EVE Search - "Extreme" P.orn Ban

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Out of Pod Experience

"Extreme" P.orn Ban

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
kor anon Amarr The Tuskers	Posted - 2009.01.05 12:31:00 - [31] Originally by: Stitcher I'm left to wonder whose version of "extreme" they're going by. Are we talking videos of strangling and uh... "taking by force", or are we talking those sad-act furry vore stories here? what's the spectrum on "extreme"? Thats the problem there is no clear definition of extreme as it depends on perspective. These politicians are smart, they could have given it a clear definition, but they chose not to. This gives the authorities some leeway in which to ****m someone over
Locus Bey Gallente Aliastra	Posted - 2009.01.05 12:43:00 - [32] The increasing level of violence in **ography I personally think is a worrying trend. I'm not talking BDSM, that is a whole other category. I am talking simulated , gagging, degrading ill treatment of women. **ography has a profound affect on many peoples sexual attitudes and activity, and from what I see and hear, I think there is a lot to be concerned about were we are possibly heading.
TimMc Gallente Brutal Deliverance OWN Alliance	Posted - 2009.01.05 12:45:00 - [33] Originally by: Stitcher I'm left to wonder whose version of "extreme" they're going by. Are we talking videos of strangling and uh... "taking by force", or are we talking those sad-act furry vore stories here? what's the spectrum on "extreme"? If the government finds you protesting outside parliament, then your ** is too extreme. Originally by:** ouroboros trading you see, what they want us to do NOW is to argue about WHAT ELSE needs to be censored, obviously rap music, dodgy humour, games, and in turn words themselves, will all be suggested as people don't tell the government to **** off but, perversely, turn on each other, social group Vs social group, that's what democracy is fast becoming, a way to make people cancel each other out whilst manipulating their behaviour. Time to start removing words from the dictionary people! Then thought crime is impossible!
Sokratesz Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2009.01.05 12:46:00 - [34] Oh jesus &#^## christ. Quote:* The idea was welcomed by the family of Jane Longhurst, of Hove, murdered by a man addicted to violent net **. I see SO MANY similarities with the recent banning of magic mushrooms (a soft drug) here in the Netherlands. Last year a French girl (who had taken alcohol, weed, and mushrooms, and had been suicidal before) threw herself off a bridge after eating them so they promptly proposed and installed a ban on them - BECAUSE OF ONE **ING INCIDENT. Wyvern & Chimera fitting flowchart
Miendo P'hegn	Posted - 2009.01.05 13:00:00 - [35] Edited by: Miendo P''hegn on 05/01/2009 13:01:11 .
vostok Minmatar Shadow of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2009.01.05 13:01:00 - [36] Originally by: Stitcher I'm left to wonder whose version of "extreme" they're going by. Are we talking videos of strangling and uh... "taking by force", or are we talking those sad-act furry vore stories here? what's the spectrum on "extreme"? I believe the classification of extreme is anything that depicts acts that may result in permanent damage or a life threatening situation. Which, as I remember, puts some fine lines on videos of piercings, scarification and stuff like that too. - Adaptation is not* an excuse for lack of ballance!* -
Dantes Revenge Caldari	Posted - 2009.01.05 13:12:00 - [37] Edited by: Dantes Revenge on 05/01/2009 13:15:52 Originally by: Qui Shon Originally by: Dantes Revenge As for the OP's question about crime increases due to not being able to get an online fix: The same amount of time it took for increased r.apes to happen after the kerbcrawling law was introduced. Almost instantly. Have any more info on that, sources perhaps? I googled a bit but mostly found news articles of convictions, like one guy who got a 3 year drivers licence suspension for "kerb-crawling". Nutty laws. It was an item on the BBC news that was removed from their site soon after. It appears the gov't slapped a silencing order on them due the 'nature of the crimes currently under investigation'. The official response was that media coverage linking the increase to the kerb crawling laws would bias any trial. Unofficially of course, it simply made the gov't look like idiots who didn't have a clue what the repercussions would be. Probably the best way would be to search for the figures for r.ape and then cross reference any rise in those figures with the date the kerb crawling law was made effective. As with most crimes of that nature, don't rely on given figures, many cases are never reported even these days. -- There's a simple difference between kinky and perverted. Kinky is using a feather to get her in the mood. Perverted is using the whole chicken. All this has happened before and will happen again
Stitcher Caldari Duty.	Posted - 2009.01.05 13:21:00 - [38] Originally by: vostok I believe the classification of extreme is anything that depicts acts that may result in permanent damage or a life threatening situation. Which, as I remember, puts some fine lines on videos of piercings, scarification and stuff like that too. where does it end? there are videos of girls swallowing live goldfish out there fore crying out loud, which I'm pretty sure constitutes "life threatening" from the goldfish's perspective. Even a bit of "tradesman's entrance" fun can cause permanent damage if it goes wrong. Regular sex can lead to pregnancy, which can in some cases cause very serious health problems or death. I'm not a big fan of laying things down in too much detail, but you do have to have SOME definition of where the minimum extreme is. - Captain Verin "Stitcher" Hakatain.
P'uck	Posted - 2009.01.05 13:39:00 - [39] Don't you think it's a problem that ANYBODY thinks it's alright to decide for you what's extreme and what not? Sure, I'd like my government to protect people from being the main role in a real snuff movie, but as long as stuff is only PLAYED I dont think its anyone's business to decide for me what's (too) extreme and what's not. That just is not friggin right. I mean, I get 18, I get rights AND FRIGGIN RESPONSIBILITIES, too. I dont see why I should be only left with responsibilities over the years. Feck, I cannot even BEGIN to describe how ****ed up this situation is. What I actually would like are some laws that enforce proper.... "product descriptions". I just want to know what to expect, so i can decide if its "safe" to watch.
vostok Minmatar Shadow of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2009.01.05 13:42:00 - [40] Originally by: Stitcher where does it end? there are videos of girls swallowing live goldfish out there fore crying out loud, which I'm pretty sure constitutes "life threatening" from the goldfish's perspective. That would probably come under bestiality which is also illegal... - Adaptation is not* an excuse for lack of ballance!* -

kor anon Amarr The Tuskers	Posted - 2009.01.05 13:44:00 - [41] Edited by: kor anon on 05/01/2009 13:43:51 Originally by: vostok Originally by: Stitcher where does it end? there are videos of girls swallowing live goldfish out there fore crying out loud, which I'm pretty sure constitutes "life threatening" from the goldfish's perspective. That would probably come under bestiality which is also illegal... WHAT? Since when does eating a goldfish constitute ****ing a goldfish?
P'uck	Posted - 2009.01.05 13:46:00 - [42] Edited by: P''uck on 05/01/2009 13:49:18 I really really cannot understand how anything consensual can be illegal, and as it weirds as it sounds: I'm pretty sure there is consensual bestiality out there each to their friggin own, and ffs, mental liberation is important. edit: and this opens a completely differnent can of worms, like euthanasia for instance. mankind is still lurking around in the friggin dark middle age, and as it seems the brits are doing there best to move backward in time faster than anybody else. I'd like to expel them from europe and sell them to the yanks
vostok Minmatar Shadow of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2009.01.05 13:49:00 - [43] Originally by: kor anon Edited by: kor anon on 05/01/2009 13:43:51 Originally by: vostok Originally by: Stitcher where does it end? there are videos of girls swallowing live goldfish out there fore crying out loud, which I'm pretty sure constitutes "life threatening" from the goldfish's perspective. That would probably come under bestiality which is also illegal... WHAT? Since when does eating a goldfish constitute **ing a goldfish? Wow this is tasteless, but since when does putting a dog in your mouth constitute *ing a dog... But it would probably be down to the context. If it was just a girl eating a goldfish it would just be weird, doing it while naked and then spitting it up onto a guy or something... But then if the fish was dead it would probably just be food so probably ok... - Adaptation is not an excuse for lack of ballance!* -
Sokratesz Rionnag Alba Triumvirate.	Posted - 2009.01.05 13:51:00 - [44] This thread is slowly starting to make me uncomfortable. Wyvern & Chimera fitting flowchart
kor anon Amarr The Tuskers	Posted - 2009.01.05 13:52:00 - [45] Well putting your dogs **** in your mouth is pretty sexual, but putting a whole goldfish in your mouth is different. I think they'd eat a live fish for the lols rather than pleasure, but then agin there are some crazy peeps out there
P'uck	Posted - 2009.01.05 13:55:00 - [46] Edited by: P''uck on 05/01/2009 13:55:34 Anyway, whoever came up with that idea and is supporting it, needs to be e-mailbombed with tubgirl- and goatse-rolls. <( O )> or something.
kor anon Amarr The Tuskers	Posted - 2009.01.05 13:58:00 - [47] Originally by: P'uck Edited by: P''uck on 05/01/2009 13:55:34 Anyway, whoever came up with that idea and is supporting it, needs to be e-mailbombed with tubgirl- and goatse-rolls. <( O )> or something. 2 girls 1 cup or 1 man 1 jar would be better tbh
Malcanis R.E.C.O.N. The Firm.	Posted - 2009.01.05 14:02:00 - [48] Originally by: mercyonman next people in the UK will be complaining that their butts hurt too much from the toilet paper and the gov. will have to protect them. You seem to be under the impression that people here actually want more government oversight
kor anon Amarr The Tuskers	Posted - 2009.01.05 14:04:00 - [49] Originally by: Malcanis Originally by: mercyonman next people in the UK will be complaining that their butts hurt too much from the toilet paper and the gov. will have to protect them. You seem to be under the impression that people here actually want more government oversight No but thats what the goverment thinks unfortunately. The days of common sense are over in the UK, beaurocracy has killed people with initiative
P'uck	Posted - 2009.01.05 14:04:00 - [50] Originally by: Delwoc Next people will be reading the date on posts Last Updated: Tuesday, 30 August 2005, 12:46 GMT 13:46 UK gosh I feel stupid now otoh, OP added a newer link... (which 404's on me, even if i try to manually subsitute the filtered part)

vostok Minmatar Shadow of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2009.01.05 14:14:00 - [51] Originally by: P'uck Originally by: Delwoc Next people will be reading the date on posts Last Updated: Tuesday, 30 August 2005, 12:46 GMT 13:46 UK gosh I feel stupid now otoh, OP added a newer link... (which 404's on me, even if i try to manually subsitute the filtered part) That said there was new legislation last year banning the depiction of children in any sexual act, which includes cartoons and also tighter legislation on violent ***. Here is a nice up to date link - Adaptation is not an excuse for lack of ballance!* -
ouroboros trading Gallente Medics On Fire	Posted - 2009.01.05 14:18:00 - [52] Originally by: kor anon 1 man 1 jar would be better tbh ugh when it shatters....uuuugh 487259? That's Numberwang!
Ivana Drake	Posted - 2009.01.05 14:25:00 - [53] Originally by: Miendo P'hegn Quote: I think at one point they tried to bring in a law where committing "acts of virtual violence" (such as shooting someone in a game) could put you in prison. Source, please. Source
Sniper Wolf18 Gallente A Pretty Pony Princess	Posted - 2009.01.05 14:27:00 - [54] Originally by: kor anon Edited by: kor anon on 05/01/2009 13:43:51 Originally by: vostok Originally by: Stitcher where does it end? there are videos of girls swallowing live goldfish out there fore crying out loud, which I'm pretty sure constitutes "life threatening" from the goldfish's perspective. That would probably come under bestiality which is also illegal... WHAT? Since when does eating a goldfish constitute ****ing a goldfish? Govmnt will say that it was oral seks most likely, which is also illegal. By the way, does it annoy you when you didnt realise that you were reading my sig?
kor anon Amarr The Tuskers	Posted - 2009.01.05 14:28:00 - [55] Originally by: Sniper Wolf18 Originally by: kor anon Edited by: kor anon on 05/01/2009 13:43:51 Originally by: vostok Originally by: Stitcher where does it end? there are videos of girls swallowing live goldfish out there fore crying out loud, which I'm pretty sure constitutes "life threatening" from the goldfish's perspective. That would probably come under bestiality which is also illegal... WHAT? Since when does eating a goldfish constitute ****ing a goldfish? Govmnt will say that it was oral seks most likely, which is also illegal. I eat beef, is that oral sex?
ouroboros trading Gallente Medics On Fire	Posted - 2009.01.05 14:33:00 - [56] if you eat my beef then yes, it would be. 614999? That's Numberwang!
vostok Minmatar Shadow of xXDEATHXx	Posted - 2009.01.05 14:33:00 - [57] Originally by: kor anon I eat beef, is that oral sex? Do you eat beef in a sexual context?! - Adaptation is not* an excuse for lack of ballance!* -
P'uck	Posted - 2009.01.05 14:34:00 - [58] A wise man once said: To Sigmund Freud, breathing in was a form of oral sex.
Sniper Wolf18 Gallente A Pretty Pony Princess	Posted - 2009.01.05 14:34:00 - [59] Originally by: kor anon Originally by: Sniper Wolf18 Govmnt will say that it was oral seks most likely, which is also illegal. I eat beef, is that oral sex? Depends what pert of the cow and if its still alive at the time of being eaten By the way, does it annoy you when you didnt realise that you were reading my sig?
kor anon Amarr The Tuskers	Posted - 2009.01.05 14:38:00 - [60] Originally by: vostok Originally by: kor anon I eat beef, is that oral sex? Do you eat beef in a sexual context?! depends i tend to get munchies afterwards, is there a grace period?



Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.