| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
161. The 0.0 Experiment - Warning: Thrilling Content....... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bump Can I Have Your Stuff? Originally by: Morlar Eve can be like an onion
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.13 13:40:00
|
162. Shield Compensation - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
That doesn't make sense because in the description of the 4 compensation skills it says that: Active hardeners gain 3% per level when module is off Passive hardeners gain 5% per level. Because that would be insane Can I Have Your Stuff? ...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.10 20:44:00
|
163. Shield Compensation - in Skill Discussions [original thread]
Is an invul field affected by the shield compensation skills? If yes, is it classed as active or passive? Can I Have Your Stuff? Originally by: Sakura Nihil Just wanted to make sure the guy didn't turn into floating goo due to our mista...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.10 20:30:00
|
164. Cerberus Setup - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: DiuxDium My HML's go 100~ KM's Missile speed on my caracal is 7312 m/s and quickfit has the cerb as the same (not T2 missiles) And it lists max flight time as 19.2 seconds. Can I Have Your Stuff? Originally by...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.10 20:08:00
|
165. Cerberus Setup - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: DiuxDium I've never fired a missile from 120km's out and hit my target. It's either dead, or warped out by the time they get there. If your opponents are dumb enough to stand there and get hit, more power to you. Buy what ...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.10 19:09:00
|
166. Cerberus Setup - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: DiuxDium Edited by: DiuxDium on 10/12/2006 18:45:07 For PvP 7x HML 1x Med nos 1x 20km Scram 1x Web 1x AB II \ MWD 1x LSE 2x Invul 2x BCU 2x PDU Drake > Cerberus Minimal DPS increase with the cerby, it's far outw...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.10 18:48:00
|
167. Cerberus Setup - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I have looked about and the only thread on Cerberus setups I can find is from 2005. Im just looking for feedback on my planned setup, and other peoples setups. This is a setup designed to use the missiles long range abilities to keep out of the...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.10 18:38:00
|
168. A collection of a few well known suggestions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Venkul Mul You see, while the variable quality for agents can be a good idea , and the smuggling too, the main problem is perfectly sumarized in you phrase: Originally by: Daravel The main effect is that there is no...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.08 20:06:00
|
169. A collection of a few well known suggestions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yeah, I saw that thread as well. I just always saw low-sec as pvp for non-alliance people and a richer playground for everyone else. For some reason, no one thinks it is rich enough, because there is no one there, at least in my experience. The ...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.08 19:36:00
|
170. A collection of a few well known suggestions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I don't see why people would quit. If say 50% are moved to low-sec with increased rewards and increased risk (the scan probe situation is being adressed), then everyone has the choice. There is little discussion of the other ideas, everyone is ...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.08 15:52:00
|
171. A collection of a few well known suggestions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I would run level 4 missions in low-sec if it meant I would get a much larger reward. I also think that other players who dont want a longer grind for isk would also do missions out there. I know that it won't cause a mass change, but it should c...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.08 12:49:00
|
172. A collection of a few well known suggestions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Frug Quote: move most level 4 missions (all + Quality agents at least) to low-sec systems. Increase the rewards to be gained from these mission. There was a much better suggestion to deal with this problem in gener...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.08 12:32:00
|
173. A collection of a few well known suggestions - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Daravel on 08/12/2006 12:22:10 - This is not a whine. - Many, if not all the ideas here have been mentioned before, but I am putting them all together in hope that the Dev's will read and seriously look at the ideas. Currently in ...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.08 12:21:00
|
174. Looted Wrecks - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Theres a post below about differentiating between looted and un-looted wrecks, and I have my own idea on this and decided to post another thread, as opposed to having it lost at the bottom of the other thread. Simply, It's an overview option, you...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.02 11:48:00
|
175. Help with Eagle fitting - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Kazaam First thing that come up to my mind is, you don't want your HAC to appear like a BS on the radar, so drop your MWD and take an AB T2 instead, since with its double range bonus, you won't need all that speed boost amou...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.01 12:29:00
|
176. Help with Eagle fitting - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Kamikaaazi 4x 250mm II, 2 heavy/assault II 3 sensor II, 2 tracking comp II 3 mag stab II, 1 tracking II Thats a looooong range setup. Iv'e already read that in a post. Main problem I see with that is if any MWD'ing ship...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.01 12:25:00
|
177. Help with Eagle fitting - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Im am looking at getting an Eagle in the near future and using it for small/large gang pvp. I am preferring to take advantage of the high resits to give it a mean tank using the med slots, and using the lo's to work on the range and pitiful damag...
- by Daravel - at 2006.12.01 12:15:00
|
178. A Newb Mistake... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Shadow Ballet Originally by: Jin Jemai Don't fly what you cannot afford to lose! This should be a compulsory message for all pilots upon their first undock attempt. Its a system message saying "Can you affor...
- by Daravel - at 2006.11.26 13:38:00
|
179. The 0.0 Experiment - Warning: Thrilling Content....... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
BUMPY BUMPY BUMPY BUMPY BUMPY BUMPY Bump? Can I Have Your Stuff? Originally by: Sakura Nihil Just wanted to make sure the guy didn't turn into floating goo due to our mistake No Pink here...
- by Daravel - at 2006.11.13 00:42:00
|
180. Nerf Caldari ... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nerf Jenny? Can I Have Your Stuff? Originally by: Sakura Nihil Just wanted to make sure the guy didn't turn into floating goo due to our mistake No Pink here...
- by Daravel - at 2006.11.13 00:35:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |