Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Fatbottom Girl
State War Academy Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 20:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Xhagen says. "Technically speaking, they were not doing anything that was forbidden
June 22, 2012 Never forget.
The death of the sandbox came as innocuously as it began. A group of enterprising individuals who examine patch notes and run spreadsheets and formulas found a way to get ahead of a poorly implemented feature on an upcoming patch. The Viking Gods of CCP hf saw fit to sacrifice innovation upon the altar of expediency.
Walls slammed into place and bars were erected. "You may go this far and no further," was the message. This bold and beautiful universe we live in became much smaller.
June 22, 2012 Never forget. |

Trendon Evenstar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 20:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Well said. |

Grey Azorria
Federation Industries
173
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 20:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
Fatbottom Girl wrote:blah blah blah Sandboxes have always had boundaries, otherwise they would just be beaches or deserts or something. Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience. |

Jayrendo Karr
Suns Of Korhal Terran Commonwealth
168
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 21:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
If you want to pull of a grand heist, you shouldn't tell anyone you just pulled off a grand heist. |

Strong Black Woman
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 21:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
Jayrendo Karr wrote:If you want to pull of a grand heist, you shouldn't tell anyone you just pulled off a grand heist.
I they didn't tell anyone, then it would be a heist. By telling everyone about it, was just emergent gameplay. |

Grey Azorria
Federation Industries
173
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 21:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
Strong Black Woman wrote:Jayrendo Karr wrote:If you want to pull of a grand heist, you shouldn't tell anyone you just pulled off a grand heist. I they didn't tell anyone, then it would be a heist. By telling everyone about it, was just emergent gameplay. Not really... Was the boomerang exploit emergent gameplay? How about that exploit where you webbed freighters as they were trying to insta-warp from stations? Both were clever manipulations of the game, but were still exploits. Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2040
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 22:10:00 -
[7] - Quote
Grey Azorria wrote:Strong Black Woman wrote:Jayrendo Karr wrote:If you want to pull of a grand heist, you shouldn't tell anyone you just pulled off a grand heist. I they didn't tell anyone, then it would be a heist. By telling everyone about it, was just emergent gameplay. Not really... Was the boomerang exploit emergent gameplay? How about that exploit where you webbed freighters as they were trying to insta-warp from stations? Both were clever manipulations of the game, but were still exploits.
People warned CCP about the possibility of this before the patch went live. CCP didn't listen. Why is CCP punishing people for pointing out that they didn't listen? This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
215
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 22:30:00 -
[8] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Grey Azorria wrote:Strong Black Woman wrote:Jayrendo Karr wrote:If you want to pull of a grand heist, you shouldn't tell anyone you just pulled off a grand heist. I they didn't tell anyone, then it would be a heist. By telling everyone about it, was just emergent gameplay. Not really... Was the boomerang exploit emergent gameplay? How about that exploit where you webbed freighters as they were trying to insta-warp from stations? Both were clever manipulations of the game, but were still exploits. People warned CCP about the possibility of this before the patch went live. CCP didn't listen. Why is CCP punishing people for pointing out that they didn't listen?
Seems to be a recurring theme that CCP doesn't listen to the testers, then knee-jerks a reaction.
|

Alexzandvar Douglass
NUTS AND BOLTS MANUFACTURING En Garde
28
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 22:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
You do know Sandboxes have walls right? This is a Sandbox not a desert. |

No More Heroes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
698
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 23:02:00 -
[10] - Quote
Grey Azorria wrote:Strong Black Woman wrote:Jayrendo Karr wrote:If you want to pull of a grand heist, you shouldn't tell anyone you just pulled off a grand heist. I they didn't tell anyone, then it would be a heist. By telling everyone about it, was just emergent gameplay. Not really... Was the boomerang exploit emergent gameplay? How about that exploit where you webbed freighters as they were trying to insta-warp from stations? Both were clever manipulations of the game, but were still exploits.
The mechanic still exists, then mechanic itself was totally intended. It was the market manipulation of various items that let the guys do what they did. . |

Large Collidable Object
morons.
1593
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 23:23:00 -
[11] - Quote
Alexzandvar Douglass wrote:You do know Sandboxes have walls right? This is a Sandbox not a desert.
I agree - and Eve has tons of walls - the thing however is that if CCP mess a mechanic up (i.e. they set the walls wrong), people can and will exploit it. CCP then may realize it isn't working as they meant it to work and may label it an exploit.
Everyone using the mechanic after that should have the assets and isk they made that way removed - fine. Up to the point they labeled it an exploit, it's a game mechanic.
Anyone remember the ferrogel incident? CCP have been made aware of the exploit several times and never fixed it - then, they suddenly realize it and punish people for their own mistake and failure to read bug reports... Now that obviously was a bug, but the mechanic was there, was reported and was neither fixed or labeled an expoit for ages, then all of a sudden CCP swings the banhammer for their own shortcomings.
What about the margin trading scam? That's more exploitative of weird game mechanics than what goons did here - will CCP suddenly decide it's an exploit after years of leaving it untouched and seize isk retroactively? You know... morons. |

Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
311
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 23:34:00 -
[12] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Grey Azorria wrote:Strong Black Woman wrote:Jayrendo Karr wrote:If you want to pull of a grand heist, you shouldn't tell anyone you just pulled off a grand heist. I they didn't tell anyone, then it would be a heist. By telling everyone about it, was just emergent gameplay. Not really... Was the boomerang exploit emergent gameplay? How about that exploit where you webbed freighters as they were trying to insta-warp from stations? Both were clever manipulations of the game, but were still exploits. People warned CCP about the possibility of this before the patch went live. CCP didn't listen. Why is CCP punishing people for pointing out that they didn't listen?
Fecking hundred times this tbh !! brb |

Phill Esteen
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
48
|
Posted - 2012.06.23 23:54:00 -
[13] - Quote
Grey Azorria wrote:Fatbottom Girl wrote:blah blah blah Sandboxes have always had boundaries, otherwise they would just be beaches or deserts or something.
beaches and deserts have boundaries, otherwise they would be Arrakis or Tatooine or something GÇô postum faex est GÇô-á |

Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
163
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 00:01:00 -
[14] - Quote
Excessive tears by Goon alts?
Exploit: to utilize, especially for profit; turn to practical account: to exploit a business opportunity.
If this is too hard to understand, perhaps I can find a kiddie's dictionary to link for you? 
Looking to stamp out apiphobia in my lifetime..... |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2041
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 00:05:00 -
[15] - Quote
Beekeeper Bob wrote:Excessive tears by Goon alts? Exploit: to utilize, especially for profit; turn to practical account: to exploit a business opportunity. If this is too hard to understand, perhaps I can find a kiddie's dictionary to link for you? 
Some words have more than one definition depending on the context. This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

ACE McFACE
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
709
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 00:13:00 -
[16] - Quote
Grey Azorria wrote:Fatbottom Girl wrote:blah blah blah Sandboxes have always had boundaries, otherwise they would just be beaches or deserts or something. Hmm, but even then deserts and beaches end eventually, so if a sandbox didnt have walls it would HAVE cover the entire planet, but then thats a boundry.
In conclusion, a sandbox without walls will fill the universe with sand I just gotta go fast! |

Vaal Erit
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
306
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 00:26:00 -
[17] - Quote
No More Heroes wrote:The mechanic still exists, then mechanic itself was totally intended. It was the market manipulation of various items that let the guys do what they did.
This doesn't make any sense. Market manipulation versus other players is fine. Market manipulation versus NPCs in order to basically dupe LP is not really intended. I'd appreciate a link where CCP explicitly states that you should be able to get unlimited LP from FW kills + market manipulation. If you think CCP knows about every possibility of their new game mechanics, you haven't been playing very long.
You are still free to charge 500m for a worthless LP store implant but if you think that gives you the right to exploit a poorly thought out formula in order to gain unlimited LP/items then you are sadly mistaken.
I hope you guys did at least a few 100+ man stabber/tempest fleet issue roams or else you are pretty bad at EVE. |

Savage Angel
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
122
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 00:34:00 -
[18] - Quote
When something sounds too good to be true, it usually is. Is this not a saying that is part of the Eve mantras?
When you get a result from your actions and say "Wow I bet CCP didn't indend THAT", you are probably right. People realize when they are exploiting, and cry foul when called on it.
Oh, and everyone needs to get over themselves with this "breaking the sandbox" BS. A sandbox has limits and rules by definition, just not a narrow direction. Just because you don't like a rule does not mean it breaks anything. |

Name Family Name
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
60
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 00:40:00 -
[19] - Quote
Savage Angel wrote:
When you get a result from your actions and say "Wow I bet CCP didn't indend THAT", you are probably right. People realize when they are exploiting, and cry foul when called on it.
I always think that when I board a Minmatar ship.
I think I'm pretty safe, though - CCP would have to ban 80% of eves playerbase. |

Azami Nevinyrall
Project Cerberus Caldari State Capturing
300
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 00:56:00 -
[20] - Quote
Posting in a Goon alt wine thread... Do you know what a sh*t-barometer is? It measures the sh*t-pressure in the air, did you hear that? The sounds of the whispering winds of sh*t... |

Ris Dnalor
Black Rebel Rifter Club
372
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 00:57:00 -
[21] - Quote
Fatbottom Girl wrote:CCP Xhagen says. "Technically speaking, they were not doing anything that was forbidden
June 22, 2012 Never forget.
The death of the sandbox came as innocuously as it began. A group of enterprising individuals who examine patch notes and run spreadsheets and formulas found a way to get ahead of a poorly implemented feature on an upcoming patch. The Viking Gods of CCP hf saw fit to sacrifice innovation upon the altar of expediency.
Walls slammed into place and bars were erected. "You may go this far and no further," was the message. This bold and beautiful universe we live in became much smaller.
June 22, 2012 Never forget.
+1, well said.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=118961
EvE = Everybody Vs. Everybody
- Qolde |

Ris Dnalor
Black Rebel Rifter Club
372
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 00:58:00 -
[22] - Quote
No More Heroes wrote:Grey Azorria wrote:Strong Black Woman wrote:Jayrendo Karr wrote:If you want to pull of a grand heist, you shouldn't tell anyone you just pulled off a grand heist. I they didn't tell anyone, then it would be a heist. By telling everyone about it, was just emergent gameplay. Not really... Was the boomerang exploit emergent gameplay? How about that exploit where you webbed freighters as they were trying to insta-warp from stations? Both were clever manipulations of the game, but were still exploits. The mechanic still exists, then mechanic itself was totally intended. It was the market manipulation of various items that let the guys do what they did.
if market manipulation is an exploit, then well, holy crapballs batman.... https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=118961
EvE = Everybody Vs. Everybody
- Qolde |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2043
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 01:00:00 -
[23] - Quote
Ris Dnalor wrote:No More Heroes wrote:Grey Azorria wrote:Strong Black Woman wrote:Jayrendo Karr wrote:If you want to pull of a grand heist, you shouldn't tell anyone you just pulled off a grand heist. I they didn't tell anyone, then it would be a heist. By telling everyone about it, was just emergent gameplay. Not really... Was the boomerang exploit emergent gameplay? How about that exploit where you webbed freighters as they were trying to insta-warp from stations? Both were clever manipulations of the game, but were still exploits. The mechanic still exists, then mechanic itself was totally intended. It was the market manipulation of various items that let the guys do what they did. if market manipulation is an exploit, then well, holy crapballs batman....
<.< . . . >.> . . . . . . ^^^
EDIT: Why does CCP hate whitespace? This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |

Akai Kvaesir
0ffice of Naval Intelligence
90
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 01:10:00 -
[24] - Quote
Here's the thing though, with the Sandbox. The whole idea behind EVE is Risk vs. Reward. There was no risk (as they were blowing up their own alts) and there was unlimited rewards. What about that isn't broken? Not only that, but seriously Goons...you posted about your heist on GD, and then get pissed when CCP wises up? You don't rob a bank, then head to the police and tell them EXACTLY how you bypassed the security...and then expect to get away with it, do you? |

Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
2
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 01:17:00 -
[25] - Quote
I stand here at the edge ... wallowing in self pity ...
Crying to anyone that might hear in the empty reaches of space. "Why or why did they do this to me?"
"Just why, not fair!" |

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
26
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 01:20:00 -
[26] - Quote
Akai Kvaesir wrote:Here's the thing though, with the Sandbox. The whole idea behind EVE is Risk vs. Reward. There was no risk (as they were blowing up their own alts) and there was unlimited rewards. What about that isn't broken? Not only that, but seriously Goons...you posted about your heist on GD, and then get pissed when CCP wises up? You don't rob a bank, then head to the police and tell them EXACTLY how you bypassed the security...and then expect to get away with it, do you?
Why wouldn't they? Capsuleers have noone to fear, except partialy Concorde, but Concorde does not police market pvp, only agression against others in high sec space.
Factions do their battles in low sec, a free for all zone. IF there was foul play, let concorde judge this, and adjust security standings therafter to prevent them from entering high sec space.
i urge you all to read the novell by CCP called Empyrian Age. This sort of gameplay is what CCP themselves front as the posibilities of EVE.
And no risk vs reward?? When one invest all the isk one have, is that not a risk? |

Tri Vetra
Rifters
51
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 01:55:00 -
[27] - Quote
never forget |

Akai Kvaesir
0ffice of Naval Intelligence
90
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 02:01:00 -
[28] - Quote
qDoctor Strangelove wrote:Akai Kvaesir wrote:Here's the thing though, with the Sandbox. The whole idea behind EVE is Risk vs. Reward. There was no risk (as they were blowing up their own alts) and there was unlimited rewards. What about that isn't broken? Not only that, but seriously Goons...you posted about your heist on GD, and then get pissed when CCP wises up? You don't rob a bank, then head to the police and tell them EXACTLY how you bypassed the security...and then expect to get away with it, do you? Why wouldn't they? Capsuleers have noone to fear, except partialy Concorde, but Concorde does not police market pvp, only agression against others in high sec space. Factions do their battles in low sec, a free for all zone. IF there was foul play, let concorde judge this, and adjust security standings therafter to prevent them from entering high sec space. i urge you all to read the novell by CCP called Empyrian Age. This sort of gameplay is what CCP themselves front as the posibilities of EVE. And no risk vs reward?? When one invest all the isk one have, is that not a risk?
You forget that EVE is a game, and that posting about their heist on a internet forum IN THE REAL WORLD, Goons just handed themselves to CCP on a silver platter. Normally, I would completely agree with you; except that the "bank" that was "robbed" equates to an infinite ISK-printer run by God (aka CCP, and not an NPC faction or corp). They found the ultimate ISK faucet, and drank their fill. I'm all for emergent gameplay, but aside from the Goon-alts that were blown up for the LP, I fail to see how this had ANYTHING to do with the rest of the playerbase, or even the NPC factions. Just because something is broken doesn't mean what happens because of it's broken nature is what is INTENDED to happen. And, in the end, it's STILL CCP's game. We only rent time to play.
EDIT: Also, Goon's have so much ISK, and all the tech they want. There's absolutely NO WAY they invested "all the ISK" into this one venture. There was no risk, as they were blowing themselves up. It's like making a bet against yourself, you can't lose. |

Akai Kvaesir
0ffice of Naval Intelligence
90
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 02:05:00 -
[29] - Quote
Tri Vetra wrote:never forget because this is TOTALLY like that last event that everyone loves to say they won't forget. Good job invalidating a terrible event by equating it to a debacle in a VIDEO GAME. |

RubyPorto
SniggWaffe YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2043
|
Posted - 2012.06.24 03:57:00 -
[30] - Quote
Akai Kvaesir wrote:Tri Vetra wrote:never forget because this is TOTALLY like that last event that everyone loves to say they won't forget. Good job invalidating a terrible event by equating it to a debacle in a VIDEO GAME.
You mean Incarna? Or maybe the 20% layoffs?
Oooohhhhh, you're assuming that a turn of phrase that's been in use for centuries (in various languages and phrasing), can only refer to one event in modern history.
December 7th 1941... or were you thinking something else? It gets used so often, who can keep them straight? This is EVE. -á Everybody Versus Everybody. |
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |