| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 |
81. Ammatar. - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Edited by: Haverloth on 20/05/2008 11:39:36 Officially the Ammatar have risen to a position of trust within certain sectors of the Empire, to the extent that an Ammatar wing has been founded under the auspices of the Vigilia Valeria and the Im...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.20 11:39:00
|
82. Alliances and Factional Warfare, the third Empyrean Age Dev Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Elsebeth Rhiannon Frankly, I think this thinking sucks. For me, why EVE is superior is that there IS NO endgame. Yes, we have people going from low sec fights to 0.0. We also have people coming from 0.0 to low sec or even ...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.20 10:37:00
|
83. Alliances and Factional Warfare, the third Empyrean Age Dev Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Khan Soriano I really don't know what the big deal is with Alliances getting nothing from this expansion..... I remember expansions that didn't do any good (in fact most of the time they ruined the game for them) to small co...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.20 10:29:00
|
84. Alliances and Factional Warfare, the third Empyrean Age Dev Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Working on this... We've been discussing in -VV- (as I know EM have, and I presume PIE and CVA and even Star Fraction etc have) about how we can make the best of this situaion. ____________________ http://1pg.vigilia-valeria.org
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.20 10:04:00
|
85. Alliances and Factional Warfare, the third Empyrean Age Dev Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
You have asked for new suggestions to what you have proposed. I will get to them, but first, your existing points are invalid: Originally by: ccp greyscale 1. It prevents Factional Warfare from excessively interfering with, or detracting ...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.20 10:03:00
|
86. Goodbye RP Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tyr Vaantau and, responding to the question "Will corporations be able to participate without having to leave their alliance?" Atropos had this telling response: Originally by: CCP Atropos Yes. Not in the initia...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.16 23:52:00
|
87. Goodbye RP Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Cailais Thats blatantly untrue. But what youre implying is that FW was promised to you, and you alone? That FW should be designed and implemented with not only the RP community in mind - but YOUR RP community. Be honest ...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.16 23:50:00
|
88. Goodbye RP Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tyr Vaantau I completely agree with this post, 100%. Well put, Telemicus. The RP Alliances, as they stand, are not compatible with any form of new feature which aim is to improve the game for the empire-based masses . Let...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.16 23:47:00
|
89. Goodbye RP Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lyra Garris Edited by: Lyra Garris on 16/05/2008 23:10:07 Five years ago, you were given a plot of land on which you could do anything. Many people were given plots of land to do things with. On your plot of land, you wa...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.16 23:37:00
|
90. Goodbye RP Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Cailais A quick question: Should the 'RP Alliances' be granted a special exception in order to allow them to participate? If yes: How will you determine what alliances meet the criteria of being an 'RP Alliance' If you...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.16 20:57:00
|
91. Goodbye RP Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: kworld I will be trying it out and look forward to it and i am glad that ccp is trying. But complaining about it here isnt going to change anything my friend got to try it before complaining, it could be brilliant for all ...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.16 20:16:00
|
92. Goodbye RP Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: MotherMoon in other words... what would be the RP reasons for holding 0.0 space other than profit? The CVA claimed Providence for the Amarr Empire. Let us also remember that there are many Alliances at stake here wh...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.16 18:42:00
|
93. Goodbye RP Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Cailais Youre excluding yourselves!!! Yes CCP have been unforgiveably lax in supporting the RP in the past: they appear to be attempting to make a massive effort to make ammends for that including: RP'd ISD reports (inclu...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.16 16:20:00
|
94. Goodbye RP Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tissa /me makes Cailais a nice cup of tea and dosent even try to put any poison in it. They dont want change and cant see how bad it would be if the mega alliances use FW as some sort of holiday resort (see: Swarm, Jihad) b...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.16 16:09:00
|
95. Goodbye RP Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Letouk Mernel Most people will jump into the FW stuff, play around with battlegrounds and grind some points for a while, then go back to 0.0 and territorial warfare. 6 months from now, lowsec will be left to the mid-bies lo...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.16 16:00:00
|
96. Goodbye RP Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Haverloth on 16/05/2008 15:24:15 Originally by: Cailais Why not roll up your alliance membership into ONE corp: heck call the corp Vigilia Valeria. There you go - problem solved no? C. Yes, there is a problem with th...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.16 15:22:00
|
97. Goodbye RP Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Haverloth on 16/05/2008 15:05:53 Originally by: Cailais Originally by: Cpt Constantinus No, we just expected to be able to participate in FW without having to leave our alliance. Its a case of join FW for small s...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.16 15:05:00
|
98. Goodbye RP Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Takal Cylotar I really start to believe the root of all evil here is CCP not wanting to touch too much code. So far they have presented the simplest solution for them. Make factions Alliances, let FW participant corps join t...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.16 14:32:00
|
99. Goodbye RP Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: maarud No, they said they would be working with alliances to find a solution, but I'm not wagering too much on it, but if they really wanted to find a solution, they could have asked before hand, while they were still doing...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.16 11:57:00
|
100. Goodbye RP Alliances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Caiman Graystock RP alliance is just a bunch of RP corps. How is a bunch of RP corps banding together under the alliance of one NPC faction and actually being directly involved with it bad? It's a better situation for RP cor...
- by Haverloth - at 2008.05.15 22:55:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |