| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Can we now have local 0.0 removed please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I don't think pointing to WH space as proof that without local it still works,is valid. There are considerable differences: 1. Loot. WH space has much more valuable loot. risk may be greater, but so is reward. 2. Entering WH space is more difficu...
- by Otellus - at 2009.06.19 23:39:00
|
2. Can we now have local 0.0 removed please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The only effect removing local will have is nerf 0.0 even further. All there will be is some POSses mining highend moonstuff and PvP gangs running around bored out of their skulls because there are no targets. Life in 0.0 is already pretty pointle...
- by Otellus - at 2009.06.18 21:58:00
|
3. Your #1 concern with EVE or #1 change you'd like to see. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well we now had the first capital going down to DDs. There were 27 titans there. Time to address it CCP or are you still unwilling to admit your mistake?
- by Otellus - at 2009.06.17 07:28:00
|
4. Your #1 concern with EVE or #1 change you'd like to see. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
1. titan DDs 2. Badly designed ships (split damagebonus typhoons and such) 3. 0.0 Sov requiring ever bigger blobs
- by Otellus - at 2009.06.07 10:32:00
|
5. Dear CCP, RE: speed changes.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Sean Forrest Apparently CCP doesn't think that you should be able to lock down a cruiser/battleship risk-free anymore. I know, it's totally not fair that you don't get to be a lazy ass and take the easy job because you dumpe...
- by Otellus - at 2008.08.05 21:19:00
|
6. [Idea] Creation of Alliance Hangars - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Good idea. I'd also like to see an abilty to rent personal hangars which you can share with other characters. Its annoying with several alts to have to switch around all the time to exchange stuff. Could also be a nice isk sink.
- by Otellus - at 2008.08.05 20:48:00
|
7. [Issues] Change to 0.0 soveriegnity - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Otellus on 04/08/2008 05:35:25 I made a proposal for this a while ago. The basics are simple. Every activity in a system or constellation (I would move to constellation based sovereignty instead of system based to spread fights out...
- by Otellus - at 2008.08.04 05:34:00
|
8. New Dev Blog: Speed Rebalanced by Nozh - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Red Thunder Originally by: Malachon Draco Originally by: MiIitary Genius Ugh, this hotbed of misinformation, lies and flaming still going? Lets try some assumtions, because if you can see _exactly_ how the g...
- by Otellus - at 2008.08.03 18:25:00
|
9. New Dev Blog: Speed Rebalanced by Nozh - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Red Thunder Originally by: Malachon Draco Originally by: MiIitary Genius Ugh, this hotbed of misinformation, lies and flaming still going? Lets try some assumtions, because if you can see _exactly_ how the g...
- by Otellus - at 2008.08.03 18:25:00
|
10. Bob and Tri have teamed up!!!! - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Otellus on 03/08/2008 18:19:29 Grrr, stupid settings
- by Otellus - at 2008.08.03 18:19:00
|
11. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Andnowthenews Originally by: RuriHoshino Originally by: TZeer All I hear is that HAC`s are supposed to be able to break through gatecamps with impunity, fight sniping bs, kill tacklers, generally kill most st...
- by Otellus - at 2008.07.31 22:05:00
|
12. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Andnowthenews Edited by: Andnowthenews on 31/07/2008 12:57:27 Quote: But if we went with your suggestion, wouldn't we be open to the accusation that if we let non-nanopilots be the testers on Sisi, that their pe...
- by Otellus - at 2008.07.31 13:06:00
|
13. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Cpt Branko Originally by: Otellus Why do you think that jumpbridges are not a factor in this? If there were no jumpbridges, non-nano roaming gangs would be more viable. I think its a very important part of the issue...
- by Otellus - at 2008.07.31 12:50:00
|
14. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Archetype02 justa small suggestion. All the Nanopilots on your test are common nanopilots on TQ. They have the interest to show that the nanos now are broke on SiSi(what are i think). Maybe try to change the roles. The peop...
- by Otellus - at 2008.07.31 12:44:00
|
15. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: TZeer Originally by: AshtarDJ Good tests there Andnowthenews.... and good work with the constructive comments there TZeer. The bottom line now is: Gangs consisted of nano-only ships will die with the patch. Gangs ...
- by Otellus - at 2008.07.31 12:36:00
|
16. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: gavhriel how did you fit the "nano" ships ? :) As far as I can tell, the nanogangs were properly fit with T2 gear and rigs as you would expect. I FCed one of the nanogangs (on my alt Gold Mamba) and FCed it the way we al...
- by Otellus - at 2008.07.31 09:44:00
|
17. [VOTE] All AGAINST The Nano-Nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Avon Originally by: DREAMWORKS Who ever came up with this nerf-has never played this game. I very much doubt the people voting against it have actually tried it. It isn't the drastic nerf they are making it ou...
- by Otellus - at 2008.07.30 10:43:00
|
18. [VOTE] All AGAINST The Nano-Nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Otellus on 30/07/2008 09:27:12 nvm
- by Otellus - at 2008.07.30 09:27:00
|
19. [Issue] Significant Problem With the Current Voting System - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Otellus on 30/07/2008 09:26:36 and now with my alt on the same account. Eidt: Hmm, works indeed.
- by Otellus - at 2008.07.30 09:26:00
|
20. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
If you still want to achieve the objective nr 5, keeping guerilla warfare possible, you need a few more tweaks. What I would consider a viable setup is where you add more agility to ships and strive for a situation where a T2 fitted HAC can do a...
- by Otellus - at 2008.07.29 15:19:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |