EVE Search - Posts by Ephemeron

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 581-600 of 3735 for by author Ephemeron (0,80 seconds)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
581. [Proposal] Alt Posting - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Hirana Yoshida Originally by: Tres Farmer Wait for the new forums..... Hope springs eternal Would love a personal block tool like the monkey-whatchamacallit script for Firefox. Originally by: Ephemeron .... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.29 19:42:00
582. [Proposal] Alt Posting - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Since that measure has no chance of passing. How about some kind of user rating system, which can be positive and negative. People who are known and post good stuff would have positive rating. They'd be taking more seriously. Some lame ass alts th... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.29 19:22:00
583. Nightmare pvp - in Ships and Modules [original thread] It's no longer viable to PvP with that in 0.0, unless you are willing to be extremely careful, in which case you would have less action than you would flying regular t1 bs. And if you can get less kills with faction bs than with regular bs, it kin... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.29 19:16:00
584. WE ARE FEED UP!!!! TIME TO MAKE SOME NOISE ABOUT RMT AND BOTTING!!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] If CCP were hardcore enough they could organize and secretly fund Anonymous type group and use it to attack the known RMT IPs, for both clients and websites. CCP got all the right things to make it happen - inside information, money, and 300,000 ... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.29 19:03:00
585. Bounty Licence for High Sec - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] This can be pretty interesting. Tho I'd add limitation that a person with bounty cannot become a valid target for 24 hours since receiving the bounty. And if the bounty is removed within 24 hour period, regaining bounty warrants another 24 hour pe... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.29 01:38:00
586. Removing Local. - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Originally by: DrDooma If you think this will somehow make PVP better, you are mistaking. You will spend most of your time warping around empty systems looking for something to shoot. Believe it or not but that's how I spend most of my t... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.29 01:29:00
587. [Proposal] Insurance De-nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Reaver Glitterstim I think we need to train people how to take out a supercap. Maybe they'll stop whining about nerfing them. That's a great idea, please post instructions in Warfare & Tactics forum It'd be nice if the in... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.29 01:06:00
588. Removing Local. - in Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread] Local nerf is inevitable - if and only if CCP still got a hardcore bone in their carebear body. It is the most logical thing to do for taking the game to new level, making the game fresh again. Time is against us tho, CCP keep getting softer, mo... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.29 00:10:00
589. easy fix for battlecruisers and their effect on battleships, cruisers - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Zilberfrid Not supported. Rig prices are not balanced across their types, this would mean some BC's would be punished more then others. These would be the harbi and the myrm, hardly the worst in the bunch. I recognize the... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.28 23:54:00
590. Fraction ships rebalans (dramiel nerf) - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Originally by: Suitonia Originally by: Ephemeron making it cost around 150 mil solves the problem without nerfing the fun This won't fix the problem, it only escalates it. Since the only reasonable counter to the Dramiel, is th... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.28 23:29:00
591. "a battleship is not meant to be a solo pwnmobile" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Quote: Every MMO has its blobs, its just eve has bigger ones. Rather than demand CCP find an impossible fix people need to just accept it and adapt. It WAS possible before The Great Nano Nerf. Make no mistake about that. We aren't talking ... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.28 19:21:00
592. Fraction ships rebalans (dramiel nerf) - in Assembly Hall [original thread] making it cost around 150 mil solves the problem without nerfing the fun - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.28 19:10:00
593. easy fix for battlecruisers and their effect on battleships, cruisers - in Assembly Hall [original thread] BC performance/cost ratio is too high. That's a fact And I'm willing to bet it might be the best ratio for all ships in EVE, t2, t3, everything. Nothing gives as much bang for the buck. - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.28 05:41:00
594. [Proposal] Insurance De-nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread] Quote: That would work essentially it would level the playing field and all pvp would be more risky. Unfortunately it would lead to an even larger proliferation in BC's as they are the best ship for reasonable cost. I have a reasonable fix... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.28 05:37:00
595. Nonconsensual Ganked Tribal Tempest >:( - in Test Server Feedback [original thread] Edited by: Ephemeron on 28/12/2010 02:53:23 Originally by: Omara Otawan Originally by: Ephemeron that kill is worth getting banned for. Any self respecting PvPer would have done the same thing. Maybe I just didnt pick up th... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.28 02:49:00
596. "a battleship is not meant to be a solo pwnmobile" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Space Pinata Solo is at a huge disadvantage, moreso than the stacking of DPS/EHP. It's really a double whammy. Solo PVPers can still make a difference, though. See all the afk-cloaker whines. A good group of skirmishers ... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.28 02:36:00
597. "a battleship is not meant to be a solo pwnmobile" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] just want to point out that battleship used to be very effective at solo before The Great Nano Nerf. Hell, there were quite a few people going solo to 0.0 with Machariels - 1.5 billion ships completely unescorted. Nowadays if you see a Mach you k... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.28 02:30:00
598. [Proposal] Insurance De-nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread] How about we just remove insurance system completely for anything bigger than a t1 cruiser? that would be a step in the right direction. That way supercap pilots wouldn't feel disadvantaged. - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.28 02:10:00
599. "a battleship is not meant to be a solo pwnmobile" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] It wouldn't be such a bad idea to put stacking penalty on RR, just like there's stacking penalty on all other buffs. And it kinda makes sense from realistic point of view - you can't expect to repair a ship in space during combat at 10x rate just... - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.28 01:24:00
600. "a battleship is not meant to be a solo pwnmobile" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Space Pinata, of course larger numbers > smaller numbers But we can influence rate of increase of power vs number of ships. It can be linear, it can be quadratic, it can be cubic. Existence of RR makes the rate geometric. - by Ephemeron - at 2010.12.28 00:55:00
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.