| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
101. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Zoltar Torzoid In my fittings on the new setup, I could realistically pull an EANM II and replace it with another MAR II, since that should clear up enough CPU to do so, but it would also lower my resistances about 5-7% acr...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.03 23:22:00
|
102. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Goumindong on 03/02/2008 22:00:15 Originally by: CCP Nozh Thanks for all the good feedback, With regards to the Deimos changes, after we changed the Zealot on our development servers, the Zealot won every single close range...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.03 21:59:00
|
103. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Ogul ... And im sure you have proof of this, no? Also, missile explosion velocty falloff is 1500, and they do not have to worry about angular velocity, which makes your rebuttals for point 2, 3, and 4 false.
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.03 19:10:00
|
104. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Goumindong on 03/02/2008 15:58:28 Originally by: Arkady Sadik blaster want to be in web range Check the optimal range and falloff of a neutron deimos with CN Antimatter. Add one TD. Now check the optimal range and fallo...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.03 15:57:00
|
105. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Ogul Edited by: Ogul on 03/02/2008 14:05:03 Originally by: Roemy Schneider Originally by: Ogul Never mind the fact that missiles already suffer far more damage reduction trying to shoot small or fast targ...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.03 15:44:00
|
106. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Arkady Sadik TD is irrelevent to deimos No it isnt. Do you know what falloff is? Do you know how blasters work?
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.03 04:43:00
|
107. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Arkady Sadik FMPL Harbinger can fit two webs. Even if the Hurricane fits two webs as well, it will take a very long time to close the 10km in to the Harbinger to benefit from the tracking advantage. Hurricane dies. The ...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.02 23:20:00
|
108. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Ariel Dawn 1. Are you joking? 2. I suppose they have spare meds if you decide having no buffer tank is a good idea. 3/4. Minmatar do not want to move closer and die by doing so because of 1.; Gallente like it best in close ...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.02 23:14:00
|
109. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Ariel Dawn Don't use cap, but the ship's base capacitors are significantly worse and tanking takes up a good deal more effective capacitor than Amarr/Gallente due to no tanking bonuses. Autocannons are easy to fit because ...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.02 23:02:00
|
110. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The raptor change is very strange: The ship has terrible dps anyway, is bonused to be a tackler, and is one of the worse because the other inties are better than it for that job. Clearly what it needed was a marginal increase in DPS while making ...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.02 21:51:00
|
111. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Ariel Dawn Goumindong; when the Minmatar ship is forced to fight within web-range, counter TDing or not, then it will lose. Lowest DPS, worst capacitors and worst tanks in EVE. Counter-TDing does nothing to improve your DPS ...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.02 21:33:00
|
112. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Arkady Sadik I'm not going to throw around numbers on this one (I'd like to, but I don't have EFT on this computer, nor an EVE client, so it'll be somewhat difficult :-/), but just from personal experience at the receiving ...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.02 21:28:00
|
113. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Arkady Sadik Actually, after the tracking boost, your main hope as an AC user is to get to 0km where the small differences in tracking actually matter a lot. Anything less close, and the pulses still out-damage ACs easily. ...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.02 20:12:00
|
114. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Ariel Dawn And whats stopping the ship at 40km from warping out? Honor? Pulses far outrange Autocannons and do significantly more damage due to working in optimal instead of falloff and you know this. Tacklers? What sto...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.02 20:11:00
|
115. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Arkady Sadik Originally by: Goumindong edit: before the change, every ship could fit a single module that made lasers useless. There is no bias agaisnt AC's or blasters here, its just a reduction in range. There ...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.02 19:10:00
|
116. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Arkady Sadik fight lasers at range You shouldnt be fighting lasers at range. Autocannos track better than lasers and extract their advantage against laser ships by getting close, using supplimentary DPS, and abusing thei...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.02 19:08:00
|
117. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Ariel Dawn Goumindog; the counter of 'getting closer' is a VERY good way to lose your ship as a Minmatar. Falloff rigs make some fits impossible to to grid increases and have a very minor impact against TDs. Furthuremore, a...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.02 19:05:00
|
118. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Goumindong on 02/02/2008 18:45:02 Originally by: Liang Nuren I'm not sure that I like the idea of the optimal range script affecting falloff. Mostly, because there is no counter for this . Has the Optimal script for TC's b...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.02 18:44:00
|
119. Planned Ship Changes, a New Blog from Fendahl - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ill keep this short: The Eagle is now overpowered: These are anti-support ships, it does too much damage at the Muninn and Zealots optimal range The Apoc is now overpowered: This thing is the best sniping battleship in the game hands down. The...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.02 07:45:00
|
120. Some love for the Amarr, new Dev Blog by Zulupark - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Black Scorpio Originally by: Goumindong Originally by: Black Scorpio You are a moron and a noob. Did not read past your first sentence. Shield tanking - superior, ah ok.. i'll tell them that. Maybe in your p...
- by Goumindong - at 2008.02.01 22:18:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |