| Pages: [1] |
1. There will never be a CSM representative for highsec.. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Reason there are so few highsec CSM delegates (and now likely there won't be any, because CSM is too important to 00 people to allow loss of a single seat) is that there aren't any thousands strong monolithic blocks of players. So even if there ar...
- by Dztrgovac - at 2012.02.07 11:15:00
|
2. WHY the majority doesn't vote for CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nope OP, mostly its just because people don't have a clue who the candidate is and volume of homework needed to check if that "3rd party highsec carebear candidate" isn't actually jita or transport alt of a -10 "uberleetpvper who feed on tears". (...
- by Dztrgovac - at 2012.01.31 08:14:00
|
3. Current population balance between areas? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Its actually much better for your side of view than one in last published QEN. (Q4 2010). That one had 80% highsec, 6% lowsec and 13% nullsec. Dunno where WH space fitted in that tally. No worries, just convince CCP to pretty much remove all high...
- by Dztrgovac - at 2012.01.31 08:09:00
|
4. Sticky:Incursion fixes/feedback thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Demonfuge Malevolent wrote: Get CONCORD involved. Seriously. The one thing that confused the bejeezles out of newer players is why CONCORD acts like sansha are its greatest pals. Maybe make incursion systems have no CONCORD (the sansha got 'em)...
- by Dztrgovac - at 2012.01.30 20:02:00
|
5. CSM Elections - Pretty much rigged voting? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This isn't tyranny of majority. This is 15% of game population being organized into strong blocks being guaranteed to take all CSM seats. Vast majority of players will know nothing about the candidates available and either vote randomly of just no...
- by Dztrgovac - at 2012.01.28 16:57:00
|
6. Sticky:Incursion fixes/feedback thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
h4kun4 wrote: I dont like beeing mad, but now its really annoying...everything is full of Whine, tears and hate... ZOMFG, so many crap I read here...lets spawn double number of Highsec Incursions and double the Cash and LP -.- No ISK only LP -...
- by Dztrgovac - at 2012.01.28 14:41:00
|
7. Sticky:Incursion fixes/feedback thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Oh and for Incursion not to be unfair breaker of risk/reward and all that. As I said, overall ISK payout should be reduced by 20-30%, with LP increased so in end VGs pay 10-20% less than current; and Assaults and HQs paying much more, to reward e...
- by Dztrgovac - at 2012.01.27 19:00:00
|
8. Sticky:Incursion fixes/feedback thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
95% of "suggestions" here are good enough that they might in practice mean "remove highsec incursiosn". Just to remind everyone that if you nerf incursions just close to L4 money they become pointless. You take take to fleet up, you trust your sh...
- by Dztrgovac - at 2012.01.27 13:50:00
|
9. Sticky:Incursion fixes/feedback thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well I have to congratulate you on your victory. If CCP accepts 1% of "suggestions" from this thread Incursions will pay out less than L4 missions. See you on renewed "remove highsec L4s" threads soon.
- by Dztrgovac - at 2012.01.27 11:57:00
|
10. Why is Eve singlethreaded? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Once upon a time Intel was promising 5GHz processors by 2004. and 10GHz down the line. AMD was already starting to scratch their head at that and doubt the feasibility of it all. And young and naive CCP believed it. Whether they first chose Pyth...
- by Dztrgovac - at 2010.07.19 22:47:00
|
11. Downtime - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Perhaps we really should demand of CCP to give us all 100k SP every time they break something. Everyone would have 100M SP after a couple more moths of current game stability.
- by Dztrgovac - at 2010.07.02 14:50:00
|
12. CCP grow a pair and get rid of the alts already! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Please, stop defending CCP in this. No, a lot functionality provided by multi accounting can't be replaced with ISK or SP in same context. Game does greatly encourage and reward multi accounting. How many other MMOs are $30 or $45 per month in pr...
- by Dztrgovac - at 2010.06.08 16:53:00
|
13. www.mmodata.net - Up-to-date MMORPG subscriber charts! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
WOW has such a huge numbers of subscribers that even a massive drop to just 2 or 3 million subs will have it making truck loads of money. But Activision shareholders want maximum return of investment, so it is very likely that Blizz's 2nd MMO will...
- by Dztrgovac - at 2010.06.03 23:49:00
|
14. www.mmodata.net - Up-to-date MMORPG subscriber charts! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Activisions greed will doom WOW. Independent Blizz might have had much slower sub numbers after 7-8 millions but would have likely lived longer than trainwreck in action will. WOW will peak again when Cataclysm goes out, but after that initial inc...
- by Dztrgovac - at 2010.06.03 16:25:00
|
15. CCP, farmer ISK became dirt cheap, GTC prices rose up to half a bil - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Affordable GTCs were one of reasons I started playing EVE, I liked the concept of the game, and knew that when occasionally i hauled in a load of ISK I could save myself from paying $$$ for gametime for at least 3 months (old 90 day GTCs). $15 per...
- by Dztrgovac - at 2008.09.16 21:47:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |