EVE Search - "Extreme" P.orn Ban

All Channels

Out of Pod Experience

"Extreme" P.orn Ban

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
vostok Minmatar Shadow of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2009.01.05 14:57:00 - [61] Originally by: kor anon Edited by: kor anon on 05/01/2009 14:52:57 Originally by: vostok Originally by: kor anon I eat beef, is that oral sex? Do you eat beef in a sexual context?! Well some people use food during sex, but for eating and 'other' activies. Does this mean they will be restricted to fruit and veg. edited so that i dont look like a complete tard I did say that it's only not allowed if the animal is still alive... Otherwise it could just be considered food. Assuming you're only eating it that is lol. - Adaptation is not* an excuse for lack of ballance!* -
P'uck	Posted - 2009.01.05 15:00:00 - [62] If screwing a mildly microwaved melon is wrong I dont want to be right!
kor anon Amarr The Tuskers	Posted - 2009.01.05 15:00:00 - [63] Originally by: vostok Originally by: kor anon Edited by: kor anon on 05/01/2009 14:52:57 Originally by: vostok Originally by: kor anon I eat beef, is that oral sex? Do you eat beef in a sexual context?! Well some people use food during sex, but for eating and 'other' activies. Does this mean they will be restricted to fruit and veg. edited so that i dont look like a complete tard I did say that it's only not allowed if the animal is still alive... Otherwise it could just be considered food. Assuming you're only eating it that is lol. The quote above says you didn't say that So a piece of steak in the ****er is a no no?
P'uck	Posted - 2009.01.05 15:01:00 - [64] Since the colon is the part that does a major part of the digesting, that is debatable
vostok Minmatar Shadow of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2009.01.05 15:12:00 - [65] Originally by: kor anon The quote above says you didn't say that So a piece of steak in the **er is a no no? Do you not remember this post then? Originally by:** vostok Originally by: kor anon Edited by: kor anon on 05/01/2009 13:43:51 Originally by: vostok Originally by: Stitcher where does it end? there are videos of girls swallowing live goldfish out there fore crying out loud, which I'm pretty sure constitutes "life threatening" from the goldfish's perspective. That would probably come under bestiality which is also illegal... WHAT? Since when does eating a goldfish constitute **ing a goldfish? Wow this is tasteless, but since when does putting a dog in your mouth constitute *ing a dog... But it would probably be down to the context. If it was just a girl eating a goldfish it would just be weird, doing it while naked and then spitting it up onto a guy or something... But then if the fish was dead it would probably just be food so probably ok... Or do you just enjoy being awkward. - Adaptation is not an excuse for lack of ballance!* -
kor anon Amarr The Tuskers	Posted - 2009.01.05 15:15:00 - [66] A little of both, dont feel insulted.
vostok Minmatar Shadow of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2009.01.05 15:19:00 - [67] Originally by: kor anon A little of both, dont feel insulted. Best write away to find out if its legal to stab you in the ear with a sausage then. - Adaptation is not* an excuse for lack of ballance!* -
kor anon Amarr The Tuskers	Posted - 2009.01.05 15:22:00 - [68] Originally by: vostok Originally by: kor anon A little of both, dont feel insulted. Best write away to find out if its legal to stab you in the ear with a sausage then. You never know i may like it
Xen Gin Universal Mining Inc Forged Dominion	Posted - 2009.01.05 15:41:00 - [69] OK, I can tell you this. No matter what those idiots in parliament do, it still doesn't mean the police will enforce. You see, almost every Computer Crimes unit in the UK has a backlog of Six Months plus. This is not going to change since they're only just looking for MAJOR crimes in large cases, and not petty ones. The CPS wont send a system off for analysis just for Copyright violations or MSN lies. And with HDD getting bigger and bigger, it's starting to take a longer and longer time to get though much more data. ------ Originally by: Rifter Drifter News just in.. Games are a pastime.. not a way of life. If your not enjoying, stop playing, and don't post about it.
kor anon Amarr The Tuskers	Posted - 2009.01.05 15:45:00 - [70] Originally by: Xen Gin OK, I can tell you this. No matter what those idiots in parliament do, it still doesn't mean the police will enforce. You see, almost every Computer Crimes unit in the UK has a backlog of Six Months plus. This is not going to change since they're only just looking for MAJOR crimes in large cases, and not petty ones. The CPS wont send a system off for analysis just for Copyright violations or MSN lies. And with HDD getting bigger and bigger, it's starting to take a longer and longer time to get though much more data. Very good point, infact its almost lol worthy that they impose new restrictive measures all the time, yet force the police to do ridiculous amounts of paperwork which stop them from enforcing these laws
Davina Braben	Posted - 2009.01.05 15:49:00 - [71] Consider the people you least want in parliament, whoever that might be. Imagine how much damage they could do with any given law. That's the test you should apply.
Xen Gin Universal Mining Inc Forged Dominion	Posted - 2009.01.05 16:57:00 - [72] Originally by: Sniper Wolf18 Edited by: Sniper Wolf18 on 05/01/2009 14:33:14 Edited by: Sniper Wolf18 on 05/01/2009 14:32:55 The UK goes on its way to ***sm by now proposing a ban on what they dub as extreme p.ornography Linkage I wonder how long it is before deviant sex crimes rise in the uk due to deviants not getting their fix online anymore? EDIT: Added newer link Linkage Law goes live on 26th of jan 09 EDIT #2: Old link 404ed adding another up-to-date Link Which is no where near this! Web Prn Crackdown In China ------ Originally by: Rifter Drifter News just in.. Games are a pastime.. not a way of life. If your not enjoying, stop playing, and don't post about it.
Arianhod	Posted - 2009.01.05 17:01:00 - [73] Originally by: Xen Gin Originally by: Sniper Wolf18 Edited by: Sniper Wolf18 on 05/01/2009 14:33:14 Edited by: Sniper Wolf18 on 05/01/2009 14:32:55 The UK goes on its way to ***sm by now proposing a ban on what they dub as extreme p.ornography Linkage I wonder how long it is before deviant sex crimes rise in the uk due to deviants not getting their fix online anymore? EDIT: Added newer link Linkage Law goes live on 26th of jan 09 EDIT #2: Old link 404ed adding another up-to-date Link Which is no where near this! Web Prn Crackdown In China So... underground internet CafTs for fapping in China to be expected? Haruhiists - Overloading Out of Pod discussions since 2007. Haruhiists - Supporting Linkification since 2008.
Shanzem Minmatar DarkStar 1 GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.01.05 17:42:00 - [74] Thought control, how provoking! -------------------------------------------
Xen Gin Universal Mining Inc Forged Dominion	Posted - 2009.01.05 18:19:00 - [75] Originally by: Shanzem Thought control, how provoking! There is NO thought control! waves hand in a Jedi Mind trick style! ------ Originally by: Rifter Drifter News just in.. Games are a pastime.. not a way of life. If your not enjoying, stop playing, and don't post about it.
Dantes Revenge Caldari	Posted - 2009.01.05 23:48:00 - [76] Originally by: kor anon Edited by: kor anon on 05/01/2009 13:43:51 Originally by: vostok Originally by: Stitcher where does it end? there are videos of girls swallowing live goldfish out there fore crying out loud, which I'm pretty sure constitutes "life threatening" from the goldfish's perspective. That would probably come under bestiality which is also illegal... WHAT? Since when does eating a goldfish constitute **ing a goldfish? I'd say the goldfish is pretty well **ed the minute it enters her mouth. -- There's a simple difference between kinky and perverted. Kinky is using a feather to get her in the mood. Perverted is using the whole chicken. All this has happened before and will happen again
Xen Gin Universal Mining Inc Forged Dominion	Posted - 2009.01.05 23:51:00 - [77] Originally by: Dantes Revenge Originally by: kor anon Edited by: kor anon on 05/01/2009 13:43:51 Originally by: vostok Originally by: Stitcher where does it end? there are videos of girls swallowing live goldfish out there fore crying out loud, which I'm pretty sure constitutes "life threatening" from the goldfish's perspective. That would probably come under bestiality which is also illegal... WHAT? Since when does eating a goldfish constitute **ing a goldfish? I'd say the goldfish is pretty well ed the minute it enters her mouth. So what about reality TV where contestants eat kangaroo *****, and other stuff like that? ------ Originally by:** Rifter Drifter News just in.. Games are a pastime.. not a way of life. If your not enjoying, stop playing, and don't post about it.
vostok Minmatar Shadow of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2009.01.05 23:55:00 - [78] Originally by: Xen Gin So what about reality TV where contestants eat kangaroo ********, and other stuff like that? If its dead its food (and before anybody says it, if its people its cannibalism which is illegal for a whole other load of reasons). - Adaptation is not an excuse for lack of ballance!* -
Tinky Winkey Caldari Caldari Provisions	Posted - 2009.01.06 01:19:00 - [79] Originally by: P'uck edit: and this opens a completely differnent can of worms, like euthanasia for instance. mankind is still lurking around in the friggin dark middle age, and as it seems the brits are doing their best to move backwards in time faster than anybody else. I'd like to expel them from europe and sell them to the yanks Please do ! It means that we would no longer have to subsidises the inefficient lump that is the EU and that brussels would no longer be able to interfere in the running of the UK !!
Xen Gin Universal Mining Inc Forged Dominion	Posted - 2009.01.06 01:42:00 - [80] Originally by: vostok Originally by: Xen Gin So what about reality TV where contestants eat kangaroo *******, and other stuff like that? If its dead its food (and before anybody says it, if its people its cannibalism which is illegal for a whole other load of reasons). I suppose we should ban those African reality TV shows where they eat live grubs and worms. ------ Originally by:** Rifter Drifter News just in.. Games are a pastime.. not a way of life. If your not enjoying, stop playing, and don't post about it.
vostok Minmatar Shadow of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2009.01.06 02:26:00 - [81] Originally by: Xen Gin Originally by: vostok Originally by: Xen Gin So what about reality TV where contestants eat kangaroo ********, and other stuff like that? If its dead its food (and before anybody says it, if its people its cannibalism which is illegal for a whole other load of reasons). I suppose we should ban those African reality TV shows where they eat live grubs and worms. Wow, I'm really bored of this now, if it's not done in a sexual context it obviously wouldn't come under this legislation. Animal genitals, for obvious reasons could quite easily be considered in a sexual context. - Adaptation is not an excuse for lack of ballance!* -
Marisal	Posted - 2009.01.06 03:34:00 - [82] Edited by: Marisal on 06/01/2009 03:37:54 Originally by: vostok Wow, I'm really bored of this now, if it's not done in a sexual context it obviously wouldn't come under this legislation. Animal genitals, for obvious reasons could quite easily be considered in a sexual context. But thats kinda why most ppl are outraged at this law been snuck under the radar, its so badly worded ppl don't know when they'd be committing an offence, given enough money and a lawyer with balls im fairly sure someone could run with this law and make an utter mockery of it by pointing out instances that would fall under the law now that are quite clearly not its target. Most of the law needed to be passed because it covers things that should have been illegal but existing laws only covered distribution rather than ownership of such content, but at the same time the law has been written in such broad strokes that there's no clearly defined edge to the law rather than a scalpel to cut away the ill elements of society its more of a mace to bludgeon away. Particular the wording that uses "appears" as part of a law is a potential mind field as this leaves the interpretation of content open to personal opinion. It was a rush piece of legislation, even that was admited, it was a knee jerk reaction to a campaign by a mother of someone who died at the hands of a nutjob chances are he would have still been a nutjob with this law inplace and without the extreme p.orn. The sad thing is though this is just another piece of law thats eroded civil liberties now and no one will ever likely challenge this law because they don't want the public profile. I have the deepest sympathy for the mother who lost her daughter but Im sorry she is wrong and she has done damage to society and I hope she realises that in time. Quoting from http://news.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/hi/newsbeat/newsid_7389000/7389331.stm The mother of the murdered woman, who has been campaigning for this law, "Sometimes the freedoms of like-minded, decent people have to be curtailed because of a few others." If we follow that logic through to its conclusion then everyone should be locked up because its the only way to stop murders.
Dirtee Girl Omega Enterprises 0mega Factor	Posted - 2009.01.06 07:56:00 - [83] nah forget it ill just get banned im not touching this.... * *
Sedious Bloke	Posted - 2009.01.06 09:12:00 - [84] Edited by: Sedious Bloke on 06/01/2009 09:17:10 I'm sorry the U.S has beat you to all of it. They are just smart enough to make sure no one notices :( gl out there brothers let us all pray to our gods that big brother doesn't start knocking on our doors. If you fight it they will sneak it in, if you tell the people madness is coming you can live with no fear because they can't black bag you because it will let the masses know. It's coming and there is nothing any of us can do. How many people would you have to stack up in front of a tsunami to stop it from washing over the shore? and in this case would the tsunami not be glad go be rid of those it washed away? I weep for you people in the U.K. because your government is more out with it. but at the same time i am filled with joy for you. At least the wolfs there don't bother wearing the latest fashion of sheeps clothing
vostok Minmatar Shadow of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2009.01.06 11:33:00 - [85] Originally by: Marisal But thats kinda why most ppl are outraged at this law been snuck under the radar, its so badly worded ppl don't know when they'd be committing an offence, given enough money and a lawyer with balls im fairly sure someone could run with this law and make an utter mockery of it by pointing out instances that would fall under the law now that are quite clearly not its target. Most of the law needed to be passed because it covers things that should have been illegal but existing laws only covered distribution rather than ownership of such content, but at the same time the law has been written in such broad strokes that there's no clearly defined edge to the law rather than a scalpel to cut away the ill elements of society its more of a mace to bludgeon away. Particular the wording that uses "appears" as part of a law is a potential mind field as this leaves the interpretation of content open to personal opinion. It was a rush piece of legislation, even that was admited, it was a knee jerk reaction to a campaign by a mother of someone who died at the hands of a nutjob chances are he would have still been a nutjob with this law inplace and without the extreme p.orn. The sad thing is though this is just another piece of law thats eroded civil liberties now and no one will ever likely challenge this law because they don't want the public profile. I have the deepest sympathy for the mother who lost her daughter but Im sorry she is wrong and she has done damage to society and I hope she realises that in time. Quoting from http://news.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/hi/newsbeat/newsid_7389000/7389331.stm The mother of the murdered woman, who has been campaigning for this law, "Sometimes the freedoms of like-minded, decent people have to be curtailed because of a few others." If we follow that logic through to its conclusion then everyone should be locked up because its the only way to stop murders. Very true, studies have already shown that murderers who kill for fun tend will just get their inspiration elsewhere. The idea that obscene images could make somebody insane is ridiculous. Its almost always ideas built up in childhood. I can't remember who it was exactly, but I remember an American serial killer was caught, and while on death row he came out with a lot of stuff about how ** had driven him to it, which the government took with new enthusiasm to attack . Research into this actually turn up evidence that he didn't look at violent *, just detective crime thriller graphic novels, which often portrayed women in erotic positions and being killed and murdered, since it was all part of the story. So I guess if you don't want to corrupt the very few people in the world born to be serial killers, we had best ban all media depicting any kind of violence at all... And that probably still wont make it less likely for you to get stabbed in the streets by a junkie. - Adaptation is not an excuse for lack of ballance!* -
Dantes Revenge Caldari	Posted - 2009.01.06 13:17:00 - [86] Edited by: Dantes Revenge on 06/01/2009 13:23:50 Originally by: vostok So I guess if you don't want to corrupt the very few people in the world born to be serial killers, we had best ban all media depicting any kind of violence at all... Also we need to ban breathing because it may cause someone to think it's fun to stop you doing it. Edit: If someone is that way inclined and unstable enough to kill, they are going to do it anyway. No amount of banning will prevent it. Therefore a very small minority may act out their fantasy based on what they see. The majority will peacefully look at it in their own homes. Take away that fix and they may be more inclined to seek their fantasy fix for real. -- There's a simple difference between kinky and perverted. Kinky is using a feather to get her in the mood. Perverted is using the whole chicken. All this has happened before and will happen again
Gabrialle Amarr Sanctuary Logistical Industries Inc	Posted - 2009.01.06 14:32:00 - [87] Edited by: Gabrialle on 06/01/2009 14:38:50 So is 'a clockwork orange' and 'a history of violence' going to be banned from shops? or will we just be arrested for owning a copy? (both these movies have ** scenes although the latter is semi-consensual) Edit: just gonna keep adding movies as i think of them:- Star-trek: Nemesis (telepathic ** scene) Dune (sexual assault scene)
Marisal	Posted - 2009.01.07 13:29:00 - [88] Originally by: Gabrialle Edited by: Gabrialle on 06/01/2009 14:38:50 So is 'a clockwork orange' and 'a history of violence' going to be banned from shops? or will we just be arrested for owning a copy? (both these movies have ** scenes although the latter is semi-consensual) Edit: just gonna keep adding movies as i think of them:- Star-trek: Nemesis (telepathic ** scene) Dune (sexual assault scene) From what i've read of the legislation, the movies themselves because they've been certified by british film board they'll be the exception to the law, how ever if you took the scene separated it from the movie so it was no longer part of the movies context, then it would be considered illegal, basically if the video/image or associated information doesn't contain proof that no one is harmed permanently it can easily be interpreted as illegal. With a video easier to do than a photo or two, the issue thats probably cause the most legal issues is the fact most ppl viewing p.orn online will be viewing us based rather than uk based sites who won't think to cater to these new laws by providing the proof.
Kaijusan Gallente gallach minig Corp New Eve Mining manufacturing Organisation	Posted - 2009.01.07 18:18:00 - [89] What do you expect from a country where their main Archbishop says Shariah Law would be a GOOD THING to implement. I cant believe this is the same nation that went alone toe to toe with ****** and was willing to fight the Soviets at the same time if need be. WTF is Winston Churchill when you really need him.
Arianhod	Posted - 2009.01.07 18:21:00 - [90] Originally by: Kaijusan What do you expect from a country where their main Archbishop says Shariah Law would be a GOOD THING to implement. He meant that with all parties consenting it should be allowed if no laws of the land are broken by their implementation. ie freedom to practice religious law on the condition it doesn't step on anyone's toes.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.