Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. [Trinity] Eagle - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Eagle - Gang oriented with alike: Hi: 5x H Electron Blaster IIs. / 1x LST S95a. Mid: 10mn MWD, Med Cap Inj., Web OR Scram, Photon Field II, LSE II. Low: DC II, 3x Mag Stab IIs. Rigs: Anti-EM, Field Ext. or 2 of them. Unfortunately there isn...
- by No21 - at 2008.05.04 01:15:00
|
2. Ferox PvP - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Ferox - Gang oriented with alike: Hi: 6x H Blasters / 1x Large Shield Transporter(s95a preferred). Mid: 10mn MWD, Med Cap Inj., Web OR Scram, LSE and a Invu F. OR 2x Active Hard. OR 2x LSE. Depending on your preference and need. Low: DC, ...
- by No21 - at 2008.05.04 00:32:00
|
3. Time for a Break, or End? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
2 Months after the merger the NFS initiative was announced( 11 Jan 2007 ): http://myeve.eve-online.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=412 and http://myeve.eve-online.com/updates/indevelopment.asp and from it: ô The Need For Speed 2007 A year-long ...
- by No21 - at 2008.05.03 16:38:00
|
4. Time for a Break, or End? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So, I think It all started with them attending http://www.nordicinnovation.net/_img/ci_syntese.pdf and realization of the potential in their core tech, establishment and others IP. Reason why they would attend it might be because of invitation, ...
- by No21 - at 2008.05.03 16:34:00
|
5. Time for a Break, or End? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Titan Pilot 1. Need for Speed = I agree, hasnt helped much 2. Steam = Good Marketing. More dollars = Servers stay up 3. Cash cow = Yes, I would think EVE is profitable. Good thing. No profits = No EVE. 2. Marketing for w...
- by No21 - at 2008.05.01 19:41:00
|
6. Time for a Break, or End? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Cordran Li Ah so you have an inside source. I bow to you. And the announced MMO 2 months earlier requiring Hardware, Developers, Licenses( http://www.naturalmotion.com/files/CCP-NM_Release.pdf ) and Marketing is all pay...
- by No21 - at 2008.04.30 19:55:00
|
7. Time for a Break, or End? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Primnproper I really do think people who come on these forums threatening to quit should be banned by the devs for the good of the comunity, you don't like it your gone plain and simple I'm not threatening to leave. I ...
- by No21 - at 2008.04.29 17:02:00
|
8. Time for a Break, or End? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: No21 on 29/04/2008 00:38:11 Originally by: Tarminic Originally by: No21 Originally by: James Lyrus Oh hell yes, on TQ. I want the devs who balance games to experience what it's like 'for real' - SiSi isn't e...
- by No21 - at 2008.04.29 00:36:00
|
9. Time for a Break, or End? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Anaalys Fluuterby Oveur just put a name on what they were already starting. Can you say "removal of Instas to decrease database load"? That is now almost 1.5 years ago. Then can you explain his disappearance? And why. ...
- by No21 - at 2008.04.28 22:54:00
|
10. Time for a Break, or End? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Lingorm Actually I had some really nice replies ... but the forums at them. *pout* 1) Need for speed was first mentioned by Oveur in January 2007 ... 2) To balance the game we need to play it ... don't like that well so...
- by No21 - at 2008.04.28 19:28:00
|
11. Time for a Break, or End? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tarminic 1. I don't get it - you're asking for a specific date at which the Need For Speed initiative was started? What point could that possibly have? Clearly if you mistrust them enough to ask those questions in the fir...
- by No21 - at 2008.04.28 18:57:00
|
12. Time for a Break, or End? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Lingorm Originally by: No21 1. It's biggest intent and purpose seems to have been for the Steam announcement. 2. Funny as it is. I have the Flameburst Precision Light Missile BPO The employees are still allo...
- by No21 - at 2008.04.28 18:01:00
|
13. Time for a Break, or End? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Anaalys Fluuterby I don't WANT to flame you, but honestly you already made up your mind. 1) You think that Need for Speed is bull. But you completely ignore the test last week on SISI where we were testing the new network p...
- by No21 - at 2008.04.28 17:30:00
|
14. Time for a Break, or End? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hopes : Well, I hope that the game will focus more on PvP.. And hope those that are more outspoken drives it towards such direction. I hope the logoff timer issue will be adjusted and CCP stops being such protectionists about their cash money f...
- by No21 - at 2008.04.28 16:42:00
|
15. Time for a Break, or End? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Culture: After the t20 incident and him remaining within the corporation, I wonder how it is. As there has been little follow ups, updates or reports of abuse. And its here where I have minimal trust towards CCP and their inclination towards repor...
- by No21 - at 2008.04.28 16:41:00
|
16. Time for a Break, or End? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Reasons : It started with the Need For Speed initiative. You can read about it here: http://myeve.eve-online.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=412 and http://myeve.eve-online.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=426 . Well, seems like a big part of it was f...
- by No21 - at 2008.04.28 16:39:00
|
17. CCP, your policy fails - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Still, it would be in our interest to know what exactly they will use it for and not. Crowd Control Productions has a reputation to uphold, it would be good to answer our/the concerns if they like to keep it in good form.
- by No21 - at 2008.04.12 20:13:00
|
18. Structure Tank , Realy that bad of an idea ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Ofc, everyone got their skills at lvl5 and are willing to spend ca 45mil on rigs to put on their Brutix. But yeah, with rigs armor prevails and leave it behind. But it has its purpose and use. Maybe you can figure it out and what and why
- by No21 - at 2008.04.09 21:05:00
|
19. Structure Tank , Realy that bad of an idea ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Hull tanking is a viable option on certain ships. Its most prominent on the Gallente ships due to the amount of hull hp and damage potential. Making a complete setup is another indication. But it has lost a lot of its potency thru changes and ...
- by No21 - at 2008.04.09 14:52:00
|
20. Amarr Recon - Current state - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
To cover them you would have to look at whats Amarr and bring in another ship. The Armageddon would be a great choice due to its fairly nice dmg output, but also its large drone bay. There to be used as auxiliary or more dmg. Either for whatever y...
- by No21 - at 2008.03.25 16:49:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |