| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Eve Fitting Tool - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I realize that the API is down now, but shouldn't EFT provide an error message in such cases? Please visit your user settings to re-enable images. Last video: Pride, Honor & Retribution
- by Mitchman - at 2008.03.13 22:14:00
|
2. Eve Fitting Tool - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Import using EVE APi doesn't seem to work. I get an empty dialog where I should select the character to use. Last video: Pride, Honor & Retribution
- by Mitchman - at 2008.03.13 05:08:00
|
3. Petition : Let Command Modules Work In Warp! - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Sounds like a reasonable request to be able to run gang modules while warping. New video: All Aboard The Pain Train
- by Mitchman - at 2007.05.02 22:27:00
|
4. Poisoning the Chalice: Smartbombs as a Counter to Nos. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Great idea, but remember that smartbombs can't be used in empire so maybe a new module "energy burst" or something is needed. New video: All Aboard The Pain Train
- by Mitchman - at 2007.02.17 12:26:00
|
5. A bit more changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Mitchman on 19/10/2006 22:02:37 Some fundamental problems with the HP increase, as I mentioned in the dev chat: - Cap intensive weapon, such as lasers and hybrids, will be at a disadvantage as it will take much longer to kill a tar...
- by Mitchman - at 2006.10.19 22:00:00
|
6. Lack of EOS fittings - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
This thread and kuso's setup has my offical stamp of approval.
- by Mitchman - at 2006.10.16 20:52:00
|
7. Some Minor changes - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
The Raven and Ishtar are in serious need of some CPU love. The raven can not be fitted with T2 gear without a cpu extender II (and forget about using the last to high slots if you use siege launchers). The ishtar needs faction hardeners to be a...
- by Mitchman - at 2006.10.11 13:43:00
|
8. My take on balancing of wcs and nos/neuts - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Dinique Being able to hold people in place with scramblers and then being able to warp away when you like with your WCS is ***. Ah, I didn't realize you mean on your own ship.
- by Mitchman - at 2006.07.27 10:23:00
|
9. My take on balancing of wcs and nos/neuts - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Dinique I still say the best solution is to have your scramblers and stabalizers cancel eachother out. If you fit 3 points of stabilizers, and 2 points of scrambling you should effectively only have 1 point of stabilizing. ...
- by Mitchman - at 2006.07.26 15:56:00
|
10. My take on balancing of wcs and nos/neuts - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Haniblecter Teg "Yes Tomb, read this 1298732978 thread on NOS/WCS and how to 'fix' them - cause we all know their borked despite being in game for YEARS - not because Ive come up with some new and inventive way of 'balancin...
- by Mitchman - at 2006.07.24 14:52:00
|
11. My take on balancing of wcs and nos/neuts - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Mila Prestoc Warpcore Stabalizers use same cap as old Warp Disruptor which is 25. (but isn't affected by the skill to lower its cap useage) This makes absolutely no difference on any ship except for a frigate, so it's ...
- by Mitchman - at 2006.07.24 12:16:00
|
12. My take on balancing of wcs and nos/neuts - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Tuxford The changes we've been looking at is pretty simple really. Just give penalty to targetting range and scan resolution. It only gimps people going into combat but wouldn't affect people travelling that much. The ...
- by Mitchman - at 2006.07.24 11:41:00
|
13. My take on balancing of wcs and nos/neuts - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Boonaki Frigs aren't supposed to fit 20k scrams, they're supposed to be fitting 7.5k scrams. That's why the 7.5ks use much less cap per second. I'm curious where you have that strange information from? If it wasn't supp...
- by Mitchman - at 2006.07.24 11:34:00
|
14. OMGOMGOMG WCS Nerf - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Here's a recap of what I posted in this thread : Sisi now has a penalty that is 20% increase in signature radius (what you suggested, more or less) and a 20% increase in lock time. I believe these penalties, if they remain as they are, will not ...
- by Mitchman - at 2006.07.24 06:09:00
|
15. My take on balancing of wcs and nos/neuts - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Maya Rkell Mitchman, Removing WCS as a viable option for combat isn't a good idea. You reduce the amount of combat quite nastily, and there are some BS sniper setups which will still be able to mount 2 WCS with only 1 other...
- by Mitchman - at 2006.07.24 05:57:00
|
16. My take on balancing of wcs and nos/neuts - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Andrea Jaruwalski Your corp losses alot of frigates, mainly interceptors. Correct. Many of our pilots have more balls than sense, and it's how it has always been Originally by: Andrea Jaruwalski If you look...
- by Mitchman - at 2006.07.24 05:47:00
|
17. My take on balancing of wcs and nos/neuts - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Some balancing issues have been bugging me and other members of my corp for some time: Warp Core Stabs As they are now, they have very little penalty for using them on a combat fitted ship. And that's my main grip about them. People can engage...
- by Mitchman - at 2006.07.22 12:32:00
|
18. Capital ships and their tanks - Design issues? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Kunming RL aircraft carriers have fighter factories in them + usually enough materials to build twice the amount of fighters they carry. Eh, no.
- by Mitchman - at 2006.03.14 13:02:00
|
19. MOROS fitting - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
This thread makes baby jesus cry
- by Mitchman - at 2005.12.22 17:37:00
|
20. SISI stacking changes - some comparisons - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
CCP _really_ need to nerf warp core stabs now. PvP is getting silly with no penalty on them.
- by Mitchman - at 2005.11.15 17:31:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |