| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2053
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:21:00 -
[91] - Quote
Information Agent wrote:RubyPorto wrote: We can't know it's broken unless CCP says it is. Plenty of mechanics had unintended side effects. Jetcan mining wasn't an intended side effect of jettisoning cargo, but there you have it. Tech's current issues were pretty clearly unintended, but it's not an exploit. Incursions weren't an exploit even though CCP didn't expect influence to immediately peg to 0 once people swooped in.
Just because it's unexpected doesn't mean it's an exploit (Jetcan mining) and just because it's profitable doesn't mean it's an exploit (Tech, NPC PI goo, etc). So how can you tell?
This is the problem, how much common sense would it have taken to realize that it was indeed an exploit, if speadsheets were being drawn up listing quantities and types of items to use in order to artificially inflate rewards then they were obviously premeditating the act, they knew it was an exploit and they used it regardless. As said by others, it was a known issue during fanfest and something that CCP said would not happen, so when it did happen how would it be labled as 'ok' by anyone with this knowledge, people dont need to be told a pan of boiling water is hot, they should be able to make a reasonable assumption for themselves. Don't get me wrong though, I admire the level of planning, mathmatical wizardry and the sheer cunning of what they did, but they did do it without thinking of the after effects and fall-out, not just for themselves but for everyone else too.
Market Manipulation isn't an Exploit Profit isn't an Exploit Blowing up your alts isn't an Exploit Spreadsheets in Spreadsheets Online certainly aren't an exploit
Where's the exploit?
Your evidence of ""premeditation" only show that they planned to make money (most industrialists use spreadsheets to ensure a profit). This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Kiteo Hatto
The Fiction Factory Blue Nation
237
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:21:00 -
[92] - Quote
Are you serious ? Its a flawed game mechanic if you MAKE isk by LOSING isk....
That's equivalent of buying npc trade goods in 1 station for 10isk each and selling them in the same station for 100isk each "That's okay it annoys me when people pile on new definitions to the word sandbox every time CCP does something they don't like." - Alara IonStorm GD is where 60% of threads make you dumber and 10% which provide you with entertainment, the remaining 30% is a mix of both. |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution Amarr 7th Fleet
211
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:22:00 -
[93] - Quote
Kiteo Hatto wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Kiteo Hatto wrote:When its so profitable that it makes you question the reality(might not be the word im looking for) of it then its most likely not intended.
Just as there was an "exploit" a while back that i discovered by getting killed to rats doing a level 3. Back when retribution hulls were 13m each, i bought a few and died to rats on purpose to further "test" it.
It was a lot more chance based profit but it was still profit by non intended game mechanics. You died in your retribution(uninsured) then salvaged it(sometimes you got intact armor plates which sold for 34m).
Me being a person with common sense i didn't abuse the exploit even though i knew it would get rich, feel free to do it if you wish. Uh, Tech? And intact armor plates aren't an exploit any more than insurance fraud is when it's possible due to changing markets. So you are saying its ok to blow up cheap ships and salvage them afterwards for a chance to get something thats worth double the isk of their whole hull ? You just said it there yourself..
CHANCE
There is a chance you will make 2x the ISK, but it is not a given... Why won't CCP fix the ongoing FW issues? Fix the speed tanking of plexes |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2053
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:25:00 -
[94] - Quote
Kiteo Hatto wrote:Are you serious ? Its a flawed game mechanic if you MAKE isk by LOSING isk....
That's equivalent of buying npc trade goods in 1 station for 10isk each and selling them in the same station for 100isk each
Sounds exactly like the NPC PI goods thing. You could buy POSes from NPCs, reprocess them, and sell the components for a fairly large profit.
Nobody got stuff taken away unless they did it after CCP announced that they should stop. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Kiteo Hatto
The Fiction Factory Blue Nation
239
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:25:00 -
[95] - Quote
At worst you will lose a few mil, at best you will double your isk. The % of success is in your favor
Devs didn't intend us to buy stacks of AFs and play lottery in space with them by ourselves, did they ?
"That's okay it annoys me when people pile on new definitions to the word sandbox every time CCP does something they don't like." - Alara IonStorm GD is where 60% of threads make you dumber and 10% which provide you with entertainment, the remaining 30% is a mix of both. |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution Amarr 7th Fleet
211
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:25:00 -
[96] - Quote
Kiteo Hatto wrote:Are you serious ? Its a flawed game mechanic if you MAKE isk by LOSING isk....
That's equivalent of buying npc trade goods in 1 station for 10isk each and selling them in the same station for 100isk each No, since that would INTRODUCE ISK into the game's economy, which the Goons did not do. They massively added to theirs, at the cost of taking a lot of other ISK out of the general economy.
People got assets and parted with their ISK for it. The issue is that the Goons could get a vast amount of these assets due to the positive LP feedback. Different issue causing something that you see as a similar outcome.
I am in the Amarr militia. I've actually been hurt by this due to having to face the Minmitar at Tier 4/5. However I still do not see what the Goons did as being illegal. Why won't CCP fix the ongoing FW issues? Fix the speed tanking of plexes |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2053
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:26:00 -
[97] - Quote
Kiteo Hatto wrote:At worst you will lose a few mil, at best you will double your isk. The % of success is in your favor
Devs didn't intend us to buy stacks of AFs and play lottery in space with them by ourselves, did they ?
Nope. But unintentional mechanic != Exploit. It's called Emergent gameplay
See: Jetcans AFK Cloaking Tech And so many more.
EDIT: Can't believe I forgot the biggest unintended mechanic of them all. Local as an Intel tool This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
171
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:30:00 -
[98] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Information Agent wrote:RubyPorto wrote:
You flew right over the part where CCP was warned about the problem before it hit TQ. That's kind of the whole ballgame. The players did their diligence by telling CCP about a thing. CCP ignored the players. The effects of the thing are on CCP's head.
just because an exploit got reported in good time to prevent it making it onto TQ, doesn't mean its ok to then use the unfixed exploit and expect to keep everything gained from it. "Wah, we told them it was broke, we used it knowing it was broke and now they take our moneys, why???? waaah" is all it sounds like from my balcony in common sense land. Its not on CCP's head at all, its on the head of every person who knowingly abused an exploit, they were the ones planning, preparing and carrying out the act after all. In my honest opinion, using an exploit that you have previous knowledge from the test server of in conjunction with knowing that it is indeed an 'exploit' by very definition should result in a permanent ban of the account/s and account holders using said exploit and total reversal of all ill-gotten gains received via use of the exploit. After all, there no telling how many totally unconnected people were affected by the use of this exploit, they may be out of pocket, they may have had enough of hearing about goons constantly and quit, or they may be put off by the fact that there is that much high level organisation going into gaming a system to an advantage. It would seriously put me off wanting to play if I was new to the game and heard people were in serious planning sessions, speadsheets an all, on how to gain vitual currency from a loophole/exploit in a game I was enjoying. Theres really no telling how far the ripples from something like this travel. We can't know it's broken unless
we abuse the hell out of it ouerselves. Hoe dare CCP punish us for this service.
Is that the spin youre going for?
RubyPorto wrote:Kiteo Hatto wrote:When its so profitable that it makes you question the reality(might not be the word im looking for) of it then its most likely not intended.
Just as there was an "exploit" a while back that i discovered by getting killed to rats doing a level 3. Back when retribution hulls were 13m each, i bought a few and died to rats on purpose to further "test" it.
It was a lot more chance based profit but it was still profit by non intended game mechanics. You died in your retribution(uninsured) then salvaged it(sometimes you got intact armor plates which sold for 34m).
Me being a person with common sense i didn't abuse the exploit even though i knew it would get rich, feel free to do it if you wish. Uh, Tech?
damn funny when Goons even admit this is basically an exploit http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Har Harrison
Amarrian Retribution Amarr 7th Fleet
211
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:32:00 -
[99] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Kiteo Hatto wrote:At worst you will lose a few mil, at best you will double your isk. The % of success is in your favor
Devs didn't intend us to buy stacks of AFs and play lottery in space with them by ourselves, did they ?
Nope. But unintentional mechanic != Exploit. It's called Emergent gameplay See: Jetcans AFK Cloaking Tech And so many more. The Devs didn't INTEND for Mittens to setup a moon goo cartel and have the north sit on an isk gathering machine (I don't say printing as they don't create isk, just gain it for the resource). The Devs thought it would foster conflict as the alliances in the south (e.g. AAA, Atlas etc...) would fight to gain those moons. Instead what has happened is that the alliances in the north have held them for such a length of time that they have built sizable war chests to use in defending these moons and as a result can
1) establish a price fixing cartel 2) throw cheap ships to their pilots for event like burn jita 3) sponser the killing of hulks etc... so as it turn Hulkageddon into an ongoing event.
Intended outcome? No, but it is still a sandbox one until CCP alter the way moons work (remove them and replace with ring mining or similar) or have the resources deplete and respawn or change t2 production again to make the moons more balanced across the map. Why won't CCP fix the ongoing FW issues? Fix the speed tanking of plexes |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2053
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:32:00 -
[100] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:RubyPorto wrote:
We can't know it's broken unless
we abuse the hell out of it ouerselves. Hoe dare CCP punish us for this service. Is that the spin youre going for?
Read Post -> THEN -> Reply
Try again. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2053
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:33:00 -
[101] - Quote
Har Harrison wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Kiteo Hatto wrote:At worst you will lose a few mil, at best you will double your isk. The % of success is in your favor
Devs didn't intend us to buy stacks of AFs and play lottery in space with them by ourselves, did they ?
Nope. But unintentional mechanic != Exploit. It's called Emergent gameplay See: Jetcans AFK Cloaking Tech And so many more. The Devs didn't INTEND for Mittens to setup a moon goo cartel and have the north sit on an isk gathering machine (I don't say printing as they don't create isk, just gain it for the resource). The Devs thought it would foster conflict as the alliances in the south (e.g. AAA, Atlas etc...) would fight to gain those moons. Instead what has happened is that the alliances in the north have held them for such a length of time that they have built sizable war chests to use in defending these moons and as a result can 1) establish a price fixing cartel 2) throw cheap ships to their pilots for event like burn jita 3) sponser the killing of hulks etc... so as it turn Hulkageddon into an ongoing event. Intended outcome? No, but it is still a sandbox one until CCP alter the way moons work (remove them and replace with ring mining or similar) or have the resources deplete and respawn or change t2 production again to make the moons more balanced across the map.
That's my point. It's unintended and massively profitable but not an Exploit.
(Oh, and CCP was, of course, warned by Akita T well before Tech hit TQ) This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Kiteo Hatto
The Fiction Factory Blue Nation
240
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:33:00 -
[102] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:
Nope. But unintentional mechanic != Exploit. It's called Emergent gameplay
I give up, its hopeless to argue against you. Its silly that a lot of people on here think that unless its specifically specified to the letter by CCP(think of the recent rookie systems thread) then you can do everything and anything you like without a second thought of whether it was intended in the first place or not.
As soon as something profits you its suddenly "emergent gameplay", as soon as ccp corrects something that concerns them its "don't touch my sandbox".
Im going to sleep now. o/ "That's okay it annoys me when people pile on new definitions to the word sandbox every time CCP does something they don't like." - Alara IonStorm GD is where 60% of threads make you dumber and 10% which provide you with entertainment, the remaining 30% is a mix of both. |

Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
51
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:34:00 -
[103] - Quote
qDoctor Strangelove wrote: And no risk vs reward?? When one invest all the isk one have, is that not a risk?
No, that's called "investing all the isk one has".
It's a risk if there's a chance you'll lose some or all of your investment.
|

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2053
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:35:00 -
[104] - Quote
Kiteo Hatto wrote:RubyPorto wrote:
Nope. But unintentional mechanic != Exploit. It's called Emergent gameplay
I give up, its hopeless to argue against you. Its silly that a lot of people on here think that unless its specifically specified to the letter by CCP(think of the recent rookie systems thread) then you can do everything and anything you like without a second thought of whether it was intended in the first place or not. As soon as something profits you its suddenly "emergent gameplay", as soon as ccp corrects something that concerns them its "don't touch my sandbox". Im going to sleep now. o/
That's umm, actually the definition of sandbox gameplay. If it's not prohibited, then it's allowed. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
172
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:36:00 -
[105] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Kiteo Hatto wrote:When its so profitable that it makes you question the reality(might not be the word im looking for) of it then its most likely not intended.
Just as there was an "exploit" a while back that i discovered by getting killed to rats doing a level 3. Back when retribution hulls were 13m each, i bought a few and died to rats on purpose to further "test" it.
It was a lot more chance based profit but it was still profit by non intended game mechanics. You died in your retribution(uninsured) then salvaged it(sometimes you got intact armor plates which sold for 34m).
Me being a person with common sense i didn't abuse the exploit even though i knew it would get rich, feel free to do it if you wish. Uh, Tech?
damn funny when Goons even admit this is basically an exploit http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
51
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:36:00 -
[106] - Quote
Fatbottom Girl wrote:This bold and beautiful universe we live in became much smaller.
The universe hasn't changed size, you can just see the existng boundaries a bit more clearly. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2053
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:37:00 -
[107] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Kiteo Hatto wrote:When its so profitable that it makes you question the reality(might not be the word im looking for) of it then its most likely not intended.
Just as there was an "exploit" a while back that i discovered by getting killed to rats doing a level 3. Back when retribution hulls were 13m each, i bought a few and died to rats on purpose to further "test" it.
It was a lot more chance based profit but it was still profit by non intended game mechanics. You died in your retribution(uninsured) then salvaged it(sometimes you got intact armor plates which sold for 34m).
Me being a person with common sense i didn't abuse the exploit even though i knew it would get rich, feel free to do it if you wish. Uh, Tech? damn funny when Goons even admit this is basically an exploit
When it's fixed do you think tech profits will be rolled back? This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
172
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:38:00 -
[108] - Quote
Kiteo Hatto wrote:RubyPorto wrote:
Nope. But unintentional mechanic != Exploit. It's called Emergent gameplay
I give up, its hopeless to argue against you. Its silly that a lot of people on here think that unless its specifically specified to the letter by CCP(think of the recent rookie systems thread) then you can do everything and anything you like without a second thought of whether it was intended in the first place or not. As soon as something profits you its suddenly "emergent gameplay", as soon as ccp corrects something that concerns them its "don't touch my sandbox". Im going to sleep now. o/
Of course it is; thats why Sreegs stopped posting and CCP are just ignoring them now
Goons... listen to reason? Peh they cant when the walls are bleeding and people's faces melting as they imbibed in their own Kool-aid
http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Kiteo Hatto
The Fiction Factory Blue Nation
240
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:41:00 -
[109] - Quote
Bah, sandbox doesn't mean "abusing unintended game flaws to majorly profit". I don't know about you but when i think sandbox i think free roam, no objectives, no storyline quests that lead to endgame and no cutscenes. (minecraft, garry's mod)
Unless you mean that eve's sandbox is: rustle other's jimmies, troll online, find loopholes to get rich. "That's okay it annoys me when people pile on new definitions to the word sandbox every time CCP does something they don't like." - Alara IonStorm GD is where 60% of threads make you dumber and 10% which provide you with entertainment, the remaining 30% is a mix of both. |

Information Agent
Apparently Miners
73
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:41:00 -
[110] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:
Market Manipulation isn't an Exploit Profit isn't an Exploit Blowing up your alts isn't an Exploit Spreadsheets in Spreadsheets Online certainly aren't an exploit
Where's the exploit?
Your evidence of ""premeditation" only show that they planned to make money (most industrialists use spreadsheets to ensure a profit).
Just a quick reply because its late where I am and Im getting sleepy hehe.
Quote:A small group of market and game mechanics wizards sat in a channel, put their heads together and designed a theoretical exploit to game the system. It succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.
Directly from the goons own mouth from the long explanation posted earlier in the week. He uses the word 'exploit' which to me states that they knew what they were doing was wrong.
Quote:The GÇ£costGÇ¥ in this equation was CCPGÇÖs own metric, which you can see by opening your cargo window or your station hangars and looking in the bottom right of the window. Therein lies the heart of the break -- CCPGÇÖs item value calculation was very vulnerable to manipulation. If you picked the right item, loaded hundreds of thousands of them into a Badger, then blew it up in the context of Faction Warfare, you could generate as much LP as you want for practically no cost. As long as you did the math right, the result was foolproof.
Manipulating CCP's calculations in a way to profit sounds less like market manipulation and more like cheating to me personally. Also, a 'coming forward' of explaining producing faction lp in limitless quantities for practically no cost in a 'foulproof' manner. Its not so much the producing that is wrong, but the quantities, nothing in EVE is limitless, its all limited either by player action or by design. So, when player action circumvents this, or design breaks, then somethings wrong.
I'll just reiterate on an earlier point that since CCP had already said 'it should not happen' means they obviously were aware that without tweaking the game before releasing Inferno that it could be 'gamed' . Which leads me to believe that CCP were in the belief that no one would try to break/game/exploit the system after fanfest given their stance on it was 'should not happen' (ie, they were in the belief that they had made it impossible to do or unlikely to happen and it wouldnt be classed as an exploit since it isnt possible etc).
Kinda hard to put it into words really without it sounding like a jabbering mess, but I think you get were Im coming from.  |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
174
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:48:00 -
[111] - Quote
Information Agent wrote: Directly from the goons own mouth from the long explanation posted earlier in the week. He uses the word 'exploit' which to me states that they knew what they were doing was wrong.
Quote:When CCP originally released their devblog on Inferno and revealed the formula they intended to use, we sat in shock. I immediately stated a phrase I would repeat many times: GÇ£/10000 will not save themGÇ¥. CCP made the assumption that rewarding a player 1/10th of the value of the playerGÇÖs kill at 1K ISK/LP, for a total of 10K ISK destroyed CCP Value/1 ISK reward, would prevent manipulation of the system. While this was an understandable mistake, it turned out to be several orders of magnitude off.
We laid in wait.
again.. the bolded part shows the foreknowledge of the misdeed
Quote:The original babby step was to use hydromagnetic datacores. Hydrocores had a CCP Value of 317,000 ISK (pay attention to this number, because itGÇÖs important). When we bought Minmatar into Tier 4, we were rewarded with a 50% reduction in both LP and ISK cost of our purchases from their loyalty store, so one datacore from the LP store at Tier 4 cost 25 LP and 25,000 isk. When the hauler with the datacore inside was duly murdered by our Minmatar loyalist, it rewarded the murderer with 63.5 LP. Blowing up datacores in this manner grossed enough LP to cash out into implants (at 2000 ISK/LP) to cover the isk portion of the cost of the datacore, while still netting excess LP in the process. Essentially, we were able to convert ISK to LP at the rate of 1390 ISK per LP, then immediately sell the produced LP for 1.5 times what we paid
Think I see why their datacores got ganked now
Sheds new light on the "datacores that had nothing to do with what they did" line... http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Charles Baker
Federal Mineral Acquisition
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 02:59:00 -
[112] - Quote
In this thread, Goon-alts cry harder than Highsec miners during Hulkageddon, honestly HTFU.
P.S. Please continue to gank highsec miners indefinitely (maybe burn Jita and Dodixie too for that matter) as i need you guys to continue driving prices up so i can smoke money like a ******* baron. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
175
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 03:03:00 -
[113] - Quote
Charles Baker wrote:In this thread, Goon-alts cry harder than Highsec miners during Hulkageddon, honestly HTFU.
P.S. Please continue to gank highsec miners indefinitely (maybe burn Jita and Dodixie too for that matter) as i need you guys to continue driving prices up so i can smoke money like a Goon smokes Tech
Me too
http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Charles Baker
Federal Mineral Acquisition
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 03:07:00 -
[114] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Goon smokes Tech
Goons can't smoke Tech, they don't have enough cash to pay sov-bills. they didn't Launder their FW money like a smart criminal honestly if you'd ran a few Multi-billion ISK IPO's you could have laundered most of it for ISK not linked to your FW scheming, yes you'd lose lots of it but at the end you 'd have nothing but sweet smelling ISKies.
|

Phill Esteen
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
52
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 03:10:00 -
[115] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Your evidence of ""premeditation" only show that they planned to make money (most industrialists use spreadsheets to ensure a profit).
ban spreadsheets GÇô postum faex est GÇô-á |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
175
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 03:13:00 -
[116] - Quote
Phill Esteen wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Your evidence of ""premeditation" only show that they planned to make money (most industrialists use spreadsheets to ensure a profit). ban spreadsheets
Wait wouldnt that ban EVE? http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2053
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 03:44:00 -
[117] - Quote
Kiteo Hatto wrote:Bah, sandbox doesn't mean "abusing unintended game flaws to majorly profit". I don't know about you but when i think sandbox i think free roam, no objectives, no storyline quests that lead to endgame and no cutscenes. (minecraft, garry's mod)
Unless you mean that eve's sandbox is: rustle other's jimmies, troll online, find loopholes to get rich.
Tech, Local, NPC PI, and Jetcan mining say you're wrong. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2053
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 03:45:00 -
[118] - Quote
Information Agent wrote:RubyPorto wrote:
Market Manipulation isn't an Exploit Profit isn't an Exploit Blowing up your alts isn't an Exploit Spreadsheets in Spreadsheets Online certainly aren't an exploit
Where's the exploit?
Your evidence of ""premeditation" only show that they planned to make money (most industrialists use spreadsheets to ensure a profit).
Just a quick reply because its late where I am and Im getting sleepy hehe. Quote:A small group of market and game mechanics wizards sat in a channel, put their heads together and designed a theoretical exploit to game the system. It succeeded beyond their wildest dreams. Directly from the goons own mouth from the long explanation posted earlier in the week. He uses the word 'exploit' which to me states that they knew what they were doing was wrong. Quote:The GÇ£costGÇ¥ in this equation was CCPGÇÖs own metric, which you can see by opening your cargo window or your station hangars and looking in the bottom right of the window. Therein lies the heart of the break -- CCPGÇÖs item value calculation was very vulnerable to manipulation. If you picked the right item, loaded hundreds of thousands of them into a Badger, then blew it up in the context of Faction Warfare, you could generate as much LP as you want for practically no cost. As long as you did the math right, the result was foolproof. Manipulating CCP's calculations in a way to profit sounds less like market manipulation and more like cheating to me personally. Also, a 'coming forward' of explaining producing faction lp in limitless quantities for practically no cost in a 'foulproof' manner. Its not so much the producing that is wrong, but the quantities, nothing in EVE is limitless, its all limited either by player action or by design. So, when player action circumvents this, or design breaks, then somethings wrong. I'll just reiterate on an earlier point that since CCP had already said 'it should not happen' means they obviously were aware that without tweaking the game before releasing Inferno that it could be 'gamed' . Which leads me to believe that CCP were in the belief that no one would try to break/game/exploit the system after fanfest given their stance on it was 'should not happen' (ie, they were in the belief that they had made it impossible to do or unlikely to happen and it wouldnt be classed as an exploit since it isnt possible etc). Kinda hard to put it into words really without it sounding like a jabbering mess, but I think you get were Im coming from. 
Google "artistic license." Be amazed. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Antisocial Malkavian
Aliastra Gallente Federation
175
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 03:57:00 -
[119] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Information Agent wrote: Directly from the goons own mouth from the long explanation posted earlier in the week. He uses the word 'exploit' which to me states that they knew what they were doing was wrong.
Quote:When CCP originally released their devblog on Inferno and revealed the formula they intended to use, we sat in shock. I immediately stated a phrase I would repeat many times: GÇ£/10000 will not save themGÇ¥. CCP made the assumption that rewarding a player 1/10th of the value of the playerGÇÖs kill at 1K ISK/LP, for a total of 10K ISK destroyed CCP Value/1 ISK reward, would prevent manipulation of the system. While this was an understandable mistake, it turned out to be several orders of magnitude off.
We laid in wait. again.. the bolded part shows the foreknowledge of the misdeed Quote:The original babby step was to use hydromagnetic datacores. Hydrocores had a CCP Value of 317,000 ISK (pay attention to this number, because itGÇÖs important). When we bought Minmatar into Tier 4, we were rewarded with a 50% reduction in both LP and ISK cost of our purchases from their loyalty store, so one datacore from the LP store at Tier 4 cost 25 LP and 25,000 isk. When the hauler with the datacore inside was duly murdered by our Minmatar loyalist, it rewarded the murderer with 63.5 LP. Blowing up datacores in this manner grossed enough LP to cash out into implants (at 2000 ISK/LP) to cover the isk portion of the cost of the datacore, while still netting excess LP in the process. Essentially, we were able to convert ISK to LP at the rate of 1390 ISK per LP, then immediately sell the produced LP for 1.5 times what we paid Think I see why their datacores got ganked now Sheds new light on the "datacores that had nothing to do with what they did" line...
Hey goon, try refuting this part, I see you skipped it the first time
http://gizmodo.com/5913381/season-your-food-with-salt-from-real-human-tears
you will be harvested |

Nikodiemus
Jokulhlaup
33
|
Posted - 2012.06.25 03:59:00 -
[120] - Quote
Fatbottom Girl wrote:CCP Xhagen says. "Technically speaking, they were not doing anything that was forbidden
June 22, 2012 Never forget.
The death of the sandbox came as innocuously as it began. A group of enterprising individuals who examine patch notes and run spreadsheets and formulas found a way to get ahead of a poorly implemented feature on an upcoming patch. The Viking Gods of CCP hf saw fit to sacrifice innovation upon the altar of expediency.
Walls slammed into place and bars were erected. "You may go this far and no further," was the message. This bold and beautiful universe we live in became much smaller.
June 22, 2012 Never forget.
Christ you people never give up do you? Any thinking person can see you are speaking bullshit and it only follows that anymore positive responses are from goons.
The shard isn't failing, the devs (for a change) are on the ball, the game is safe, and the assholes that tried to hurt every other player that was not directly involved in the scam are being dealt with.
Spreadsheets online is still Eve. Manipulating a game mechanic in a way that it was not intended as the rules state, is not Eve. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |