Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Black Ops - Upcoming changes - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I've never flown a Black ops before But. Personaly 1. I think they should have more DPS then a T1 ship, very combaty close range. 2. They should have suffiently better tank then a T1 ships, as they are high tech-ish 3. They should be able to d...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.04.05 04:15:00
|
2. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
what the heck? Noboby had a problem with the stealth bomber's damage out put, everyone was happy with it. It wasn't the stealth bombers damage ability that people had a problem with it was the fact that you had to A. wait 30 secconds after declo...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.04.03 17:44:00
|
3. Hi, I thought I'd like to let you know: The heretic bonus - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Heretic is most deffinatly not a rocket ship, you don't want to get anywhere near close to rocket range. The heretic is a missle boat. The problem isn't with the heretic, the problem is in general with all indictor's really. -W
- by Winterreign - at 2009.04.03 17:36:00
|
4. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
After looking closely and experementing with the changes in stealth bombers I've got to say that I love the changes, mostly the use of torpedo's, range and alpha firepower. However there are several things that just add to my demise repeatedly ...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.04.03 04:29:00
|
5. Agility Changes on Singularity - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Perhaps i have my math backwards But all agility was based upon original agility changes. which *o.7 Does the lower agility = faster align time? Or Does the higher agility = Faster align time? You mentioned reducing agility so i assume that t...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.04.02 10:28:00
|
6. ECM Ship II - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Not happy with loosing the Scorpion changes. Scorp is the only battleship with out a damage mod or Rof bonus out of all the battleships in eve. Sure jamming is ok, but the orginal ECM idea 20% jamming str, no optimal range bonus and the 5% ROF w...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.03.31 16:09:00
|
7. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
He has a point. I like these changes but your better off just splitting it off into 2 different ships. A. Percision Stealth Bomber B. Suppression Stealth Bomber Or somthing of the like, you are kind of cheeseing over all those players who spec...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.03.30 15:30:00
|
8. Stealth Bombers II - A new focused role - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
My Thoughts. There should be no penalty for Covert Ops Recloaking. This should be removed. Instead lower the Scan rezolution a bit more on the SB and raise it's Signature radius by a bit as well. The thought being that you can uncloak, lock and ...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.03.30 15:14:00
|
9. ECM changes --- fill me in? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
actually no Like most things people don't bother to check to see for revisions Falcon is the "Sniper" 20% bonus to ECM str 12.5 bonus to optimal/falloff of ECM range +1 turret/-1 launcher 10% bonus to hybrid optimal ranges 20% bonus to cap usa...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.03.28 01:18:00
|
10. ECM changes --- fill me in? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Yeah that was my idea before i revised it, and as far as i know. No it is not going to be implimented. The ECM changes at this point are strictly limited to the changes proposed in the sticky. -W
- by Winterreign - at 2009.03.28 01:01:00
|
11. Radical ECM Change! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It can be mitigated sure, but how is it easly countered? Utilizing x2 ECM-Links on a freindly ship would reduce Signature Raidus by -63% if the forumula was followed. That reduces a standard battle ship down to 185 sig radius and a cruiser down t...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.03.27 08:04:00
|
12. Radical ECM Change! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Sensor damps effect scan rez propossed ECM changes effect signature radius which effects how much damage you take as well. -W
- by Winterreign - at 2009.03.26 07:02:00
|
13. Radical ECM Change! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Revised 1.1 ECM Modules When active ECM modules lower your ships signature radius by a certain amount calculated (Jammer strength divided by Sensor strength up to a max of 50% effectiness per module) This signature radus benefit varies depending...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.03.26 05:52:00
|
14. Radical ECM Change! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The problem as mentioend with ECM is that it dominates all forms of Electronic warfare cultivating a massive power vacume comparied to other factions Ewar abilties. I think it's fair to reduce thus advantages to more in keeping with other faction...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.03.25 17:06:00
|
15. Stealth Bombers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Personaly I would think about saving Torpedo launchers for a Destoyer type variant which would be more in keeping with it's role. And a much welcome addition. The primary boost to Stealth bombers that needs to be considered is T2 Assault frigate ...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.03.25 16:56:00
|
16. Radical ECM Change! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
This follows my original Posting over @ http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1032703&page=1 I listed my idea over there on page 19 and the more I thought about the changes to ECM ships the more i began to realize that changi...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.03.25 16:38:00
|
17. Radical ECM Change! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Winterreign on 25/03/2009 16:46:41 Edited by: Winterreign on 25/03/2009 16:44:48 Edited by: Winterreign on 25/03/2009 16:38:59 Question: Will ECCM counter this Sig reduction effect? Answer: Yes, ECM modules sig reduction bon...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.03.25 16:38:00
|
18. ECM Ships - Looking at better defined roles - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
This is my good idea for ECM. Please read following CCP. Personaly the ranges are not nessisarly the problem. The problem is the functionality of ECM in general. ECM stands for Electronic Counter Measures, the fact that in eve what ECM means i...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.03.25 14:27:00
|
19. Mother of all T3 subsystem feedback threads. (SUPER ULTRA LONG) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I've actually been having alot of fun with my Legion latly, and i am not entirly sure why the complaint on the ship itself. Though If i did have one it is the Lack of a Khanid based offensive system, mainly stressing missles launcher slots. As a ...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.03.05 05:41:00
|
20. Tengu Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Winterreign on 04/03/2009 08:32:28 The problem with that KK is that utlizing missle systems really eats up your CPU. Thus really destoyering your ability to use ECM. Toss in the fact that you do not get a range bonus on the ECM you...
- by Winterreign - at 2009.03.04 08:31:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |