| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. CCP IN CHARGE OF GAME BALANCE - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Roime wrote: PotatoOverdose wrote: Saying "My nanocane does 700dps, EFT says so" is no less tarded than saying: "My Mael has a cap stable 5k dps tank, EFT says so" ....or saying: "the mael has 800 dps and will kill dem nanocanes before t...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.06.03 02:09:00
|
2. Reactive armor hardener? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Jorma Morkkis wrote: Cyc Lilith wrote: i meant special in PvP when ur not often have capstable ships or get neuted. If you try to be capstable in pvp you're doing it wrong. If you get neuted all, I repeat all, active tanks shut down. Actu...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.06.02 23:58:00
|
3. First 25 Run Reactive Armor Hardener BPC? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Lustralis wrote: Anya Ohaya wrote: Are there any stats on how it actually functions, how it stacks with other modules etc? The item info doesn't help. If it outperforms a t2 active hardener everyone will want one, and mission runners think ...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.05.25 00:20:00
|
4. Dreads.. so what use are they now ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: He was saying that a Carrier can't tank a single dread with the type of support fleet that's likely fielded by someone who only drops one dread. This is a pair of dreads, 4 supers, and the kind of support fleet that's likely ...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.05.25 00:13:00
|
5. Anti-Archon Cheap Solution. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Pink Marshmellow wrote: Tracking Dreads lol. Unlike a titan, dreads can't hit **** without subcapital support. I'd be more worried about the support fleet than the dread. ... Tracking penalty to sieges has been removed.... .... Dreads tra...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.05.24 23:17:00
|
6. Punisher - Heavy tackler - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Maeltstome wrote: Gibbo3771 wrote: I love how you say your posting fits here to help noobs when you seem to think a nos empty's an opponents cap. Cap heavy builds make your won cap % go down, making nos effective at lower your opponents c...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.05.24 20:34:00
|
7. Target Spectrum Breaker? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Sradoc wrote: I tested my theory (anti site gank) in a null sec site, and had a buddy of mine warp in as if he was going to tackle me for a red fleet. Did it 5 times, and I had a 0% success rate at getting out of there 'alive'. And, actually a...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.05.24 20:06:00
|
8. If tracking disruptors are going to increase missile explosion radius, then... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Exploited Engineer wrote: Darius Brinn wrote: -Use no cap. -Have selectable damage profiles. -Never miss. -Transversal becomes almost irrelevant and you always get hit for some (or much) damage. -And, until now, they were not affected by one...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.05.24 19:47:00
|
9. Dreads.. so what use are they now ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: Lin-Young Borovskova wrote: ELECTR0FREAK wrote: Dreads really should be an anti-capital weapon... it's a shame they're not very effective at it. Granted, it's been a while since I got rid of my Revelation, but it's kinda...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.05.23 23:37:00
|
10. Gankers upset about carebear whining... - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Vera Algaert wrote: how is a gank "safe" if you are guaranteed to lose your ship in it? It is "safe" because, outside of getting an optimal warp in on your target, there is no threat. You do not have to worry about jumping into a gate camp, ...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.05.23 21:38:00
|
11. Looks like we're winning the war: Highsec mining drops by HALF! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James 315 wrote: Hammer Crendraven wrote: James 315 can not even stop mining in one belt much less one solar system or entire eve. As for hulkageddon it did not even kill 2% of the miner fleet. ...is what you'd be able to get away with sayi...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.05.23 03:18:00
|
12. The end is Nigh! Making more mining hisec ores in Covetor than ratting in nul! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andreus Ixiris wrote: And thus it comes full circle, as I confidently predicted it would. Null-sec pilots are displeased about the relative safety and profitability of the mining profession. Instead of whining, they instigate a large series of ...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.05.22 22:51:00
|
13. Passive vs. Active tanking.... your thoughts? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Active tanking will always be subservient to passive tanking for two simple reasons, alpha and logistics. Take an ideal fight for example, your tanked dps boats are within their optimal of the opposing fleet, and your logistics are (hopefully) "b...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.05.15 04:06:00
|
14. GMs - Please weigh in on the boomerang maneuver. Exploit (y/n)? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
CoLe Blackblood wrote: The fact that you brought a real life occurence of running from the police into your argument and then related it to this make believe game is laughable at best. Why the F should an internet space game correlate to real...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.05.09 03:46:00
|
15. Lasers, do they suck ****? Are they in the same category as blasters before the... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Kumi Mashiba wrote: Edward Longshanx wrote: Damage. Type. Sucks. 100% agree. It's absolute bullshit that I can't break the tank on a single rep wolf/jag in a 200dps (scorch) retribution. 90% / 80% innate em/thermal resists is bullshit an...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.05.09 03:06:00
|
16. Missile ships...We have come full circle and... - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Ishanmae wrote: Jack Miton wrote: I love the fact that youre complaining about a weapon system that is used by the 2 MOST popular ships in EVE (Tengu and Drake). Really gives me the impression that you have done your research... Bottom line...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.05.03 18:33:00
|
17. @CCP - breach of national laws - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
highonpop wrote: 1 - We are not all in Germany 2 - Germany's legal precedents don't hold any water on the international scope 3 - This is not even a legal issue because you signed away those privacy rights when you accepted the EULA /endt...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.05.01 22:05:00
|
18. War dec's costs likely outcome, high sec super alliance. - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Herping yourDerp wrote: Mechael wrote: Robbie Robot wrote: They have little to gain by fighting back This right here is the root problem that needs to be solved. not worth fighting in highsec wars.. the people who dec you just want ...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.04.09 05:50:00
|
19. GMs - Please weigh in on the boomerang maneuver. Exploit (y/n)? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
CoLe Blackblood wrote: I wouldn't ever use the Boomerang and only just heard of it, but I think calling it an exploit is a load of bull. What is the point of having concord modeled as an entity, with ships, reaction times, even an in-game perso...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.04.09 02:41:00
|
20. Dear CCP Soundwave: RE: income adjustment - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So thinking about what Tyberius Franklin is saying; the problem with the system is too much ISK remaining in the system. The system essentially relies on transaction tax/brokers fees to reduce the ISK, lets face it, most other sinks can be avoided...
- by Cunanium - at 2012.03.31 04:47:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |