Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
21. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: SurrenderMonkey Edited by: SurrenderMonkey on 14/09/2010 15:16:13 Originally by: ChrisIsherwood Disclaimer: I don't have a horse in this race and am indifferent to the outcome, which is probably CCP continuing to...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.09.14 16:38:00
|
22. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Whitehound Originally by: Jovialmadness 1. No cause its the same ******s doing it. 2. Oh rlly? You should stop now. 3. Yes, however in this case its only the same ******s doing it. 4. ...? There is actually evide...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.09.14 12:34:00
|
23. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Faccat Originally by: Jovialmadness since inventors can already out produce bpo holders False. BPO holders will never be reduced below the level of inventors or they would just invent. False, inventors have t...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.09.13 18:39:00
|
24. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: Best solution would IMHO be to raise the ME of invented BPC's to 0, AND make some way they can be researched. BPO's should still have an edge, but no way as huge as today. Well geeewhiz im glad you would be so kind as to leave us ...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.09.13 17:35:00
|
25. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Whitehound Edited by: Whitehound on 13/09/2010 15:25:23 Originally by: Jovialmadness 1. You dont have the capability to create that. 2. There is no massive outrage. 3. No evidence exists for their removal. 4. I a...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.09.13 16:23:00
|
26. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Whitehound Edited by: Whitehound on 13/09/2010 14:50:03 Originally by: Jovialmadness For the thousandth time, ccp isnt going to remove them due to referencing the lottery. Ccp isnt going to remove them because of...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.09.13 15:08:00
|
27. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Whitehound Originally by: Dtail Just something to think about I do what she does. I take a stubborn position, I insist on my argument being the only valid one, in a discussion that turns out was never meant to be ...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.09.13 14:26:00
|
28. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Whitehound Edited by: Whitehound on 11/09/2010 12:35:24 Originally by: Llyandrian Onker's proposition confirmed by response. No. I already wrote that I do not have any T2 BPOs and that I do not need them. I al...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.09.11 17:17:00
|
29. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Whitehound Edited by: Whitehound on 10/09/2010 18:52:24 Originally by: Jovialmadness Not taking that bait. You need to go with the accepted flow LHA and stop this. Make some isk, create a goal and achieve. Trying...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.09.10 19:03:00
|
30. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Whitehound Edited by: Whitehound on 10/09/2010 17:52:27 Originally by: Jovialmadness 1. I dont need you to respect my opinion. Yours sucks so bad i just want to call you out on it. 2. Ill be the loser...sure. Do...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.09.10 18:07:00
|
31. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Whitehound Edited by: Whitehound on 10/09/2010 17:04:03 Originally by: Jovialmadness ... I do not care about US politics, sorry. I also do not argue about the past. So most of what you wrote is rant to me. It...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.09.10 17:15:00
|
32. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Thats whats so awesome about eve yani. I, along with most bpo holders currently, never got a bpo from the lottery. The VAST majority of current T2 bpo holders bought them post invention. It hapoened like this: 1. During the lottery some bpo's wer...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.09.10 15:12:00
|
33. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 10/09/2010 14:55:04 Originally by: Whitehound Logic does not work, because EVE is not a logic game. It would be possible to introduce larger freighters, with twice the cargo size and only half the speed of c...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.09.10 14:54:00
|
34. T2 BPOs - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 10/09/2010 12:25:45 6 years of playing. Pvping, manufacturing and trading. My guestimation of their numbers are: 16 ship bpos for each ship with 75-90% being utilized at any given time. 32 module bpos for each mod...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.09.10 12:18:00
|
35. BIG CORPORATION SCAM on COMMON CAPSULEERS - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Ulf, you are a crazy guy. If you trully caught a nice market manipulation like this its sad you didnt atleast pause for one second and atleast consider taking part in it. If you did pause and still decided to be a hero....well thats just crazy. Ho...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.08.30 12:53:00
|
36. Giving Invention a Boost. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Kryss Stevenson exactly my point Yep thought id add my emphasis on it.
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.08.26 18:17:00
|
37. Giving Invention a Boost. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Kryss Stevenson Mmmm.... I have not seen any CCP response in any of these very important discussions. Either way they won't be able to look at them until 17 or is it now 16 months from now? They have more important things to...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.08.26 18:10:00
|
38. Giving Invention a Boost. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Caldari Citizen20090217 Apparently over 1/3 of all t2 is made by BPO holders. Want to boost invention? nerf T2 BPOS. In before T2 BPO holder alts trying to justify their monopoly.... . You have absolutely no clue wh...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.08.26 13:34:00
|
39. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Guys ive already removed whitehound from the ranks of the United Trolls of EvE Association. It was determined that he was awful and his only true skill was MAYBE baiting. Please, for the sake if trolls everywhere(we gotta have work), stop feeding...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.08.25 13:10:00
|
40. Giving Invention a Boost. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Quote: Now we could argue that this may or may not hurt the market, thats not the purpose of this post. The above is where i stopped reading. How in the hell can you discuss boosting invention and not entertain the possible harm to the e...
- by Jovialmadness - at 2010.08.24 17:19:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |