| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Undock Overview Bug from Citadel in Wormholes - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
One of my characters in a C3 wormhole appears briefly on other player's overview when undocking from an Astrahus citadel while they are not on the citadel grid. This issue only happens when undocking in an Anathema. Tried other ships and it didn'...
- by Vel'drinn - at 2016.06.01 16:18:58
|
2. Turn the feckkin heat up!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kill off nullsec and have everyone pile into FW Sov. No entosis. Frags every day. Null is going there for content anyway. Eve saved from itself lol. Can't change human nature but FW is the place to be for fights and fun content. Join Amarr toda...
- by Vel'drinn - at 2015.10.18 21:49:34
|
3. New Micro Jump Destroyers? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I see a use for it in faction warfare. Minnies always perch at 'minmatar range' so having an option for small ships to jump on top of their ****** kestrel and talwar gangs would be cake.
- by Vel'drinn - at 2015.10.03 13:12:03
|
4. podding in lowsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP also was very generous by making jump clones accessible to all! To think a couple clicks could save half a bil!
- by Vel'drinn - at 2015.08.27 12:05:21
|
5. Playing on limited time/ Older gamers. How do you play?? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
FW seems to be the place to be for that 'instant action' mindset. With wife, kid, house and what not this worked out best for me. Came out of a 2 year WH cycle that honestly felt like a lot of work fueling towers in and spending too much time loo...
- by Vel'drinn - at 2015.07.28 16:26:51
|
6. Advanced transport (Blockade Runner) should be interdiction nullifie... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Trader Hansen wrote: What kinda urks me is, why are all these fancy ship-specific abilities baked into the hulls? Abilities like interdiction nullification should be provided by fitting specific modules, while the hulls merely give bonuses to c...
- by Vel'drinn - at 2015.06.23 16:46:12
|
7. Burn Amarr - an opportunity. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Thanks goons for creating a target rich environment.
- by Vel'drinn - at 2015.06.22 16:21:44
|
8. Sticky:[Proteus - January] Recon ships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This is the only song playing in my head after reading this post. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFtb3EtjEic
CCP gifts us the ultimate gank tool in wormholes! Dscan invisibility is gonna be so good lol.
- by Vel'drinn - at 2014.12.18 18:48:45
|
9. Sticky:[Phoebe] Stealth Bombers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I kind of like the concept of damage intensity based on position from the blast point. Aiming your bomb at the correct range requires extra skill and risk to pull off. By risk I'm talking about unplanned bomb runs where you get a warp in but don't...
- by Vel'drinn - at 2014.10.22 16:37:23
|
10. Sticky:[Phoebe] Stealth Bombers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Komi Toran wrote: Unfortunately I think CCP is pretty reliant on ISBoxer for subscriptions. Banning it would hurt their bottom line too much as the Replicators of the shard unsubscribe their dozens of alts. The game's addicted to it, and withdr...
- by Vel'drinn - at 2014.10.17 16:49:00
|
11. Sticky:[Phoebe] Stealth Bombers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
August - Breeze wrote: I love these changes! Many more ship types will be flown now and that is a good thing for EVE! There were just to many ships that could not be flown in fleets because bombers would way to easily destroy them all. More var...
- by Vel'drinn - at 2014.10.16 16:21:00
|
12. Incoming Stealth Bomber nerf? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Covert cloakies decloaking each other would suck by proximity. As is you have the challenge level of one dude failing to engage his cloak in large fleets wrecking a shot at a bombing run. Fleet movements are not going to be manageable in anything ...
- by Vel'drinn - at 2014.10.12 11:06:24
|
13. Incoming Stealth Bomber nerf? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Covert cloakies decloaking each other would suck by proximity. As is you have the challenge level of one dude failing to engage his cloak in large fleets wrecking a shot at a bombing run. Fleet movements are not going to be manageable in anything ...
- by Vel'drinn - at 2014.10.12 11:06:00
|
14. The Great POCO LOCO Campaign - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
As a producer of P4 materials, specifically POCO upgrade parts, best expansion ever
- by Vel'drinn - at 2013.11.23 18:19:00
|
15. Do many EVE players fear consentual PvP? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pretty sure only the dudes that think 10 vs 1 PvP being pro have an issue with it. It seems like a good change but it does remove the scamming aspect which is part of most EVE gameplay. Duels in Jita are 100% legit right?
- by Vel'drinn - at 2013.01.21 17:12:00
|
16. dronesholocaust - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jerick Ludhowe wrote: Drones getting agro has hardly been an issue at all. Similar experience with Drone Lands sites. One of my sentries took a sliver of shield damage the entire night. If anything more relaxing, less micro management.
- by Vel'drinn - at 2012.12.06 17:42:00
|
17. Rating, even mining bots are toasted after Retribution. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Not going to change much for null residents in their home space. Standard procedure for miners or ratters is to safe up in a tower when a red enters local. They will stay there until the big bad red goes away or AFK in the tower till 15 min timer ...
- by Vel'drinn - at 2012.11.27 17:57:00
|
18. The Big Lie - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm sure somebody will find a way to complain about blobbing in Planetside 2
- by Vel'drinn - at 2012.11.22 17:44:00
|
19. Sometimes the Answer is so Simple... (TL;DR simple fix for 0.0) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Improve 0.0 Indy Accessibility + Balance Risk / Rewards > Nerfing Eve Nerfing crap just pisses people off. 0.0 just needs to be more attractive to get people in there. I'm sure CCP can think of some creative solutions to do this. I don't wan...
- by Vel'drinn - at 2012.11.22 17:32:00
|
20. Goons - two years on the tech moons - how you guys feel about that, question abo... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: You have apparently not seen the alchemy-induced tech nerf. Step in the right direction. Not quite the kick in the balls that was needed. Not for goons but all of Eve. Lord Zim wrote: This will never happen, not unless CC...
- by Vel'drinn - at 2012.11.15 18:13:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |