| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 |
101. Making Supercaps Super Again - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hmmm. While I would protest that my concept is much more elegant than the thread linked I do see your point. Even in an underdog alliance that might desperately need supers individual pilots of that alliance would still be tempted to sell the top...
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.28 23:47:00
|
102. Making Supercaps Super Again - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
leviticus ander wrote: I think that making them something to be in awe of would be nice. but with your limiting method of the low percent mining thing the Russians would still rule with their horde of bot miners. As I said, the potential for...
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.28 21:48:00
|
103. CSM Elections - Pretty much rigged voting? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ira Theos wrote: Malcanis wrote: There are approximately 7000 members of GSF. Let's be generous and assume that every single one of these members belongs to a seperate account which can vote There are approximately 350,000 active accounts w...
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.28 21:43:00
|
104. Who would you like to see applying for the next CSM - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Malcanis and Tippia are the gods of reason in these forums, imo. Also I'd like to see Vaerah Vahrokha be there for some much needed finance/market iteration.
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.28 01:43:00
|
105. CCP Dont you get it stop Nerfing the Titan itself but Nerf how many can be moved... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Herping yourDerp wrote: you can't do this but it would work if you could 1 titan on the field per alliance? make multiple alliances 1 per corp? many corps 10 total? jump 10 titans into enemy system they no longer can have titans in their syste...
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.28 01:39:00
|
106. Idea: Wormhole Beachhead - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
If I'm reading it right, there would be no way to extend the life of the wormhole further than an additional 50% of its natural allowed mass? If that's the case it seems reasonable. Otherwise you'd see fleets far bigger than any 'natural' wormhol...
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.28 01:03:00
|
107. Highsec Concerns about CSM- no representation? Highsec's fault? Help from CCP? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cyprus Black wrote: Many of the nullsec dwellers just assume that everyone in highsec is scared of PvP and avoids it at all costs. This blanket assumption is simply not true. Nullsec dwellers fail to understand that it's not PvP they're avoidin...
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.28 00:33:00
|
108. Highsec Concerns about CSM- no representation? Highsec's fault? Help from CCP? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Issler Dainze wrote: Patient 2428190 wrote: I could go for another repeat of Ankhtehblahblah That drama was extra entertaining. Will you vote for the Voice of Reason candidates if we promise to throw sporks? Issler Dainze Voice of Re...
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.28 00:12:00
|
109. CCP Dont you get it stop Nerfing the Titan itself but Nerf how many can be moved... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I believe that nerfing supercarriers is both needed but also dumb. Unerfed, they are far too OP while nerfed they are pointless. CCP needs to address the mechanics behind which supers exist. I shall now plug my thread: https://forums.eveonlin...
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.28 00:07:00
|
110. PI and Dust514 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Let's see: In nullsec, you can pay a sunk cost of ~70M isk and pay no taxes; of course your 70M isk investment is vulnerable to attack at any time. Or, in highsec the income is taxed but is risk free. Grumpy Owl, how is that exorbitant? You cla...
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.28 00:02:00
|
111. EvE Online: Reality Check - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Valei Khurelem wrote: No, there shouldn't, because basically you're just saying "I want fun for everyone else but me and I don't give a **** about them even though they're paying for the subscription fees and CCP servers the same as everyone ...
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.27 23:02:00
|
112. EvE Online: Reality Check - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Valei Khurelem wrote: Obsidian Hawk wrote: in other news people still want instant gratification and dont want to work hard like the bitter vets. IT'S A GAME YOU MORON! WHY WOULD ANYONE WANT TO WORK HARD IN A GAME ?! The attra...
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.27 22:12:00
|
113. Please voice specific suggestions for High Security Space in This Thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What are your opinions on diversifying the four empires resources? ie: splitting up the low end minerals similarly to ice with the goal of boosting regional economies and increasing trade? You'd have to tweak the regional mission drops as well ofc.
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.27 22:07:00
|
114. Making Supercaps Super Again - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Bump because I'd like for at least one person to tell me why this idea is/isn't bad.
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.27 21:47:00
|
115. Sticky:New dev blog: Community events at Fanfest 2012 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP I have to say I think you burned your lol buttes ship description bridge too fast.
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.27 19:36:00
|
116. General Poll: Would you prefer omniscient Local Chat, or an actual Intel Tool? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Never said I wanted carpal tunnel.
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.27 07:37:00
|
117. There will never be a CSM representative for highsec.. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tore Vest wrote: Bears dont care about politics.... We do our carebear stuff .... And..... When CSM/CCP destroy our fun... We leave This is pretty much the reality. Luckily for you, no one is seriously out to destroy highsec because it wou...
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.27 07:30:00
|
118. General Poll: Would you prefer omniscient Local Chat, or an actual Intel Tool? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andski I don't think anyone wants to see a delayed local in null, or anyone serious anyways. I think that local is a little limiting in its design though. I liked Grath's point about an intel system that rewards people who good at eve and penaliz...
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.27 07:26:00
|
119. There will never be a CSM representative for highsec.. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
met worst wrote: Thorn Galen wrote: Mr M wrote: There's been highsec delegates, not impossible that there will be new ones. But that wont happen as long as people don't care to vote. There it is, that's all true. It's not a problem ab...
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.27 05:58:00
|
120. There will never be a CSM representative for highsec.. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Aiwha wrote: Patient 2428190 wrote: Why would casual high sec players need a CSM representative anyways? The CSM has turned its collective gaze on the isk faucet that is the Incursions. Begun, the CSM war has.
- by Zirse - at 2012.01.27 05:40:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |