| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. Sticky:CSM Guest Blog: "Reasonable Things" Voting Phase - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Overs, 6, 98, 50, 66, 19, 29, 30, 69, 15, 14, 60, 93, 22
- by Overs - at 2013.08.07 15:07:00
|
2. Sticky:CSM Guest Blog: "Reasonable Things" Crowdsourcing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Suggestion: Give the tech2 mwd better cap performance than it's lower meta level variants.
- by Overs - at 2013.07.21 18:09:00
|
3. Sticky:CSM Guest Blog: "Reasonable Things" Crowdsourcing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Suggestion: A small capital ship with a jump portal generator. Keyword: capital ship Note: This ship would be the size of a freighter (can fit through gates) but instead of a massive cargo hold they would only be able to fit a jump portal genera...
- by Overs - at 2013.07.19 13:02:00
|
4. Sticky:CSM Guest Blog: "Reasonable Things" Crowdsourcing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Suggestion: Let jump bridges connect to user selected cynosurals. Note: This would bring back the unbroken jump chains of the bigger empires, but such networks would not be protected by cyno jammers. A possible caveat could be to not allow a jump...
- by Overs - at 2013.07.19 12:30:00
|
5. Sticky:CSM Guest Blog: "Reasonable Things" Crowdsourcing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Suggestion: Implement a "use it or lose it" sovereignty mechanic. Note: Lose the current iHub, TCU, and SBU system - btw, thanks CCP for fixing POS spamming. Instead let industrial activity be the main driver of sov. Industrial activity should in...
- by Overs - at 2013.07.19 12:16:00
|
6. Sticky:Dev Blog: A New Live Event for July - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rob Crowley wrote: Overs wrote: The mac client doesn't support anti-aliasing. So, instead of polluting my computer with a bootcamp windows partition, I curse all those who participate in this contest with system crashes. I hope you all are n...
- by Overs - at 2013.07.13 19:15:00
|
7. Sticky:Dev Blog: A New Live Event for July - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The mac client doesn't support anti-aliasing. So, instead of polluting my computer with a bootcamp windows partition, I curse all those who participate in this contest with system crashes. I hope you all are negligent with your clones, die to pira...
- by Overs - at 2013.07.10 02:44:00
|
8. Cynosural Probe - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
tl;dr - a probe that flies to a near by star and lights a cyno. The Skinny: I've perused a few of these confangled "why do I have to have a cyno lit in a system I want to jump to" threads and I had an idea. Why not have a fat probe about 100 cubi...
- by Overs - at 2012.12.20 18:43:00
|
9. Capital Jump Drive Modification - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jumping through space ain't like dusting crops, boy! Without precise calculations you could fly right through a star, or bounce too close to a supernova and that'd end your trip real quick, wouldn't it.
- by Overs - at 2012.12.20 17:36:00
|
10. hacking bubbles - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Give codebreakers the ability to unanchor warp bubbles that don't belong to you or your corp.
- by Overs - at 2012.12.15 00:29:00
|
11. Redefine Moons by Rarity Type - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Redefine moons generically by their rarity type. Allow the players to determine which moon mineral of a moon's given rarity types a harvester collects. For example if a player sets up a POS and harvester on a Moon of rarity 32, the player decides ...
- by Overs - at 2012.12.13 20:54:00
|
12. Idea... A bit radical. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I invented Fire!
- by Overs - at 2012.12.13 19:11:00
|
13. Why Was Sovereignty Introduced? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
A friend of mine who played EVE way back when mentioned once that the sovereignty system was introduced to mitigate station ownership pingpong back before the Exodus expansion. Anyone out there able to corroborate this or expand upon it?
- by Overs - at 2012.12.13 19:07:00
|
14. Was it better with the old SOV mechanics? A Serious Debate! - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
It seems Snot Shot has stolen this thread. To the original point of this thread, the current system is an improvement over POS spam, but I don't like the current system. Why not develop a system where a direct measure of player, corp, and allianc...
- by Overs - at 2012.12.09 12:27:00
|
15. Habro and CCP Announce NERF Ship Deal - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Sturmwolke wrote: ...You never saw a (steel) ship float? You ever see a submarine submerge?
- by Overs - at 2012.08.23 22:01:00
|
16. Habro and CCP Announce NERF Ship Deal - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
For those of you who have never noticed, CCP lists various stats of their ships such as mass and volume. These stats are relevant to game mechanics, but to reality, they are hilarious bad science. For example, the Dominix: ship mass: 97,100,000 ...
- by Overs - at 2012.08.23 20:51:00
|
17. Announcement:Extended Singularity downtime from August 17, 2012 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
After everything gets integrated into TQ, I wonder how the Dusties will react after blue balling for 3 hours.
- by Overs - at 2012.08.20 14:11:00
|
18. Sticky:New dev blog: Ship Balancing: Mining Barges - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Though I stand to profit from investing into a **** ton of retrievers, I think these upcoming mining barge changes are terrible and should be scrapped. Instead of a big clumsy ill-conceived change, why not introduce changes in babysteps and start...
- by Overs - at 2012.08.07 14:17:00
|
19. WTS 4x GTC 950mil Per ONLINE NOW! - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
1 for Overs and 1 for Andrew Gunn
- by Overs - at 2012.08.04 02:06:00
|
20. Sticky:New dev blog: Ship Balancing: Mining Barges - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Express advantages of the procurer with speed and agility instead of an obscene tank. Also the procurer could have added defensive capability with 2-4 turret hardpoints and the extra fitting (cpu, cap, grid, and extra high slots) to handle medium ...
- by Overs - at 2012.08.03 18:37:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |