EVE Search - I would just like to point out

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

I would just like to point out

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 3 post(s)
LaVista Vista	Posted - 2009.02.04 09:33:00 - [1] That thy shall no longer wait for the CSM minutes. They are available right here. Please enjoy. There's a lot of good stuff especially on 0.0 and sov mechanics and some good ideas on mining.
Navtiqes Englebarna	Posted - 2009.02.04 09:34:00 - [2] I got here as fast as I could. Thumbs up, guys -_-;

Chribba Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire	Posted - 2009.02.04 09:43:00 - [3] rawr mining! meow no M10.

Pontet Canet Amarr en primeur	Posted - 2009.02.04 09:54:00 - [4] Thumbs up for the TLDR :)
Vaal Erit Science and Trade Institute	Posted - 2009.02.04 10:17:00 - [5] Highlights: -A lot of real poorly thought out 0.0 improving ideas thrown at CCP -Recycled materials = 40% of all the materials in EVE -Skill Queue is being worked on as we speak -"Sorry, nop" on live events The best part by far is when CCP completely OWNS CSM member Ankh about her ridiculously dumb ideas about Factional Warfare. I told you that your ideas were dumb and now you wasted CCPs time having to listen to your useless rabble. God you fail, Ankh.
Omber Zombie	Posted - 2009.02.04 10:52:00 - [6] did i mention i made a movie? ---------------------- My Blog
MotherMoon Huang Yinglong	Posted - 2009.02.04 10:56:00 - [7] Quote: Pattern raised the topic of Environmental effects. Aspects would involve slowing ships down, but the point here would be to use those effects to effect sov through alliances controlling them. This was stated as being slated for being part of EVE in Apocrypha's Wormholes I love you guys :)
LaVista Vista	Posted - 2009.02.04 11:03:00 - [8] Originally by: Omber Zombie did i mention i made a movie? You just had to find the worst picture of me
Omber Zombie	Posted - 2009.02.04 11:08:00 - [9] which one? ---------------------- My Blog
LaVista Vista	Posted - 2009.02.04 11:10:00 - [10] Originally by: Omber Zombie which one? The first one, just after the pictures of Diagoras and Darius

CCP Xhagen	Posted - 2009.02.04 11:44:00 - [11] Applied glue.

Omber Zombie	Posted - 2009.02.04 11:48:00 - [12] ohai Xhagen ---------------------- My Blog
Joss Sparq Caldari ANZAC ALLIANCE Southern Cross Alliance	Posted - 2009.02.04 11:50:00 - [13] NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOUR STUPID COUNCIL. - just kidding, I've been reading the notes for the last twenty minutes or so. Good stuff, I found myself nodding my head/frowning on a regular basis and might post some comments later.
LaVista Vista	Posted - 2009.02.04 11:50:00 - [14] Changed op to reflect the newest dev-blog on the long-awaited skill-queue. I hope that everybody is happy about the outcome of the skill-queue issue. We raised this during the first CSM which has now made it's way into a major expansion. I think that's a nice result
SentryRaven KIA Corp	Posted - 2009.02.04 12:59:00 - [15] I agree, the sov discussion and 0.0 stuff is hot air, or vaporware. You are throwing around multiple ideas that have no coherence. But I'll give it another read, just to make sure I haven't missed stuff...
Jack Gilligan Dragon's Rage Ethereal Dawn	Posted - 2009.02.04 13:04:00 - [16] The CSM is probably the only "legislative" body less productive than the United States Congress.
Joss Sparq Caldari ANZAC ALLIANCE Southern Cross Alliance	Posted - 2009.02.04 13:32:00 - [17] Edited by: Joss Sparq on 04/02/2009 13:34:40 TL;DR crowd: Why are my opinions important enough to publish? I don't know, but I'm still publishing them. Friday 16th January 2009 I. Incentivizing 0.0 & Environmental Effects Comments: the "Pendulum" actually reminds me very much of the system being employed in Warhammer Online right now (represent Ironclaw Destruction?) where certain activities (Public Quests, Realm v.s. Realm combat, etc) accrue points that result in certain benefits being unlocked for the Realm with the "Pendulum" swinging in their favor. I generally like this system in WO so I hope it could work here in some capacity. However I don't quite see how/why sov should affect what moon materials are generated. For example, why should my Atmospheric Gases Moon magically turn into a Dysprosium Moon because I have a higher sov and then return to being an Atmospheric Gases pumpkin again when the server dings after my sov goes down? There is a lot of different ideas to process here however so I won't go any further for now. II. General Discussion on Mining Comments: Call me odd, but I like the current mining mechanics: Go to belt, pick rock, lock rock, mine rock. That isn't to say there is no room for improvement. There does need to be more incentives for miners to move out of high security space. At the same time the system could use some spicing up and it really does need a boost in profit v.s. missions, in my reasoned opinion. However, I don't know what to think of ninja mining. Without any details it sounds more like warping in, managing your HP while mining for however long you can, then warping out again possibly to rinse/repeat. Hardly inspiring. III. Skill Training Queue mk2 Comments: DO IT! I should be able to play when I want to play and not feel forced to login by the game developer or feel bad when Real Life ruins all my carefully orchestrated login and skill change plans, the fact that I was is still silly. I won't comment on the Dev Blog directly as I might make a few comments too pointed, suffice to say: about **ing time already, guys! I think the 24hrs should be 3 days, but whatever. IV. Live Events Comments: I do miss these. I didn't get to do many due to time zone differences but the ones I got to take part in I greatly enjoyed. Personally I'd like to see them return but it isn't really practical I guess. V. Drone Improvements & Drone Protocols Comments: drones are an area of improvement. Tech II drone modules, drone implants and yes, disconnection issues and drone control. VI. (1)R&D Job Security, (2)Addition of ôView Contractsö to Context Menu, (3)UI Import/Export Overview Settings, (4)UI New Context Menu Comments: (3) is my main area of concern, it can be a real pain to get everything setup just right only to lose it all and have to start again with settings. VII. Regular Revisit of Pre-Nerfed Features Comments: lol @ the poor Black Ops. Your time will come Soon(tm). VIII. Unanchoring Abandoned/Offline POS High/Low Security: Dead Corp: Unanchor on next DT after corp goes dead. Allow players to scoop or just delete the POS. No fuel: Unanchor after 1 month. Allow players to scoop. 0.0 Security: Dead Corp: Unanchor on next DT after corp goes dead. Allow players to scoop or just delete the POS. No fuel: Unanchor after 1 month. Allow players to scoop. You snooze, you lose! IX. Colonies Comments: Interesting. Maybe turn the "happiness factor" into an ISK sink, then offset that by a successful colony churing out some products. X. Factional Warfare û Focus & Goals Comments: Not my area of expertise at all but it does seem a game feature which has been a little orphaned. Perhaps attache VP to LP will be a good start. XII. Modifiable Corporation Orders** Comments: Who should pay? The corporation. Implement? I have no idea. Good luck, Team CCP! - Last few entries are mostly TL;DR so I'll skip along to,
Joss Sparq Caldari ANZAC ALLIANCE Southern Cross Alliance	Posted - 2009.02.04 13:33:00 - [18] Saturday 17th January 2009 I. Mission Monopoly On StandingComments: Standings seem like one of if not the biggest boon of mission running and a big part of why mission running usually leaves mining way behind it in time v.s. value. Heaps of stuff is tied to Standings which gives missions a hell of a lot of pulling power v.s. other professions. II. Ghost Training Comments: horrible implementation was horrible. I was surprised SP was killed but RP wasn't. Seemed strange. I'm not too fussed about the production. May as well kill RP, if only to hear their anguished cries. III. Display Account Expiration Date On Character Selection Screen Comments: lol @ technical difficulties, glad to see it is being looked into. **ing annoying as hell to be in the middle of a scrap in 0.0 only to be kicked out of the game without warning. IV. Contract API Comments: could prove interesting for some and downright almighty for others. V. Grouping of Non-Weapon Systems Comments: Another case of DO IT! It felt half implemented being limited to just weapons. VI. Smartbomb Overhaul Comments: Ideas on the linked wiki page are interesting. Never thought much about it before. will chew on these some more. VII. Marks Against Account Comments: It would be useful for many people to know these things at a glance. VIII. Item Database Updates & Database Exports** Comments: Evelopedia is delicious. IX. Bookmark My Ship Comments: Hurray! X. Suicide Ganking Part 2 Comments: I'm recalling a thread about this recently on GD. Therefore I "lol". Nothing further to add. XI. Events & Gathering Forums being merged Ugh, lotteries. ... All in all, the minutes were very interesting reading and I'm happy to see some progress on several fronts. I may not agree with the priority given to some things but I certainly can't say it is wholly unsatisfactory. P.S. if you ask them nicely will they let you swim in the fish tank?
Cors It's A Trap	Posted - 2009.02.04 13:46:00 - [19] I loved the talk on 0.0 sov. And how to get 0.0 more populated. It's quite simple. People stay in empire because it's "Safe"er. So make is so that major alliance's can make 0.0 "safe"er. Setup a system that ties in with the SOV system. Make Sov 5. Sov 5 is directly tied to the systems NEXT to it. If one of the systems next to a sov 5 System get taken, the sov 5 system devolves to a sov 4 system. In the Sov 5 system, only those who are +10 to the alliance can enter. This will create pockets of "safe" space in 0.0. this will pull the industiralists out of empire to mine/build in those systems. If it's a system with an NPC mission agent, it'll help pull folks from emipre to run missions. This will also allow 0.0 alliance's to create sov 5 systems at strategic choke points to block off their space. This is a GOOD thing, as this will give a focus for PVP. The Sov 4 systems surrounding the Sov 5 systems will become targets for alliance's. This will give 0.0 alliance's a potential way to introduce 0.0 life to carebears slowly. People carebear in high sec due to the safety. Give a similar safety in 0.0 in small numbers, and you'll give folks a reason to leave high sec. In the long term, as more and more systems are made into Sov 5 systems, we'll see more and more pvp takeing place in the Sov 1/2/3 systems. Combat fronts will appear where pvp will be focused. These fronts will focus pvp into smaller areas, with tighter target density.
Abrazzar	Posted - 2009.02.04 13:56:00 - [20] I prefer Devblogs. At least those have substance and are not talking about things that may or may not, partly, completely or not at all in the same, similar or different shape as discussed some day, eventually maybe or never come on the live server.
Kayosoni Caldari Arcane Technologies The Five	Posted - 2009.02.04 13:56:00 - [21] Meeting seems to have lacked much substance besides talking about sov mechanic.
Malcanis R.E.C.O.N.	Posted - 2009.02.04 14:11:00 - [22] Originally by: Cors I loved the talk on 0.0 sov. And how to get 0.0 more populated. It's quite simple. People stay in empire because it's "Safe"er. So make is so that major alliance's can make 0.0 "safe"er. Setup a system that ties in with the SOV system. Make Sov 5. Sov 5 is directly tied to the systems NEXT to it. If one of the systems next to a sov 5 System get taken, the sov 5 system devolves to a sov 4 system. In the Sov 5 system, only those who are +10 to the alliance can enter. This will create pockets of "safe" space in 0.0. this will pull the industiralists out of empire to mine/build in those systems. If it's a system with an NPC mission agent, it'll help pull folks from emipre to run missions. This will also allow 0.0 alliance's to create sov 5 systems at strategic choke points to block off their space. This is a GOOD thing, as this will give a focus for PVP. The Sov 4 systems surrounding the Sov 5 systems will become targets for alliance's. This will give 0.0 alliance's a potential way to introduce 0.0 life to carebears slowly. People carebear in high sec due to the safety. Give a similar safety in 0.0 in small numbers, and you'll give folks a reason to leave high sec. In the long term, as more and more systems are made into Sov 5 systems, we'll see more and more pvp takeing place in the Sov 1/2/3 systems. Combat fronts will appear where pvp will be focused. These fronts will focus pvp into smaller areas, with tighter target density. That's a truly dreadful idea. Giving alliances the ability to lock the rest of eve out of whole systems would be awful for the game. Destructible gate guns or whatever: fine. Flat out closing off a system: HELL NO.
Thargat Caldari North Star Networks Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2009.02.04 16:23:00 - [23] Originally by: Omber Zombie did i mention i made a movie? That video was awesome, but it was faster than a pre nerf vagabond, I can barely read that fast.
Omarvelous Destry's Lounge	Posted - 2009.02.04 16:45:00 - [24] Originally by: Cors In the Sov 5 system, only those who are +10 to the alliance can enter. This will create pockets of "safe" space in 0.0. I'd rather have a dangerous low populated area than this awful awful idea. Seriously - blocking off access to accommodate carebears?! Keep them in high sec. Use financial rewards to lure pople out of safety - not blocking off access.
Thargat Caldari North Star Networks Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2009.02.04 16:53:00 - [25] Originally by: Omarvelous Originally by: Cors In the Sov 5 system, only those who are +10 to the alliance can enter. This will create pockets of "safe" space in 0.0. I'd rather have a dangerous low populated area than this awful awful idea. Seriously - blocking off access to accommodate carebears?! Keep them in high sec. Use financial rewards to lure pople out of safety - not blocking off access. This better? http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=986402 Breathing 0.0
Kayosoni Caldari Arcane Technologies The Five	Posted - 2009.02.04 18:48:00 - [26] Originally by: Thargat Originally by: Omber Zombie did i mention i made a movie? That video was awesome, but it was faster than a pre nerf vagabond, I can barely read that fast. Actually I really like the idea of of controlling gates with a regional sov system. You get something of real substance for laying claim to some space so intently. Personally I think using gates as KoTH control points is what should contribute to Sov. ---
Smog890 Minmatar Knights Of the Black Sun	Posted - 2009.02.04 19:27:00 - [27] You did not bring up this topic http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=975896 I did a quick search for it but nothing on faction warfare!!!
Pottsey Enheduanni Foundation	Posted - 2009.02.04 20:47:00 - [28] Why do CCP keep trying to get PvE people into PvP or into 0.0. The very nature of PvE people means they mostly don't want to do PvP or move to 0.0. FW failed as the PvE people mostly don't want to be shot at by other players so they don't do the FW missions. The PvP don't want to PvE so they don't do the missions. There needs to be content just for the PvE people and just for the PvP people.
Kazzac Elentria	Posted - 2009.02.04 20:49:00 - [29] Originally by: Pottsey Why do CCP keep trying to get PvE people into PvP or into 0.0. The very nature of PvE people means they mostly don't want to do PvP or move to 0.0. FW failed as the PvE people mostly don't want to be shot at by other players so they don't do the FW missions. The PvP don't want to PvE so they don't do the missions. There needs to be content just for the PvE people and just for the PvP people. Because this is a PvP game, period. You can and should be able to be killed anywhere at anytime for any reason given sufficient planning and force for your attacker. Sorta makes this game unique among the other MMOs
Pottsey Enheduanni Foundation	Posted - 2009.02.04 21:44:00 - [30] Kazzac Elentria said " Because this is a PvP game, period." It is not a PvP game period. It's a PvP and a PvE game. Many people play it as a PvE only game and lots of the content is clearly PvE. Eve is by no means unique among other MMO's. PvE to Eve is just as important as PvP. Tryingf to force all the PvE people into PvP is just going hurt Eve. For Eve to survive it needs a balance between PvP and PvE.

Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.