Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Rhinanna
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 12:30:00 -
[31]
1. Asteroids/Other objects that have hit/collusion boxes much bigger than their visual appearence (over twice in many cases) 2. Most of the best looking ships in the game (Hurricane, Maelstrom, Drake) don't have Tech 2 variants
|

Hebron Melkor
Hunerian Science Institute Virtue of Selfishness
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 12:55:00 -
[32]
1. The ability to anchor/online more than one POS module at a time - maybe link this to anchoring skill (up to a max of 5). If players consider this will effect 0.0/Low Sec POS Warfare too much then possibly restrict it to Empire POS only.
|

Ghoest
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 13:27:00 -
[33]
Redo soveriegnty.
Make it require actually doing stuff rather than parking POS and then never doing anything in the system.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|

Maxpie
Cross Roads
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 13:38:00 -
[34]
Get rid of alts. Better yet (though not realistic) get rid of multiple accounts too.
He put... creatures... in our bodies... to control our minds. He made us... say lies... do things. |

Kel Nissa
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 16:16:00 -
[35]
Full scale mandatory faction ware. (Translation: the eve storyline should be part of eve)
|

Areo Hotah
Paxton Industries Paxton Federation
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 16:27:00 -
[36]
Devs associated with game balance actually base their opinions and ideas on playing the game, and not pure EFT numbers and silly arguments like "projectile can choose dmg type, so that means lower DPS", or carebear complaints. They should also listen to player feedback (not whines), and regularly providing feedback to player feedback in the forums.
|

Mara Rinn
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 16:32:00 -
[37]
Address the imbalance of mineral values. |

GBlair
Caldari State Protectorate
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 17:06:00 -
[38]
Originally by: Araviel death to jita.
This.
Try looking in other systems and save yourself some money. Bleep bloop, I have achevables. |

Mercspector
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 17:13:00 -
[39]
1. Be able to kick scotty trough the airlock of your ship. 2. Painting your ship. 3. Damadge models for ships.
|

MightyRhinox
Minmatar Rhinox Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 17:24:00 -
[40]
My number one concern in Eve is how much isk is in my wallet. The number one thing I'd like to see changed in EVE is how much ISK there is in my wallet. Devs please to be depositing 10billion isk in my wallet as soon as is possible. Thank you. |
|

SpaceSquirrels
Caldari
|
Posted - 2009.06.06 15:14:00 -
[41]
Hmm I expected different answers. |

Raneru
Euphoria Released
|
Posted - 2009.06.06 16:06:00 -
[42]
1. Change 0.0 local chat to delayed mode
2. Somehow make it a lot more difficult for large alliances/coalitions to take large areas of space, Forcing groups to make more efficient use of the space they have.
|

Haniblecter Teg
F.R.E.E. Explorer Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.06.06 16:33:00 -
[43]
Originally by: SpaceSquirrels Edited by: SpaceSquirrels on 05/06/2009 05:57:35 Because of how broad EVE is it's hard to get the scope of what the majority of EVE players want to see or is their concern. Granted due to this very "grandiose" scope pf things there might not be a majority at all. Further more there is no polling system built into the forums. Which also makes it tedious to collect the priority concerns of the community.
Mine is rather odd, and i'm probably one of the few... But EVE for me isn't very casual friendly in the sense of time allocation. Most missions take awhile to complete (i have what now 5million sp?) PVP can be a tossup, but these days hard to find a quick engagement or two. I wouldnt call myself a casual player, but I don't have that much time to play what eve sometimes requires (combat wise) Further more traveling can take considerable time. Granted you can go afk in high sec, but other places that's unwise. I'd rather not have the only time I have jumping gates, and right clicking WTZ.
So i'd like to see maybe (lesser) missions that take less time to complete (lesser reward). And the possibility of adding a "freeway gate system" in which less jumps are require to certain sectors of space. One idea being certain gates that lead to FW areas easier. (sectors not systems necessarily) Or multi path gateways that jump to one area etc. EG: system A gates can all jump to system x and system B gates do as well.
So please post your number one concern below. I'd like to see what the consensus is.
Wow, you just described 0.0.
We have very nice belt rats that net in the millions, and jumpgates that allow me to zip around whole regions in little time.
So yea, leave carebear land and join the real fight.
Oh, don't try us, we dont take newbs. ----------------- Friends Forever |

Qarthy
|
Posted - 2009.06.06 19:25:00 -
[44]
1.) Limit the amount of star systems that any one Alliance or Corp can claim sovereignty in.
2.) Change POS and SOV warfare to something more fluid and fun. Current system is such a drag.
3.) Increase the number of gates and locations that 0.0 can be entered.
|

Selma Body
Amarr Ad Astra Vexillum Sc0rched Earth
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 00:11:00 -
[45]
We need old cyno effects back ! |

Petra Katell
Pator Tech School
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 02:59:00 -
[46]
Ships balance is really the thing that bothers me the most. There's just a bunch of basically worthless ships.
Hawk, Deimos, Muninn, Nighthawk, Eos, Raptor, Rapier (sorta), Ferox (sorta), Eagle (mostly), all EAF sans maybe the Sentinal, all interdictors sans the Sabre. I'm sure there are others that are more or less debatable.
Each ship should have a *useful* PVP role and fill that role well. Also make sure each ship can fit a reasonable PVP fit.
Really wish they would spend more time on fulfilling that.
|

No Homo
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 03:03:00 -
[47]
Originally by: Rhinanna
Most of the best looking ships in the game ([...] Drake)
wut?
|

SeanStakes
Caldari 8492nd Tactical Fleet
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 09:47:00 -
[48]
Originally by: Petra Katell Nighthawk
Take That back.. Now.
|

Otellus
Imperial Shipment
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 10:32:00 -
[49]
1. titan DDs 2. Badly designed ships (split damagebonus typhoons and such) 3. 0.0 Sov requiring ever bigger blobs |

Mihali
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 11:05:00 -
[50]
Originally by: WhiteSavage more cake
The cake is a lie.
1. Titan DDs. They have become too common now. Make them like siege mode & can't move for 10 minutes.
2. Moar love to Black Ops ships.
3. Change Sovereignty mechanics so that 0.0 isn't just a pos grind. |
|

mizuki saki
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 11:06:00 -
[51]
faction ships overhaul, med officer weapons |

ViolatngUall
Caldari Corp 1 Allstars
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 12:33:00 -
[52]
Make Jump bridges to where only a certain number of pilots can jump at one time is accourding to ship size. Like 3 carriers or 2 carriers and 3 battlecruisers ect ect. then there has to be a cooldown of 90 seconds to prevent major blobs from jumping in enuff pilots to make it a 8 vs 1 witch is in all respects is unsporting to alot of the older players when you just want it to be 5 v 5, fight to the death, dishonor your new corpse in your hold and post your km.
P3N!5 |

5pinDizzy
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 12:36:00 -
[53]
One of my main concerns should be getting fixed by the time they bring out scalable rigs, in that tech 1 frigs and cruisers are the only ships that aren't worth rigging meaning they have a large disadvantage usually from the get go. |

Irida Mershkov
Gallente War is Bliss
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 12:38:00 -
[54]
Originally by: Riho
Originally by: Dan Glebitts An end to nuetral reppers.
tbh.. nothing wrong whit that as you can shoot them
Except for the part where they immediately dock up if you open fire, granted that's station combat exclusively, but that's where it almost always happens in high-security space. |

nails
Caldari Ota Corps
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 13:44:00 -
[55]
Remove High Sec space. Make eve 100% 0.0 --------------
http://nails.otaku.jp/ota-corps/ |

Kessiaan
Minmatar MicroFunks
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 13:53:00 -
[56]
Edited by: Kessiaan on 07/06/2009 13:53:01 1) Make FW plexing not suck. Preferably before I finish BS5 / Large Hybrids V in about six months and go out to nullsec.
2) Un-nerf rockets. Thank you.
3) UI has gotten a lot better, but still has a long way to go.
4) More cake!
|

Viginti Tres
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 14:02:00 -
[57]
I just want to be able to pay for a plex like I pay for my subscription. It's so irritating that I can't buy it because I have the common sense to not get a credit card.
Christ. |

Santiago Fahahrri
Galactic Geographic
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 15:25:00 -
[58]
The biggest change I'd like to see is setting Local to Recent Speakers mode in 0.0 space, just like in wormhole systems. ~ Santiago Fahahrri Galactic Geographic |

Black Leather
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 15:41:00 -
[59]
Bumping!
Little ships should bounce off big ships, dammit!
Fix now, please
|

Riki Halcyon
|
Posted - 2009.06.07 21:18:00 -
[60]
I like the superhighway idea.
Originally by: Facecorn Select station --> Dock --> Warping, then docking --> Ship actually docks 100% of the time
Sucks to have to babysit your ship while in warp to dock, fearing that you get the short end of the stick, especially since this 'bug' has been around forever.
This does bug me.
Originally by: Dirk Magnum More opportunities to PvP in High Sec and a revamping of the security status system. I'm thinking something that might make people feel more comfortable with attacking people who have low security status or those who flag themselves, such as an insurance bonus provided by CONCORD for sacrificing your ship in defense against piracy. I also think that if CCP wants to keep the security status mechanic as it is, it should still allow criminals access to systems up to at least 0.8 without police intervention. The goal being to prompt High Sec residents to attack unwary or outnumbered outlaws visiting High Sec systems, and thus generate more PvP.
I like this idea a lot. Before I started playing my friends were telling me about EVE and I thought things were going to be more like this. It would be neat to find a way to actually be a profitable bounty hunter, maybe have CCP create bounties for people with low standing? That would be neat.
Now, my two concerns: 1) Lag in large FW engagements - lame! 2) Make Assets search function find items inside of my containers - please! Or at least let us open our containers remotely. (Yeah not the biggest deal in the world, but I use my containers to organize my crap and then I buy things four times over when I all ready have them in a container somewhere or I just can't things that I know I bought).
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |