| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
41. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Grath Telkin wrote: Angsty Teenager wrote: The Legion, Loki, and Proteus have never been good ships outside of very niche roles (i.e. heavy tackle proteus, or armor web loki) in fleets, where they simply fill a role...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 20:03:00
|
42. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Grimpak wrote: so, a conclusion can be drawn from all this mess, to wich I also helped a bit to create: 1 - T2's specialized role is where they must shine, and they better be damn good at it; 2 - T3's flexibility cannot beat T2's in their turf...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 19:35:00
|
43. Bad Manners in Space - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
There is a great sketch with a swedish comedian playing wow where someone ninjaed the loot. He yelled some at the ninja and was then asked by the interviewer if there was anything he could do about it. Answer was: No. In EVE there are several thi...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 19:15:00
|
44. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gah'Matar wrote: Lexmana wrote: Naah ... If there were equal number of x-type and T1 put on the market (i.e. equal availability before accounting for demand) the X-type would cost more. If there were equal numbers of T1 and x-type available ...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 18:19:00
|
45. What if T3 cruisers were shapeshifters? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
marVLs wrote: Leave in space transformation for T3 BattleShips I think that might be a good idea but only if they can make it work on cruisers first without breaking the game.
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 17:29:00
|
46. What if T3 cruisers were shapeshifters? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
War Kitten wrote: OP, yes I too would love a cloaky interdiction nullified ship that instantly transformed into a gank-mobile once in the correct system, and then changed back to escape the gatecamps. That would be totally reasonable. It is ...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 15:43:00
|
47. What if T3 cruisers were shapeshifters? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tiber Ibis wrote: Have you people lost your marbles here? People are actually discussing having shape shifting ships in eve..... That is, ships which can transform and and change shape whilst flying in space....... lol How exactly would that be...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 15:35:00
|
48. What if T3 cruisers were shapeshifters? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kijo Rikki wrote: It's a neat idea, but my first thought is with such versatility, fleet commanders wouldn't be sure how to counter an enemy that can change its doctrine on the fly and eventually all fleets would be t3 ships because of this. ...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 14:14:00
|
49. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This rebalance will bring more tears than nerfing the Dramiel did but for the same reasons.
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 12:56:00
|
50. What if T3 cruisers were shapeshifters? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
We all know T3 cruisers are up for rebalancing and many think it has to be a nerf. Maybe not. T3 cruisers were meant to excel in versatility and not over shine any specialised ship (HAC, RECON, commad ship etc) in their specific role. But many fea...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 11:49:00
|
51. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Donedy wrote: Tippia wrote: Tom Gerard wrote: T3s should be the ultimate in subcapital DPS and Tank. Period. Your standard trolling aside (and seeing as how there are plenty of genuine fools who actually belive this nonsense)GǪ No, t...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 10:54:00
|
52. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Riot Girl wrote: Sushi Nardieu wrote: Nor do they want to consider buying a 500 mil hull when the Tech II variant is about the same. Who says they're going to cost 500m? I like that thinking. Make them cheaper and weaker and more flexibl...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 09:26:00
|
53. Hacking/Relic Site Bugs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Haulie Berry wrote: CCP Bayesian wrote: Haulie Berry, that's the specific reason we started looking at the rules, everyone's in cloaky frigates now to explore and it is somewhat immersion breaking when something vanishes under your feet. ...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 09:15:00
|
54. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Voyager Arran wrote: Tippia wrote: Mr Kidd wrote: The popularity of a T3 comes from exactly what is saying needs to be fixed: adaptability & flexibility. These are exactly the reasons they're popular and yet CCP wants to fix that. No...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 08:58:00
|
55. First day - a little ice mining report - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Lexmana wrote: I like it. There is actually some tension in highsec over resources. Maybe there will even be wars. Please take some time to remind highsec miners that NPC corps are not decable, and you can escape into ...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 07:04:00
|
56. If I had a penny for... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kazur Nemic wrote: Everytime someone complained about the new camera system I would be a millionare. Hopefully they will make it by default not enabled, or just simply remove it. I myself hate the new camera, before I learned how to disable it,...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.10 06:51:00
|
57. First day - a little ice mining report - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I like it. There is actually some tension in highsec over resources. Maybe there will even be wars.
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.09 21:39:00
|
58. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mr Kidd wrote: The popularity of a T3 comes from exactly what is saying needs to be fixed: adaptability & flexibility. These are exactly the reasons they're popular and yet CCP wants to fix that. I can only assume the fix will require some ...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.09 19:25:00
|
59. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Grimpak wrote: Lexmana wrote: Grimpak wrote: Lexmana wrote: Grimpak wrote: if an X-type shield hardener had the same availability as a T1, cost would drop to levels of said T1. Naah ... If there were equal number of x-type and T1...
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.09 18:59:00
|
60. Would muting the Jita local improve the situation ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
You can mut it yourself by minimising local chat. It has almsot the same effect and it will improve the situation for most people.
- by Lexmana - at 2013.06.09 18:49:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |