| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
3921. Paving the way to the next nerf: mining barges! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Jorma Morkkis wrote: RubyPorto wrote: That's not properly tanked. 40.8k EHP vs Void and still enough tank that 2 volleys from a Nado won't kill it. [Hulk, Tank Fit] Micro Auxiliary Power Core II Damage Control II Medium Shield Extender I...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 06:58:00
|
3922. FW Gate - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Unintended Gameplay != Bug Needing a Patch != Bug (unless you're saying that Tech either doesn't need patching or is a bug) Not a Bug/Exploit != Not needing a patch Well the response of CCP will at le...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 06:51:00
|
3923. FW Gate - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alaya Carrier wrote: RubyPorto wrote: You flew right over the part where CCP was warned about the problem before it hit TQ. That's kind of the whole ballgame. The players did their diligence by telling CCP about a thing. CCP ignored the play...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 06:42:00
|
3924. How much ISK do you make? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lipbite wrote: I'm earning ~ 1 monocle per week. If they weren't that ugly I could have them in each hole of my body. Seventy dollar Speculums?
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 05:27:00
|
3925. FW Gate - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Frying Doom wrote: RubyPorto wrote: EDIT: Being on the ball about this would have been fixing it when it was reported on SISI or at Fanfest. Not knowing the companies internal workings, I can not...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 05:25:00
|
3926. Paving the way to the next nerf: mining barges! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Jorma Morkkis wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Not in a suicide gank. A fact that has been pointed out so many times when you lie about it. Well, it's not even near profitable, but it can be done. Don't know if there's someone stupid enough to do...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 05:21:00
|
3927. FW Gate - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: RubyPorto wrote: EDIT: Being on the ball about this would have been fixing it when it was reported on SISI or at Fanfest. Not knowing the companies internal workings, I can not say how feasible this is. However any pe...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 05:08:00
|
3928. Armor tank modules - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Paikis wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Tippia wrote: PavlikX wrote: For now we have situation in the game when Shield tank (ST) is better in general than Armor tank (AT) Right now, we have a situation which is pretty much exactly the same one...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 05:06:00
|
3929. Armor tank modules - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Tippia wrote: PavlikX wrote: For now we have situation in the game when Shield tank (ST) is better in general than Armor tank (AT) Right now, we have a situation which is pretty much exactly the same one as when armour tanks were GǣbetterG...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 04:20:00
|
3930. FW Gate - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Frying Doom wrote: Children know the difference between right and wrong. This was not market manipulation as that does not require interaction to another part of the game. Note I said require, the ice ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 04:17:00
|
3931. How the hell do people modify their interface like this? Wasn't it disallowed? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
That I know, nobody's gotten in trouble for modifying their overview XML file. There have even been services advertised on the forums creating custom XML files for people.
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 04:16:00
|
3932. FW Gate - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Frying Doom wrote: Children know the difference between right and wrong. This was not market manipulation as that does not require interaction to another part of the game. Note I said require, the ice interdiction could have been done by artif...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 04:06:00
|
3933. FW Gate - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Antisocial Malkavian wrote: Information Agent wrote: Directly from the goons own mouth from the long explanation posted earlier in the week. He uses the word 'exploit' which to me states that they knew what th...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 04:03:00
|
3934. Spank for ISD ~~ Worth it? - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Yoshite McLulzypants wrote: i can totally get behind a guy who pretends to be a girl. I think that's precisely the point of pretending to be a girl.
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 03:46:00
|
3935. FW Gate - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Information Agent wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Market Manipulation isn't an Exploit Profit isn't an Exploit Blowing up your alts isn't an Exploit Spreadsheets in Spreadsheets Online certainly aren't an exploit Where's the exploit? Your eviden...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 03:45:00
|
3936. FW Gate - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kiteo Hatto wrote: Bah, sandbox doesn't mean "abusing unintended game flaws to majorly profit". I don't know about you but when i think sandbox i think free roam, no objectives, no storyline quests that lead to endgame and no cutscenes. (minecr...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 03:44:00
|
3937. FW Gate - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Antisocial Malkavian wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Kiteo Hatto wrote: When its so profitable that it makes you question the reality(might not be the word im looking for) of it then its most likely not intended. Just as there was an "exploit" a...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 02:37:00
|
3938. FW Gate - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kiteo Hatto wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Nope. But unintentional mechanic != Exploit. It's called Emergent gameplay I give up, its hopeless to argue against you. Its silly that a lot of people on here think that unless its specifically spe...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 02:35:00
|
3939. FW Gate - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Har Harrison wrote: RubyPorto wrote: Kiteo Hatto wrote: At worst you will lose a few mil, at best you will double your isk. The % of success is in your favor Devs didn't intend us to buy stacks of AFs and play lottery in space with them ...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 02:33:00
|
3940. FW Gate - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Antisocial Malkavian wrote: RubyPorto wrote: We can't know it's broken unless we abuse the hell out of it ouerselves. Hoe dare CCP punish us for this service. Is that the spin youre going for? Read Post -> THEN -> Reply Try...
- by RubyPorto - at 2012.06.25 02:32:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |