| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
1. Multi-boxing Navy Omens in EVE using ISBoxer - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Reppyk wrote: I'm not an EULA expert nor a macro expert but "push butan : all DPS unlock targets" (which is not as easy to get as it may sound) looks especially suspicious (without a macro you must repeat the keys a few times). Feel free to ...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2013.04.22 04:02:00
|
2. my email to CCP about trade margin exploits. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Katran Luftschreck wrote: Simple Solution: Replace "Margin Trading" with " Layaway ." Allows buyer to purchase things without all ISK, blah blah blah. However, items purchased in this way go into reserve and cannot be pickup up by the buyer...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.12.21 16:13:00
|
3. my email to CCP about trade margin exploits. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Maxpie wrote: Yet another issue that would largely sort itself out if there were no alts. You mean same way having RL credit card details as your nametag instead custom made name prevents trolling and doesn't lead to whole different can of w...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.12.21 02:57:00
|
4. my email to CCP about trade margin exploits. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jealousy Asques wrote: ... My solution to make it so people can see if the buy order is currently capable of being filled harms nobody but the scammers... Actually, the "scam" part of the whole deal is selling overpriced stuff to people. Un...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.12.20 15:43:00
|
5. THANKS CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
cheese monkey wrote: Get real. This is balls. Will CCP randomly seed more t2 bpos? they have never done this b4.... there needs to be warning before they fuq with the markets. On every patch notes so far that have effected the markets or playe...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.12.20 15:11:00
|
6. my email to CCP about trade margin exploits. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hello good Sir/Madam, I'm wealthy Nigerian prince who wants to buy VW Beetle from year 1967 for bazillion euros/dollars. Unfortunately my country very poor and cannot afford VW dealer. Will you kindly buy one for me from your local dealer for che...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.12.20 15:06:00
|
7. SANSHA CLAUS IS COMING - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Goliath wrote: Nice one! Here's mine, to the tune of "Good King Wenceslas" (warning, contains lore) Old man Tibus Heth looked at A starmap of New Eden Other factions round about Zealots, Feds and heathens Golems, Harpies, Drakes and Rokhs ...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.12.13 17:14:00
|
8. Sec hit for killing capsuleer with bounty ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Romvex wrote: And the law is inescapable and immortal, capable of killing you anywhere, anytime and very quickly. oh, and the mysterious god force ruling the universe deems it an exploit to even try to evade this immortal law And what people...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.12.13 02:42:00
|
9. Missiles getting nerfed? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Markus Reese wrote: Here is the real interesting question, so many people complaining about the added ewar, but how many of you fit tracking disruptors to your pvp boats? Here's even more interesting question, how many people fit covop bridg...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.05.18 18:50:00
|
10. Missiles getting nerfed? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
TheButcherPete wrote: Well, honestly, if defenders killed multiple missiles instead of just one, you wouldn't need a full rack of Rapid Lights to counter another full rack of Heavy. But, if CCP made defenders do slight AOE damage against miss...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.05.18 17:02:00
|
11. Missiles getting nerfed? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
TheButcherPete wrote: awww, you're just upset that your missiles were e-war proof, because a. Smartbombs were rarely timed good enough to kill one, and b. defenders are useless. Then you complain when CCP brings your weapon to scale with all ...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.05.18 16:10:00
|
12. Anaconda and Python mine BPO's missing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sentinel Smith wrote: I agree.. anything in the hands of a player should be returned to the player.. If you are going on about stuff being got through Illicit means, then why are the Tech II BPO's still out there ? Make a consistent line in ...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.03.31 04:39:00
|
13. Anaconda and Python mine BPO's missing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Entity wrote: Thanks, but I still want my implant back. Just because I have the only one doesn't mean it was acquired illegally. There's plenty of single items that are entirely legit... This is exactly why I pointed out why there should b...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.03.29 21:37:00
|
14. Anaconda and Python mine BPO's missing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What's more, how about not just returning items but instead ensuring the internal procedures follow simple formula; Thinking about messing something that players own? 1. Check via internal tools/statistic department how big % of playerbase is af...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.03.28 19:12:00
|
15. Logoffski exploit, video proof. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
RougeOperator wrote: yeah he clearly wasnt accounting for the situation I have laid out in this thread. Try context next time. Read what he said, go ahead, you really dont want me to pull his comment apart and explain you what he means wit...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.03.27 18:29:00
|
16. Logoffski exploit, video proof. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tyler Rainez wrote: Screw it...here is one...if you log off to avoid PVP and can escape the 15 min timer...that is an exploit and it will be called as such (at least by me) until CCP says otherwise. The Fact that CCP has said in the past th...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.03.27 18:01:00
|
17. Heavy Assault Missile Launchers have become Assault Missile Launchers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cearain wrote: Whats with the "cruiser" in everything? You may need to break this down for ccp even a bit more. We should explain that: "Torpedo launcher meta 04" should actually be the meta 4 torp launcher and not the meta 2 rocket launcher....
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.03.02 18:44:00
|
18. Heavy Assault Missile Launchers have become Assault Missile Launchers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I commented Sisi thread about certain name changes when they werent in TQ yet... Why go half-way and not embrace the "easy to understand" naming formula all on. "Launcher cruiser light meta xx" "Launcher cruiser assault meta xx" "Launcher cruise...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.03.02 00:08:00
|
19. Custom Ship Painting - Coming Soon - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sweetest Kiss wrote: Would be absolutely great, but I do hope all these customizable features will be VERY expansive, like 50Mil ISK per logo you upload and so forth. Right now with the removal of most NPC sell orders there are just not enough...
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.02.09 19:42:00
|
20. Looking at eves communication lore. Nurf local. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lore wise I could pay bribes to have clone maintainers to keep you alive and locked inside the vat you respawn in after getting podded. Cmon CCP, perma"death" makes sense lore wise, why cant we have it?
- by TR4D3R4LT - at 2012.02.08 14:27:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |