| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Groingrinder
   |
Posted - 2009.03.22 08:57:00 -
[61]
we need this
|
CommanderData211
|
Posted - 2009.04.08 18:06:00 -
[62]
Needs another bump.
|
MrGarak
|
Posted - 2009.04.14 18:32:00 -
[63]
+1, signed.
When searching for what I want to melt I'd love to be able to throw the items into a seperate 'partition' or 'bin' then just switch to that when I'm ready.
|
Groingrinder
|
Posted - 2009.05.09 21:03:00 -
[64]
I would like to see this happen along with more wallet divisions. Basically, just more tools to separate and organize your stuff.
|
Ismil
|
Posted - 2009.05.10 23:15:00 -
[65]
This is already ingame. -> mark all your containers, rights click, "Open Container" will bring them all up
tip: merge them into one big window with as many tabs as you like [you only need to do this once]
tip2: double click on the window title bar to see only the tabs (esp useful for sorting your loot)
ps: You can buy Station Containers at every Station, just keep in mind that they can't leave the station ;)
|
CommanderData211
|
Posted - 2009.05.12 03:05:00 -
[66]
As I stated before in the post, I'm of the mind that the containers aren't good enough. I do understand that the basic functionality in the end result of what I am looking for is already present with cans, but the truth of the matter is that they are terrible for a whole host of reasons.
Most notable is the fact that they cannot be opened remotely, through the assets pane to be able to peek in and see exactly what is inside. You could set up a contract for the can itself, but that only gives you the base stack of the items in the can and not the amount of each stack. Also there can be nothing done about managing those items remotely either (i.e. contracting and such).
I use cans and it sucks. You have to open them each time, and then if for some reason you have to reinstall the client (but eve never craps out!) then you have to reset the settings on every one that you have because all that info is saved client-side.
Lastly, you can't sell items directly from within a can, which is another pain in the colon.
I would advocate a change for cans as well as an implementation of the item-tabbing idea, but I still think, given that we have a corporation hangar that encoporates this function, it seems only natural that we have divisions in our own personal hangars that follow suit.
This issue had prior support by at least 2 CSM members and I hope that the new guys pick up the torch. Keep the ideas coming though guys, and gals.
|
Keitoshi Yamada
Mjolnir Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.05.12 04:20:00 -
[67]
Edited by: Keitoshi Yamada on 12/05/2009 04:22:32
Supported.
Allow us to make custom tabs.
Maybe we can 'partition' hangar space for each tab.
Allow this for ships, aswell.
This would make Station Containers useless, but you can't search containers in your assets.
Oh, and, if this is implemented... Let tabs show up as expandable trees in the assets window, just like corp divisions.
-EDIT-
For those that will whine about all their organized station containers:
CCP: Turn all Station Containers into tabs of the same name (Tab # if the container isn't named) and automatically reprocess all station containers into ore. :3
-EDIT- |
CommanderData211
|
Posted - 2009.06.08 12:31:00 -
[68]
Bump
|
MJ Maverick
IronPig
Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2009.07.08 08:52:00 -
[69]
110%
--------------------
CCP arse kissing drones are not welcome in my threads. CCP are not perfect. |
Xenon Barinade
Helix Protocol
|
Posted - 2009.07.08 16:42:00 -
[70]
Also make items stack faster in busy areas
|
|
|
Ms Murda
|
Posted - 2009.07.08 16:53:00 -
[71]
Supported
|
Daedalus80
|
Posted - 2009.07.08 21:02:00 -
[72]
supported
We nee the option to sort our stuff and still be able to sell/reprocess it from there. Stationcontainers close down everytime and have that annoying 3 week timer to repackage. Freightcontainers dont take certain items.
So, tabs would be great.
|
Red Raider
Caldari
Airbourne Demons
DeMoN's N AnGeL's
|
Posted - 2009.07.08 21:12:00 -
[73]
WOW! A good idea!
A happy gamer isnt on the forums, they are playing the game unless they have an idea that they honestly think is helping out. |
Groingrinder
|
Posted - 2009.07.17 08:52:00 -
[74]
Bump!
|
mazzilliu
|
Posted - 2009.07.17 14:41:00 -
[75]
containers suck and i hate having to use them
MAZZILLIU 2009. CHANGE I CAN IMPOSE ON YOU. |
Susiqueta Muir
|
Posted - 2009.07.23 12:20:00 -
[76]
I agree with the "market view" approach highlighted earlier as a lot of the code should be in place.
All it would need is the following.
Take the Assets list and use that instead of the Market data.
Allow players to select station, system, region or all as the range.
Replace the market list right click context menu with the standard item R/C Menu. If the item is outside the current station then you would not be able to "fit to active ship", but all the other options (sell, repackage, reprocess etc.) should be available if the player has the relevant skills to do this remotely.
It would enable you to search your items and they would be organised in a standard layout that we are already used to with the Market view.
They could be colour coded to show if they are in the players location (i.e. you need to fit a module and want to see all you have, thereby helping you decide if you need to fly a few jumps for the slightly better one you have tucked away somewhere.
All items, ships and suchlike will be under one consolidated list and this could also be then applied to the corporate assets, showing which station the items are within and helping manage larger organisations.
Even with a 10 player corp, we have so much stuff all over the place it is a large overhead to sort it all out.
possibly have the options to create contracts if you need large amounts of ore picking up and consolidating etc...
SM. |
W3370Pi4
|
Posted - 2009.07.25 20:32:00 -
[77]
_______
Join the "Legit Trading"Channel
*Scam Free Trading Channel* |
Kiri Serrensun
|
Posted - 2009.07.25 22:28:00 -
[78]
 Originally by: Ismil
This is already ingame. -> mark all your containers, rights click, "Open Container" will bring them all up
tip: merge them into one big window with as many tabs as you like [you only need to do this once]
tip2: double click on the window title bar to see only the tabs (esp useful for sorting your loot)
ps: You can buy Station Containers at every Station, just keep in mind that they can't leave the station ;)
Except that you can't search within them via the Assets menu or search function, making remote stuff management painful and you need to reopen all of them manually every time you redock (and remerge the windows if they've playfully decided to seperate themselves).
Supporting this--though I'd settle for Assets working on stuff inside containers.
|
Dierdra Vaal
|
Posted - 2009.07.26 23:56:00 -
[79]
An alternative solution is to make (station) containers transparent to the assets window
Director of Education :: EVE University
Chairman of the CSM
|
CommanderData211
|
Posted - 2009.08.02 00:27:00 -
[80]
I really feel like I need to make something clear.
I believe that the issues involving cans not being properly displayed in the assets window is a valid concern and I an ALL FOR changing that. I think that you should be able to open up containers remotely and do things like make contract for the items within remotely. However, I don't want to see this thread turn into a "How can we fix cans to make them less horrible."
The idea for the item tabs is to have sorting mechanism in place that doesn't involve the hassle of cans at all. Now this is not to say that cans would be obsolete. Quite to the contrary, they would compliment this system perfectly, much like cans in corporate hangar arrays can give more detailed sorting options.
I also would like to clear up the assets window discussion. I want the assets window to compliment the item tabbing idea, not to overtake it. It doesn't make sense to use the assets window for in-station item sorting when we have an item hangar where your items are stored anyway.
I want to see something new with the item hangars. This idea is for sorting in a way that the individual sees fit. I would like to take my PVP gear, my ratting loot, my minerals, my shared gang loot, and anything else you can think of, and sort it in an intuitive and easy way, exactly like what we have in corporate hangars. I just want to extend that functionality to personal hangars and have the individual be able to tag them as they see fit.
I reiterate the fact that I want cans to change, I just want this more.
Thank you to the CSM delegates who have supported this idea and please let me know what CCP has to say about it.
|
|
|
Agent Known
Apotheosis of Virtue
|
Posted - 2009.08.02 07:27:00 -
[81]
Support. I literally have dozens of station containers scattered across the universe because you can't just get rid of them when you move (two week log timeout, go figure), so it gets the Assets window all cluttered.
The existing API does see through containers already, so it shouldn't be hard to implement!
|
Hashin Kyojin
|
Posted - 2009.08.02 08:47:00 -
[82]
please
|
Fille Balle
Ballbreakers R us
|
Posted - 2009.08.26 22:49:00 -
[83]
Ok, I would like as well.
|
Sophie Malaster
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 19:04:00 -
[84]
Supported
________________________________________________
|
Groingrinder
|
Posted - 2009.10.10 21:15:00 -
[85]
bump
|
shuckstar
Hauling hogs
|
Posted - 2009.10.11 01:39:00 -
[86]
You are going to fast! Wait five minutes and try again. |
CommanderData211
|
Posted - 2009.11.21 18:44:00 -
[87]
Resurrected.
|
WheatGrass
Silent but Friendly
|
Posted - 2009.11.22 02:00:00 -
[88]
Edited by: WheatGrass on 22/11/2009 02:02:18
Originally by: Dierdra Vaal
An alternative solution is to make (station) containers transparent to the assets window
I'll take both please. :-)
|
Tirrus Rex
American Gods
Sanctimony of Bellum
|
Posted - 2009.11.23 04:11:00 -
[89]
really like this idea. Woo!
|
Vestus Regula
The Black Dawn Gang
|
Posted - 2009.11.23 20:37:00 -
[90]
Yes, please!
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |