| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
1. Sticky:EVE Online: Retribution 1.1 Macintosh Issues and Feedback - in Macintosh [original thread]
Is there a bug causing automatic look at on selecting a target? I am starting to feel seasick as my main srceen won't stay still (really not kidding - I can't keep playing). It is also very jerky as the camera keeps recalculating everything. I can...
- by Shidhe - at 2013.06.07 18:44:00
|
2. Anyone else misses Jesus features? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I am hoping for a new industrial expansion - incorporating Dust and enhanced planetary interaction, as well as introducing more diverse supply chains to make trade (and therefore piracy) more popular. The economy has too many bottlenecks (nanoribb...
- by Shidhe - at 2013.05.02 20:29:00
|
3. RIP hisec mining, it was fun while it lasted. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
People will still mine in high sec - it will still make money. However I am a bit concerned about making null-sec even more independent. When we built a Mothership (as it was then) deep in nullsec, we had a huge logistics job moving stuff - largel...
- by Shidhe - at 2013.04.27 16:33:00
|
4. Why risk versus reward doesn't matter - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The classic current problems with risk vs reward vs cost (adding caso as correctly pointed out by OP) 1) Planetary interaction in HiSec. This should cost a LOT paid to the planetary authorities. PI should be a big reason for pilots to re-populate ...
- by Shidhe - at 2013.04.06 14:52:00
|
5. What one thing would you choose to improve industrial game play? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
We really need a big industrial expansion. It is needed to boost planetary interaction to make Dust mercs worthwhile to fund. It is needed to boost trade by creating a need to move materials from place to place. That will improve piracy too - all ...
- by Shidhe - at 2013.03.12 20:53:00
|
6. The X'th thread about low sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Wrong. Low sec economy cannot rely on a few items, it must have a serious and diverse base to get enough non-pirates into low sec to make life viable there - one reason I want to see sec status penalties reduced. It is the economy, it is always th...
- by Shidhe - at 2012.09.11 12:23:00
|
7. The X'th thread about low sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If low sec was worth going to, people would go. That's what used to happen. Scouting before valuable loads, risking less valuable ones, because you knew the area. Unofficial residents discussion channels where the latest warnings were traded... It...
- by Shidhe - at 2012.09.11 10:49:00
|
8. The X'th thread about low sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
1) Stop all planetary interaction in High sec - those systems are full of NPCs already... 2) Make some of those low sec gas clouds useful for manufacturing other things 3) Make more varied materials lists for new tech - not all from one source plu...
- by Shidhe - at 2012.09.09 23:27:00
|
9. Sticky:New dev blog: Tech is fine l2p - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Hmm. Look at oil in the real world just now. Extreme price volatility is a function of a limited supply material reaching peak production. The problem with EvE raw materials is that there are a few bottle necks and a lot of not valuable stuff. Who...
- by Shidhe - at 2012.07.31 20:47:00
|
10. Highsec vs 0.0 - enough is enough, time to add some risk to the real carebears! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Low sec!!! Actually make low sec worthwhile, relative to the relative security of both hi sec and 0.0. A major industry upgrade in EvE concentrating on the following will help significantly: 1) Making low sec relatively more profitable (can be do...
- by Shidhe - at 2012.07.05 17:41:00
|
11. CCP; a numbers question if i may - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kieron VonDeux wrote: That could be by either reducing the risk Or by increasing the reward. I think it may be a combination of both. A reasonable solution for increasing interest and reward: 1) Stop planetary interaction in high sec. Thi...
- by Shidhe - at 2012.06.13 18:45:00
|
12. Low Sec / Null Sec - My Take - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Low sec is potentially the most interesting place in EvE - real lack of law (not just swapping Concord for some alliance diplomats). It is the place for small corps that don't want to be just cogs in some big alliance machine to go. The problem is...
- by Shidhe - at 2011.08.21 14:42:00
|
13. New Dev Blog: CSM May summit - meeting minutes are out - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dust interaction - more detail and economic importance for planetary interaction still needed. Why should I attack a planet on the ground? Why invest lots of cash in it? Planets should promote trade, and trade should promote piracy, and piracy sho...
- by Shidhe - at 2011.08.14 17:08:00
|
14. The issue of Low-sec - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Shidhe on 04/06/2011 15:08:40 Moon mining used to be good in low sec - the prom / dyspro mess caused us to pull out of low sec. Never seen a good reason to move back. In principle, planetary interaction might provide such a reason. ...
- by Shidhe - at 2011.06.04 15:05:00
|
15. The issue of Low-sec - in Science and Industry [original thread]
I remember when lowsec was profitable for industrialists and pirates - then came the Promethium / Dyspro mess, and it never recovered. CCP have to act to diversify their ingredient lists in a big way to avoid bottlenecks (currently Melted nano / T...
- by Shidhe - at 2011.03.19 14:02:00
|
16. Where the hell is CCP driving us to and "are we there yet?" - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hmm.. Long term full planetary interaction leading to colonisation, wars and empire building I guess, but there are some problems on the war. The main one is that we need something worth fighting for, and that ain't so simple as it sounds. You hav...
- by Shidhe - at 2011.03.19 13:43:00
|
17. New Dev Blog: Planetary Interaction and the Future - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
What is the issue? To quote Bill Clinton, `its the economy' (rest deleted). To get PI sufficiently popular to base Dust 514 on it means making it economically more useful. That means making more things (or even a couple of new things). There needs...
- by Shidhe - at 2010.10.21 17:47:00
|
18. why there is no REAL bank in eve? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
The main reason is that the corp/allaince management is too unstable, in that one person can destroy it in virtually no time. This has happened time and time again, and no long term progress can be made until it is repaired. [No replies about indi...
- by Shidhe - at 2010.07.15 10:33:00
|
19. PI Oversupplied and Underutilized - in Market Discussions [original thread]
PI needs more help. The biggest consumer of PI should be PI - keeping planets happy and economically active. They should use consumer electronics, foods, etc. Maintaining planets should be the key to soverignity in a system. Research should be mov...
- by Shidhe - at 2010.07.15 10:00:00
|
20. DUST 514 is only worthy of Eveniverse if... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Johnnyan Most of you people should search for the word "irony" in a dictionary... You mean that I have to role play my own ironing or my nice dust uniform looks dusty? How long will this ironing take? Are there any skill...
- by Shidhe - at 2010.06.15 18:41:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |