on EvE playing the market. If the war dec lasts too long, I will simply stop playing, logging on only to update skill queues.
I don't shoot ninjas who invade my mission space. Instead, I abandon all wrecks immediately. If there is a mission completion item, I will dock up and complete the mission later. Losing the time bonus doesn't bother me at all versus accidentally gaining agro from the invader. I don't want to fight you, and I will do everything in my power to make that abundantly clear.
I do not venture into lowsec space. I know that I am a huge target and that there are players all over that area of space looking to take me down at their first opportunity.
My question is:
Why does this bother some of you?
I enjoy the PvE aspect of the game, I really do. How does this affect the PvP players in any way? Are you trying to lower the subscriber base of EvE by driving out the people who don't see things the same way you do? I know that I am not alone in my playstyle, in fact most of my alliance members are mission runners or industrialists.
Can the blood hungry PvPers not see that blowing away industrialists is equivalent to shooting yourself in the foot? Who makes your ships that you so happily blow into space dust? Who mines the minerals? Who risks their freighter every time they jump into Jita?
Carebears do.
So, does it really make sense to push them out of the game in hopes that spaceships will start growing on trees?
Extra credit bonus question:
Are there not enough people actively looking for PvP that instead PvP players must turn to harassing PvE players?
doesn't bother me at all.
On holiday. -áIn some other world. Where the music of the radio was a labyrinth of sonorous colours. To a bright centre of absolute convicton. -áWhere the dripping patchouli was more than scent. -á It was a sun |

Five Thirty
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 20:57:00 -
[27] - Quote
I would hazard a guess that for players who are actually good at PvP, no attention is paid by them to the PvE players.
The problem lies in those who cannot hold their own in PvP either through lack of skill training, or simply pilot skill. They cannot seek out a fight with someone who wishes to fight, so instead they come to force their will on the unwilling.
Those who say bear tears are the best tears are wrong. Pirate tears are far sweeter. Plus, you can find them in any thread about CCP changing highsec mechanics in favor of the PvE player! No pesky scanning or trickery required. |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
161
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 21:01:00 -
[28] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:I would hazard a guess that for players who are actually good at PvP, no attention is paid by them to the PvE players.
The problem lies in those who cannot hold their own in PvP either through lack of skill training, or simply pilot skill. They cannot seek out a fight with someone who wishes to fight, so instead they come to force their will on the unwilling.
Those who say bear tears are the best tears are wrong. Pirate tears are far sweeter. Plus, you can find them in any thread about CCP changing highsec mechanics in favor of the PvE player! No pesky scanning or trickery required.
Yeah, my killboard says otherwise.
Did you know most of the kills since I resubbed are in lo sec? Did you know I live in lo sec? Things are only impossible until they are not. |

Silver Nightmare
NightSong Entertainment NightSong Directorate
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 21:05:00 -
[29] - Quote
I am a full time carebear, you can even look at my killboard not a shot fired. But I can tell you now that if it was not for PvPers locking down a system for me to mine in or do my ratting I would be screwed. 99% of good PvPers actually hunt anything they can find regaurdless of what the target is, shoot first ask questions later is the way most players see it (unless your CVA then your just the joke of eve) so I thank master and all his friends that keep me safe so I can make sweet sweet iskies. Hell not even our WT's have found me yet! No offense to my WT's you do a great job hunting and its nice to see you here too in forums! But in all honesty this is a sandbox, just like real life if someone wants to do something they will regaurdless of consiquence (concord being like the police there is a price to the actions) and as a sandbox it should stay a vulnerable place. |

roboto212
Hull Breach Inc. Double Tap.
17
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 21:12:00 -
[30] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:I would hazard a guess that for players who are actually good at PvP, no attention is paid by them to the PvE players.
The problem lies in those who cannot hold their own in PvP either through lack of skill training, or simply pilot skill. They cannot seek out a fight with someone who wishes to fight, so instead they come to force their will on the unwilling.
Those who say bear tears are the best tears are wrong. Pirate tears are far sweeter. Plus, you can find them in any thread about CCP changing highsec mechanics in favor of the PvE player! No pesky scanning or trickery required.
Here was you seem to be missing. We pvpers have friends that are carebears too. And some times care bears upset eachother then they turn to us there pvp friends to exact revenge. You seem to think that is some how unfair. Instead of crying try getting to know people that do other things. Most pvpers I know would risk billions of isk worth of ships to prtect there industrial friends it how we get our ships cheaper then market and how they get pvp skills when threatened. Massive mutiplayer not single player.
And I now have a linked I must hunt down this week and try and kill. |

Silver Nightmare
NightSong Entertainment NightSong Directorate
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 21:17:00 -
[31] - Quote
Touche good WT touche |

roboto212
Hull Breach Inc. Double Tap.
17
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 21:38:00 -
[32] - Quote
Silver Nightmare wrote:Touche good WT touche
I must say you are the nicest WT's ever I mean giveing me a large tower after useing that big bad moros on my poor defenseless mega. You guys have class i don't care what those other low sec people say. |

Vaal Erit
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
149
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 22:42:00 -
[33] - Quote
It's mostly the attitude. Just calling someone who plays EVE a "PvP'er" is ridiculous, This is EVE. Everyone is a PvPer, it is a PvP based game. That and you got your attitude from playing any other MMORPG in which PvP combat is shunned because the goal of those games is to band together to kill some big dragon. That is not EVE. EVE is a dog eat dog world centered around competing with other players for limited resources.
Somehow you seem to think you are the white knight good guy Keanu Reeves and PvPers are the bad guy out to ruin everyone's fun. It is the other way around, we are supposed to attack, swindle, steal, scam, ransom, and kill everything and everyone in order to get more power and riches. That is the whole point of EVE. Telling us that PvPers should only fight against themselves is just completely backwards to how the game is designed. We hunt defenseless targets *solely* because they chose to be defenseless targets with high value cargo and do not properly defend themselves.
Now I don't care if you don't want to PvP, but you have not given it a fair shake. You have brought your own opinion of how PvP is somehow inherently evil even though this could not be more further from the truth. I'd say a good 90% of the super carebears I know who try PvP combat find that they really enjoy it. If someone attacks you or messes with you, the correct response is to get some bigger guns and blow them out of space for daring to mess with you, not cower and whine like a 4 year old.
Instead of being paralyzed in fear of someone interacting with you or attacking you in a video game, you need to:
Be a man We must be swift as the coursing river Be a man With all the force of a great typhoon Be a man With all the strength of a raging fire Mysterious as the dark side of the moon |

Katja Faith
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
31
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 23:05:00 -
[34] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote: My question is:
Why does this bother some of you?
It bothers people because you're playing YOUR game, and not theirs. |

Lady Ayeipsia
Morskoj Industries
73
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 23:36:00 -
[35] - Quote
I too like missioning. I like inventing and manufacturing. I hate the numbers part, but I like being a dealer in space ships. I enjoy popping rats, salvaging, and selling the rigs I make in out of the way places at high prices. So I can sympathize with the op in this regard.
However, no rat, no mission, no successful invention, and not even selling at 500% jita markup has ever gotten my heart pounding as fast or as loud as stalking a gate camping blackbird with a stealthbomber. The success of our fight depend on me killing or chasing that blackbir d from the field.
Try pvp... You may find something new that sparks a little fire in your belly. |

Psychic Sue
The Executives Executive Outcomes
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 01:06:00 -
[36] - Quote
tl;dr I know you are a fast poster and a vocal one too, but at least have the courtesy to check your facts before you claim something to be true and build your chain of arguments on top of it. CONCORD was there from the beginning, it was not added due to what you claim was a forum whine and it was constantly updated to keep highsec PVP at bay from at least the 3rd patch onwards, being less than 30 days from the game's conception in 2003.
masternerdguy wrote:Five Thirty wrote:masternerdguy wrote:I don't care if you want to PVP! This is EVE, and you signed up for a game which is one big giant open pvp arena. Then why does CONCORD shoot you when you agress me in highsec? Because people like you cried on the forums back in 2003 enough to make CCP introduce concord. Besides, I can still gank you or get you to aggress me in lots of ways.
For the sake of arguing with a forum warrior, not in the interest of pvp vs. pve and meant in the nicest sense really, I dare to question the validity your argument.
First: you were not there, your character was created in March 2011 and yet you use historical events and patchnotes in a way that suggest your were there at the time they were written.
Second: If you had been there and checked your records, you should not have ommitted that CONCORD as such was part of the storyline and eve from at least 2001 as seen in the Chronicle's picture timestamp here, two full years prior to what you have stated being their conception.
Third: Now you may state that you in fact were present at that time and have the knowledge of that time too on a different character and/or account but chose not to use this original character but instead this 03/2011 newcomer of yours to educate us on eve history; then your argument would of course be that the patchnotes obviously enforce your claim.
Fourth: The first mention of a CONCORD change was in the EVE patch to v.1054, which as you of course know was issued as early as the 30th of May 2003, being the third EVE patch at all, less than one month after the game's release and way before it's first expansion. Out of personal experience I will contest you in that fact that "whining on the forums" as you claim it to be was not present at that time and as the patch notes will tell you, this constructive criticism was not to conceive CONCORD but to change it.
PS: this is in no way a favour for PVE or PVP, merely a call for truth in arguments.
|

Silver Nightmare
NightSong Entertainment NightSong Directorate
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 05:03:00 -
[37] - Quote
While we are on the subject you may want to take a look at MNGs toon, its not a 2011, granted from what I looked at its 2007 but still lets keep facts straight when we are talking about keeping facts straight. Hey I think i'll make a meme of that!
=P |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
476
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 05:58:00 -
[38] - Quote
OP,
I guess your terms "PVE" and "PVP" are relevant in some other games, in EVE they don't exist. There is only one server, with "PVP rules" if you want to keep using that game lingo.
|

Zeb Rain
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 09:48:00 -
[39] - Quote
Bother us? not at all. You may not wish to PvP and that is your prerogative. You may wish to avoid pvp again your choice. However it is our choice to ignore your desire not to pvp. You dont want to fight? fine, battle is over sooner and we move on to someone else. It is called agreeing to disagree.
GL |

Mark Androcius
17
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 10:16:00 -
[40] - Quote
This reminds me of a Southpark episode about toilet seats.
Women are nagging that men should put the toilet seat down and men are nagging that women could just as well put it down themselves.
Why don't women put the toilet seat up for me huh? Yes i am dutch, no i don't do drugs. |

Ildryn
The Inf1dels GIANTSBANE.
44
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 10:19:00 -
[41] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:
It's really not about helping corpmates. We cannot win a war with PvP combat, none in my alliance are trained or prepared to fight people who PvP on a daily basis. Instead, we win the war by wasting their time so much that they go away. As I mentioned in the OP, you cannot force someone into PvP.
How does a npc corp go to war? How do you have an alliance?
|

Salicaz
Wolfsbrigade Lost Obsession
7
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 10:26:00 -
[42] - Quote
Op reminds me of the people on other games who roll on a pvp server and cry like a ***** when they get attacked.
This is Eve
There is only one server
IT'S ALL PVP!!! |

Ludi Burek
The Player Haters Corp
42
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 10:37:00 -
[43] - Quote
There is one key part of the equation, the market. If you were selling to NPCs and buying from NPCs then who cares if you just like to pve. That's your thing, that's how the game was designed. In that case claims that forced pvp is griefing may even hold some merit.
Eve is different though. You sell to other players, buy from other players. Claiming that you are a "PVEer" and everyone else is forcing you to pvp simply doesn't apply.
Eve is built around competition. The tools are in game to make yourself as safe as possible within game mechanics. It's people that demand artificial safety and those that rage if someone interferes with their game that are clueless and too selfish to see the imbalance of their demands.
As long as you actually get what's going on but you prefer to avoid direct conflict, who really cares if some internet person doesn't like your play style. But when you start demanding that pvp is wrong and you should be safe and protected, then you're crossing into moron territory. Observing these forums, you will notice, it is densely populated. |

Dutarro
Matari Munitions The Fendahlian Collective
66
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 11:22:00 -
[44] - Quote
OP raises a valid point. If you attack an industrial corp for economic reasons that's one thing, but forum rhetoric comes off as more of an ideological crusade against "carebearism". Case in point, that long, deranged anti-carebear manifesto someone posted recently. Reminds me of how puritanism is sometimes described as "the fear that somewhere, someone is having fun". This idea that players hiding in every nook and cranny of EVE must be rooted out and engaged in combat is a bit fanatical. |

Mark Androcius
17
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 12:20:00 -
[45] - Quote
Ildryn wrote:How does a npc corp go to war? How do you have an alliance?
While your question is not actually that weird, i have to ask, how long have you been playing EVE? You think most people would post things like this with their main char? Yes i am dutch, no i don't do drugs. |

Jackie Ozuwara
The roid broke mah lazors
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 12:52:00 -
[46] - Quote
What I wonder is why someone who is not interested in PVP at all would pay monthly fees for a PVP-oriented game. You might as well play a singleplayer game like X-¦ and have no other players at all. As Ludi said, even on the market you're entirely interacting with other player, essentially non-combat PVP as well. If you can call it that. The thing is, unless you play a classic MMO like WOW on a PVE server, you can't escape other players, no matter how much you want to. |

Mark Androcius
17
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 13:06:00 -
[47] - Quote
Jackie Ozuwara wrote:What I wonder is why someone who is not interested in PVP at all would pay monthly fees for a PVP-oriented game. You might as well play a singleplayer game like X-¦ and have no other players at all. As Ludi said, even on the market you're entirely interacting with other player, essentially non-combat PVP as well. If you can call it that. The thing is, unless you play a classic MMO like WOW on a PVE server, you can't escape other players, no matter how much you want to.
Fair point there, but on the other hand, not fair at all.
When CCP started to make EVE, their intention was to make a sandbox and see what happens ( well sort of at least ).
When Goonswarm came up, CCP actually took the time to think about, if they should do something about it, which to me, indicates that this was not intended. The fact that CCP decided not to act on it, has nothing at all to do with what EVE was actually meant for.
When large scale scams and theft came to play, CCP actually took the time to think about what to do about it. The fact that CCP decided not to act on that either, has nothing at all to do with what EVE was actually meant for.
My point here is this: Why do people claim EVE was meant to be played in a certain way, when all it was meant for, was to play it however the hell you wanted?
So in other words, as EVE is and always will be a sandbox, you avoid PVP if you don't want PVP and you pursue PVP if you do. You avoid mining if you hate mining and you do mining if you don't. You avoid PVE if you don't want PVE and you do PVE if you do want PVE.
EVE is a sandbox, how many times does that have to be repeated?
O one other thing. When i was a little kid, playing in a sandbox at school, i used to love destroying other people's sandcastle's, but others used to love making them. Yes i am dutch, no i don't do drugs. |

Jackie Ozuwara
The roid broke mah lazors
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 13:14:00 -
[48] - Quote
Mark Androcius wrote:Jackie Ozuwara wrote:What I wonder is why someone who is not interested in PVP at all would pay monthly fees for a PVP-oriented game. You might as well play a singleplayer game like X-¦ and have no other players at all. As Ludi said, even on the market you're entirely interacting with other player, essentially non-combat PVP as well. If you can call it that. The thing is, unless you play a classic MMO like WOW on a PVE server, you can't escape other players, no matter how much you want to. When Goonswarm came up, CCP actually took the time to think about, if they should do something about it, which to me, indicates that this was not intended. The fact that CCP decided not to act on it, has nothing at all to do with what EVE was actually meant for. When large scale scams and theft came to play, CCP actually took the time to think about what to do about it. The fact that CCP decided not to act on that either, has nothing at all to do with what EVE was actually meant for. You can't deny that EVE is and simply has more PVP than most other MMOs. Whether or not that was what EVE was "actually meant for" is not relevant. The fact is, PVP happens in EVE, it happens a lot, EVE is a lot less controlled and policed than most other MMOs, and that's the environment you have to accept when you sign up for EVE.
Sitting there in HiSec and claiming that mean players, pirates and people who PVP are either bad or playing wrong is just inappropriate. As you said, there's no "right" way to play EVE, but following that, there's no "wrong" way either. |

Mark Androcius
17
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 13:27:00 -
[49] - Quote
Jackie Ozuwara wrote:You can't deny that EVE is and simply has more PVP than most other MMOs. Whether or not that was what EVE was "actually meant for" is not relevant. The fact is, PVP happens in EVE, it happens a lot, EVE is a lot less controlled and policed than most other MMOs, and that's the environment you have to accept when you sign up for EVE.
Sitting there in HiSec and claiming that mean players, pirates and people who PVP are either bad or playing wrong is just inappropriate. As you said, there's no "right" way to play EVE, but following that, there's no "wrong" way either.
I happen to think the exact same way you do, i was just trying to get some nuance into the mix. However, saying that one could better play the X series of games, solely for this reason, is a little bit ( yes a little ) far fetched, EVE is way more than just a PVP oriented game. It has unmatched awesomeness in it's graphics, market dynamics, life-like industrial chains and man managed politics. EVE attracts people for a million reasons, otherwise, you could just as well play Warhammer or Guild Wars 2. Yes i am dutch, no i don't do drugs. |

Jackie Ozuwara
The roid broke mah lazors
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 13:45:00 -
[50] - Quote
I think it's just a little pretentious and ignorant to claim that pirates and "mean" players are bad at the game because they prey on weak targets. As if they're bound to assign to some code of honor or sportsmanship to prove their ability. I bet most of those players could handle any given ship better than the miner they just blew up, because they didn't spend half their days sitting in an asteroid field in HiSec clicking a button every 2 minutes and watching cash roll in. |

Mark Androcius
17
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 13:53:00 -
[51] - Quote
Jackie Ozuwara wrote:I think it's just a little pretentious and ignorant to claim that pirates and "mean" players are bad at the game because they prey on weak targets. As if they're bound to assign to some code of honor or sportsmanship to prove their ability. I bet most of those players could handle any given ship better than the miner they just blew up, because they didn't spend half their days sitting in an asteroid field in HiSec clicking a button every 2 minutes and watching cash roll in.
True.
I mine a lot too though, when I'm at work. I can't pay attention to the game the whole time, so this allows me to make isk semi afk. I however, have been smart enough to find a system nobody ever really pays attention too, so maybe that's a good tip for the moaning miners. Yes i am dutch, no i don't do drugs. |

Ildryn
The Inf1dels GIANTSBANE.
44
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 16:05:00 -
[52] - Quote
Mark Androcius wrote:Ildryn wrote:How does a npc corp go to war? How do you have an alliance?
While your question is not actually that weird, i have to ask, how long have you been playing EVE? You think most people would post things like this with their main char?
I would...
|

Ardashir Sarum
Rage Against The Evil Minmatar
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 16:13:00 -
[53] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote: ... Why does this bother some of you? ...
It does not bother us. We just don't stop trying to shoot you.
|

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient Electus Matari
257
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 16:34:00 -
[54] - Quote
The OP and 90 percent of this thread misses the point of EVE.
OP is PvPing. Her goal in PvP is not to make the other guy's ship to explode, but to stay alive herself and deny the other guy the kill, but nevertheless, when you fly smart so that you can evac from a mission site before you get scrammed by someone showing up, you are in fact engaging in PvP play.
EVE PvP is not about an arena where you go and see who wins a duel. EVE PvP is about doing your stuff and stopping other people from stopping you. Just because your ship does not have guns on it does not mean you are not PvPing.
And why it bothers some people that the OP does this - why, it's because the OP is winning. She achieves her goals while denying the opposition theirs. |

Astroniomix
EliteTroll
48
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 16:40:00 -
[55] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:masternerdguy wrote:I don't care if you want to PVP! This is EVE, and you signed up for a game which is one big giant open pvp arena. Then why does CONCORD shoot you when you agress me in highsec? Because if all of eve was nullsec nothing would happen. |

Propmod
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
32
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 17:19:00 -
[56] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:masternerdguy wrote:To that question, it bothers me they want to change game mechanics to make themselves safer to avoid any unwanted pvp, thus ruining the game I love. You still haven't answered my question. Why do you insist on PVPING people who aren't interested in, or cannot, fight back? Because they're carebears just like you. Ignore high sec "pvpers" For the most part they're just scrubs who cant hack it else where.
|

Astroniomix
EliteTroll
48
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 20:00:00 -
[57] - Quote
Propmod wrote:Five Thirty wrote:masternerdguy wrote:To that question, it bothers me they want to change game mechanics to make themselves safer to avoid any unwanted pvp, thus ruining the game I love. You still haven't answered my question. Why do you insist on PVPING people who aren't interested in, or cannot, fight back? Because they're carebears just like you. Ignore high sec "pvpers" For the most part they're just scrubs who cant hack it else where. This is true in many cases. There are exceptions, but a fair portion of the griefdecking crowd will run from anything that mounts a sensor booster. |

Eryn Velasquez
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 21:16:00 -
[58] - Quote
Mark Androcius wrote: O one other thing. When i was a little kid, playing in a sandbox at school, i used to love destroying other people's sandcastle's, but others used to love making them.
Well, some people grow up, some stay kids all their life ... Suicide gankers - Silly griefing kiddies, annoying like dog poop under my shoes |

BearJews
Android Arms And Industrial Corporation Tenth Legion
32
|
Posted - 2012.04.14 22:36:00 -
[59] - Quote
some people love to bully people that want nothing to do with them. Even though this is just a game, people's personalities will always cross the lines between reality and virtual reality.
I hate bullys therefore dont understand greifing or hi-sec war deccing or any of that ****. DOes it bother me to the point where i question people's game morals??? GOD NO.
But i love bully tears. THere is nothing greater in this game then hearing bullies whine when things do not go their way.
Like the introduction of concord is a great tear. Or the boomerang technique, another great tear. Or how hi-sec greifers want you to play their game. Another great tear. |

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient Electus Matari
265
|
Posted - 2012.04.15 05:31:00 -
[60] - Quote
I think it is unfair to call all high-sec random war-deccing bullying. It is a mechanic that definitely can be and is used for bullying, but it is also a mechanic that some people use to haunt weak prey not because they want the weak prey to cry but because they find the role of a high-sec industry-destroying pirate fun. There is a difference and I think if we seriously want to affect the EVE culture and diminish actual bullying, we have to separate between them.
(Though I have to agree rare thing in EVE is as funny as someone who enjoys "griefing wardecs" whining about unfairness when you dec them back.) |

Bella Rugente
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.04.15 16:00:00 -
[61] - Quote
Eve is definitely designed around Player vs Player (a.k.a. competition with other live, adaptive, and responsive opponents). Eve is designed to encourage individual players to interact with others, make friends, form fleets, form corporations, alliances, and coalitions. There is a reason the rarest of materials and best rewards are progressively further from the relative safety of CONCORD. These things need to be found and protected (or conquered and protected) by groups of people that constantly have to fight to keep the resource and all the infrastructure to maintain it. Even in hisec, in a market hub, it takes more than one person to keep from getting steamrolled and chased away. The very game concepts that the avid noncombatants loathe are the same concepts that keep this games content fresh and evolving.
I can't imagine Eve surviving long in the warm fuzzy vision the OP and some others envision. NPCs are very predictable, so much that after a short bit of training and farming, there is no excuse for losing a ship. Everyone would have the same Marauder or Hulk for years on end (assuming 90% of people wouldn't be so bored with the drudgery that they'd leave), there would be very little value in supersaturated mineral/ship markets, and content would fit on a couple of wiki pages. As it is, you have the option of forcibly removing other players from thriving markets and plentiful resources by making friends and actively encouraging market turnover. In the process, content is built on the struggles, offenses, and defenses. This sounds way better than 30k players hanging out in Jita doing nothing but socializing in their shiny playpurties.
Everyone that is involved in ship-to-ship combat has been at some point on both sides of the spanking. We've all been ganked, suicided, war-decced, podded, and sent running screaming at some point. It's the game by design, and if you choose not to participate actively.. fine. It doesn't bother anyone that you want to cower and hide, it bothers people that you want to change the basic game design to be like every other MMO that is overregulated by warm fuzzy feelgood rules that take all the fun (competition) out of it. |

Five Thirty
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 20:24:00 -
[62] - Quote
Apparently I should clarify.
I am NOT advocating NOR suggesting that all PvP should be removed from the game. PvP is a very important part of every MMO game ever introduced.
What I am addressing in my OP is the sort of 'forced pvp' that occurs against players who have no ability to defend themselves. Please understand that I am not speaking of any specific incident or tactic. This is not about suicide ganking, can flipping, highsec war decs, or anything of the sort. it is about players who spend their time in game solely trying to upset and harass other players.
What am trying to ascertain is the mentality behind spending hours upon hours in game not trying to make progress for oneself, but instead trying to impede the progress of others.
I've been around long enough to know that the majority of people who engage in non-consensual PvP do it for "the lolz" or "tears", but what does this really mean? I would love to have someone take my question seriously and provide a serious answer, rather than hiding behind whatever meme they deem appropriate.
I actually have massive amounts of respect for those who participate in PvP outside empire space. Highsec bullies, not so much. |

Sophisto
Dark Circle Enforcement Templis Dragonaors
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 20:51:00 -
[63] - Quote
The game by design, supports both PVP and PVE Elements. As a casual player with limited time to play, I play PVE more since its the safe way to play, however, I do enjoy Faction Warfare when I have time to commit, and the budget to support the loss of ships. Ive lost a LONG list of ships since 2007 when I first started playing. Ive lost them in corp wars, low sec pvp, and in FW most recently.
I live BOTH sides of the fence on this one and support each side equally with the following reservation. PVE and PVP ship combat environments should be split entirely. Obviously there is plenty of "Space" out there for CCP to do this. The reason I would call and support this to happen is because loosing a 600+M ISK Tengu Mission Runner to a low sec pirate while playing PVE is very costly! So much that it will take months of casual playing to re-coop the loss and continue on.. In mission running, PVE is my choice. Its a choice that allows me to interact with friends, bring friends & corp mates along, and enjoy the PVE environment. This keeps me and the other PVE players happy and more cash in CCP's wallet for my continued subscription. Since the loss of the Tengu, I no longer take low sec missions due to the obvious threat of "choosing to enter" unsecured space which is not protected via Concord. If I had no choice in the separation between the two, certainly I would cancel my account
When I have time to commit to Faction Warfare & general PVP, I run my ass down to low sec and dock up where my personal fleet of PVP ships are, and enjoy the adrenaline pumping suspense of all that is low sec weather it be PIES or WTs all mashed together in local. PVP is a choice and I choose to respect Concord & PVE players casually being one myself. In my opinion PVP players should leave us Carbears alone since there is more then enough WT's in low sec that; one who calls himself a pure combat PVP player would never need to come into high sec looking for an easy kill.
|

Thelron
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 22:12:00 -
[64] - Quote
Jackie Ozuwara wrote:What I wonder is why someone who is not interested in PVP at all would pay monthly fees for a PVP-oriented game. You might as well play a singleplayer game like X-¦ and have no other players at all. As Ludi said, even on the market you're entirely interacting with other players, essentially non-combat PVP as well. If you can call it that. The thing is, unless you play a classic MMO like WOW on a PVE server, you can't escape other players, no matter how much you want to.
Quote:The thing is, unless you play a classic MMO like WOW on a PVE server, you can't escape other players
Quote:a classic MMO like WOW
I this what the world is coming to? No wonder threads like this devolve so quickly into the terrified shouts of people who fear having to actually work a bit to have a giggle at someone else's expense.
The day EvE *actually* sugar-coats everything (as opposed to just making people be sure they REALLY want to be randomly violent in the places where thematically you should have to be REALLY sure you want to be randomly violent) is they day it *actually* dies. Thankfully, almost nobody wants that, just as almost nobody really wants everything to be any one other part of EvE... but I think so many people here have had such a bad time of it in new-age-y do-it-all games (like WOW) that invariably turn out to be really fancy facebook games (like WOW), there's a built-in reaction not just any time someone suggests making hi-sec more secure (even if it's by way of fixing things that are *blindingly obviously not intended*) but any time anything other than their personally preferred playstyle is discussed and presented as valid.
What's interesting (to me, at least) is how varied the playstyles of everyone involved in these "discussions" actually are, and how much they benefit from each other. Not in terms of "carebear mining = violence-junkie equipment emporium," but in the basic richness of the overall population (someone's already mentioned it, but it does seem to get lost in the noise quite often). The fact that you *can* play in so many different ways is one of the strengths of this game, and so it really shouldn't surprise people when a question like this comes up. Why DO some players actively seek to declare certain playstyles "invalid" or "wrong?" I don't mean people coming on the forums and complaining about how incursions are out of control or how some bad person managed to destroy their "invincible" ship or any of the usual hyperbolic nonsense, I mean the fundamental disgust expressed against basic aspects such as missioning, being vulnerable, and the thought of consentual mining. The only two explanations I've been able to come up with are probably both to some degree correct: Firstly, regardless of how we play most of us who actually *enjoy* the game are pretty heavily invested in it sentimentally, and the last thing anyone wants is for someone else to come and kick over the haystack now that it finally seems to be heading in a good direction; secondly, the population of EvE is largely made up of sociopaths.
So, really, the answer to, "why does how some people play offend others," is partly because "others" are a bunch of jerks, but partly because they care. |

Barry Hallsack
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 22:42:00 -
[65] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:
My question is:
Why does this bother some of you?
I enjoy the PvE aspect of the game, I really do. How does this affect the PvP players in any way? Are you trying to lower the subscriber base of EvE by driving out the people who don't see things the same way you do? I know that I am not alone in my playstyle, in fact most of my alliance members are mission runners or industrialists.
Can the blood hungry PvPers not see that blowing away industrialists is equivalent to shooting yourself in the foot? Who makes your ships that you so happily blow into space dust? Who mines the minerals? Who risks their freighter every time they jump into Jita?
Carebears do.
So, does it really make sense to push them out of the game in hopes that spaceships will start growing on trees?
Extra credit bonus question:
Are there not enough people actively looking for PvP that instead PvP players must turn to harassing PvE players?
well Im sure this post in general is a big reason they like to mess with PVErs it produces tears. and highsec is far from the only source of ships in the game theres hardcore PVPers who produce as many if not more then their carebear counterpart. Why do you think there has been so many times 0.0 alliances have been able to manipulate the market, Which shows eve is a game where PVP and PVE have had a sexy time relationship and we are forced to do a little of both unless you wanna spend tons of money on the game. The question could be asked both ways why should PVPers be forced to PVE?
Because this is eve you gotta do both.
Five Thirty wrote:masternerdguy wrote:Instead of commiserating, you should learn how to do it.
Everyone is a noob once in every area. You have to try to learn.
Explain to me why PVE people are so slow to uptake the fact that they can learn to pvp too? For the exact same reason that PVP people are so slow to uptake the fact that some players DO NOT WANT TO PVP. I have over 70 million skillpoints, none of which are PvP related. Hell, I can't even fit a warp scrambler to my ship. My active avoidance of all things PvP is due to the fact that I do not enjoy it in the slightest. No, I don't have to try and learn PvP if I do not want to. I will continue to run missions and do other carebear activities for many more years, because I love this game.
Your avoidance of PVP is essentially your version of PVP that you are forced to deal with because thats what makes EVE |

Bella Rugente
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 22:50:00 -
[66] - Quote
[quote=Five Thirty]Apparently I should clarify
I am NOT advocating NOR suggesting that all PvP should be removed from the game. PvP is a very important part of every MMO game ever introduced.
What I am addressing in my OP is the sort of 'forced pvp' that occurs against players who have no ability to defend themselves. Please understand that I am not speaking of any specific incident or tactic. This is not about suicide ganking, can flipping, highsec war decs, or anything of the sort. it is about players who spend their time in game solely trying to upset and harass other players
What am trying to ascertain is the mentality behind spending hours upon hours in game not trying to make progress for oneself, but instead trying to impede the progress of others
I've been around long enough to know that the majority of people who engage in non-consensual PvP do it for "the lolz" or "tears", but what does this really mean? I would love to have someone take my question seriously and provide a serious answer, rather than hiding behind whatever meme they deem appropriate.
I actually have massive amounts of respect for those who participate in PvP outside empire space. Highsec bullies, not so much.[/quote
For most, it's not about having a vendetta against you, it's simply easier and more fun to loot a faction module from someone elses ship than to spend the time to mission for it. For people that are dead set on not even learning to defend themselves, much less get aggressive, there is probably no way that you could ascertain the mentality behind the joy of breaking open a pinata full of fancy faction stuff. This is a game where we are all allowed to do this within certain limitations, so why not.
Someone pointed out that Eve is full of sociopaths and he may be right. There are few people that given an opportunity to gank a faction battleship, knowing that they would be successful, would walk from that opportunity. As far as PvP outside Empire, you forget that Empire is Eve too, only with different rules of engagement. |

Sophisto
Dark Circle Enforcement Templis Dragonaors
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.16 23:59:00 -
[67] - Quote
Quote: For people that are dead set on not even learning to defend themselves, much less get aggressive, there is probably no way that you could ascertain the mentality behind the joy of breaking open a pinata full of fancy faction stuff. This is a game where we are all allowed to do this within certain limitations, so why not.
I would like this except a PVE fit ship will get Rick Rolled every time to a PVP ship of whom is the aggressor. The PVP player isnt usually rolling around in a T1 Cruiser picking a fight with a Battleship he knows he'll get schooled by running in a pocket somewhere. The aggressor is always strategic picking a fight he "knows or thinks" he can win. This takes us right back to the OP of Five Thirty.
If ships for PVE could be equally fit for PVP effectiveness, the PVPer might have more of an argument, but thats not the way CCP made this game. This fact alone shows the intended design element for the different aspects of the game..
CCP should separate high sec missions from low sec completely for those of us who want to stay out of PVP's way possible. |

Bella Rugente
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 00:23:00 -
[68] - Quote
Just because people don't fit their PvE ships to be defensible doesn't mean they can't. To say that CCP made it impossible is absolutely untrue. I run Sanctums and Plexes in a PvP fit ship. Solo. If the're unwilling to do this, there's a directional scanner that you can watch to see trouble coming, and the old fallback.. fleetmates.
There's no doubt that when Eve was being developed, the idea of separating the two was on the table. They decided against it. I guess people are just stuck with other people wanting to take your stuff. You don't even need to go grab a pirate costume, friends with logistics ships work fine. There are many ways to fend off or avoid attackers without firing a shot. Why does the game need to change so people can be lazy and not have to pay attention? I have quite a few "mains", doing everything from hisec/lowsec missioning, piracy, empire building, etc, most without a GSF tag. With the changes to minerals I may even stoop to mining. All of the problems people complain about, I have to deal with as well with the same tools as anyone else. The difference is that some folks cry and some folks adapt.
Look elsewhere for the easy button.
|

Kekron Orlenard
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 04:15:00 -
[69] - Quote
My god people. Every other post is about how EVE was created as a pvp game. Modern Warfare was created as a PVP game. EVE was created as a sandbox game. Toss a crap ton of players in a world and give them no rules. What eventually happens? Crap ton of PVP. The PVP of EVE is a result of the nature of EVE, not the reason for its existence.
With that said there is no right or wrong way to play. There is only your way to play. As far as I'm concerned the way I play EVE is the only way to play since well I'm the one doing it. My friends who play use a different play style that I commonly disagree with, but its their play style and thats ok too.
Spoken like a true Gallente right? haha
As for my stance on the whole carebear thing. I will admit. I'm totally a carebear. Right now I feel that I wouldnt put up much of a fight against another player so I avoid PVP. However eventually I probably will dabble in it, especially in fleet action. But seriously though. Whats the worst that will happen? I lose my ship? Um ok. Insurance + some mining and I have the ship back.
While I do have a problem with another player just making my life a living hell. Perhaps by repeatedly ganking me to the point where Im getting seriously pissed. But the beauty of EVE is that I call up my corp buddies (well when I have them) and they roll in in T2 BS (again hypothetical) and blow his *** to the next quadrant.
Isnt there the saying "Dont fly anything you arent willing to lose?".
We are definitely beating a dead horse here in that this is a sandbox game and anything goes. If someone is treating you unfairly then kick his ***. If you arent into that kind of thing, pay someone else to do it for you. As an industrialist you should have the ISK for that no? |

Iria Ahrens
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
15
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 04:18:00 -
[70] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:Apparently I should clarify.
I am NOT advocating NOR suggesting that all PvP should be removed from the game. PvP is a very important part of every MMO game ever introduced.
What I am addressing in my OP is the sort of 'forced pvp' that occurs against players who have no ability to defend themselves. Please understand that I am not speaking of any specific incident or tactic. This is not about suicide ganking, can flipping, highsec war decs, or anything of the sort. it is about players who spend their time in game solely trying to upset and harass other players.
If PvP were voluntary, then it would just another dueling game. And I disagree with your statement. Pvp is an afterthought in just about every other MMO. PvP in other MMOs is nothing but a means for players to compare the sizes of their e-peens.
In EVE it is different. Because Pvp affects every aspect of the game and no where is truly safe, PVP is an important part of EVE. The PvP experience matters. Hate, anger, misery, laughter, triumph, defeat, these are REAL in EVE. In other games, players will dress in white armor, claim to be the Knight of Goodness, and then go looking for someone wearing bat wings, declair they are evil. They duel, one wins, the other loses. Whichever loses doesn't matter, because the both laugh it off and decide to try again tomarrow.
In EVE when you fight someone that is evil, you're not fighting someone who wears black, and has extra long canines. You are fighting someone who is truly trying to ruin your day. If another player decides to defend all right and goodness, he doesn't prove his pureness of heart by wearing white and challenging someone with red eyes to a friendly duel. He will guard some traveling merchants or miners from aggression, and drive any bandits away.
Both sides of this has beaning. If someone wants to play an evil character, they can actually be evil. If someone wants to play good, they can play good. If someone want's to play the victim, they can really be the victim. But through it all, what you do is real. Eve is about being real, not the pretense of real.
Of course I'm using terms like Good and Evil for their inflammatory nature. To I don't personally see good or evil having much application in a game where you can't really be hurt. How hurt you feel is more of how enamored a player becomes not an intrinsic aspect of the other player's actions in game. |

Halete
Teraa Matar White-Lotus
54
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 05:36:00 -
[71] - Quote
I personally don't have a problem with your play-style, but if you want people to accept your 'non-PVP' play-style so desperately then why do you have to question how the PVPers trying to kill/impede you are playing?
You're smart enough to recognize that we can all do what we want in the sand-box and you'll defend how you build your sand castles to death, but can't wrap your head around the people who want to kick it down.
I'm just saying, it's kind of obnoxious.
They probably... Enjoy what they're doing, just like you enjoy what you're doing. Just an idea. Why you seek justification beyond that is past me.
I could basically copy and paste your OP and replace select words to make an 'A griefer's question' thread but I don't feel like enough of a douche right now. Free hugs for Amarr holders. No, really. |

Plaude Pollard
Aliastra Gallente Federation
21
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 07:15:00 -
[72] - Quote
Deen Wispa wrote: Some will go off and selfishly do their own thing while others will proudly defend their home until the last Ibis goes down in a flame of glory. Some will stay docked because they don't have any PvP-skills at all, and know that there's nothing they can do to survive for even a minute, most likely also because they don't have any useful PvP-ships at hand. |

IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69
Angry Mustellid Iron Oxide.
123
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 09:24:00 -
[73] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:Can the blood hungry PvPers not see that blowing away industrialists is equivalent to shooting yourself in the foot? Who makes your ships that you so happily blow into space dust? Who mines the minerals? Who risks their freighter every time they jump into Jita?
Carebears do.
So, does it really make sense to push them out of the game in hopes that spaceships will start growing on trees?
If you were playing the multiplayer game, Eve Online, you'd know that the problem with eve is not enough stuff getting destroyed and too much being produced. There are vastly too many carebears pumping ISK into the economy and not nearly enough being destroyed by the people who actually play the game as it was intended.
If you don't care about PVP why are you not just playing skyrim or mass effect or something? I'm sure there are 100s of different games with better PVE gameplay that Eve.
|

Eryn Velasquez
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
13
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 10:20:00 -
[74] - Quote
IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote:[ If you don't care about PVP why are you not just playing skyrim or mass effect or something? I'm sure there are 100s of different games with better PVE gameplay that Eve.
Could turn this just around like: If you're so into PVP, why don't you just play CS?
EVE is far more complex than relying only on "kill, boom, bang", it has a complex economy, a social community, some just play the game for trade, production, or R&D - simply to stay in contact with friends, to chat, joke and for fun.
And this complexity was the intention, not another silly "high noon in space". Suicide gankers - Silly griefing kiddies, annoying like dog poop under my shoes |

Sophisto
Dark Circle Enforcement Templis Dragonaors
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 12:22:00 -
[75] - Quote
Eryn Velasquez wrote:IHaveCandyGetInTheVan69 wrote:[ If you don't care about PVP why are you not just playing skyrim or mass effect or something? I'm sure there are 100s of different games with better PVE gameplay that Eve.
Could turn this just around like: If you're so into PVP, why don't you just play CS? EVE is far more complex than relying only on "kill, boom, bang", it has a complex economy, a social community, some just play the game for trade, production, or R&D - simply to stay in contact with friends, to chat, joke and for fun. And this complexity was the intention, not another silly "high noon in space".
Excellent. Further illustrating EVE is a place for all kinds of players and not solely designed for pvp.. |

Tenris Anis
Schattenengel Clan
42
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 12:29:00 -
[76] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:The truth of the matter is that you cannot FORCE someone to PvP.
I personally don't PvP. I absolutely detest PvP, and have avoided it in every game I've ever played. If my alliance gets a war dec, I simply stay in station and spend my time on EvE playing the market...
... and there is fails. EVE markets are PVP. So you are doing pvp. And you are even forced to do so by a war dec. |

Sophisto
Dark Circle Enforcement Templis Dragonaors
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 15:49:00 -
[77] - Quote
Tenris Anis wrote:Five Thirty wrote:The truth of the matter is that you cannot FORCE someone to PvP.
I personally don't PvP. I absolutely detest PvP, and have avoided it in every game I've ever played. If my alliance gets a war dec, I simply stay in station and spend my time on EvE playing the market... ... and there is fails. EVE markets are PVP. So you are doing pvp. And you are even forced to do so by a war dec.
she's talking about Combat PVP between ships.. |

Fredfredbug4
Kings of Kill EVE Animal Control
202
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 20:31:00 -
[78] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:The truth of the matter is that you cannot FORCE someone to PvP.
I personally don't PvP. I absolutely detest PvP, and have avoided it in every game I've ever played. If my alliance gets a war dec, I simply stay in station and spend my time on EvE playing the market.
This just shows how you don't know what you are talking about. Playing the market is a form of PVP. You are a player, competing with other players to spend the least and gain the most.
Quote: My question is
Why does this bother some of you?
Most of us are fine with people not wanting to engage in PVP activities. That is their loss. It's when people like to complain to CCP and try to have the entire game changed just because they are getting what they signed up for, a sandbox. There are kids who like to build sandcastles and others who like to kick sand in other kid's faces.
Quote:I enjoy the PvE aspect of the game, I really do. How does this affect the PvP players in any way?
As a part-time mission runner myself I can safely say it does indeed impact PVP in some ways. PVE is yet another demand on ships, raising the prices.
Quote: Are you trying to lower the subscriber base of EvE by driving out the people who don't see things the same way you do?
I could easily ask the group you represent the same question.
Quote: Can the blood hungry PvPers not see that blowing away industrialists is equivalent to shooting yourself in the foot? Who makes your ships that you so happily blow into space dust? Who mines the minerals? Who risks their freighter every time they jump into Jita?
Again, another circle of questions could be offered back. Who creates the demand for minerals? Who are the people paying you? Who are the people keeping the EVE economy spinning? Combat pilots. Without us there would be an overabundance of minerals. Even high end minerals would be worthless. |

Anvil44
Independent Traders and Builders MPA
67
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 20:50:00 -
[79] - Quote
Well the OP gave it a good try but ultimately asking this type of question is like asking 'Why does water follow this path down the hill instead of that path?' It's because there is less resistance this way. Hi-sec ganks and war decs on industrial corps is usually done because it is easy. My corp was decced once by another corp that flew HACs and T3s. I am pretty sure they decced high sec corps because it was safe for them. Hi-sec = safety. It is (or at least was) very difficult to catch and kill those types of ships, especially if you choose targets that couldn't really fight back effectively.
PvP is needed in Eve just as much as mining and PvE. As one post said, there are lots of different ways to play Eve and they all work together. The one thing people don't have in this game that, as a result, allows for so much griefing, is consequences. If in the real world, you could do some of these things without the consequences of jail, execution, banishment, punishment, failure and death etc, it would happen all the time
Decency to others has very little importance and priority here. I don't say this as if to imply this is bad or inherently wrong, but if you can accept that one truth, war dec corps and griefers/gankers in general won't really bother you as much
I also have to laugh at all these people that point out: "you can do this or that to prevent a grief/gank, have corp mates stand by", etc. That's like having someone stand by your car with a phone to call police with in case someone tries to steal your car or vandalize it. It's possible it might be stolen but you have no idea when or where and no one in their right mind wants to sit around 'just in case'. If I am 'playing a game' I want to actually do something. Not sit around waiting to do something, just in case. I may not like you or your point of view but you have a right to voice it. |

Valheru Adun
CompleXion Industries CompleXion Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 22:17:00 -
[80] - Quote
I've been thinking about this lately. In EvE I recently became a miner. At this point I can spare time for that, I cannot commit to something more - like null sec. However I am a very competitive player, even if I am not competing in any kind of PvP in EvE, at this point. So it really baffles me when someone comes to me and wants to kill my Retriever, that could last a few shots tops. How is that logical? And what does that say for the player doing it? To me, as someone who has been PvP-ing and playing on a very high level in quite a few online games, this is not PvP. This is what happens when sad people are trying to make other people sad. Now I'm a new player in Eve, I've invested some Isk on a BC, then some on this Retriever which has an expensive fit(for my in game finances). Then some sad person comes and destroys my humble investment in this Retriever. He's not doing any sort of PvP by doing so, because I do not pose any kind of threat. My ship is not armed and cannot be defended. I'm just there doing what I've decided to do.
The big issue is, that there are no consequences. Losing a silly frigate is not a consequence. It's a laughable loss. Now if someone was to come in RL to my work place and punch me in the face, do you think, that this person will face no consequences to this act of aggression towards me? You bet your ass he will. There will be severe consequences ranging from me punching him back, to me suing the guy.
See the thing is, most people feel safe behind their computers. And this brings out their real self. The one that's full of sh*t. And because they can't spew their sh*t in RL, they do it in game, and claim it to be PvP. It is not. It is no different than RL griefing. A game is a game, but when you are involved with other people, there should be boundaries to what you can do and consequences when you cross them. As simple as that.
How many will come and destroy my little Retriever to make their little penises feel good, if say they became an outlaw in all of High Sec and are shot on sight by Concord for a longer period of time? Why not? I lose a lot when I lose a huge investment, they lose nothing. I risk a lot going out to mine, they risk nothing. Generally most people are idiots and this is why good behavior is enforced in RL and should be enforced in Eve, the same way it's enforced in every other MMO.
By the way, by calling ganking high sec mining ships PvP, you really insult yourself. |

Rezig Huruta
Pale Horse Ministry
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 22:55:00 -
[81] - Quote
In response to the high sec ganking of mining ships...
What does a player who destroys a mining ship get? I mean... is there any ISK reward type of thing or just some 'loot'. I haven't partaken in PVP yet, but I'm curious.
Is there an IN GAME benefit to actually BE a pirate? (aside from simply blowing up other people's stuff).
|

Five Thirty
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
25
|
Posted - 2012.04.17 22:59:00 -
[82] - Quote
There is some loot and some salvage from what the ship was fitted with. Most gankers are doing it for tears and to upset other people. A lot of them take joy in the suffering of others. |

Mr Muldour
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 01:06:00 -
[83] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:If my alliance gets a war dec, I simply stay in station and spend my time on EvE playing the market.
I hate to burst your bubble but you've just engaged in PvP, that was MY sell order you just undercut... thirty five times! You are welcome to correct your original post to say you don't engage in direct ship to ship combat but saying you don't PvP is a bald faced lie!
|

Corina Jarr
Spazzoid Enterprises Purpose Built
684
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 01:24:00 -
[84] - Quote
Unless you only mine from your rookie ship (or kill only bots with your rookie ship) you are engaged in PvP somehow. It is 99% unavoidable. |

Five Thirty
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
25
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 02:24:00 -
[85] - Quote
I find it interesting that I made a post regarding non-consensual pvp (ganking) and people try to derail the thread into a discussion about how the market is pvp, how mining is pvp, etc etc etc.
|

Valheru Adun
CompleXion Industries CompleXion Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 09:42:00 -
[86] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:I find it interesting that I made a post regarding non-consensual pvp (ganking) and people try to derail the thread into a discussion about how the market is pvp, how mining is pvp, etc etc etc.
That's because they haven't done any proper PvP. They want to feel good about themselves. It's really silly. :) |

evil art
The Forgotten Navy Gentlemen's Agreement
6
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 10:06:00 -
[87] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:The truth of the matter is that you cannot FORCE someone to PvP.
I personally don't PvP. I absolutely detest PvP, and have avoided it in every game I've ever played. If my alliance gets a war dec, I simply stay in station and spend my time on EvE playing the market. If the war dec lasts too long, I will simply stop playing, logging on only to update skill queues.
I don't shoot ninjas who invade my mission space. Instead, I abandon all wrecks immediately. If there is a mission completion item, I will dock up and complete the mission later. Losing the time bonus doesn't bother me at all versus accidentally gaining agro from the invader. I don't want to fight you, and I will do everything in my power to make that abundantly clear.
I do not venture into lowsec space. I know that I am a huge target and that there are players all over that area of space looking to take me down at their first opportunity.
My question is:
Why does this bother some of you?
I enjoy the PvE aspect of the game, I really do. How does this affect the PvP players in any way? Are you trying to lower the subscriber base of EvE by driving out the people who don't see things the same way you do? I know that I am not alone in my playstyle, in fact most of my alliance members are mission runners or industrialists.
Can the blood hungry PvPers not see that blowing away industrialists is equivalent to shooting yourself in the foot? Who makes your ships that you so happily blow into space dust? Who mines the minerals? Who risks their freighter every time they jump into Jita?
Carebears do.
So, does it really make sense to push them out of the game in hopes that spaceships will start growing on trees?
Extra credit bonus question:
Are there not enough people actively looking for PvP that instead PvP players must turn to harassing PvE players?
So what you are saying you dont want to defend "your space", how are you then gona keep it? let others Do it for you? in my view thats leeching on others, Or are you talking about low sec pvp with no sov for example? there are industri corp-¦s out there that contribute the wareffort also. but in eve you earn your space. so im not sure what you will do there. Good Luck |

Stalking Mantis
Amarrian Retribution Amarr 7th Fleet
153
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 13:12:00 -
[88] - Quote
1-Concord is not meant to protect you ever. Concord is meant to punish. Concord is a consequence to an action. Everything you do in this game has consequences.
2-This is EVE. It is Dark it Is Scary. It is dangerous. Adapt.
3-By default if you are space you are either hunter or prey. Sometimes the roles are turned around very fast. Are you a lion or a gazelle?
4-I will admit that chasing around highsec mission runners is pretty much the bottom of the barrel as far as PvP abilitiy. That is why I am in Faction Warfare as I surround myself by willing targets that die as a consequence of being on the opposing side. (notice the recurring theme of action and consequence).
5-Everything in this game is an action and a consequence of previous actions/decisions you made. As life is. Unlike other games there is no reset or reload option. It is meant to be that way.
6-The gankers you speak of in highsec cannot compete with a real pvp'er. If they could they would. That is why they chase around defensless players.
6-Look up Agony Unleashed (google the name). Trust me nothing compares to the PvP shakes. If you do try it out and decide you like PvP do yourself a favor....Dont turn into a highsec ganking nub. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
1316
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 13:22:00 -
[89] - Quote
I think you need to rethink your idea of what is and is not PVP.
http://stinkinguplocal.wordpress.com/2012/04/09/save-me-from-non-consentual-pvp/
Quote:[Eve] is PVP. Do you run incursions? Another fleet can contest a site and reap all the rewards when your fleet did almost half the work. Are you an explorer? Even in highsec someone can come along, race you to the acceleration gate in a DED 4/10 site, and be the one who gets the expensive loot even though you did 90% of the shooting. Even miners can engage in a small amount of PVP against other miners: itGÇÖs possible to mine asteroids out from under other miners, wasting their cycles and reducing their yield significantly.
...
Now, I could say that I have no interest in that PVP. I just want to buy a few ships, I might say, and not have to fly 10 jumps to get what I need at a decent price. ItGÇÖs non-consentual PVP and I want no part in it. CCP should put all the items in one big pool, sell them at fixed prices, and have them instantly delivered to wherever you are when you buy them. That way I can play the game how I want to play it. Hyperbole? Certainly. But sometimes hyperbole is necessary to make a point. It's time to put an end to CCP's war on piracy. Fight your own battles and stop asking CCP to do it for you. |

Five Thirty
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 15:19:00 -
[90] - Quote
I am only going to say this one more time.
This thread is about:
- Suicide ganking - Invading missions to bait mission runners into agressing
This thread is NOT about:
- War - Lowsec roams - Nullsec territory battles - Market PvP - Mining PvP - Contesting incursion sites - Ninjaing complexes
Seriously, it kinda makes me wonder about the people who either cannot or will not understand what this thread is about, despite several attempts by me to keep it on track.
|

Roime
Shiva Furnace
493
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 16:14:00 -
[91] - Quote
In your OP you say that this thread is about forcing PVP on others.
Which, in a open world sandbox, is an oxymoron, there is no "opt-out of PVP" anywhere on Tranquility.
Suicide ganking and all that hisec faggotry is crap, tho. Luckily you can avoid them 100% by moving out of hisec, so it's your choice really.
|

Iria Ahrens
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
16
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 16:14:00 -
[92] - Quote
Valheru Adun wrote:I've been thinking about this lately. In EvE I recently became a miner. At this point I can spare time for that, I cannot commit to something more - like null sec. However I am a very competitive player, even if I am not competing in any kind of PvP in EvE, at this point. So it really baffles me when someone comes to me and wants to kill my Retriever, that could last a few shots tops. How is that logical? And what does that say for the player doing it? To me, as someone who has been PvP-ing and playing on a very high level in quite a few online games, this is not PvP. This is what happens when sad people are trying to make other people sad.
PvP is a result not a cause. It doesn't matter WHY one player kills another, it is the act of killing other players that is PvP. Whether someone is a threat, or an ally is irrelevant to the term PvP. As someone who has been PvPing in other games, you haven't really been PvPing if you don't intrinsically understand this.
|

Iria Ahrens
Freelance Economics Astrological resources Tactical Narcotics Team
16
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 16:24:00 -
[93] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:I am only going to say this one more time.
This thread is about:
- Suicide ganking - Invading missions to bait mission runners into agressing
This thread is NOT about:
- War - Lowsec roams - Nullsec territory battles - Market PvP - Mining PvP - Contesting incursion sites - Ninjaing complexes
Seriously, it kinda makes me wonder about the people who either cannot or will not understand what this thread is about, despite several attempts by me to keep it on track.
I suggest you re-read your OP. The OP is what this thread is about. You start off stating a falacy as a fact, "The truth of the matter is that you cannot FORCE someone to PvP." Then go on and say a lie. "I personally don't PvP. I absolutely detest PvP, and have avoided it in every game I've ever played."
People are replying to your OP, the words you said, not whatever you intend the thread to be about. This thread is therefore about correcting your fallacies and lies.
|

Valheru Adun
CompleXion Industries CompleXion Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 16:48:00 -
[94] - Quote
Iria Ahrens wrote:Valheru Adun wrote:I've been thinking about this lately. In EvE I recently became a miner. At this point I can spare time for that, I cannot commit to something more - like null sec. However I am a very competitive player, even if I am not competing in any kind of PvP in EvE, at this point. So it really baffles me when someone comes to me and wants to kill my Retriever, that could last a few shots tops. How is that logical? And what does that say for the player doing it? To me, as someone who has been PvP-ing and playing on a very high level in quite a few online games, this is not PvP. This is what happens when sad people are trying to make other people sad. PvP is a result not a cause. It doesn't matter WHY one player kills another, it is the act of killing other players that is PvP. Whether someone is a threat, or an ally is irrelevant to the term PvP. As someone who has been PvPing in other games, you haven't really been PvPing if you don't intrinsically understand this.
This is incorrect. PvP is not the result of Griefing. Griefing has no result. Griefing is griefing.
I pose no threat, 0 threat. I cannot defend myself. Therefor I am not VERSUS the one who's attacking me. I'm just receiving. Even if I'm fitted to somehow survive until Concord arrives, I'm still just receiving. If you call this PvP, then you must hold no respect for yourself as a PvP player.
Also a lot of players seem to mistake interaction between players for PvP. Trading is not PvP, supplying minerals, building ships is not PvP. It's player interaction. PvP - Player versus Player - is the result of 1(or more) player engaging in battle 1(or more) player. That is PvP. Eve is the only MMO community, that claims that every interaction between players is PvP. It is not, no matter how hard you wish it to be so. It is not. Try to comprehend what I'm saying. Have some self respect. |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
493
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 17:06:00 -
[95] - Quote
Yes, we comprehend what you are saying, but you are still wrong.
Player vs Player happens, when your actions in game gain you an advantage over the other player(s). Cornering a market is example of such an action, your operation robbed the income from a dozen of other traders. A small victory for you, player vs player.
When you find a Guristas Scout Outpost in hisec, and another player finds the same site, you race to pop the radar, player vs player.
When you fire your weapons on another ship, it's called combat. The player VERSUS player thing took place before that. His effort to find and lock your weak, unprotected ship, versus your effort to do **** all about to prevent that from happening. |

Valheru Adun
CompleXion Industries CompleXion Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 17:19:00 -
[96] - Quote
Roime wrote:Yes, we comprehend what you are saying, but you are still wrong.
Player vs Player happens, when your actions in game gain you an advantage over the other player(s). Cornering a market is example of such an action, your operation robbed the income from a dozen of other traders. A small victory for you, player vs player.
When you find a Guristas Scout Outpost in hisec, and another player finds the same site, you race to pop the radar, player vs player.
When you fire your weapons on another ship, it's called combat. The player VERSUS player thing took place before that. His effort to find and lock your weak, unprotected ship, versus your effort to do **** all about to prevent that from happening.
This logic can be applied to almost all the MMO's out there and it would work if people believe in it. But no, player versus player is exactly that - battle between players. Nothing more, nothing less. I will repeat this again, this is the only community that uses all the "everything is PvP" bullcrap to justify their actions. Your actions don't need justification, my inaction doesn't need explaining. I can do whatever I want and you can do whatever you want, but there should always be consequences. Miners face the consequences every time they lose a ship, while the griefer faces no consequences and there's no way he will ever face any with the current game mechanics. It's a pity really. The current mechanics actually encourage griefing and discourage PvP. The griefers aren't looking for battle when they warp to an asteroid belt, they are looking for an easy kill. |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
493
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 17:29:00 -
[97] - Quote
The ganker faces consequences every time, he loses his ship, gets a security status hit and you receive kill rights. Whether or not you use your legal right is up to you.
By the way, I've been lately mining Arkonor, Bistot, Cronkite and Dark Ochre until my little bear paws bleed. I don't belong to a sov-holding alliance, and I don't need CONCORD to protect me, I live in lawless space. All I need for my security is my planning, and my handful of trusty corpmates.
This is a sandbox, with total freedom to be or not to be a victim.
|

Valheru Adun
CompleXion Industries CompleXion Alliance
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 18:00:00 -
[98] - Quote
Roime wrote:The ganker faces consequences every time, he loses his ship, gets a security status hit and you receive kill rights. Whether or not you use your legal right is up to you. By the way, I've been lately mining Arkonor, Bistot, Cronkite and Dark Ochre until my little bear paws bleed. I don't belong to a sov-holding alliance, and I don't need CONCORD to protect me, I live in lawless space. All I need for my security is my planning, and my handful of trusty corpmates. This is a sandbox, with total freedom to be or not to be a victim.
You still don't get it. This might be a sandbox, but it's not anarchy. There is High sec, Low sec and Null sec. They are here for a reason. High sec space should be a relatively safe space. Right now it's not. Especially for industrialists. We have a lot on the line here. We must fit, we must anticipate, we must have corpmates for protection, alts etc. All that effort just to protect ourselves from some random douche bag with a low cost frigate.
See for a game that's supposed to offer a lot of freedom, there's not much choice for us industrialists. We either invest more and more, and prepare etc, or we're sitting ducks. The griefer on the other hand risks a low cost frigate and doesn't care about standing anyway. Things are a little bit uneven here. |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
493
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 18:21:00 -
[99] - Quote
Hisec is a relatively safe place. You can store your assets and dock in stations that can't be blown up, CONCORD will blow up those who break the law, navies will shoot enemies of the state and generally you can travel safely without being attacked.
Quote:We must fit, we must anticipate, we must have corpmates for protection, alts etc. All that effort just to protect ourselves from some random douche bag with a low cost frigate.
This is exactly the same to everybody. All that effort to succeed.
Why do you think that being an "industrialist" in hisec is not your choice? Why do you think that your choice would somehow liberate you from the same requirements we all share- to anticipate, to have corpmates and alts?
|

Roime
Shiva Furnace
493
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 18:47:00 -
[100] - Quote
And btw what defines an "industrialist"?
I've built a stockpile of hundreds of cruisers and battlecruisers in anticipation of Inferno, more is in the cooker all the time. From BPOs I've researched (in lowsec before I figured I could do it in our POS, btw, the queues are shorter there), now even mining minerals and recycling loot as the supply is currently poor and prices high. I harvest gas. I've collected a big pile of salvage, decryptors and Incognito tool thingies for rig manufacturing and invention later.
I enjoy all these things in addition to blowing up spaceships, because I can. It's a sandbox.
|

Valheru Adun
CompleXion Industries CompleXion Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 18:54:00 -
[101] - Quote
Roime wrote:And btw what defines an "industrialist"?
I've built a stockpile of hundreds of cruisers and battlecruisers in anticipation of Inferno, more is in the cooker all the time. From BPOs I've researched (in lowsec before I figured I could do it in our POS, btw, the queues are shorter there), now even mining minerals and recycling loot as the supply is currently poor and prices high. I harvest gas. I've collected a big pile of salvage, decryptors and Incognito tool thingies for rig manufacturing and invention later.
I enjoy all these things in addition to blowing up spaceships, because I can. It's a sandbox.
It may be a sandbox, but Sandbox or not, griefing is not ok. Ok ? |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
493
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 19:06:00 -
[102] - Quote
No, griefing is not "ok" in my subjective opinion either, and it's also a bannable offense as stated by the EULA, but I don't see how it's relevant to the topic we are discussing.
|

Sir John Halsey
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 20:30:00 -
[103] - Quote
Roime wrote:The ganker faces consequences every time, he loses his ship, gets a security status hit and you receive kill rights. Whether or not you use your legal right is up to you. ...
The ganker doesn't 'faces consequences'. Those are not consequences. They are only calculated risk ... Just saying...
|

Roime
Shiva Furnace
495
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 21:19:00 -
[104] - Quote
They are known consequences that will happen every time.
A miner takes a calculated risk when warping to a belt. |

Maximum Troll
Republic University Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 22:22:00 -
[105] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:There is some loot and some salvage from what the ship was fitted with. Most gankers are doing it for tears and to upset other people. A lot of them take joy in the suffering of others.
This guy gets it.
Anyone who says they're lol-blapping industrialists for the modules is a liar. It's always been about that three seconds of giggling we do while sitting next to your wreck in our wreck. |

Knus'lar
Deep Void Industrial Group T A B O O
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 23:30:00 -
[106] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:Apparently I should clarify.
I am NOT advocating NOR suggesting that all PvP should be removed from the game. PvP is a very important part of every MMO game ever introduced.
What I am addressing in my OP is the sort of 'forced pvp' that occurs against players who have no ability to defend themselves. Please understand that I am not speaking of any specific incident or tactic. This is not about suicide ganking, can flipping, highsec war decs, or anything of the sort. it is about players who spend their time in game solely trying to upset and harass other players.
What am trying to ascertain is the mentality behind spending hours upon hours in game not trying to make progress for oneself, but instead trying to impede the progress of others.
I've been around long enough to know that the majority of people who engage in non-consensual PvP do it for "the lolz" or "tears", but what does this really mean? I would love to have someone take my question seriously and provide a serious answer, rather than hiding behind whatever meme they deem appropriate.
I actually have massive amounts of respect for those who participate in PvP outside empire space. Highsec bullies, not so much.
And whats essentially wrong with non-consensual pvp in high sec? It is well within the rights of anyone to do so... And if you have a problem with people who do it for fun, then you misunderstand what a 'game' is. |

Knus'lar
Deep Void Industrial Group T A B O O
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.18 23:56:00 -
[107] - Quote
Valheru Adun wrote:I've been thinking about this lately. In EvE I recently became a miner. At this point I can spare time for that, I cannot commit to something more - like null sec. However I am a very competitive player, even if I am not competing in any kind of PvP in EvE, at this point. So it really baffles me when someone comes to me and wants to kill my Retriever, that could last a few shots tops. How is that logical? And what does that say for the player doing it? To me, as someone who has been PvP-ing and playing on a very high level in quite a few online games, this is not PvP. This is what happens when sad people are trying to make other people sad. Now I'm a new player in Eve, I've invested some Isk on a BC, then some on this Retriever which has an expensive fit(for my in game finances). Then some sad person comes and destroys my humble investment in this Retriever. He's not doing any sort of PvP by doing so, because I do not pose any kind of threat. My ship is not armed and cannot be defended. I'm just there doing what I've decided to do.
The big issue is, that there are no consequences. Losing a silly frigate is not a consequence. It's a laughable loss. Now if someone was to come in RL to my work place and punch me in the face, do you think, that this person will face no consequences to this act of aggression towards me? You bet your ass he will. There will be severe consequences ranging from me punching him back, to me suing the guy.
See the thing is, most people feel safe behind their computers. And this brings out their real self. The one that's full of sh*t. And because they can't spew their sh*t in RL, they do it in game, and claim it to be PvP. It is not. It is no different than RL griefing. A game is a game, but when you are involved with other people, there should be boundaries to what you can do and consequences when you cross them. As simple as that.
How many will come and destroy my little Retriever to make their little penises feel good, if say they became an outlaw in all of High Sec and are shot on sight by Concord for a longer period of time? Why not? I lose a lot when I lose a huge investment, they lose nothing. I risk a lot going out to mine, they risk nothing. Generally most people are idiots and this is why good behavior is enforced in RL and should be enforced in Eve, the same way it's enforced in every other MMO.
By the way, by calling ganking high sec mining ships PvP, you really insult yourself.
People do it because of people like you. Not to 'make their tiny penises feel good', or because 'they're full of sh*t'. I mean... seriously... Its because people like you try and take the moral high ground and cry on the ones 'below' you. This game is not real life, so dont pretend like it is and apply real life rules to this game. Maybe you should stop honor tanking your miner, and get a little more savvy about this game and how it works? If you really want things to be like they are in real life, take up mining as a career. I promise no one will come blow you up. |

Knus'lar
Deep Void Industrial Group T A B O O
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 00:01:00 -
[108] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:There is some loot and some salvage from what the ship was fitted with. Most gankers are doing it for tears and to upset other people. A lot of them take joy in the suffering of others.
Suffering is a matter of attitude. If you have the wrong one, you will provide them sweet sweet tears. But maybe if you learn that EVE is not a place where things will go your way all the time, and learned to give a little bit of fight, people will stop attacking you so much. And if you refuse to change, sorry. The universe in RL and in EVE do not revolve around you |

Amakre Ovyu
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 00:17:00 -
[109] - Quote
my only problem with pvp is how hard it is to get into. going at it solo just wont work, and if you do find a corps, the games so utterly cutthroat youre just as likely to get killed by a corpmate as anyone else. |

Knus'lar
Deep Void Industrial Group T A B O O
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 00:20:00 -
[110] - Quote
Amakre Ovyu wrote:my only problem with pvp is how hard it is to get into. going at it solo just wont work, and if you do find a corps, the games so utterly cutthroat youre just as likely to get killed by a corpmate as anyone else.
I agree solo work is very hard to do. I think a lot of people over estimate the danger of null sec though. I decided very early i wanted to do pvp work, so i found a null sec PvP corp to do it with. We are all pretty close, none of us would ever attack the other. |

ValentinaDLM
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
485
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 00:38:00 -
[111] - Quote
I just lol at this whole "us vs them" mentality on the forums, I pvp, pve, build stuff, trade, rp, etc, I really don't see what the big deal is.
If someone wants to have fun in highsec running missions day in and day out I would think only someone who was fun police would actually have a problem with them doing this. Sure, I have attacked highsec mission runners before,, and I have killed many mining barges with thrasher alts too, but it was all for the sake of me having a good time, not some irrational hate towards people who want to play that way. |

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient Electus Matari
271
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 05:21:00 -
[112] - Quote
Maximum Troll wrote:Five Thirty wrote:There is some loot and some salvage from what the ship was fitted with. Most gankers are doing it for tears and to upset other people. A lot of them take joy in the suffering of others. This guy gets it. Anyone who says they're lol-blapping industrialists for the modules is a liar. It's always been about that three seconds of giggling we do while sitting next to your wreck in our wreck. Is it absolutely impossible to contemplate the idea that not every high-sec killrer of a miner might have the same motives for doing so? |

Jack Miton
Lapse Of Sanity Exhale.
187
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 06:27:00 -
[113] - Quote
Omnomnom, posting in tear thread :)
Bottom line: EVE is a PVP game, be it shooting people, stealing their ****, undercutting their market orders, suicide ganking their 3bil tengus, it all comes down to PVP.
The second you log in, you are accepting that people can and probably will shoot you, scam you, steal your **** and then laugh at you in local.
The absolute best thing about eve is that if you want to, you can go and kill anyone, anywhere, any time with the right planning. Personally i dont gank for profit since there are far easier and better ways of making isk. I do suicide gank on occasion when my sec status is high enough, generally I fit out a gank ship and pick a target at random in whatever system I happen to be in. Why? because i can :) |

Tenris Anis
Schattenengel Clan
43
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 06:39:00 -
[114] - Quote
Valheru Adun wrote: The big issue is, that there are no consequences. Losing a silly frigate is not a consequence. It's a laughable loss. Now if someone was to come in RL to my work place and punch me in the face, do you think, that this person will face no consequences to this act of aggression towards me? You bet your ass he will. There will be severe consequences ranging from me punching him back, to me suing the guy.
Now I want to test if you stand to your word.
And the problem in eve with doing that is, that you usually do this with a character who is immune to revenge. You have alts for ganking, you can gank out of npc corps, you have not commit yourself to this lifestyle. You just log in your alt, kill some worthless miners and may be carebearing even at the same time on another alt. |

IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome
10
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 06:41:00 -
[115] - Quote
Instead of trolling the OP I will give excellent advise that will keep him safe and help avoid unwanted aggression.
Start your own corp. Post in this thread when you do, so they know not to bug you any more.
It's simply cause you're in an NPC corp that griefers are bugging you.
Faction War is also a great way to stay safe - especially for miners.
:) Fix this **** See Sea Pea. |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
496
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 06:53:00 -
[116] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:Omnomnom, posting in tear thread :)
Bottom line: EVE is a PVP game, be it shooting people, stealing their ****, undercutting their market orders, suicide ganking their 3bil tengus, it all comes down to PVP.
The second you log in, you are accepting that people can and probably will shoot you, scam you, steal your **** and then laugh at you in local.
The absolute best thing about eve is that if you want to, you can go and kill anyone, anywhere, any time with the right planning. Personally i dont gank for profit since there are far easier and better ways of making isk. I do suicide gank on occasion when my sec status is high enough, generally I fit out a gank ship and pick a target at random in whatever system I happen to be in. Why? because i can :)
This man gets it.
I wouldn't suicide anyone in hisec, but I also wouldn't play if it wasn't an option. And I sure as hell will gank any sorry PVE or indy ship you might bring to our wormhole, no matter how defenseless or pacifist you and your family are. And pod you.
"You can't have your cake and eat it" is true also in regards to sandbox. Freedom allows asshattery, we haven't been able to come up with a proper solution to that in 10000 years, and I don't expect CCP to do it in 7 years. |

Shusakurwa
Pragmatic Kernel
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 06:57:00 -
[117] - Quote
lol, how is it even possible thas this thread went up to 6 pages... it should have stopped at message #4 |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
496
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 07:11:00 -
[118] - Quote
This is not the first thread on the topic, and certainly not the last one 
In the end it all boils down to morality and ethics, stuff as old as civilization. I sometimes feel :disappoint: when people don't see what the freedom to gank anywhere, anytime and anyone adds to EVE.
It allows us to make the choice, to act like moral (or amoral) beings. If your mining barge couldn't be popped in 0.9, I'd be robbed of the choice to not pop you. This is huge, imho.
And to repeat myself- you have the choice not to be the hapless miner in a hisec belt, waiting to be popped. If you still insist on doing it, I just quote a wise Wizard:
~ deal with it ~
|

Eryn Velasquez
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
15
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 08:11:00 -
[119] - Quote
Knus'lar wrote: And whats essentially wrong with non-consensual pvp in high sec? It is well within the rights of anyone to do so... And if you have a problem with people who do it for fun, then you misunderstand what a 'game' is.
Ah yeah "within the rights" - but why is this ganking-scum flagged a criminal with a gcc? Normally, when you do something within the existing laws you're not a criminal ...
Suicide gankers - Silly griefing kiddies, annoying like dog poop under my shoes |

Eryn Velasquez
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
15
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 08:15:00 -
[120] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote: Why? because i can :)
Yeah, dogs lick their balls, because they can ... Suicide gankers - Silly griefing kiddies, annoying like dog poop under my shoes |

March rabbit
Trojan Trolls Red Alliance
155
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 10:17:00 -
[121] - Quote
masternerdguy wrote:Rezig Huruta wrote:masternerdguy wrote:
Everyone is a noob once in every area. You have to try to learn.
Explain to me why PVE people are so slow to uptake the fact that they can learn to pvp too?
I think you missed the point about him saying that he has no interest in it. The general question he's asking is "why does it bother the PVP players if someone doesn't want to PVP?" To that question, it bothers me they want to change game mechanics to make themselves safer to avoid any unwanted pvp, thus ruining the game I love. maybe if you try to engage pvp-minded people this will not bother you anymore? We understand this is not an easy to fight when you can loose.... but you should try  |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow NightSong Directorate
326
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 20:09:00 -
[122] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:maybe if you try to engage pvp-minded people this will not bother you anymore? We understand this is not an easy to fight when you can loose.... but you should try 
I live in lo sec and get into fights like that all the time, don't worry. Things are only impossible until they are not. |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
1327
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 20:52:00 -
[123] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:I am only going to say this one more time.
This thread is about...This thread is NOT about... Even on the forums, you think you can dictate the behavior of others. That speaks volumes. Also, I like how that immediately followed my post that stated the EVERYTHING in Eve is PVP, and you simply dismissed it with "but I don't want to talk about that."
If you sell stuff on the market, you participate in PVP. Anyone who wants to by anything is FORCED to do the same. How DARE you push your gameplay on us. It's time to put an end to CCP's war on piracy. Fight your own battles and stop asking CCP to do it for you. |

Five Thirty
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
33
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 21:10:00 -
[124] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote: Even on the forums, you think you can dictate the behavior of others. That speaks volumes. Also, I like how that immediately followed my post that stated the EVERYTHING in Eve is PVP, and you simply dismissed it with "but I don't want to talk about that."
If you sell stuff on the market, you participate in PVP. Anyone who wants to by anything is FORCED to do the same. How DARE you push your gameplay on us.
I've always wanted to say this:
Cry more stupid pirate... I love pirate tears.
If you want to make stupid comments about how everything is PvP, make your own thread. |

Maximum Troll
Trollocalypse
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.19 23:41:00 -
[125] - Quote
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:Maximum Troll wrote:Five Thirty wrote:There is some loot and some salvage from what the ship was fitted with. Most gankers are doing it for tears and to upset other people. A lot of them take joy in the suffering of others. This guy gets it. Anyone who says they're lol-blapping industrialists for the modules is a liar. It's always been about that three seconds of giggling we do while sitting next to your wreck in our wreck. Is it absolutely impossible to contemplate the idea that not every high-sec killrer of a miner might have the same motives for doing so?
It's not impossible to contemplate it, no. Dismiss the idea, yes. |

Scerwup
Black Mesa Mavericks
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 06:02:00 -
[126] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:Apparently I should clarify.
I am NOT advocating NOR suggesting that all PvP should be removed from the game. PvP is a very important part of every MMO game ever introduced.
What I am addressing in my OP is the sort of 'forced pvp' that occurs against players who have no ability to defend themselves. Please understand that I am not speaking of any specific incident or tactic. This is not about suicide ganking, can flipping, highsec war decs, or anything of the sort. it is about players who spend their time in game solely trying to upset and harass other players.
What am trying to ascertain is the mentality behind spending hours upon hours in game not trying to make progress for oneself, but instead trying to impede the progress of others.
I've been around long enough to know that the majority of people who engage in non-consensual PvP do it for "the lolz" or "tears", but what does this really mean? I would love to have someone take my question seriously and provide a serious answer, rather than hiding behind whatever meme they deem appropriate.
I actually have massive amounts of respect for those who participate in PvP outside empire space. Highsec bullies, not so much.
The simple answer is, because they can, or, that's how they choose to play.
To expand on that, everyone plays the game for a different reason. Some people choose to build stuff, some choose to mine, some choose to fight in large fleets, some choose to fight in small gangs, others choose to relentlessly grief people. That's what makes the game so great.
I actually think you are trying to overanalyze this.
The reason some people choose to do what you describe is because, at the end of the day, they want to sit down and annihilate "helpless" carebears. That's about all, they enjoy doing it, is there really any other reason needed? |

LT Alter
Mostly Wrong Decisions
3
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 06:47:00 -
[127] - Quote
You asked the wrong question, why do you detest us and our need to blow things up? |

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
1071
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 08:26:00 -
[128] - Quote
I have carebeared.
I have PVPed.
I have flat out griefed, yet I have also given a new player hundreds of millions of ISK and advice. More than a few times.
The problem isn't that you mine, build things, rat, whatever. All players do this.
The problem is you don't want to do anything else and expect someone else to change the rules to help you.
I recently setup a war against another corp because, hey, why not it'll be a laugh. The first thing they did (within half an hour) was completely disband the corp. The very next thing they did was send petitions to CCP complaining about it.
The alt corp used was less than half their size, with characters as young as 5 days. No kills to the corps name. The target was offered help by two alliances but instead just disbanded.
That's just pathetic. I have no desire, per se, to drive someone out of the game, but yes, people who act like a victim are just going to get thrown on the ground and kicked. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

Halete
Teraa Matar White-Lotus
78
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 09:18:00 -
[129] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:... The alt corp used was less than half their size, with characters as young as 5 days. No kills to the corps name. The target was offered help by two alliances but instead just disbanded...
What is this, I don't even.
Remembers, fly Frigates - Capsuleers are more tenacious than baseliner crews.-á |

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient Electus Matari
273
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 13:41:00 -
[130] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote: The problem is you don't want to do anything else and expect someone else to change the rules to help you.
OP didn't, actually. He just asked why it bothers some people he does not want to do PvP.
But I guess part of the answer is "because some people who prefer not to spend a lot of time demanding that rules be changed to support their stance, so you are easily mistaken for someone like that". |

Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
1075
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 13:48:00 -
[131] - Quote
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote: The problem is you don't want to do anything else and expect someone else to change the rules to help you.
OP didn't, actually. He just asked why it bothers some people he does not want to do PvP. But I guess part of the answer is "because some people who prefer not to spend a lot of time demanding that rules be changed to support their stance, so you are easily mistaken for someone like that".
Read some of his other posts and then tell me he isn't exactly in that camp.
- "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
1334
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 13:56:00 -
[132] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:Cry more stupid pirate... I love pirate tears. Sarcasm isn't your strong point, is it?
Five Thirty wrote:If you want to make stupid comments about how everything is PvP, make your own thread. Mmmm...no.
If you want to avoid one kind of PVP, then we should all be able to avoid all kinds of PVP. Therefore we need:
-fixed market prices -instanced missions, incursions, and exploration -PVP dueling in deadspace pockets -infinite ore asteroids so that miners can't cut each other's cycles -total protection from scamming -the inability to engage in aggressive acts in highsec
If that's the game you want, I think you came to the wrong place. If it's not the game you want, if you like Eve for all the competition and opportunities it provides, then you have to accept all varieties of PVP. Even those you don't like. It's time to put an end to CCP's war on piracy. Fight your own battles and stop asking CCP to do it for you. |

Halete
Teraa Matar White-Lotus
79
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 13:59:00 -
[133] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Five Thirty wrote:Cry more stupid pirate... I love pirate tears. Sarcasm isn't your strong point, is it? Five Thirty wrote:If you want to make stupid comments about how everything is PvP, make your own thread. Mmmm...no. If you want to avoid one kind of PVP, then we should all be able to avoid all kinds of PVP. Therefore we need: -fixed market prices -instanced missions, incursions, and exploration -PVP dueling in deadspace pockets -infinite ore asteroids so that miners can't cut each other's cycles -total protection from scamming -the inability to engage in aggressive acts in highsec If that's the game you want, I think you came to the wrong place. If it's not the game you want, if you like Eve for all the competition and opportunities it provides, then you have to accept all varieties of PVP. Even those you don't like.
Erased my internet history, wiped my hard-drive, burned my tower, smashed the monitor, scattered the remains into the street, called the police, called MI5, called the FBI, called Samaritans, swallowed a bunch of pills then wrote this whilst choking to death on my own vomit on my phone. Remembers, fly Frigates - Capsuleers are more tenacious than baseliner crews.-á |

FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
1335
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 15:27:00 -
[134] - Quote
Halete wrote:Erased my internet history, wiped my hard-drive, burned my tower, smashed the monitor, scattered the remains into the street, called the police, called MI5, called the FBI, called Samaritans, swallowed a bunch of pills then wrote this whilst choking to death on my own vomit on my phone. It's probably The Mittani's fault. It's time to put an end to CCP's war on piracy. Fight your own battles and stop asking CCP to do it for you. |

March rabbit
Trojan Trolls Red Alliance
155
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 16:15:00 -
[135] - Quote
masternerdguy wrote:March rabbit wrote:maybe if you try to engage pvp-minded people this will not bother you anymore? We understand this is not an easy to fight when you can loose.... but you should try  I live in lo sec and get into fights like that all the time, don't worry. should it be this way you wouldn't be here whining about high-sec carebears would you?  |

Kestrix
UV Heavy Industries
14
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 18:15:00 -
[136] - Quote
Eve is a very open game. People are free to do as they please within the games mechanics. You are free to try and avoid PvP at any cost, and other players are free to persue you or ignore you as they please. You can ether be a victim allowing yourself to be pushed around and have your playing style restricted to the point that you won't even log in. Thats your choice. The game does not need to be changed.
As I've said before, diversity is the spice of life Train up multiple proffesions and as players try to shut one down (hulkageddon for instance) move onto another. |

yopparai
ASTARTES CORP
18
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 18:29:00 -
[137] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:masternerdguy wrote:To that question, it bothers me they want to change game mechanics to make themselves safer to avoid any unwanted pvp, thus ruining the game I love. You still haven't answered my question. Why do you insist on PVPING people who aren't interested in, or cannot, fight back?
Because we can. We don't need any other reasons. I don't hate carebears nor do I think anyone needs to change the way they play for anyone else.
In EvE you should never be 100% safe from losing your assets. That's why most of us love this game, because losses matter, and you never know when you might lose something.
Yopp |

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
87
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 20:49:00 -
[138] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:The truth of the matter is that you cannot FORCE someone to PvP.
I personally don't PvP. I absolutely detest PvP, and have avoided it in every game I've ever played. If my alliance gets a war dec, I simply stay in station and spend my time on EvE playing the market. If the war dec lasts too long, I will simply stop playing, logging on only to update skill queues.
I don't shoot ninjas who invade my mission space. Instead, I abandon all wrecks immediately. If there is a mission completion item, I will dock up and complete the mission later. Losing the time bonus doesn't bother me at all versus accidentally gaining agro from the invader. I don't want to fight you, and I will do everything in my power to make that abundantly clear.
I do not venture into lowsec space. I know that I am a huge target and that there are players all over that area of space looking to take me down at their first opportunity
My question is
Why does this bother some of you
I enjoy the PvE aspect of the game, I really do. How does this affect the PvP players in any way? Are you trying to lower the subscriber base of EvE by driving out the people who don't see things the same way you do? I know that I am not alone in my playstyle, in fact most of my alliance members are mission runners or industrialists.
Can the blood hungry PvPers not see that blowing away industrialists is equivalent to shooting yourself in the foot? Who makes your ships that you so happily blow into space dust? Who mines the minerals? Who risks their freighter every time they jump into Jita?
Carebears do
So, does it really make sense to push them out of the game in hopes that spaceships will start growing on trees
Extra credit bonus question
Are there not enough people actively looking for PvP that instead PvP players must turn to harassing PvE players?
The PVP you speak of is not real PVP. Attacking a pilot flying an industrial for no reason other than lawls is Ganking. Ganking is what wanna be PVPers do when they suck at true PVP
PVP stands for Player vs Player as in two or more players fighting each other. A pilot who can not cut it in null flying around high sec looking for easy prey that will have no chance of fighting back is not PVP it is PGP Player Ganking Player. I under stand some Gankers actually enjoy this, and that they do it just for the tiers. What I do not get is why? For me a game needs to have challenge and risk to be even remotely enjoyable. Attacking defenseless indy pilots is neither Challenging or risky, The only challenge is popping them before concord shows up which is actually quite easy, and there is no risk. The indy pilot has no chance, the fight is completely one sided. Sure there is a very high risk of getting CONCORDED but that is something they accept before even considering ganking, not a risk but a known liability that they plan for
The only reason I can see for a ganker to actually go out ganking and call it PVP, is that they are so afraid of losing a fight that they are to scared to actually go into NULL or W-space where the real PVPers are. Just as the little over grown kid in the play ground who thinks it is fun to run around beating on all the small kids who are to little to defend themselves is nothing but a pathetic little failure with no friends. A Ganker is no better. They can say they do it for the tiers all they want, but in reality are just as pathetic as the little bully in the play ground
They call me a carebear, yet I have lived and fought in null, I have held my own against far better PVPers than any high sec ganker could ever hope to be. Oh wow you can kill a HULK. your entire little gank could not take me down in one of my PVP fit ships. Hell even my PVE mission ships would be an impossible target for the typical ganker. We will see who is crying when ship prices get so high the Gankers need to spend more time grinding isk than hunting HULKS |

Daemon Ceed
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
55
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 23:20:00 -
[139] - Quote
Your weakness reminds me of a baby lamb who is destined to become veal...shivering in a dark corner of a filthy barn, cut off from all light and nourishment. It's ok though. Soon you will become a delicacy. I, for one, cannot wait to sink my teeth in you.  Post with your main or GTFO! |

Daemon Ceed
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
55
|
Posted - 2012.04.20 23:23:00 -
[140] - Quote
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: The only reason I can see for a ganker to actually go out ganking and call it PVP, is that they are so afraid of losing a fight that they are to scared to actually go into NULL or W-space where the real PVPers are.
Gankers don't call it pvp. They call it ganking, and it's usually for profit or tears. There is a difference and the only people to confuse the term and use of it are carebears who don't know any better. Post with your main or GTFO! |

Bernie Nator
Talocan Hive Talocan United
214
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 08:09:00 -
[141] - Quote
Daemon Ceed wrote:Your weakness reminds me of a baby lamb who is destined to become veal...shivering in a dark corner of a filthy barn, cut off from all light and nourishment. It's ok though. Soon you will become a delicacy. I, for one, cannot wait to sink my teeth in you.  How did you turn lamb into cow?
Mmmmm, veal. |

Ayla Hanaya
Hellbound Turkeys Alliance of Abandoned Cybernetic Rejects
4
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 21:57:00 -
[142] - Quote
Honestly, there is nothing stopping you from presenting less of a target to gankers. I mine regularly in a covetor, but that doesnt stop me from strapping on a spear and shield and beating the war drum when necessary, I can and have killed other players in PvP during war, and during dull times when I need to burn ISK. You would be surprised how exciting being on the giving end of a PvP exchange is, instead of going OH ****, youre going **** YES! Give it a try, if you try it you just might like it. BURN THEM ALL, COME BURN THE GODLESS HEATHENS OF JITA! 0000Z 28APR2012
|

Knus'lar
Deep Void Industrial Group T A B O O
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.22 23:03:00 -
[143] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote: What I am addressing in my OP is the sort of 'forced pvp' that occurs against players who have no ability to defend themselves.
You have NO ability to defend yourself? The game is stopping you from learning how to tank and fight back? No, you just refuse to do so. No one gives half a damn if you dont like getting blown up, they like blowing you up and they are free to do so until you stop them.
Basically, Man up. |

Dheeradj Nurgle
Misfit Syndicate Warden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.23 13:56:00 -
[144] - Quote
How do I say this nicely....
You have any idea how many minerals are in game? So much that fools are selling them for jack-squat You have any idea hwo much ISK is in game? Neither do I..
The fact is, PvP, Solo, ganking, small gangs, Large fleets, POS Bashing, it all serves a purpose
PvP as I see it is the only large(And yet very ineffective) money sink
More PvP = more use for minerals, is an economy that has more life, = happy industrials. And since the industrials need to buy more minerals, the Miners will be happy, since they'll get better prices.. ---
I myself started as a Miner, I then went into trading, and later into Industry... The fact is, as theraputic(SP?) Mining lasers are, as fun as it is to analize market data, It screws up the economy, it creates hugh stockpiles of minerals/ships/mods etc
TL;DR: PvP is good for everybody, Don't cry over a lost ship, it helps the economy, and remember, Hulkagedon is just around the corner. |

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
90
|
Posted - 2012.04.23 14:13:00 -
[145] - Quote
Daemon Ceed wrote:Bugsy VanHalen wrote: The only reason I can see for a ganker to actually go out ganking and call it PVP, is that they are so afraid of losing a fight that they are to scared to actually go into NULL or W-space where the real PVPers are.
Gankers don't call it pvp. They call it ganking, and it's usually for profit or tears. There is a difference and the only people to confuse the term and use of it are carebears who don't know any better.
That is true for some PVPers who occasionally go out ganking. Like for example many participants in HULKAGEDDON who enjoy the occasional gank especially when prizes are involved.
But there are others who do nothing but ganking and call themselves PVPers. Even showing up on the forums occasionally asking for restrictions to be placed on CONCORD, or for content to be added to force carebears into low sec. Just to give them more easy targets. The same players who constantly complain about no good PVP content. There is loads of PVP content in EVE you just need to know where to look for it. True PVP content though has as much danger for the attacker as the defender, unlike ganking where ther is no chance of the defender to survive, they usually don't even have guns.
These are the gankers I am referring to. The ones who have no clue what real PVP is all about, and have never engaged in a fight they were not 200% sure to win. The players who do the same activities as carebears to grind isk but think ganking other carebears makes them PVPers. These are the asshats that ruin most PVP MMO games. the same guys who camp spawn points, and mission/quest drop points killing players several levels lower than themselves. The same guys who use cheat codes and hacks in FPS games as it is the only way they can get their name on the boards. Guys who would absolutely fail in any sort of PVP activity that was not stacked their favor. |

Psychotic Monk
The Skunkworks
221
|
Posted - 2012.04.23 17:12:00 -
[146] - Quote
I've noticed a problem with the logic of many of the posters here. The issue seems to be that many think that unless the two pilots in an engagement are equal then it's not really PvP
Without getting too Sun Tzu on you, any engagement is PvP, and if it's one-sided, that's just because the actual mashing-F1 part isn't the the point at which the engagement starts
Let's look at a blob-on-blob, which, while many would argue is boring, I think everyone can agree is most certainly PvP
So, the things that determine the outcome in the engagement include, but are not limited to -number -fleet compositio -FCin
However, there are many things that are outside the scope of that one grid that also determine the fight, such as -Moral -Reimbursement programs (effecting pilot risk tolerance -Spyin -Use of time zone differenc -Recruitment practice -etc
So, the engagement isn't the competition, it's just the conclusion
By that same token, wardecs, ganks, massivly one-sided gatecamps and the smartbombing Rohk that sits in Rancer are all engagements that aren't decided on the field, but rather in the fitting window, recruitment channel and the d-scan window
OP is winning his contests, as he is accomplishing his goals and the mission invaders aren't. The hulk that tanks or watches d-scan or does anything else to make sure that he doesn't get ganked is winning his contests. When I go on safari, the corp that looks at my killboard or corp history or bio and decides that it's a bad idea to recruit me because I'll kill their dudes is winning their contest
Carebears might think that they're whining because they're forced into comp in the first place, but they're actually whining because their failure to prepare is making them lose their contests. |

Lord Dravius
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2012.04.24 14:50:00 -
[147] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:The truth of the matter is that you cannot FORCE someone to PvP.
I personally don't PvP. I absolutely detest PvP, and have avoided it in every game I've ever played. If my alliance gets a war dec, I simply stay in station and spend my time on EvE playing the market. If the war dec lasts too long, I will simply stop playing, logging on only to update skill queues.
I don't shoot ninjas who invade my mission space. Instead, I abandon all wrecks immediately. If there is a mission completion item, I will dock up and complete the mission later. Losing the time bonus doesn't bother me at all versus accidentally gaining agro from the invader. I don't want to fight you, and I will do everything in my power to make that abundantly clear.
I do not venture into lowsec space. I know that I am a huge target and that there are players all over that area of space looking to take me down at their first opportunity. Then maybe you should be playing a game that only has consensual PvP.
Five Thirty wrote:My question is: Why does this bother some of you? Because this is a sandbox game. It's about freedom. Including not having special zones to dictate where we can and can't do certain activities. It's also because Eve is about a different kind of entertainment. I'd like to direct your attention to an article that offers a better explanation than I can. The title of part two sums it up nicely; "Fun is for children. Adventure is for adults.".
Part 1
Part 2 |

Five Thirty
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
49
|
Posted - 2012.04.24 15:03:00 -
[148] - Quote
Lord Dravius wrote:Then maybe you should be playing a game that only has consensual PvP. Maybe you and the rest of your little carebear circle jerk **** buddies should play a game that fits what you want in a game instead of repeatedly joining games that are the opposite of what you want and crying like a ***** until the game is ruined for the players who actually had the common sense to play a game they liked in the first place. Your kind won. 99% of the MMO market is full of games designed for people just like you. Go play them instead of whining until the developers ruin one of the only games left designed for people like me.
It took a while, but I finally got some hardcore tears. Well done Lord Dravius, well done. |

Eryn Velasquez
33
|
Posted - 2012.04.24 15:04:00 -
[149] - Quote
sry for that GÇ£A man's freedom consists in his being able to do whatever he wills, but that he should not, by any human power, be forced to do what is against his will.GÇ¥-áGÇò Jean-Jacques Rousseau-á |

Eryn Velasquez
33
|
Posted - 2012.04.24 15:05:00 -
[150] - Quote
There was an issue with parsing this post's BBCode GÇ£A man's freedom consists in his being able to do whatever he wills, but that he should not, by any human power, be forced to do what is against his will.GÇ¥-áGÇò Jean-Jacques Rousseau-á |

Eryn Velasquez
33
|
Posted - 2012.04.24 15:05:00 -
[151] - Quote
Lord Dravius wrote:The title of part two sums it up nicely; "Fun is for children. Adventure is for adults.".
I agree with this article nearly 100%.
Quote:By death what we are really talking about is the concept of risk. This can be distilled even further: dying in a MMO is all about risking the investment of your time.
As for the T3-Cruisers, where you lose a certain part of your SP when you die - that's a risc. But not a calculated loss of a cheap fitted ganking dessy. GÇ£A man's freedom consists in his being able to do whatever he wills, but that he should not, by any human power, be forced to do what is against his will.GÇ¥-áGÇò Jean-Jacques Rousseau-á |

Lord Dravius
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2012.04.24 15:10:00 -
[152] - Quote
Five Thirty wrote:It took a while, but I finally got some hardcore tears. Well done Lord Dravius, well done. See? I knew deep in your timid little carebear heart you were capable of some form of aggression. I'm so proud of you. |

Five Thirty
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
49
|
Posted - 2012.04.24 15:13:00 -
[153] - Quote
Lord Dravius wrote:See? I knew deep in your timid little carebear heart you were capable of some form of aggression. I'm so proud of you.
You did a poor job making the transition from butthurt to condescending, please try again.
|

Connaght Badasaz
Reasonable People Of Sound Mind
27
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 02:49:00 -
[154] - Quote
I do what I want, when I want. I have not yet wanted to grief anyone; not my style. Yay for you if it is.
Bears make the mistake of being easy meat. If you weren't easy, many folks wouldn't bother and you would be safe. So in a weird way you are the cause of your own grief.
If you absolutely hate PvP, be absolutely ready to enforce it. Get pissed off and shoot back, not whine and run away. |

Valkyrie D'ark
Armed Resistance Movement
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 05:32:00 -
[155] - Quote
Not sure what you're referring to really. If this post is in response to people constantly harassing your "carebear" alliance then it's not that they cant stand the fact that you wont PVP. It's that they're no good at pvp themselves so prey themselves on unworthy easy targets like yourself. You cannot avoid PVP in the sense that other people can and always will affect you in EVE whether you like it or not. Someone wardecing you and forcing you to stay docked for a week IS PVP, even if they never saw you in space. I suggest you find other people who do like to PVP to protect your assets. In EVE, if you build something great you should be willing to defend it. Whether it is through your own force, through hired mercs, or through friends and contacts you have acquired. After all, that is the whole point of the Alliance, invite a pvp prone corp to yours and supply them with discount ships and mods in exchange for protection.
If that option is also distasteful to you, then I'm sorry but you're out of luck. This is an MMO.. Massively Multiplayer game and EVE is an MMO built on principle of working together with other people and being able to affect and interact with one other, even if the interaction is undesirable.
In any case, Inferno expansion should be perfect for corps/alliances like yours. Good luck! |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |