| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Supercapital event feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I finally got in after several hours in queue only to get ganked immediately outside of station several times and then when I was able to warp off to two different FFA's my Titan was dead within 30secs. Fighting outside station was ridiculous unti...
- by DiseL - at 2009.10.11 06:27:00
|
2. ECM Ship II - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: isdisco3 This 'nerf' is a major boost for falcons in small-gang warfare. I have already been in a fight where a falcon perma-jammed 2 other recons and a hac for about 3-4 minutes, even with one recon being at 80k. So yeah, ...
- by DiseL - at 2009.04.18 01:46:00
|
3. ECM Ship II - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Logic obviously has went out the window. Why reduce the Falcon drone bay down to 10m3 after starting out giving it 25m3? A close range brawler gets 10m3 while the long range sniper gets 25m3. Do you honestly expect 10m3 to be useful in a close ran...
- by DiseL - at 2009.04.15 02:25:00
|
4. ECM Ship II - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: isdisco3 My hictor example was solely to illustrate a point, which was to show that making the falcon come in from 180 to 80 won't diminish its ability to permajam multiple ships pretty much at will. i continue to argue tha...
- by DiseL - at 2009.04.09 19:36:00
|
5. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: DiseL on 06/04/2009 14:54:33 Originally by: CCP Chronotis Originally by: Thenoran Originally by: CCP Chronotis Hey Folks, Quick update on what we are looking at testing: - increase of bomb velocity to 2000...
- by DiseL - at 2009.04.06 14:54:00
|
6. ECM Ship II - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: isdisco3 Edited by: isdisco3 on 03/04/2009 18:50:19 These changes are not enough, not nearly. All you're saying is that falcons will have to move from 200km to 100 (minimum, as you said its w/out SDA's or rigs), and they...
- by DiseL - at 2009.04.04 00:26:00
|
7. ECM Ship II - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The comparisons to the Curse/Pilgrim combo just doesn't fly. The Pilgrim is my favorite solo ship. It has 5 lows, 5 mids, and 4 highs. One ewar type in the highs, one in the mids, and a full five low slot tank. <----- This all while being able ...
- by DiseL - at 2009.04.03 18:32:00
|
8. ECM Ship II - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I must say these changes are disappointing to say the least! A Falcon with 3 SDA II's, 2 Particle Dispersion Projectors, and max skills gives a 74km optimal and 53km falloff. Pathetic at best. The same current setup yields 190km optimal and 33km f...
- by DiseL - at 2009.04.03 03:11:00
|
9. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: DiseL on 02/04/2009 16:50:28 BTW, we may not all agree with these bomber changes but I must admit this is the most interaction (Falcon thread also) I have ever seen by ccp regarding a game change. This is the first time I have felt ...
- by DiseL - at 2009.04.02 16:50:00
|
10. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I agree about the cloak. I would love to see the ability to fit non-covert ops cloak with the zero targetting delay/zero recloak delay as it is now. Tie the 30sec recloak timer to the cov-ops only. The new torps changes are much better than the fi...
- by DiseL - at 2009.04.02 16:44:00
|
11. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: DiseL on 01/04/2009 18:30:28 Originally by: Seishomaru Learn properly the new game mechanics and discover that QR was a huge BOOST to missiles. Just get a ceptor put 10 people with 2 TP each on the ceptor and throw 1 rage to...
- by DiseL - at 2009.04.01 18:29:00
|
12. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I was not impressed at all with the current bomber setup in the above post on the test server. This is a ship that quite a few lower skill point players step into and the extremely short range of Torps without max missile skills are going to see m...
- by DiseL - at 2009.04.01 04:41:00
|
13. cald imbalance ? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Mass'a Whipcracka im not against making EW more fair and giving it a more propper role, i am however against one race getting constructive improvements while the other 3 get the shaft, so either nerf EW, or be ready to help ...
- by DiseL - at 2009.03.31 19:04:00
|
14. ECM Ships - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
First of all the comparisons to other recons should stop. Just because they are all in the recon group does not mean they should all be the same. Why do people keep using the phrase "solo Falcon"? When has anyone ever seen a Falcon solo anything i...
- by DiseL - at 2009.03.25 20:11:00
|
15. Stealth Bombers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Polinus Originally by: DiseL I do not see this being viable if it is limited to Torpedo use only. The only time this would be effective is against a solo BS or BC or possibly a pair. How often do you see this? If the...
- by DiseL - at 2009.03.25 01:22:00
|
16. Stealth Bombers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I do not see this being viable if it is limited to Torpedo use only. The only time this would be effective is against a solo BS or BC or possibly a pair. How often do you see this? If there is any support the bombers are toast or at best get off o...
- by DiseL - at 2009.03.25 01:03:00
|
17. ECM Ships - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
How many times can CCP nerf/buff a single item before figuring out they should have left it alone in the first place. A Falcon will be absolutely toast now unless you can guarantee jamming the entire hostile fleet. Even then fast ships with drones...
- by DiseL - at 2009.03.24 23:03:00
|
18. Thoughts on Transports and Blockade Runners - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I like the ideas for the buff but a little shocked there was no mention of the Crane getting a powergrid increase to make it viable.
- by DiseL - at 2008.10.31 04:16:00
|
19. NERF FALCONS! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Fly a Falcon for awhile and you will learn real quick how to counter them. Two damps on a Falcon and it's useless. Missing one cycle on a good sniper fit BS and the Falcon either dies or warps out. Get a drone boat near a Falcon and ECM becomes ir...
- by DiseL - at 2008.08.04 04:16:00
|
20. Fix scanresolution-penalty on stealthbombers and blackops - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Give it some time. In two or three years it will be fixed. To many other important things to do like kill another race of recons, gimp the dictors, do a 180 on ECM and buff the ships to counter the ECM nerf from two years ago.
- by DiseL - at 2007.11.11 05:55:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |